Abstract
Skills in innovation and collaboration are critical in research and professional settings. These skills can be enhanced through consistent feedback. Herein, we demonstrate a toolkit used to assess skills in innovation, creativity, collaboration, communication, and critical thinking. The toolkit includes surveys, semi-structured interview questions, and feedback reflection questions. In an innovation challenge setting and used in conjunction with critical feedback, this toolkit measured perceptions of growth in soft skills. This toolkit can be modified for different educational settings, including biological experimentation, where the development of such skills will enhance the impact of the process and potentially the direction of the experiment. Overall, future use of this toolkit may give educators more insight into student inclination for innovation and growth of important skill sets over time.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, J. (2013). The fourth age of research. Nature, 497, 557–560.
AlShebi, B. K., Rahwan, T., & Yoon, W. L. (2018). The preeminence of ethnic diversity in scientific collaboration. Nature Communications, 9, 5163.
Altman, M., Huang, T. T. K., & Breland, J. Y. (2018). Design thinking in health care. Preventing Chronic Disease, 15, E117.
Andersson, C., & Palm, T. (2017). Characteristics of improved formative assessment practice. Education Inquiry, 8(2), 104–122.
Bailey, R., & Garner, M. (2010). Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers’ reflections on their practices. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 187–198.
Beier, M., Kim, M., Saterbak, A., Leautaud, V., Bishnoi, S., & Gilberto, J. (2018). The effect of authentic project-based learning on attitudes and career aspirations in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(1), 3–23.
Bennett, L. M., & Gadlin, H. (2012). Collaboration and team science, from theory to practice. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 60(5), 768–775.
Beno, S. M., Wingo, N. P., Berry, J. L., Noles, K., & Tucker, D. C. (2020). Assessment of 21st century skills during an innovation challenge. The Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 20(13), 79–108.
Braun, M. (2017). Comparative evaluation of online and in-class student team presentations. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 14(3), 19–40.
Brownell, S. E., Price, J. V., & Steinman, L. (2013). Science communication to the general public: Why we need to teach undergraduate and graduate students this skill as part of their formal training. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 12(1), E6–E10.
Cheruvelil, K. S., De Palma-Dow, A., & Smith, K. A. (2020). Strategies to promote effective student research teams in undergraduate biology labs. The American Biology Teacher, 82(1), 18–27.
Corwin, L. A., Runyon, C., Robinson, A., & Dolan, E. L. (2015). The laboratory course assessment survey: A tool to measure three dimensions of research-course design. CBE Life Sciences Education, 14, 1–11.
DeHaan, R. L. (2009). Teaching creativity and incentive problem solving in science. CBE Life Sciences Education, 8(3), 172–181.
Hardavella, G., Aamli-Gaagnat, A., Saad, N., Rousalova, I., & Sreter, K. B. (2017). Incorporating student centered learning in innovation and entrepreneurship education. European Journal of Education, 43, 513–526.
Harkema, S., & Schout, H. (2008). Incorporating student-centered learning in innovation and entrepreneuship, education. European Journal of Education, 43(4), 513–526.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
Havyer, R. D., Wingo, M. T., Comfere, N. I., Nelson, D. R., Halvorsen, A. J., McDonald, F. S., & Reed, D. A. (2014). Teamwork assessment in internal medicine: A systematic review of validity evidence and outcomes. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 29, 894–910.
Jarmai, K., & Vogel-Pöschl, H. (2020). Meaningful collaboration for responsible innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(1), 138–143.
Li, G. (2017). Role of innovation and entrepreneurship education in improving employability of medical university students. Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13, 8149–8154.
Morphet, J., Hood, K., Cant, R., Baulch, J., Gibee, A., & Sandry, K. (2014). Teaching teamwork: An evaluation of an interprofessional training ward placement for health care students. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 5, 197–204.
Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102–122.
Parker, A., Lewis, G., & Scott, M. (2020). Improving technical communication with a cue awareness intervention using poster presentations. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on computing education practice (Vol. 5, pp. 1–4). Association for Computing Machinery.
Pelaez, N., Anderson, T. R., Gardner, S. M., Yin, Y., Abraham, J. K., Bartlett, E. L., Gormally, C., Hill, J. P., Hoover, M., Hurney, C. A., Long, T. M., Newman, D. L., Sirum, K., & Stevens, M. T. (2017). The basic competencies of biological experimentation: Concept-skill statements. In PIBERG Instructional Innovation Material Paper 4. Purdue International Biology Education Research Group.
Pelaez, N., Anderson, T. R., Gardner, S. M., Yin, Y., Abraham, J. K., Bartlett, E. L., Gormally, C., Hurney, C. A., Long, T. M., Newman, D. L., Sirum, K., & Stevens, M. T. (2018). A community-building framework for collaborative research coordination across the education and biology research disciplines. CBE Life Sciences Education, 17(2), es2.
Pellegrini, J. J., & Jansen, E. (2013). The Mayo innovation scholars program: Undergraduates ex-plore the science and economics of medical innovations. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(4), 28–32.
Poulos, A., & Mahony, M. J. (2008). Effectiveness of feedback: The students’ perspective. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 143–154.
Reynders, G., Lantz, J., Ruder, S. M., Stanford, C. L., & Cole, R. S. (2020). Rubrics to assess critical thinking and information processing in undergraduate STEM courses. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 9.
Rosenthal, S. (2020). Media literacy, scientific literacy, and science videos on the internet. Frontiers in Communication, 5, 581585.
Rudd, K. E., Johnson, S. C., Agesa, K. M., Shackleford, K. A., Kievlan, D. R., Colombara, D. V., Ikuta, K. S., Kissoon, N., Finfer, S., Fleischmann-Struzek, C., Machado, F. R., Reinhart, K. K., Rowan, K., Seymour, C. W., Watson, R. S., West, T. E., Marinho, F., Hay, S. I., Lozano, R., … Naghavi, M. (2020). Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: Analysis for the global burden of disease study. Lancet, 395, 200–211.
Rushton, A. (2005). Formative assessment: A key to deep learning? Medical Teacher, 27(6), 509–513.
Salas, E., Reyes, D. L., & McDaniel, S. H. (2018). The science of teamwork: Progress, reflections, and the road ahead. The American Psychologist, 73(4), 593–600.
Scheufele, D. A., & Krause, N. M. (2019). Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(16), 7662–7669.
Vermeulen, N., Parker, J. N., & Penders, B. (2013). Understanding life together: A brief history of collaboration in biology. Endeavour, 37(3), 162–171.
Acknowledgments
We were able to pilot our toolkit with the Presidential Clinical Innovation Summer Fellowship program, which was funded by the Office of the President at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. We would like to thank the students that participated in the program and provided feedback about the implementation of the toolkit. The protocol was reviewed and approved by UAB’s Institutional Review Board (protocol #060619003). SMB was supported by the UAB Mentored Experiences in Research, Instruction, and Teaching program, which is funded by a National Institutes for Health grant, GM088010.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beno, S.M., Tucker, D.C. (2022). Growing Innovation and Collaboration Through Assessment and Feedback: A Toolkit for Assessing and Developing Students’ Soft Skills in Biological Experimentation. In: Pelaez, N.J., Gardner, S.M., Anderson, T.R. (eds) Trends in Teaching Experimentation in the Life Sciences. Contributions from Biology Education Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98592-9_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98592-9_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-98591-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-98592-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)