Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Journal of High Energy Physics
  3. Article

Aligned CP-violating Higgs sector canceling the electric dipole moment

  • Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • Open access
  • Published: 06 August 2020
  • Volume 2020, article number 26, (2020)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Aligned CP-violating Higgs sector canceling the electric dipole moment
Download PDF
  • Shinya Kanemura1,
  • Mitsunori Kubota1 &
  • Kei Yagyu1 

  • 465 Accesses

  • 29 Citations

  • Explore all metrics

A preprint version of the article is available at arXiv.

Abstract

We discuss the effect of CP violation in the aligned scenario of the general two-Higgs-doublet model, in which the Higgs potential and the Yukawa interaction provide additional CP-violating phases. An alignment is imposed to the Yukawa interaction in order to avoid dangerous flavor changing neutral currents. The Higgs potential is also aligned such that the coupling constants of the lightest Higgs boson, which is identified as the discovered Higgs boson with the mass of 125 GeV, are the same as those of the standard model. In general, CP-violating phases originated by the Yukawa interaction and the Higgs potential are strongly constrained by the current data for the electric dipole moment (EDM). It is found that in our scenario contributions from the two sources of CP violation can be destructive and consequently their total contribution can satisfy the EDM results, even when each CP-violating phase is large. Such a large CP-violating phase can be tested at collider experiments by looking at the angular distributions of particles generated by the decays of the additional Higgs bosons.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Testing aligned CP-violating Higgs sector at future lepton colliders

Article Open access 15 April 2021

CP violation from charged Higgs bosons in the three Higgs doublet model

Article Open access 21 July 2021

Measuring CP violation in two-Higgs-doublet models in light of the LHC Higgs data

Article Open access 18 November 2014
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  1. A.D. Sakharov, Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe, Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 5 (1967) 32 [JETP Lett. 5 (1967) 24] [Sov. Phys. Usp. 34 (1991) 392] [Usp. Fiz. Nauk 161 (1991) 61]. [INSPIRE].

  2. V.A. Kuzmin, V.A. Rubakov and M.E. Shaposhnikov, On the Anomalous Electroweak Baryon Number Nonconservation in the Early Universe, Phys. Lett. B 155 (1985) 36 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Huet and E. Sather, Electroweak baryogenesis and standard model CP-violation, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 379 [hep-ph/9404302] [INSPIRE].

  4. K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen and M.E. Shaposhnikov, Is there a hot electroweak phase transition at mH ≤ mW?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 2887 [hep-ph/9605288] [INSPIRE].

  5. M. Yoshimura, Unified Gauge Theories and the Baryon Number of the Universe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41 (1978) 281 [Erratum ibid. 42 (1979) 746] [INSPIRE].

  6. S. Weinberg, Cosmological Production of Baryons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42 (1979) 850 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, Baryogenesis Without Grand Unification, Phys. Lett. B 174 (1986) 45 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. J.R. Espinosa, B. Gripaios, T. Konstandin and F. Riva, Electroweak Baryogenesis in Non-minimal Composite Higgs Models, JCAP 01 (2012) 012 [arXiv:1110.2876] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. J.M. Cline and K. Kainulainen, Electroweak baryogenesis and dark matter from a singlet Higgs, JCAP 01 (2013) 012 [arXiv:1210.4196] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. B. Grzadkowski and D. Huang, Spontaneous CP-Violating Electroweak Baryogenesis and Dark Matter from a Complex Singlet Scalar, JHEP 08 (2018) 135 [arXiv:1807.06987] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. N. Turok and J. Zadrozny, Electroweak baryogenesis in the two doublet model, Nucl. Phys. B 358 (1991) 471 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. J.M. Cline, K. Kainulainen and A.P. Vischer, Dynamics of two Higgs doublet CP-violation and baryogenesis at the electroweak phase transition, Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 2451 [hep-ph/9506284] [INSPIRE].

  13. L. Fromme, S.J. Huber and M. Seniuch, Baryogenesis in the two-Higgs doublet model, JHEP 11 (2006) 038 [hep-ph/0605242] [INSPIRE].

