Abstract
The pressure on sustainability and responsible resource utilization while meeting stakeholder requirements often result in accounting information being misaligned with its objective of providing information for decision support. Even though the interpretation of accounting information is vital for all who interact with a company, one wonders whether this has not become muddled more than accounting protocols. Since philosophy is understood as a rational investigation of truths, such an approach to critically reflect on the legitimacy of accounting (as a science) may be overdue. In context, this chapter illustrates a reflective research approach to consider the impact of ethical considerations in accounting, the definition of an accountancy philosophy that embraces accountability, integrity, and reliability, and the concepts of value and decision-usefulness.
The reflection concludes that ethical conduct remains a crucial aspect of accounting, founded on competency, integrity, objectivity, and confidentiality. Furthermore, three essential objectives of accounting theory are recording incurred economic events, providing practical and comparable information about such events, and facilitating management decisions. Accounting could thus be seen as a measurement activity to estimate reality and is unlikely to possess any predictive ability due to the various users’ different objectives and backgrounds. The decision-usefulness criteria, however, cannot outrightly be rejected.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Audi. R., (ed.), (2005). Cambridge dictionary of philosophy. 2nd ed. p. 1001. Cambridge University Press.
Blackbury, S., (ed.), (1994). Oxford dictionary of philosophy. p. 408. Oxford University Press.
Carlsson, S. V. (2006, February). Towards and information systems design research framework: A critical realist perspective. Destrist, 192–212.
Carson, D., Gilmore, A., Perry, C. & Gronhaug, K. (2009). Qualitative marketing research. p. 256. Sage Publishing.
Demski, J. S. (2007, June). Is accounting an academic discipline? Accounting Horizons 21(2), 153–157.
Demski, J. S., Fellingham, J. C., Jiri, Y. & Sunder, S. (2002, June). Some thoughts on the intellectual foundations of accounting. Accounting Horizons 16(2), 157–168.
Drury, C. (2018). Management and cost accounting (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Epstein, B. J., Nach, R. & Bragg, S. M. (2005). GAAP 2006: Interpretation and application of generally accepted accounting principles. p. 1177. John Wiley and Sons.
Fellingham, J. C. (2007, June). Is accounting an academic discipline? Accounting Horizons, 21(2), 159–163.
Hazelrigg, L. E. (1986, December). Is there a choice between “Constructionism” and Objectivism”? Social problems, 33(6), 1–13.
Henning, E., Van Rensburg, W. & Smit, B. (2009). Finding your way in qualitative research. p. 179. Van Schaik.
Horngren, C.T., Datar, S. M. & Rajan, M. V. (2015). Cost accounting: a managerial emphasis. 15th ed. Pearson.
Kekeya, J. (2019, November). The commonalities and differences between research paradigms. Contemporary PNG Studies: DWU Research Journal, 31, 26–36.
Ladyman, J. (2002). Understanding philosophy of science. p. 290. Routledge.
Lewis, D. (2001). Objectivism vs constructivism: The origins of this debate and implications for instructional designers. http://davidlewisphd.com/publications/Objectivism_vs_Constructivism.htm. Date of access: 15 November 2010
Livingstone, C., (ed.), (2008). Oxford mini dictionary and thesaurus. p. 722. Oxford University Press.
Mouton, J. (2011). How to succeed in your master’s & doctoral studies: A South African guide and resource book. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
Mouton, J. & Marais, H. C. (2009). Basic concepts in the methodology of the social sciences. p. 269. HSRC Press.
Nieuwenhuis, J. (2020). Introducing qualitative research. In: Maree, K. (ed.), First steps in research. Pretoria: Van Schaik. pp. 56–76.
Parker, L. D. (2007). Financial and external reporting research: The broadening corporate governance challenge. Accounting and Business Research, 37(1), 39–54.
Palepu, K. G., Healy, P. & Bernard, V. (2007). Business analysis & valuation using financial statements. 4th ed. p. 984. South-Western College.
Probert, S. (1999). Towards a critical framework of IS research. Association for information systems. (AMCIS 1999 proceedings. Paper 58. http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis1999/58).
Rahi, S. (2017). Research design and methods: A systematic review of research paradigms, sampling issues and instrument development. International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences, 6(2), 1000403.
Schroeder, R. G., Clark, M. W. & Cathey, J. M. (2005). Financial accounting theory and analysis. 8th ed. p. 598. Wiley.
Van der Schyf, D. B. (2008). The essence of a university and scholarly activity in accounting, with reference to a Department of Accounting at a South African university. Meditari: Accountancy Research, 16(1), 1–26.
Williams, P. (2009). Rethinking decision usefulness. (A paper read at the 9th Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Accounting conference held in Innsbruck, Austria).
Disclosure Statement
This chapter is derived from the following research project: Buys, P.W. (2012). The legitimacy predicament of current-day accounting theory (PhD thesis). North-West University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Buys, P.W. (2023). The Legitimacy Predicament of Current-Day Accounting Theory. In: Buys, P.W., Oberholzer, M. (eds) Business Research . Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9479-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9479-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-9478-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-9479-1
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)