Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Hierarchical Identities from Group Signatures and Pseudonymous Signatures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The New Codebreakers

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 9100))

Abstract

The use of group signatures has been widely suggested for authentication with minimum disclosure of information. In this paper, we consider an identity management system, where users can access several group signatures, managed by different authorities. These authorities follow a hierarchy that impacts key issuing and revocation, but we still enforce that anonymity within a group is preserved towards authorities of other groups. We thus define cross-unlinkable hierarchical group signatures, for which we give a generic instantiation based on VLR group signatures and domain-specific pseudonymous signatures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Sometimes, additional algorithms to verify openings are suggested, e.g., the \(\mathtt {DProve}\) and \(\mathtt {DVerify}\) algorithms of [11, 14].

  2. 2.

    The \(\mathtt {SendToIssuer}\) oracle might be surprising here. But, contrary to group signatures, the issuing authority IA is not corrupted. This assumption is minimal since the IA may trace all honest users. Hence we must give the adversary the ability to interact as a corrupted user with the honest issuer.

  3. 3.

    Our model takes into account the case where pseudonyms leak from the network. To this aim, the \(\mathtt {NymDomain}\) oracle gives the adversary a collection of pseudonyms.

References

  1. Ateniese, G., Tsudik, G.: Some open issues and new directions in group signatures. In: Franklin, M.K. (ed.) FC 1999. LNCS, vol. 1648, pp. 196–211. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Belenkiy, M., Camenisch, J., Chase, M., Kohlweiss, M., Lysyanskaya, A., Shacham, H.: Randomizable proofs and delegatable anonymous credentials. In: Halevi, S. (ed.) CRYPTO 2009. LNCS, vol. 5677, pp. 108–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bender, J., Dagdelen, Ö., Fischlin, M., Kügler, D.: Domain-specific pseudonymous signatures for the German identity card. In: Gollmann, D., Freiling, F.C. (eds.) ISC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7483, pp. 104–119. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Benjumea, V., Choi, S.G., Lopez, J., Yung, M.: Fair traceable multi-group signatures. In: Tsudik, G. (ed.) FC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5143, pp. 231–246. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Boneh, D., Shacham, H.: Group signatures with verifier-local revocation. In: Atluri, V., Pfitzmann, B., McDaniel, P.D. (eds.) ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 168–177. ACM (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bringer, J., Chabanne, H., Lescuyer, R., Patey, A.: Efficient and strongly secure dynamic domain-specific pseudonymous signatures for ID documents. In: Financial Cryptography and Data Security (FC) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bringer, J., Chabanne, H., Patey, A.: An application of a group signature scheme with backward unlinkability to biometric identity management. In: Samarati et al. [20], pp. 421–425 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bringer, J., Chabanne, H., Patey, A.: Cross-unlinkable hierarchical group signatures. In: De Capitani di Vimercati, S., Mitchell, C. (eds.) EuroPKI 2012. LNCS, vol. 7868, pp. 161–177. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Bringer, J., Chabanne, H., Patey, A.: Collusion-resistant domain-specific pseudonymous signatures. In: Lopez, J., Huang, X., Sandhu, R. (eds.) NSS 2013. LNCS, vol. 7873, pp. 649–655. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Bringer, J., Chabanne, H., Pointcheval, D., Zimmer, S.: An application of the Boneh and Shacham group signature scheme to biometric authentication. In: Matsuura, K., Fujisaki, E. (eds.) IWSEC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5312, pp. 219–230. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Bringer, J., Patey, A.: VLR group signatures - how to achieve both backward unlinkability and efficient revocation checks. In: Samarati et al. [20], pp. 215–220 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. BSI: advanced security mechanisms for machine readable travel documents. Part 2 extended access control version 2 (EACv2), password authenticated connection establishment (PACE), and restricted identification (RI). Technical report TR-03110-2, BSI, version 2.10, March 2012

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chaum, D., van Heyst, E.: Group signatures. In: Davies, D.W. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1991. LNCS, vol. 547, pp. 257–265. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, L., Li, J.: VLR group signatures with indisputable exculpability and efficient revocation. In: Elmagarmid, A.K., Agrawal, D. (eds.) SocialCom/PASSAT, pp. 727–734. IEEE Computer Society (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fuchsbauer, G., Pointcheval, D.: Anonymous proxy signatures. In: Ostrovsky, R., De Prisco, R., Visconti, I. (eds.) SCN 2008. LNCS, vol. 5229, pp. 201–217. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Khader, D.: Attribute based group signature with revocation. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive 2007, 241 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Khader, D.: Attribute based group signatures. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive 2007, 159 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kim, S., Park, S., Won, D.: Group signatures for hierarchical multigroups. In: Okamoto, E. (ed.) ISW 1997. LNCS, vol. 1396. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Patey, A.: Techniques cryptographiques pour l’authentification et l’identification biométriques respectant la vie privée. Ph.D. thesis, Télécom ParisTech (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Samarati, P., Lou, W., Zhou, J. (eds.): SECRYPT 2012 - Proceedings of the International Conference on Security and Cryptography, Rome, Italy, 24–27, SECRYPT is part of ICETE - The International Joint Conference on e-Business and Telecommunications. SciTePress (2012), July 2012

    Google Scholar 

  21. Trolin, M., Wikström, D.: Hierarchical group signatures. In: Caires, L., Italiano, G.F., Monteiro, L., Palamidessi, C., Yung, M. (eds.) ICALP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3580, pp. 446–458. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hervé Chabanne .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bringer, J., Chabanne, H., Lescuyer, R., Patey, A. (2016). Hierarchical Identities from Group Signatures and Pseudonymous Signatures. In: Ryan, P., Naccache, D., Quisquater, JJ. (eds) The New Codebreakers. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9100. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49301-4_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49301-4_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-49300-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-49301-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics