Abstract
Within online learning communities, receiving timely and meaningful insights into the quality of learning activities is an important part of an effective educational experience. Commonly adopted methods–such as the Community of Inquiry framework–rely on manual coding of online discussion transcripts, which is a costly and time consuming process. There are several efforts underway to enable the automated classification of online discussion messages using supervised machine learning, which would enable the real-time analysis of interactions occurring within online learning communities. This paper investigates the importance of incorporating features that utilise the structure of online discussions for the classification of “cognitive presence”–the central dimension of the Community of Inquiry framework focusing on the quality of students’ critical thinking within online learning communities. We implemented a Conditional Random Field classification solution, which incorporates structural features that may be useful in increasing classification performance over other implementations. Our approach leads to an improvement in classification accuracy of 5.8 % over current existing techniques when tested on the same dataset, with a precision and recall of 0.630 and 0.504 respectively.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arbaugh, J., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S.R., Garrison, D.R., Ice, P., Richardson, J.C., Swan, K.P.: Developing a community of inquiry instrument: testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. Internet High. Educ. 11(3–4), 133–136 (2008)
Corich, S., Hunt, K., Hunt, L.: Computerised content analysis for measuring critical thinking within discussion forums. J. e Learn. Knowl. Soc. 2(1), 47–60 (2012)
Culotta, A., Kulp, D., McCallum, A.: Gene prediction with conditional random fields (2005)
Donnelly, R., Gardner, J.: Content analysis of computer conferencing transcripts. Interact. Learn. Environ. 19(4), 303–315 (2011)
Feng, D., Shaw, E., Kim, J., Hovy, E.: An intelligent discussion-bot for answering student queries in threaded discussions. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 171–177. ACM (2006)
FitzGerald, N., Carenini, G., Murray, G., Joty, S.: Exploiting conversational features to detect high-quality blog comments. In: Butz, C., Lingras, P. (eds.) Canadian AI 2011. LNCS, vol. 6657, pp. 122–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Garrison, D.R.: Thinking Collaboratively: Learning in a Community of Inquiry. Routledge, New York (2015)
Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., Archer, W.: Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. Am. J. Distance Educ. 15(1), 7–23 (2001)
Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., Archer, W.: The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: a retrospective. Internet High. Educ. 13(1–2), 5–9 (2010a)
Garrison, D.R., Arbaugh, J.: Researching the community of inquiry framework: review, issues, and future directions. Internet High. Educ. 10(3), 157–172 (2007)
Garrison, R., Cleveland-Innes, M., Fung, T.S.: Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. Internet High. Educ. 13(1–2), 31–36 (2010b)
Gašević, D., Adesope, O., Joksimović, S., Kovanović, V.: Externally-facilitated regulation scaffolding and role assignment to develop cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. Internet High. Educ. 24, 53–65 (2015)
Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S., Kulikowich, J.M.: Coh-metrix providing multilevel analyses of text characteristics. Educ. Res. 40(5), 223–234 (2011)
Jin, W.: Blog comments classification using tree structured conditional random fields. Ph.D. Thesis, University of British Columbia (Vancouver (2012)
Kovanovic, V., Gasevic, D., Hatala, M.: Learning analytics for communities of inquiry. J. Learn. Analytics 1(3), 195–198 (2014)
Kovanović, V., Gašević, D., Joksimović, S., Hatala, M., Adesope, O.: Analytics of communities of inquiry: effects of learning technology use on cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. Internet High. Educ. 27, 74–89 (2015)
Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Hatala, M.: Automated contentanalysis of online discussion transcripts. In: Proceedings of the Workshops at the LAK 2014 Conferenceco-Located with 4th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK 2014). Indianapolis, March 2014. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1137/
Lafferty, J., McCallum, A., Pereira, F.C.N.: Conditional random fields: probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data (2001)
Landis, J.R., Koch, G.G.: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1), 159–174 (1977)
Manning, C.D., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J., Bethard, S.J., McClosky, D.: The stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. In: Proceedings of 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, pp. 55–60 (2014). http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P/P14/P14-5010
McCallum, A.K.: Mallet: A machine learning for language toolkit. Technical report (2002). http://mallet.cs.umass.edu
McKlin, T., Harmon, S., Evans, W., Jones, M.: Cognitive presence in web-based learning: a content analysis of students’ online discussions. In: IT Forum, vol. 60 (2002)
Ravi, S., Kim, J.: Profiling student interactions in threaded discussions with speech act classifiers. Front. Artif. Intell. Appl. 158, 357 (2007)
Shen, D., Sun, J.T., Li, H., Yang, Q., Chen, Z.: Document summarization using conditional random fields. In: IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 2862–2867 (2007)
Soller, A., Lesgold, A.: A computational approach to analyzing online knowledge sharing interaction. In: Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 253–260 (2003)
Sutton, C., McCallum, A.: An introduction to conditional random fields. Found. Trends Mach. Learn. 4(4), 267–373 (2011)
Tausczik, Y.R., Pennebaker, J.W.: The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 29(1), 24–54 (2010)
Wang, H., Wang, C., Zhai, C.X., Han, J.: Learning online discussion structures by conditional random fields. In: SIGIR 2011 - Proceedings of the 34th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Beijing, pp. 435–444 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Waters, Z., Kovanović, V., Kitto, K., Gašević, D. (2015). Structure Matters: Adoption of Structured Classification Approach in the Context of Cognitive Presence Classification. In: Zuccon, G., Geva, S., Joho, H., Scholer, F., Sun, A., Zhang, P. (eds) Information Retrieval Technology. AIRS 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9460. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28940-3_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28940-3_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28939-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28940-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)