  14. J.M. Cline, K. Kainulainen and M. Trott, Electroweak Baryogenesis in Two Higgs Doublet Models and B meson anomalies, JHEP 11 (2011) 089 [arXiv:1107.3559] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Shu and Y. Zhang, Impact of a CP-violating Higgs Sector: From LHC to Baryogenesis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 091801 [arXiv:1304.0773] [INSPIRE].

  16. K. Fuyuto, W.-S. Hou and E. Senaha, Electroweak baryogenesis driven by extra top Yukawa couplings, Phys. Lett. B 776 (2018) 402 [arXiv:1705.05034] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. T. Modak and E. Senaha, Electroweak baryogenesis via bottom transport, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 115022 [arXiv:1811.08088] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. H.H. Patel and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, Stepping Into Electroweak Symmetry Breaking: Phase Transitions and Higgs Phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 035013 [arXiv:1212.5652] [INSPIRE].

  19. C.-W. Chiang and T. Yamada, Electroweak phase transition in Georgi-Machacek model, Phys. Lett. B 735 (2014) 295 [arXiv:1404.5182] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. C. Grojean, G. Servant and J.D. Wells, First-order electroweak phase transition in the standard model with a low cutoff, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 036001 [hep-ph/0407019] [INSPIRE].

  21. S. Kanemura, Y. Okada and E. Senaha, Electroweak baryogenesis and quantum corrections to the triple Higgs boson coupling, Phys. Lett. B 606 (2005) 361 [hep-ph/0411354] [INSPIRE].

  22. M. Cepeda et al., Report from Working Group 2: Higgs Physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 7 (2019) 221 [arXiv:1902.00134] [INSPIRE].

    Google Scholar 

  23. K. Fujii et al., Physics Case for the International Linear Collider, arXiv:1506.05992 [INSPIRE].

  24. K. Fujii et al., Physics Case for the 250 GeV Stage of the International Linear Collider, arXiv:1710.07621 [INSPIRE].

  25. LISA collaboration, Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, arXiv:1702.00786 [INSPIRE].

  26. N. Seto, S. Kawamura and T. Nakamura, Possibility of direct measurement of the acceleration of the universe using 0.1-Hz band laser interferometer gravitational wave antenna in space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 221103 [astro-ph/0108011] [INSPIRE].

  27. V. Corbin and N.J. Cornish, Detecting the cosmic gravitational wave background with the big bang observer, Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 2435 [gr-qc/0512039] [INSPIRE].

  28. C. Grojean and G. Servant, Gravitational Waves from Phase Transitions at the Electroweak Scale and Beyond, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 043507 [hep-ph/0607107] [INSPIRE].

  29. J.R. Espinosa and M. Quirós, Novel Effects in Electroweak Breaking from a Hidden Sector, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 076004 [hep-ph/0701145] [INSPIRE].

  30. J.R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin, J.M. No and M. Quirós, Some Cosmological Implications of Hidden Sectors, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 123528 [arXiv:0809.3215] [INSPIRE].

  31. J.R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin, J.M. No and G. Servant, Energy Budget of Cosmological First-order Phase Transitions, JCAP 06 (2010) 028 [arXiv:1004.4187] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. M. Hindmarsh, S.J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D.J. Weir, Numerical simulations of acoustically generated gravitational waves at a first order phase transition, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 123009 [arXiv:1504.03291] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. M. Kakizaki, S. Kanemura and T. Matsui, Gravitational waves as a probe of extended scalar sectors with the first order electroweak phase transition, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 115007 [arXiv:1509.08394] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. K. Hashino, M. Kakizaki, S. Kanemura and T. Matsui, Synergy between measurements of gravitational waves and the triple-Higgs coupling in probing the first-order electroweak phase transition, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 015005 [arXiv:1604.02069] [INSPIRE].

  35. K. Hashino, R. Jinno, M. Kakizaki, S. Kanemura, T. Takahashi and M. Takimoto, Selecting models of first-order phase transitions using the synergy between collider and gravitational-wave experiments, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 075011 [arXiv:1809.04994] [INSPIRE].

  36. R. Zhou and L. Bian, Baryon asymmetry and detectable Gravitational Waves from Electroweak phase transition, arXiv:2001.01237 [INSPIRE].

  37. W. Bernreuther and M. Suzuki, The electric dipole moment of the electron, Rev. Mod. Phys. 63 (1991) 313 [Erratum ibid. 64 (1992) 633] [INSPIRE].

  38. T. Fukuyama, Searching for New Physics beyond the Standard Model in Electric Dipole Moment, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 27 (2012) 1230015 [arXiv:1201.4252] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. R.G. Leigh, S. Paban and R.M. Xu, Electric dipole moment of electron, Nucl. Phys. B 352 (1991) 45 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. D. Bowser-Chao, D. Chang and W.-Y. Keung, Electron electric dipole moment from CP-violation in the charged Higgs sector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 1988 [hep-ph/9703435] [INSPIRE].

  41. M. Jung and A. Pich, Electric Dipole Moments in Two-Higgs-Doublet Models, JHEP 04 (2014) 076 [arXiv:1308.6283] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. T. Abe, J. Hisano, T. Kitahara and K. Tobioka, Gauge invariant Barr-Zee type contributions to fermionic EDMs in the two-Higgs doublet models, JHEP 01 (2014) 106 [Erratum ibid. 04 (2016) 161] [arXiv:1311.4704] [INSPIRE].

  43. K. Cheung, J.S. Lee, E. Senaha and P.-Y. Tseng, Confronting Higgcision with Electric Dipole Moments, JHEP 06 (2014) 149 [arXiv:1403.4775] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. D. Egana-Ugrinovic and S. Thomas, Higgs Boson Contributions to the Electron Electric Dipole Moment, arXiv:1810.08631 [INSPIRE].

  45. K. Cheung, A. Jueid, Y.-N. Mao and S. Moretti, The 2-Higgs-Doublet Model with Soft CP-violation Confronting Electric Dipole Moments and Colliders, arXiv:2003.04178 [INSPIRE].

  46. C. Degrande, A basis of dimension-eight operators for anomalous neutral triple gauge boson interactions, JHEP 02 (2014) 101 [arXiv:1308.6323] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. B. Grzadkowski, O.M. Ogreid and P. Osland, CP-Violation in the ZZZ and ZWW vertices at e+e− colliders in Two-Higgs-Doublet Models, JHEP 05 (2016) 025 [Erratum ibid. 11 (2017) 002] [arXiv:1603.01388] [INSPIRE].

  48. A. Barroso, P.M. Ferreira, R. Santos and J.P. Silva, Probing the scalar-pseudoscalar mixing in the 125 GeV Higgs particle with current data, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 015022 [arXiv:1205.4247] [INSPIRE].

  49. J. Brod, U. Haisch and J. Zupan, Constraints on CP-violating Higgs couplings to the third generation, JHEP 11 (2013) 180 [arXiv:1310.1385] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. M. Aoki, K. Hashino, D. Kaneko, S. Kanemura and M. Kubota, Probing CP-violating Higgs sectors via the precision measurement of coupling constants, PTEP 2019 (2019) 053B02 [arXiv:1808.08770] [INSPIRE].

  51. E. Asakawa, S.Y. Choi, K. Hagiwara and J.S. Lee, Measuring the Higgs CP property through top quark pair production at photon linear colliders, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 115005 [hep-ph/0005313] [INSPIRE].

  52. E. Christova, H. Eberl, W. Majerotto and S. Kraml, CP violation in charged Higgs decays in the MSSM with complex parameters, Nucl. Phys. B 647 (2002) 359 [hep-ph/0205227] [INSPIRE].

  53. Y. Chen, A. Falkowski, I. Low and R. Vega-Morales, New Observables for CP-violation in Higgs Decays, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 113006 [arXiv:1405.6723] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. X. Chen, G. Li and X. Wan, Probe CP-violation in H → γZ through forward-backward asymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 055023 [arXiv:1705.01254] [INSPIRE].

  55. L. Bian, N. Chen and Y. Zhang, CP violation effects in the diphoton spectrum of heavy scalars, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 095008 [arXiv:1706.09425] [INSPIRE].

  56. J.H. Kühn and F. Wagner, Semileptonic Decays of the tau Lepton, Nucl. Phys. B 236 (1984) 16 [INSPIRE].

  57. K. Hagiwara, T. Li, K. Mawatari and J. Nakamura, TauDecay: a library to simulate polarized tau decays via FeynRules and MadGraph5, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2489 [arXiv:1212.6247] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. R. Harnik, A. Martin, T. Okui, R. Primulando and F. Yu, Measuring CP-violation in h → τ+τ− at Colliders, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 076009 [arXiv:1308.1094] [INSPIRE].

  59. D. Jeans and G.W. Wilson, Measuring the CP state of tau lepton pairs from Higgs decay at the ILC, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 013007 [arXiv:1804.01241] [INSPIRE].

  60. S. Bar-Shalom, D. Atwood, G. Eilam, R.R. Mendel and A. Soni, Large tree level CP-violation in e+e− → \( t\overline{t}{H}^0 \) in the two Higgs doublet model, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 1162 [hep-ph/9508314] [INSPIRE].

  61. K. Hagiwara, H. Yokoya and Y.-J. Zheng, Probing the CP properties of top Yukawa coupling at an e+e− collider, JHEP 02 (2018) 180 [arXiv:1712.09953] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. P. Niezurawski, A.F. Zarnecki and M. Krawczyk, Model-independent determination of CP-violation from angular distributions in Higgs boson decays to WW and ZZ at the photon collider, Acta Phys. Polon. B 36 (2005) 833 [hep-ph/0410291] [INSPIRE].

  63. F. Bishara, Y. Grossman, R. Harnik, D.J. Robinson, J. Shu and J. Zupan, Probing CP-violation in h → γγ with Converted Photons, JHEP 04 (2014) 084 [arXiv:1312.2955] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. T.D. Lee, A Theory of Spontaneous T Violation, Phys. Rev. D 8 (1973) 1226 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  65. A. Pich and P. Tuzon, Yukawa Alignment in the Two-Higgs-Doublet Model, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 091702 [arXiv:0908.1554] [INSPIRE].

  66. CMS collaboration, Combined measurements of Higgs boson couplings in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 421 [arXiv:1809.10733] [INSPIRE].

  67. ATLAS collaboration, Combined measurements of Higgs boson production and decay using up to 80 fb−1 of proton-proton collision data at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 012002 [arXiv:1909.02845] [INSPIRE].

  68. S.M. Barr and A. Zee, Electric Dipole Moment of the Electron and of the Neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 21 [Erratum ibid. 65 (1990) 2920] [INSPIRE].

  69. K. Fuyuto, W.-S. Hou and E. Senaha, Cancellation mechanism for the electron electric dipole moment connected with the baryon asymmetry of the Universe, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 011901 [arXiv:1910.12404] [INSPIRE].

  70. F.J. Botella and J.P. Silva, Jarlskog-like invariants for theories with scalars and fermions, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 3870 [hep-ph/9411288] [INSPIRE].

  71. S. Davidson and H.E. Haber, Basis-independent methods for the two-Higgs-doublet model, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 035004 [Erratum ibid. 72 (2005) 099902] [hep-ph/0504050] [INSPIRE].

  72. S.L. Glashow and S. Weinberg, Natural Conservation Laws for Neutral Currents, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 1958 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  73. V.D. Barger, J.L. Hewett and R.J.N. Phillips, New Constraints on the Charged Higgs Sector in Two Higgs Doublet Models, Phys. Rev. D 41 (1990) 3421 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  74. M. Aoki, S. Kanemura, K. Tsumura and K. Yagyu, Models of Yukawa interaction in the two Higgs doublet model, and their collider phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 015017 [arXiv:0902.4665] [INSPIRE].

  75. S. Kanemura, T. Kubota and E. Takasugi, Lee-Quigg-Thacker bounds for Higgs boson masses in a two doublet model, Phys. Lett. B 313 (1993) 155 [hep-ph/9303263] [INSPIRE].

  76. I.F. Ginzburg and I.P. Ivanov, Tree-level unitarity constraints in the most general 2HDM, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 115010 [hep-ph/0508020] [INSPIRE].

  77. A.G. Akeroyd, A. Arhrib and E.-M. Naimi, Note on tree level unitarity in the general two Higgs doublet model, Phys. Lett. B 490 (2000) 119 [hep-ph/0006035] [INSPIRE].

  78. S. Kanemura and K. Yagyu, Unitarity bound in the most general two Higgs doublet model, Phys. Lett. B 751 (2015) 289 [arXiv:1509.06060] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  79. S. Nie and M. Sher, Vacuum stability bounds in the two Higgs doublet model, Phys. Lett. B 449 (1999) 89 [hep-ph/9811234] [INSPIRE].

  80. S. Kanemura, T. Kasai and Y. Okada, Mass bounds of the lightest CP even Higgs boson in the two Higgs doublet model, Phys. Lett. B 471 (1999) 182 [hep-ph/9903289] [INSPIRE].

  81. M.E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, A new constraint on a strongly interacting Higgs sector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 964 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  82. M.E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 381 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  83. H.E. Haber and A. Pomarol, Constraints from global symmetries on radiative corrections to the Higgs sector, Phys. Lett. B 302 (1993) 435 [hep-ph/9207267] [INSPIRE].

  84. A. Pomarol and R. Vega, Constraints on CP-violation in the Higgs sector from the ρ parameter, Nucl. Phys. B 413 (1994) 3 [hep-ph/9305272] [INSPIRE].

  85. B. Grzadkowski, M. Maniatis and J. Wudka, The bilinear formalism and the custodial symmetry in the two-Higgs-doublet model, JHEP 11 (2011) 030 [arXiv:1011.5228] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  86. H.E. Haber and D. O’Neil, Basis-independent methods for the two-Higgs-doublet model III: The CP-conserving limit, custodial symmetry, and the oblique parameters S, T, U, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 055017 [arXiv:1011.6188] [INSPIRE].

  87. S. Kanemura, Y. Okada, H. Taniguchi and K. Tsumura, Indirect bounds on heavy scalar masses of the two-Higgs-doublet model in light of recent Higgs boson searches, Phys. Lett. B 704 (2011) 303 [arXiv:1108.3297] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  88. F. Mahmoudi and O. Stal, Flavor constraints on the two-Higgs-doublet model with general Yukawa couplings, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 035016 [arXiv:0907.1791] [INSPIRE].

  89. M. Jung, A. Pich and P. Tuzon, The \( \overline{B} \) → Xsγ Rate and CP Asymmetry within the Aligned Two-Higgs-Doublet Model, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 074011 [arXiv:1011.5154] [INSPIRE].

  90. ACME collaboration, Improved limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron, Nature 562 (2018) 355 [INSPIRE].

  91. nEDM collaboration, Measurement of the permanent electric dipole moment of the neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 081803 [arXiv:2001.11966] [INSPIRE].

  92. M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Neutron EDM from electric and chromoelectric dipole moments of quarks, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 073015 [hep-ph/0010037] [INSPIRE].

  93. J. Hisano, J.Y. Lee, N. Nagata and Y. Shimizu, Reevaluation of Neutron Electric Dipole Moment with QCD Sum Rules, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 114044 [arXiv:1204.2653] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  94. K. Fuyuto, J. Hisano, N. Nagata and K. Tsumura, QCD Corrections to Quark (Chromo)Electric Dipole Moments in High-scale Supersymmetry, JHEP 12 (2013) 010 [arXiv:1308.6493] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  95. Z.-z. Xing, H. Zhang and S. Zhou, Updated Values of Running Quark and Lepton Masses, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 113016 [arXiv:0712.1419] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  96. J. Bijnens, J. Lu and J. Rathsman, Constraining General Two Higgs Doublet Models by the Evolution of Yukawa Couplings, JHEP 05 (2012) 118 [arXiv:1111.5760] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  97. Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of Particle Physics, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 030001 [INSPIRE].

  98. D. Kawall, Searching for the electron EDM in a storage ring, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 295 (2011) 012031 [INSPIRE].

  99. R. Picker, How the minuscule can contribute to the big picture: the neutron electric dipole moment project at TRIUMF, JPS Conf. Proc. 13 (2017) 010005 [arXiv:1612.00875] [INSPIRE].

  100. K.K.H. Leung et al., The neutron electric dipole moment experiment at the Spallation Neutron Source, EPJ Web Conf. 219 (2019) 02005 [arXiv:1903.02700] [INSPIRE].

  101. V. Anastassopoulos et al., A Storage Ring Experiment to Detect a Proton Electric Dipole Moment, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87 (2016) 115116 [arXiv:1502.04317] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  102. J.A. Grifols and A. Mendez, The WZH± Coupling in SU(2) × U(1) Gauge Models, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 1725 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  103. M. Capdequi Peyranere, H.E. Haber and P. Irulegui, H± → W±γ and H± → W±Z in two Higgs doublet models. 1. The large fermion mass limit, Phys. Rev. D 44 (1991) 191 [INSPIRE].

  104. S. Kanemura, Enhancement of loop induced H±W∓Z0 vertex in two Higgs doublet model, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 095001 [hep-ph/9710237] [INSPIRE].

  105. LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/LHCPhysics/LHCHXSWG.

  106. CMS collaboration, Search for charged Higgs bosons with the H± → τ±ντ decay channel in the fully hadronic final state at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-HIG-16-031, CERN, Geneva (2016).

  107. ATLAS collaboration, Search for charged Higgs bosons decaying via H± → τ±ντ in the τ+jets and τ+lepton final states with 36 fb−1 of pp collision data recorded at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS experiment, JHEP 09 (2018) 139 [arXiv:1807.07915] [INSPIRE].

  108. A. Belyaev, N.D. Christensen and A. Pukhov, CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the Standard Model, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 1729 [arXiv:1207.6082] [INSPIRE].

  109. P.M. Nadolsky et al., Implications of CTEQ global analysis for collider observables, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 013004 [arXiv:0802.0007] [INSPIRE].

  110. T. Plehn, Charged Higgs boson production in bottom gluon fusion, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 014018 [hep-ph/0206121] [INSPIRE].

  111. E.L. Berger, T. Han, J. Jiang and T. Plehn, Associated production of a top quark and a charged Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 115012 [hep-ph/0312286] [INSPIRE].

  112. ATLAS collaboration, Search for heavy Higgs bosons decaying into two tau leptons with the ATLAS detector using pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 051801 [arXiv:2002.12223] [INSPIRE].

  113. S. Gori, H.E. Haber and E. Santos, High scale flavor alignment in two-Higgs doublet models and its phenomenology, JHEP 06 (2017) 110 [arXiv:1703.05873] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  114. G. Passarino and M.J.G. Veltman, One Loop Corrections for e+e− Annihilation Into μ+μ− in the Weinberg Model, Nucl. Phys. B 160 (1979) 151 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  115. A. Djouadi, The anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. I: The Higgs boson in the standard model, Phys. Rept. 457 (2008) 1 [hep-ph/0503172] [INSPIRE].

  116. A. Djouadi, The anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. II. The Higgs bosons in the minimal supersymmetric model, Phys. Rept. 459 (2008) 1 [hep-ph/0503173] [INSPIRE].

  117. G.C. Branco, P.M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M.N. Rebelo, M. Sher and J.P. Silva, Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models, Phys. Rept. 516 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1106.0034] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka, 560-0043, Japan

    Shinya Kanemura, Mitsunori Kubota & Kei Yagyu

Authors
  1. Shinya Kanemura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mitsunori Kubota
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kei Yagyu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitsunori Kubota.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

ArXiv ePrint: 2004.03943

Rights and permissions

This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kanemura, S., Kubota, M. & Yagyu, K. Aligned CP-violating Higgs sector canceling the electric dipole moment. J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 26 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2020)026

Download citation

  • Received: 09 April 2020

  • Revised: 07 June 2020

  • Accepted: 06 July 2020

  • Published: 06 August 2020

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2020)026

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • CP violation
  • Beyond Standard Model
  • Higgs Physics
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Cancel contracts here

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2024 Springer Nature