Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Dovetail: Stronger Anonymity in Next-Generation Internet Routing

  • Conference paper
Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PETS 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 8555))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Given current research initiatives advocating “clean slate” Internet designs, researchers have the opportunity to design an internetwork layer routing protocol that provides efficient anonymity by decoupling identity from network location. Prior work in anonymity for the next-generation Internet fully trusts the user’s ISP. We propose Dovetail, which provides anonymity against an active attacker located at any single point within the network, including the user’s ISP. A major design challenge is to provide this protection without including an applicationlayer proxy in data transmission. We address this in path construction by using a matchmaker node (an end host) to overlap two path segments at a dovetail node (a router). The dovetail then trims away part of the path so that data transmission bypasses the matchmaker. We develop a systematic mechanism to measure the topological anonymity of our designs, and we demonstrate their privacy and efficiency by Internet-scale simulations at the AS-level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reiter, M., Rubin, A.: Crowds: Anonymity for web transactions. ACM ToISS (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dingledine, R., Mathewson, N., Syverson, P.: Tor: The second-generation onion router. In: USENIX Security (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. The Tor Project, Inc.: Tor metrics portal: Users, https://metrics.torproject.org/users.html (accessed: February 11, 2014)

  4. Paul, S., Pan, J., Jain, R.: Architectures for the future networks and the next generation internet: A survey. Computer Communications (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. The National Science Foundation: NSF NeTS FIND initiative, http://www.nets-find.net/index.php (accessed: February 11, 2014)

  6. CORDIS: FIRE home page, http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/fire/home_en.html (accessed: February 11, 2014)

  7. National Institute of Information and Communications Technology: “AKARI” architecture design project for new generation network, http://www.nict.go.jp/en/photonic_nw/archi/akari/akari-top_e.html (accessed: February 11, 2014)

  8. Papadopoulos, F., Krioukov, D., Bogua, M., Vahdat, A.: Greedy forwarding in dynamic scale-free networks embedded in hyperbolic metric spaces. In: IEEE INFOCOM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bhattacharjee, B., Calvert, K., Griffioen, J., Spring, N., Sterbenz, J.P.: Postmodern internetwork architecture. NSF Nets FIND Initiative (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Godfrey, P.B., Ganichev, I., Shenker, S., Stoica, I.: Pathlet routing. In: ACM SIGCOMM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Farinacci, D., Lewis, D., Meyer, D., Fuller, V.: The locator/ID separation protocol (LISP). RFC 6830 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yang, X., Wetherall, D.: Source selectable path diversity via routing deflections. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yang, X.: NIRA: A new internet routing architecture. In: ACM SIGCOMM FDNA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, X., Hsiao, H.C., Hasker, G., Chan, H., Perrig, A., Andersen, D.G.: SCION: Scalability, control, and isolation on next-generation networks. In: IEEE S&P (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Falk, A.: GENI at a glance (2011), http://www.geni.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/GENI-at-a-Glance-1Jun2011.pdf

  16. Hsiao, H.C., Kim, T.J., Perrig, A., Yamada, A., Nelson, S.C., Gruteser, M., Meng, W.: LAP: Lightweight anonymity and privacy. In: IEEE S&P (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pfitzmann, A., Hansen, M.: A terminology for talking about privacy by data minimization, v0.34 (2010), http://dud.inf.tu-dresden.de/literatur/Anon_Terminology_v0.34.pdf

  18. Kaufman, C., Hoffman, P., Nir, Y., Eronen, P.: Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2). RFC 5996 (Proposed Standard), Updated by RFCs 5998, 6989 (September 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eckersley, P.: How unique is your web browser? In: Atallah, M.J., Hopper, N.J. (eds.) PETS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6205, pp. 1–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Soltani, A., Canty, S., Mayo, Q., Thomas, L., Hoofnagle, C.J.: Flash cookies and privacy. In: SSRN eLibrary (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Acquisti, A., Dingledine, R., Syverson, P.: On the economics of anonymity. In: Wright, R.N. (ed.) FC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2742, pp. 84–102. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Dingledine, R., Murdoch, S.J.: Performance improvements on Tor or, why Tor is slow and what we’re going to do about it (2009), http://www.torproject.org/press/presskit/2009-03-11-performance.pdf

  23. Jansen, R., Johnson, A., Syverson, P.: LIRA: Lightweight Incentivized Routing for Anonymity. In: NDSS (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dischinger, M., Haeberlen, A., Gummadi, K.P., Saroiu, S.: Characterizing residential broadband networks. In: ACM SIGCOMM IMC (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Levine, B.N., Reiter, M.K., Wang, C.-X., Wright, M.: Timing attacks in low-latency mix systems. In: Juels, A. (ed.) FC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3110, pp. 251–265. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Houmansadr, A., Kiyavash, N., Borisov, N.: RAINBOW: A robust and invisible non-blind watermark for network flows. In: NDSS (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chen, S., Wang, X., Jajodia, S.: On the anonymity and traceability of peer-to-peer voip calls. IEEE Network 20(5), 32–37 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Reimer, J.: Your ISP may be selling your web clicks (2007), http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2007/03/your-isp-may-be-selling-your-web-clicks/

  29. Dampier, P.: ‘Cable ONE spied on customers’ alleges federal class action lawsuit (2012), http://stopthecap.com/2010/02/08/cable-one-spied-on-customers-alleges-federal-class-action-lawsuit

  30. Syverson, P.: Why I’m not an entropist. In: Christianson, B., Malcolm, J.A., Matyáš, V., Roe, M. (eds.) Security Protocols 2009. LNCS, vol. 7028, pp. 213–230. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Murdoch, S.J., Zieliński, P.: Sampled traffic analysis by internet-exchange-level adversaries. In: Borisov, N., Golle, P. (eds.) PET 2007. LNCS, vol. 4776, pp. 167–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Boyan, J.: The anonymizer. Computer-Mediated Communication Magazine (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Panchenko, A., Pimenidis, L., Renner, J.: Performance analysis of anonymous communication channels provided by Tor. In: ARES (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  34. DiBenedetto, S., Gasti, P., Tsudik, G., Uzun, E.: ANDaNA: Anonymous named data networking application. In: NDSS (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gao, L.: On inferring autonomous system relationships in the internet. In: IEEE/ACM ToN (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Giotsas, V., Zhou, S.: Valley-free violation in internet routing-analysis based on BGP community data. In: IEEE ICC (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ryan, P.S., Gerson, J.: A primer on Internet exchange points for policymakers and non-engineers (August 2012), http://ssrn.com/abstract=2128103

  38. Lodhi, A., Dhamdhere, A., Dovrolis, C.: Open peering by Internet transit providers: Peer preference or peer pressure? In: Proc. IEEE INFOCOM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rekhter, Y., Li, T., Hares, S.: A border gateway protocol 4 (BGP-4). RFC 4271 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sankey, J., Wright, M.: Dovetail: Stronger anonymity in next-generation internet routing (April 2014), http://www.jsankey.com/papers/Dovetail.pdf

  41. Borisov, N., Danezis, G., Mittal, P., Tabriz, P.: Denial of service or denial of security? In: CCS (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wright, M.K., Adler, M., Levine, B.N., Shields, C.: Passive-logging attacks against anonymous communications systems. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC) 11(2) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Chen, S., Wang, R., Wang, X., Zhang, K.: Side-channel leaks in web applications: A reality today, a challenge tomorrow. In: IEEE S&P (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mittal, P., Khurshid, A., Juen, J., Caesar, M., Borisov, N.: Stealthy traffic analysis of low-latency anonymous communication using throughput fingerprinting. In: ACM CCS (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hopper, N., Vasserman, E.Y., Chan-Tin, E.: How much anonymity does network latency leak? In: ACM CCS (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Murdoch, S.J., Danezis, G.: Low-cost traffic analysis of Tor. In: IEEE S&P (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Evans, N., Dingledine, R., Grothoff, C.: A practical congestion attack on Tor using long paths. In: USENIX Security (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  48. CAIDA: The CAIDA UCSD inferred AS relationships - 20120601 (2012), http://www.caida.org/data/active/as-relationships/index.xml

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Texas at Arlington, USA

    Jody Sankey & Matthew Wright

Authors
  1. Jody Sankey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthew Wright
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, London, UK

    Emiliano De Cristofaro

  2. Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, 15 JJ Thomson Avenue, CB3 0FD, Cambridge, UK

    Steven J. Murdoch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sankey, J., Wright, M. (2014). Dovetail: Stronger Anonymity in Next-Generation Internet Routing. In: De Cristofaro, E., Murdoch, S.J. (eds) Privacy Enhancing Technologies. PETS 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8555. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08506-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08506-7_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08505-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08506-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation