Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Experimental Evaluation of Adaptive Operators Selection Methods for the Dynamic Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition (DMOEA/D)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hybrid Intelligent Systems Based on Extensions of Fuzzy Logic, Neural Networks and Metaheuristics

Abstract

This paper compares three methods of adaptive selection of operators (AOS) incorporated into the Dynamic Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition (DMOEA/D). The first method is structured in several continuous sections and is designed to execute a test and application procedure to find the way that allows a better adaptive selection of the best available operators. The second method is based on a multi-armed bandit problem in which Thomson Dynamic Sampling (DYTS) is applied. Each arm represents a reproduction operator and is assigned a previous reward distribution. This method chooses an operator through sampling that rewards distribution according to DYTS. Finally, the third method also focused on multi-arm bandits and adding the range of the fitness rate to track the dynamics of the process and uses a sliding window to record the rates of improvement of the current fitness achieved by the operators, at the same time applying a decrementing mechanism to increase the probability of selecting the best operator. The computational experiments evaluated four dynamic reference problems called FDA1, FDA3, dMOP1, and dMOP2 and applied hypervolume metrics, generalized dispersion, and inverted generational distance. For the feasibility validation of these methods, the Wilcoxon and Friedman non-parametric tests were applied with a significance level of 5%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Azzouz, R., Bechikh, S., & Ben Said, L. (2016). Dynamic multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms: A survey. In: Recent advances in evolutionary multi-objective optimization (pp. 31–70). Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Deb, K., Rao N., U. B., & Karthik, S. (n.d.). Dynamic multi-objective optimization and decision-making using modified NSGA-II: A case study on hydro-thermal power scheduling. In: Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 803–817). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, Q., & Li, H. (2007). MOEA/D: A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 11(6), 712–731. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yu, Q., Zhong, S., Liu, Z., Lin, Q., & Huang, P. (2020). Dynamic multiobjective optimization with multiple response strategies based on linear environment detection. In: Q. Wang (Ed.), Complexity (Vol. 2020, pp. 1–26). Hindawi Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Li, K., Fialho, A., Kwong, S., & Zhang, Q. (2014). Adaptive operator selection with bandits for a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 18(1), pp. 114–130. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fialho, Á. (2010). Adaptive operator selection for optimization. Computer Science [cs]. Université Paris Sud - Paris XI, 2010. English. tel-00578431

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sun, L., & Li, K. (2020). Adaptive operator selection based on dynamic thompson sampling for MOEA/D (Version 1).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dong, L., Lin, Q., Zhou, Y., & Jiang, J. (2022). Adaptive operator selection with test-and-apply structure for decomposition-based multi-objective optimization. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 68, 101013. Elsevier BV.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José A. Brambila-Hernández .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brambila-Hernández, J.A., García-Morales, M.Á., Fraire-Huacuja, H.J., del Angel, A.B., Villegas-Huerta, E., Carbajal-López, R. (2023). Experimental Evaluation of Adaptive Operators Selection Methods for the Dynamic Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition (DMOEA/D). In: Castillo, O., Melin, P. (eds) Hybrid Intelligent Systems Based on Extensions of Fuzzy Logic, Neural Networks and Metaheuristics. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 1096. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28999-6_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics