Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Acts of Organizing and Knowledge Sharing: Key Factors Towards a Non-positivist Development of E-Service Studies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Organizational Change and Information Systems

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 2))

  • 2313 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this conceptual chapter is to show, within a service science approach, that the improvement of e-services (and not just of services) is based not only on further development of ICTs (e.g., band width and computing power) but on the effective exchange of knowledge (including tacit knowledge) between providers and consumers enabled by the interplay of technology and people through specific acts of organizing. To this end, e-government has been chosen as an area of investigation and exploration because of the number of heterogeneous actors involved (individuals and public and private organizations), of the extensive use of technology, and of the issues that are being debated. Furthermore, the field has been an object of study for several years so that the available literature to draw upon is rich. Results show that the basic tenets of service science developed so far are an appropriate lens to understand current concerns in e-government and, conversely, the results of research on this subject can help address some key questions in e-service studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chesbrough, H. W. (2005). Toward a new science of services. Harvard Business Review, 83(February), 43–44.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chesbrough, H., & Spohrer, J. I. M. (2006). A reserach manifesto for services science. Communications of the ACM, 49(7), 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Spohrer, J., Maglio, P., Bailey, J., & Gruhl, D. (2007). Steps toward a science of service systems. Computer, 40(1), 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dreyfus, H. L. (1992). What computers still can’t do (p. 354). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, M. A. (2008). On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal, 26(3), 145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Orlikowski, W. J. (2010). The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. OECD. (2003). The e-government imperative. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Persson, A., & Goldkuhl, G. (2010). Government value paradigms—bureaucracy, new public management, and e-government government. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 27, 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Petricek, V., Escher, T., Cox, I.J. & Margetts, H. (2006). The web structure of e-government—developing a methodology for quantitative evaluation. Public Policy, pp. 669–678.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alshawi, S., & Alalwany, H. (2009). e-government evaluation: Citizen’s perspective in developing countries. Information Technology for Development, 15, 193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Serafeimidis, V., & Smithson, S. (2000). Information systems evaluation in practice: A case study of organizational change. Journal of Information Technology, 15, 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sense making. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thomas R. (2005). The identity project an assessment of the UK identity cards bill and its implications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3, 398–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yildiz, M. (2007). E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 646–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. OECD. (2001). Citizens as partners: information, consultation and public participation in policy-making. Paris, p. 253.

    Google Scholar 

  19. West, D. M. (2001). E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64, 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller, E. A., & West, D. M. (2009). Where’s the revolution? Digital technology and health care in the internet age. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 34(2), 261–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. United Kingdom Government Cabinet Office. (2005). Transformational government—enabled by technology.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dubberly, H., Mehta, R., Evenson, S., & Pangaro, P. (2010). Reframing health to embrace design of our own well-being. Interactions, 17(3), 56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chan, C. M. L., & Pan, S. L. (2008). User engagement in e-government systems implementation: a comparative case study of two Singaporean e-government initiatives. Journal of Strategic Information System, 17, 124–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Damodaran, L., & Olphert, C. W. (2006). Informing digital futures: Strategies for citizen engagement. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Mumford, E. (1983). Designing human systems for new technology: the ETHICS method. Manchester: Manchester Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  26. McLoughlin, I., Maniatopoulos, G., Wilson, R., & Martin, M. (2009). Hope to die before you get old? Techno-centric versus user-centred approaches in developing virtual services for older people. Public Management Review, 11(6), 857–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Olphert, W. (2007). Citizen participation and engagement in the design of e-government services: The missing link in effective ICT design and delivery. Journal of Association of Information Systems., 8(9), 491–507.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hosking, D. M. (1988). Organizing, leadership and skilful process. Journal of Management Studies, 25(2), 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Depaoli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Depaoli, P. (2013). Acts of Organizing and Knowledge Sharing: Key Factors Towards a Non-positivist Development of E-Service Studies. In: Spagnoletti, P. (eds) Organizational Change and Information Systems. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37228-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics