Abstract
The purpose of this conceptual chapter is to show, within a service science approach, that the improvement of e-services (and not just of services) is based not only on further development of ICTs (e.g., band width and computing power) but on the effective exchange of knowledge (including tacit knowledge) between providers and consumers enabled by the interplay of technology and people through specific acts of organizing. To this end, e-government has been chosen as an area of investigation and exploration because of the number of heterogeneous actors involved (individuals and public and private organizations), of the extensive use of technology, and of the issues that are being debated. Furthermore, the field has been an object of study for several years so that the available literature to draw upon is rich. Results show that the basic tenets of service science developed so far are an appropriate lens to understand current concerns in e-government and, conversely, the results of research on this subject can help address some key questions in e-service studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chesbrough, H. W. (2005). Toward a new science of services. Harvard Business Review, 83(February), 43–44.
Chesbrough, H., & Spohrer, J. I. M. (2006). A reserach manifesto for services science. Communications of the ACM, 49(7), 35–40.
Spohrer, J., Maglio, P., Bailey, J., & Gruhl, D. (2007). Steps toward a science of service systems. Computer, 40(1), 1–46.
Dreyfus, H. L. (1992). What computers still can’t do (p. 354). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, M. A. (2008). On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal, 26(3), 145–152.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2010). The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 125–141.
OECD. (2003). The e-government imperative. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Persson, A., & Goldkuhl, G. (2010). Government value paradigms—bureaucracy, new public management, and e-government government. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 27, 45–62.
Petricek, V., Escher, T., Cox, I.J. & Margetts, H. (2006). The web structure of e-government—developing a methodology for quantitative evaluation. Public Policy, pp. 669–678.
Alshawi, S., & Alalwany, H. (2009). e-government evaluation: Citizen’s perspective in developing countries. Information Technology for Development, 15, 193–208.
Serafeimidis, V., & Smithson, S. (2000). Information systems evaluation in practice: A case study of organizational change. Journal of Information Technology, 15, 93–105.
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sense making. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.
Thomas R. (2005). The identity project an assessment of the UK identity cards bill and its implications, London.
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3, 398–428.
Yildiz, M. (2007). E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 646–665.
OECD. (2001). Citizens as partners: information, consultation and public participation in policy-making. Paris, p. 253.
West, D. M. (2001). E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64, 15–27.
Miller, E. A., & West, D. M. (2009). Where’s the revolution? Digital technology and health care in the internet age. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 34(2), 261–284.
United Kingdom Government Cabinet Office. (2005). Transformational government—enabled by technology.
Dubberly, H., Mehta, R., Evenson, S., & Pangaro, P. (2010). Reframing health to embrace design of our own well-being. Interactions, 17(3), 56–63.
Chan, C. M. L., & Pan, S. L. (2008). User engagement in e-government systems implementation: a comparative case study of two Singaporean e-government initiatives. Journal of Strategic Information System, 17, 124–139.
Damodaran, L., & Olphert, C. W. (2006). Informing digital futures: Strategies for citizen engagement. New York: Springer.
Mumford, E. (1983). Designing human systems for new technology: the ETHICS method. Manchester: Manchester Business School.
McLoughlin, I., Maniatopoulos, G., Wilson, R., & Martin, M. (2009). Hope to die before you get old? Techno-centric versus user-centred approaches in developing virtual services for older people. Public Management Review, 11(6), 857–880.
Olphert, W. (2007). Citizen participation and engagement in the design of e-government services: The missing link in effective ICT design and delivery. Journal of Association of Information Systems., 8(9), 491–507.
Hosking, D. M. (1988). Organizing, leadership and skilful process. Journal of Management Studies, 25(2), 147–166.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Depaoli, P. (2013). Acts of Organizing and Knowledge Sharing: Key Factors Towards a Non-positivist Development of E-Service Studies. In: Spagnoletti, P. (eds) Organizational Change and Information Systems. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37228-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37228-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37227-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37228-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)