Abstract
The modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP) is a serious analytical issue for research using spatial data. The MAUP manifests itself through the apparent instability of statistical results derived from alternative aggregations of the same data. These results are conditional on two facets of aggregation – the spatial scale at which the units are measured, and the configuration of the units used at that scale. The uncertainty caused by the MAUP impacts the robustness and reliability of statistical results. Although solutions have been proposed, none have been applicable in more than a handful of specific cases, although recent work has pointed to some of the underlying causes helping to further our understanding. This chapter charts the scale and zonation effects, and details the important role of spatial autocorrelation and spatial structures in understanding the processes that lead to the statistical uncertainty. The role of zone design as a tool to enhance analysis is explored and reference made to analyses that have adopted explicit spatial frameworks.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amrhein C, Flowerdew R (1989) The effect of data aggregation on a Poisson regression model of Canadian migration. In: Goodchild MF, Gopal S (eds) Accuracy of spatial databases. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 229–238
Arbia G (1989) Spatial data configuration in statistical analysis of regional economic and related problems. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Baumann J, Fischer MM, Schubert U (1983) A multiregional labour supply model for Austria: the effects of different regionalisations in labour market modelling. Pap Reg Sci Assoc 52(1):214–218
Boyle P, Alvanides S (2004) Assessing deprivation in English inner city areas: making the case for EC funding for Leeds city. In: Clarke G, Stillwell J (eds) Applied GIS and spatial analysis. Wiley, Chichester, pp 111–136
Cliff AD, Ord JK (1981) Spatial processes: models & applications. Pion, London
Duncan OD, Duncan B (1955) A methodological analysis of segregation indices. Am Sociol Rev 20:210–217
Flowerdew R (2011) How serious is the modifiable areal unit problem for analysis of English census data? Popul Trends 145 (Autumn). Office for National Statistics, 1–13
Flowerdew R, Green M (1994) Areal interpolation and types of data. In: Fotheringham S, Rogerson P (eds) Spatial analysis and GIS. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 121–145
Flowerdew R, Geddes A, Green M (2001) Behaviour of regression models under random aggregation. In: Tate NJ, Atkinson PM (eds) Modelling scale in geographical information science. Wiley, Chichester, pp 89–104
Fotheringham AS, Wong DWS (1991) The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environ Plann A 23(7):1025–1044
Gehlke CE, Biehl K (1934) Certain effects of grouping upon the size of the correlation in census tract material. J Am Stat Assoc 29(Special Suppl):169–170
Getis A (2010) Spatial autocorrelation. In: Fischer MM, Getis A (eds) Handbook of applied spatial analysis. Software, methods and applications. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, pp 255–278
Green M, Flowerdew R (1996) New evidence on the modifiable areal unit problem. In: Longley P, Batty M (eds) Spatial analysis: modelling in a GIS environment. GeoInformation International, Cambridge, UK, pp 41–54
Heasman MA, Kemp W, Maclaren AM, Trotter P, Gillis CR, Hole DJ (1984) Incidence of leukaemia in young persons in west of Scotland. Lancet 323(8387):1188–1189
Jones K, Manley D, Johnston R, Owen D (2018) Modelling residential segregation as unevenness and clustering: A multilevel modelling approach incorporating spatial dependence and tackling the MAUP. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 45(6):1122–1141.
Kirby AM, Taylor PJ (1976) A geographical analysis of voting patterns in the EEC referendum. Reg Stud 10(2):183–191
Manley D, Flowerdew R, Steel D (2006) Scales, levels and processes: studying spatial patterns of British census variables computers. Environ Urban Syst 30(1):143–160
Martin D (2003) Developing the automated zoning procedure to reconcile incompatible zoning systems. Int J Geogr Inform Sci 17(1):181–196
Odoi A, Martin SW, Michel P, Holt J, Middleton D, Wilson J (2003) Geographical and temporal distribution of human giardiasis in Ontario, Canada. Int J Health Geogr 2(1):5
Openshaw S (1977) A geographical solution to the scale and aggregation problem in region-building, partitioning and spatial modeling. Trans Inst Br Geographr New Ser 2(4):459–472
Openshaw S (1978) An empirical study of some zone-design criteria. Environ Plann A 10(7):781–794
Openshaw S (1984) The modifiable areal unit problem. CATMOG 38. GeoBooks, Norwich
Openshaw S, Rao L (1995) Algorithms for reengineering 1991 census geography. Environ Plann A 27(3):425–446
Openshaw S, Taylor PJ (1979) A million or so correlation coefficients, three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem. In: Wrigley N (ed) Statistical applications in the spatial sciences. Pion, London, pp 127–144
Openshaw S, Taylor PJ (1981) The modifiable areal unit problem. In: Bennet RJ, Wrigley N (eds) Quantitative geography. Routledge Kegan Paul, Henley-on-Thames, pp 60–69
Openshaw S, Alvanides S, Whalley S (1998) Some further experiments with designing output areas for the 2001 UK census. In: The paper presented at the 4th of the ESRC/JISC supported workshops planning for the 2001 census
Poulsen M, Johnston R, Forrest J (2011) Using local statistics and neighbourhood classifications to portray ethnic residential segregation: a London example. Environ Plann B 38(4):636–658
Tobler W (1970) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Econ Geogr 46(2):234–240
Wilkie D (1986) Precognition on: review of the Scottish Health Service ISD report on Geographical distribution of leukaemia in young persons in Scotland 1968–1983 (document D/P/20). Presented at EDRP public local inquiry, Thurso, September, 1986
Wong D (2003) Spatial decomposition of segregation indices: a framework toward measuring segregation at multiple levels. Geograph Anal 35(3):179–194
Wong D (2009) Chapter 7. The modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP). In: Fotheringham AS (ed) The SAGE handbook of spatial analysis. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 95–112
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Manley, D. (2019). Scale, Aggregation, and the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem. In: Fischer, M., Nijkamp, P. (eds) Handbook of Regional Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36203-3_69-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36203-3_69-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36203-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36203-3
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences