Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

A Comparative Study of Performance Metrics of Data Mining Algorithms on Medical Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICCCE 2020

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 698))

  • 1851 Accesses

Abstract

Computers have brought about significant technological improvements leading to the creation of enormous volumes of data, particularly in health care systems. The availability of vast amounts of data contributed to a greater need for data mining techniques to produce useful knowledge. Accurate analyzes of medical data are gaining early detection of illness and patient care with the increase of data in biomedical and health care communities. The data mining is one of the major approaches for developing sophisticated algorithms for classification of data. Some have castigated Data mining for not meeting all of the humanistic statistics specifications [5]. Classification of diseases is that one of the main applications of data mining and many important attempts have been made in recent years to improve the accuracy of the diagnosis of diseases through data mining. We used four prominent data mining algorithms such as Naive Bayes Classifier, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) Classifier, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithms to develop predictive models using that the ILPD (Indian Liver Patient Data Set) from the UCI Machine learning repository. For performance comparison purposes, we used the 10-fold cross validation method to calculate the estimation of six predictive models. We find that the support vector machine delivers the best results in a 74.82 percent accuracy classification and 56.55 percent accuracy of the Naive Bayes performed the worst. The performance metrics of classifiers were analyzed on medical dataset further sections below.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sorich MJ, Miners JO, McKinnon RA, Winkler DA, Burden FR, Smith PA (2003) Comparison of linear and nonlinear classification algorithms for the prediction of drug and chemical metabolism by human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 43(6):2019–2024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Paul R, Harper A (2005) A review and comparison of classification algorithms for medical decision making. Health Policy 71(3):315–331

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang L-C, Hsu S-Y, Lin E (2009) A comparison of classification methods for predicting Chronic Fatigue Syndrome based on genetic data. J Transl Med 7(81)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cios KJ, Moore GW (2002) Uniqueness of medical data mining. Artif Intell Med 26:124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Haykin S (1998) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu H, Kim S (2012) SVM tutorial: classification, regression, and ranking. In: Handbook of natural computing

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rish I (2001) An empirical study of the Naive Bayes classifier. In: IJCAI workshop on empirical methods in AI

    Google Scholar 

  8. Altman NS (1992) An introduction to kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression. Amer Stat 46(3):175–185

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Berman JJ (2002) Confidentiality issues for medical data miners. Artif Intell Med 26:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Burke HB, Goodman PH, Rosen DB, Henson DE, Weinstein JN, Harrell FE Jr et al (1997) Artificial neural networks improve the accuracy of cancer survival prediction. Cancer 79:857–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Al-Sharafat WS, Naoum R (2009) Development of Genetic-based machine learning for network intrusion detection. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 55: 20–24

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eyheramendy JJ, Lewis D, Madigan D (2003) On the Naive Bayes model for text categorization. In: proceedings artificial intelligence statistics

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashok Suragala .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Suragala, A., Venkateswarlu, P., China Raju, M. (2021). A Comparative Study of Performance Metrics of Data Mining Algorithms on Medical Data. In: Kumar, A., Mozar, S. (eds) ICCCE 2020. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 698. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7961-5_139

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7961-5_139

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-7960-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-7961-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics