Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Scale, Aggregation, and the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Regional Science

Abstract

The modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP) is a serious analytical issue for research using spatial data. The MAUP manifests itself through the apparent instability of statistical results derived from alternative aggregations of the same data. These results are conditional on two facets of aggregation – the spatial scale at which the units are measured, and the configuration of the units used at that scale. The uncertainty caused by the MAUP impacts the robustness and reliability of statistical results. Although solutions have been proposed, none have been applicable in more than a handful of specific cases, although recent work has pointed to some of the underlying causes helping to further our understanding. This chapter charts the scale and zonation effects, and details the important role of spatial autocorrelation and spatial structures in understanding the processes that lead to the statistical uncertainty. The role of zone design as a tool to enhance analysis is explored and reference made to analyses that have adopted explicit spatial frameworks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amrhein C, Flowerdew R (1989) The effect of data aggregation on a Poisson regression model of Canadian migration. In: Goodchild MF, Gopal S (eds) Accuracy of spatial databases. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 229–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbia G (1989) Spatial data configuration in statistical analysis of regional economic and related problems. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann J, Fischer MM, Schubert U (1983) A multiregional labour supply model for Austria: the effects of different regionalisations in labour market modelling. Pap Reg Sci Assoc 52(1):214–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle P, Alvanides S (2004) Assessing deprivation in English inner city areas: making the case for EC funding for Leeds city. In: Clarke G, Stillwell J (eds) Applied GIS and spatial analysis. Wiley, Chichester, pp 111–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff AD, Ord JK (1981) Spatial processes: models & applications. Pion, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan OD, Duncan B (1955) A methodological analysis of segregation indices. Am Sociol Rev 20:210–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew R (2011) How serious is the modifiable areal unit problem for analysis of English census data? Popul Trends 145 (Autumn). Office for National Statistics, 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew R, Green M (1994) Areal interpolation and types of data. In: Fotheringham S, Rogerson P (eds) Spatial analysis and GIS. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 121–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew R, Geddes A, Green M (2001) Behaviour of regression models under random aggregation. In: Tate NJ, Atkinson PM (eds) Modelling scale in geographical information science. Wiley, Chichester, pp 89–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham AS, Wong DWS (1991) The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environ Plann A 23(7):1025–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehlke CE, Biehl K (1934) Certain effects of grouping upon the size of the correlation in census tract material. J Am Stat Assoc 29(Special Suppl):169–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Getis A (2010) Spatial autocorrelation. In: Fischer MM, Getis A (eds) Handbook of applied spatial analysis. Software, methods and applications. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, pp 255–278

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Green M, Flowerdew R (1996) New evidence on the modifiable areal unit problem. In: Longley P, Batty M (eds) Spatial analysis: modelling in a GIS environment. GeoInformation International, Cambridge, UK, pp 41–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Heasman MA, Kemp W, Maclaren AM, Trotter P, Gillis CR, Hole DJ (1984) Incidence of leukaemia in young persons in west of Scotland. Lancet 323(8387):1188–1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones K, Manley D, Johnston R, Owen D (2018) Modelling residential segregation as unevenness and clustering: A multilevel modelling approach incorporating spatial dependence and tackling the MAUP. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 45(6):1122–1141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby AM, Taylor PJ (1976) A geographical analysis of voting patterns in the EEC referendum. Reg Stud 10(2):183–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manley D, Flowerdew R, Steel D (2006) Scales, levels and processes: studying spatial patterns of British census variables computers. Environ Urban Syst 30(1):143–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin D (2003) Developing the automated zoning procedure to reconcile incompatible zoning systems. Int J Geogr Inform Sci 17(1):181–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odoi A, Martin SW, Michel P, Holt J, Middleton D, Wilson J (2003) Geographical and temporal distribution of human giardiasis in Ontario, Canada. Int J Health Geogr 2(1):5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw S (1977) A geographical solution to the scale and aggregation problem in region-building, partitioning and spatial modeling. Trans Inst Br Geographr New Ser 2(4):459–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw S (1978) An empirical study of some zone-design criteria. Environ Plann A 10(7):781–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw S (1984) The modifiable areal unit problem. CATMOG 38. GeoBooks, Norwich

    Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw S, Rao L (1995) Algorithms for reengineering 1991 census geography. Environ Plann A 27(3):425–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw S, Taylor PJ (1979) A million or so correlation coefficients, three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem. In: Wrigley N (ed) Statistical applications in the spatial sciences. Pion, London, pp 127–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw S, Taylor PJ (1981) The modifiable areal unit problem. In: Bennet RJ, Wrigley N (eds) Quantitative geography. Routledge Kegan Paul, Henley-on-Thames, pp 60–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw S, Alvanides S, Whalley S (1998) Some further experiments with designing output areas for the 2001 UK census. In: The paper presented at the 4th of the ESRC/JISC supported workshops planning for the 2001 census

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulsen M, Johnston R, Forrest J (2011) Using local statistics and neighbourhood classifications to portray ethnic residential segregation: a London example. Environ Plann B 38(4):636–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobler W (1970) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Econ Geogr 46(2):234–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie D (1986) Precognition on: review of the Scottish Health Service ISD report on Geographical distribution of leukaemia in young persons in Scotland 1968–1983 (document D/P/20). Presented at EDRP public local inquiry, Thurso, September, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong D (2003) Spatial decomposition of segregation indices: a framework toward measuring segregation at multiple levels. Geograph Anal 35(3):179–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong D (2009) Chapter 7. The modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP). In: Fotheringham AS (ed) The SAGE handbook of spatial analysis. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 95–112

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Manley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Manley, D. (2019). Scale, Aggregation, and the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem. In: Fischer, M., Nijkamp, P. (eds) Handbook of Regional Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36203-3_69-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36203-3_69-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36203-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36203-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics