Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Journal of High Energy Physics
  3. Article

Jet energy drop

  • Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • Open access
  • Published: 05 November 2020
  • Volume 2020, article number 12, (2020)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Jet energy drop
Download PDF
  • Pedro Cal1,2,
  • Kyle Lee  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1827-29583,4,5,
  • Felix Ringer5,6 &
  • …
  • Wouter J. Waalewijn  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5739-46271,2 

  • 349 Accesses

  • 2 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

A preprint version of the article is available at arXiv.

Abstract

We study the jet energy drop, which is the relative difference between the groomed and ungroomed jet energy or transverse momentum. It is one of the fundamental quantities that characterizes the impact of grooming on jets produced in high energy collisions. We consider three different grooming algorithms i) soft drop, ii) iterated soft drop, and iii) trimming. We carry out the resummation of large logarithms of the jet energy drop, the jet radius as well as relevant grooming parameters at next-to-leading logarithmic (NLL′) accuracy. In addition, we account for non-global and clustering logarithms, and determine the next-to-leading order corrections. For soft drop we perform a joint resummation of the jet energy drop and the groomed jet radius, which is necessary to achieve the correct all-order structure of the cross section, in particular for the Sudakov-safe case of soft drop with β = 0. We present numerical results for LHC energies and compare to Pythia simulations as well as CMS data. Our factorization framework predicts the onset of nonperturbative effects in the jet energy distribution, in line with what we find in Pythia. The jet energy drop observables stand out because they only probe soft radiation, making them ideal candidates for the tuning of parton shower Monte Carlo event generators and for probing medium effects in heavy-ion collisions.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

The groomed and ungroomed jet mass distribution for inclusive jet production at the LHC

Article Open access 22 October 2018

Factorization for groomed jet substructure beyond the next-to-leading logarithm

Article Open access 12 July 2016

A study of jet mass distributions with grooming

Article Open access 27 July 2017

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.
  • Experimental Particle Physics
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  1. A.J. Larkoski, I. Moult and B. Nachman, Jet substructure at the Large Hadron Collider: a review of recent advances in theory and machine learning, Phys. Rept. 841 (2020) 1 [arXiv:1709.04464] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Kogler et al., Jet substructure at the Large Hadron Collider: experimental review, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 (2019) 045003 [arXiv:1803.06991] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Marzani, G. Soyez and M. Spannowsky, Looking inside jets: an introduction to jet substructure and boosted-object phenomenology, Springer, Germany (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Krohn, J. Thaler and L.-T. Wang, Jet trimming, JHEP 02 (2010) 084 [arXiv:0912.1342] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. S.D. Ellis, C.K. Vermilion and J.R. Walsh, Recombination algorithms and jet substructure: pruning as a tool for heavy particle searches, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 094023 [arXiv:0912.0033] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, SoftKiller, a particle-level pileup removal method, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 59 [arXiv:1407.0408] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. A.J. Larkoski, S. Marzani, G. Soyez and J. Thaler, Soft drop, JHEP 05 (2014) 146 [arXiv:1402.2657] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Frye, A.J. Larkoski, J. Thaler and K. Zhou, Casimir meets Poisson: improved quark/gluon discrimination with counting observables, JHEP 09 (2017) 083 [arXiv:1704.06266] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. F.A. Dreyer, L. Necib, G. Soyez and J. Thaler, Recursive soft drop, JHEP 06 (2018) 093 [arXiv:1804.03657] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Frye, A.J. Larkoski, M.D. Schwartz and K. Yan, Factorization for groomed jet substructure beyond the next-to-leading logarithm, JHEP 07 (2016) 064 [arXiv:1603.09338] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Marzani, L. Schunk and G. Soyez, A study of jet mass distributions with grooming, JHEP 07 (2017) 132 [arXiv:1704.02210] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Z.-B. Kang, K. Lee, X. Liu and F. Ringer, The groomed and ungroomed jet mass distribution for inclusive jet production at the LHC, JHEP 10 (2018) 137 [arXiv:1803.03645] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Z.-B. Kang, K. Lee, X. Liu, D. Neill and F. Ringer, The soft drop groomed jet radius at NLL, JHEP 02 (2020) 054 [arXiv:1908.01783] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. P. Cal, D. Neill, F. Ringer and W.J. Waalewijn, Calculating the angle between jet axes, JHEP 04 (2020) 211 [arXiv:1911.06840] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the soft-drop jet mass in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 092001 [arXiv:1711.08341] [INSPIRE].

  16. CMS collaboration, Measurement of the splitting function in pp and Pb-Pb collisions at \( \sqrt{s_{NN}} \) = 5.02 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 142302 [arXiv:1708.09429] [INSPIRE].

  17. STAR collaboration, Measurement of the shared momentum fraction zg using jet reconstruction in p+p and Au+Au collisions with STAR, Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc. 289-290 (2017) 137 [arXiv:1703.10933] [INSPIRE].

  18. CMS collaboration, Measurement of the groomed jet mass in PbPb and pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s_{NN}} \) = 5.02 TeV, JHEP 10 (2018) 161 [arXiv:1805.05145] [INSPIRE].

  19. CMS collaboration, Measurements of the differential jet cross section as a function of the jet mass in dijet events from proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, JHEP 11 (2018) 113 [arXiv:1807.05974] [INSPIRE].

  20. ALICE collaboration, Exploration of jet substructure using iterative declustering in pp and Pb-Pb collisions at LHC energies, Phys. Lett. B 802 (2020) 135227 [arXiv:1905.02512] [INSPIRE].

  21. ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the Lund jet plane using charged particles with the ATLAS detector from 13 TeV proton-proton collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 222002 [arXiv:2004.03540].

  22. ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of soft-drop jet observables in pp collisions with the ATLAS detector at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 052007 [arXiv:1912.09837] [INSPIRE].

  23. STAR collaboration, Measurement of groomed jet substructure observables in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 200 GeV with STAR, arXiv:2003.02114 [INSPIRE].

  24. ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the Lund jet plane using charged particles in 13 TeV proton-proton collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 222002 [arXiv:2004.03540] [INSPIRE].

  25. Y. Makris, Transverse momentum dependent fragmenting jet functions with applications to quarkonium production, PoS(QCDEV2017)035 [INSPIRE].

  26. A.J. Larkoski, I. Moult and D. Neill, Factorization and resummation for groomed multi-prong jet shapes, JHEP 02 (2018) 144 [arXiv:1710.00014] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. A.J. Larkoski, I. Moult and D. Neill, Analytic boosted boson discrimination at the Large Hadron Collider, arXiv:1708.06760 [INSPIRE].

  28. J. Baron, S. Marzani and V. Theeuwes, Soft-drop thrust, JHEP 08 (2018) 105 [Erratum ibid. 05 (2019) 056] [arXiv:1803.04719] [INSPIRE].

  29. Z.-B. Kang, K. Lee, X. Liu and F. Ringer, Soft drop groomed jet angularities at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 793 (2019) 41 [arXiv:1811.06983] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Y. Makris and V. Vaidya, Transverse momentum spectra at threshold for groomed heavy quark jets, JHEP 10 (2018) 019 [arXiv:1807.09805] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. A. Kardos, G. Somogyi and Z. Trócsányi, Soft-drop event shapes in electron-positron annihilation at next-to-next-to-leading order accuracy, Phys. Lett. B 786 (2018) 313 [arXiv:1807.11472] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. J. Chay and C. Kim, Factorized groomed jet mass distribution in inclusive jet processes, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 74 (2019) 439 [arXiv:1806.01712] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. D. Napoletano and G. Soyez, Computing N-subjettiness for boosted jets, JHEP 12 (2018) 031 [arXiv:1809.04602] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. C. Lee, P. Shrivastava and V. Vaidya, Predictions for energy correlators probing substructure of groomed heavy quark jets, JHEP 09 (2019) 045 [arXiv:1901.09095] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. A.H. Hoang, S. Mantry, A. Pathak and I.W. Stewart, Nonperturbative corrections to soft drop jet mass, JHEP 12 (2019) 002 [arXiv:1906.11843] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. D. Gutierrez-Reyes, Y. Makris, V. Vaidya, I. Scimemi and L. Zoppi, Probing transverse-momentum distributions with groomed jets, JHEP 08 (2019) 161 [arXiv:1907.05896] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. A. Kardos, A. Larkoski and Z. Trócsányi, Soft-dropped observables with CoLoRFuLNNLO, Acta Phys. Polon. B 50 (2019) 1891 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. S. Marzani, D. Reichelt, S. Schumann, G. Soyez and V. Theeuwes, Fitting the strong coupling constant with soft-drop thrust, JHEP 11 (2019) 179 [arXiv:1906.10504] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Y. Mehtar-Tani, A. Soto-Ontoso and K. Tywoniuk, Dynamical grooming of QCD jets, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 034004 [arXiv:1911.00375] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. A. Kardos, A.J. Larkoski and Z. Trócsányi, Two- and three-loop data for the groomed jet mass, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 114034 [arXiv:2002.05730] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. A.J. Larkoski, Improving the understanding of jet grooming in perturbation theory, JHEP 09 (2020) 072 [arXiv:2006.14680] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. A. Lifson, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, Calculating the primary Lund Jet Plane density, arXiv:2007.06578 [INSPIRE].

  43. ATLAS collaboration, New ATLAS event generator tunes to 2010 data, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-008 (2011).

  44. S. Amoroso et al., Les Houches 2019: Physics at TeV colliders: standard model working group report, in the proceedings of the 11th Les Houches workshop on physics at TeV colliders: PhysTeV Les Houches, June 10–18, Les Houces France (2020) [arXiv:2003.01700] [INSPIRE].

  45. M. Dasgupta, A. Fregoso, S. Marzani and G.P. Salam, Towards an understanding of jet substructure, JHEP 09 (2013) 029 [arXiv:1307.0007] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. A.H. Hoang, S. Mantry, A. Pathak and I.W. Stewart, Extracting a short distance top mass with light grooming, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 074021 [arXiv:1708.02586] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. S. Marzani, L. Schunk and G. Soyez, The jet mass distribution after soft drop, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 96 [arXiv:1712.05105] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. Y.-T. Chien and I.W. Stewart, Col linear drop, JHEP 06 (2020) 064 [arXiv:1907.11107] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. C.W. Bauer, S. Fleming and M.E. Luke, Summing Sudakov logarithms in B → X (sγ) in effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2000) 014006 [hep-ph/0005275] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. C.W. Bauer, S. Fleming, D. Pirjol and I.W. Stewart, An effective field theory for col linear and soft gluons: Heavy to light decays, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 114020 [hep-ph/0011336] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. C.W. Bauer and I.W. Stewart, Invariant operators in col linear effective theory, Phys. Lett. B 516 (2001) 134 [hep-ph/0107001] [INSPIRE].

    MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. C.W. Bauer, D. Pirjol and I.W. Stewart, Soft col linear factorization in effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 054022 [hep-ph/0109045] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. M. Beneke, A.P. Chapovsky, M. Diehl and T. Feldmann, Soft collinear effective theory and heavy to light currents beyond leading power, Nucl. Phys. B 643 (2002) 431 [hep-ph/0206152] [INSPIRE].

    MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. M. Dasgupta and G.P. Salam, Resummation of nonglobal QCD observables, Phys. Lett. B 512 (2001) 323 [hep-ph/0104277] [INSPIRE].

    MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. R.B. Appleby and M.H. Seymour, Nonglobal logarithms in interjet energy flow with kt clustering requirement, JHEP 12 (2002) 063 [hep-ph/0211426] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. A. Banfi, G. Marchesini and G. Smye, Away from jet energy flow, JHEP 08 (2002) 006 [hep-ph/0206076] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. H. Weigert, Nonglobal jet evolution at finite Nc, Nucl. Phys. B 685 (2004) 321 [hep-ph/0312050] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. A. Hornig, C. Lee, J.R. Walsh and S. Zuberi, Double non-global logarithms in-N-out of jets, JHEP 01 (2012) 149 [arXiv:1110.0004] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. A. Hornig, C. Lee, I.W. Stewart, J.R. Walsh and S. Zuberi, Non-global structure of the \( \mathcal{O}\left({\alpha}_s^2\right) \) dijet soft function, JHEP 08 (2011) 054 [Erratum ibid. 10 (2017) 101] [arXiv:1105.4628] [INSPIRE].

  60. M. Dasgupta, K. Khelifa-Kerfa, S. Marzani and M. Spannowsky, On jet mass distributions in Z+jet and dijet processes at the LHC, JHEP 10 (2012) 126 [arXiv:1207.1640] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. Y. Hagiwara, Y. Hatta and T. Ueda, Hemisphere jet mass distribution at finite Nc, Phys. Lett. B 756 (2016) 254 [arXiv:1507.07641] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. S. Caron-Huot, Resummation of non-global logarithms and the BFKL equation, JHEP 03 (2018) 036 [arXiv:1501.03754] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  63. A.J. Larkoski, I. Moult and D. Neill, Non-global logarithms, factorization, and the soft substructure of jets, JHEP 09 (2015) 143 [arXiv:1501.04596] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. T. Becher, M. Neubert, L. Rothen and D.Y. Shao, Factorization and resummation for jet processes, JHEP 11 (2016) 019 [Erratum ibid. 05 (2017) 154] [arXiv:1605.02737] [INSPIRE].

  65. A.J. Larkoski, I. Moult and D. Neill, The analytic structure of non-global logarithms: convergence of the dressed gluon expansion, JHEP 11 (2016) 089 [arXiv:1609.04011] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  66. M. Balsiger, T. Becher and A. Ferroglia, Resummation of non-global logarithms in cross sections with massive particles, JHEP 09 (2020) 029 [arXiv:2006.00014] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  67. Y. Delenda, R. Appleby, M. Dasgupta and A. Banfi, On QCD resummation with kt clustering, JHEP 12 (2006) 044 [hep-ph/0610242] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  68. K. Khelifa-Kerfa, Non-global logs and clustering impact on jet mass with a jet veto distribution, JHEP 02 (2012) 072 [arXiv:1111.2016] [INSPIRE].

    MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  69. Y. Delenda and K. Khelifa-Kerfa, On the resummation of clustering logarithms for non-global observables, JHEP 09 (2012) 109 [arXiv:1207.4528] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  70. R. Kelley, J.R. Walsh and S. Zuberi, Abelian non-global logarithms from soft gluon clustering, JHEP 09 (2012) 117 [arXiv:1202.2361] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  71. R. Kelley, J.R. Walsh and S. Zuberi, Disentangling clustering effects in jet algorithms, arXiv:1203.2923 [INSPIRE].

  72. D. Neill, Non-global and clustering effects for groomed multi-prong jet shapes, JHEP 02 (2019) 114 [arXiv:1808.04897] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  73. A.J. Larkoski, S. Marzani and J. Thaler, Sudakov safety in perturbative QCD, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 111501 [arXiv:1502.01719] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  74. A. Larkoski, I. Moult and D. Neill, Measuring two angularities on a single jet, Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser. 37 (2015) 1560046 [INSPIRE].

    Google Scholar 

  75. M. Procura, W.J. Waalewijn and L. Zeune, Joint resummation of two angularities at next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic order, JHEP 10 (2018) 098 [arXiv:1806.10622] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  76. J. Gallicchio and M.D. Schwartz, Seeing in color: jet superstructure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 022001 [arXiv:1001.5027] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  77. A.J. Larkoski, S. Marzani and C. Wu, Theory predictions for the pull angle, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 091502 [arXiv:1903.02275] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  78. A. Larkoski, S. Marzani and C. Wu, Safe use of jet pull, JHEP 01 (2020) 104 [arXiv:1911.05090] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  79. A. Mukherjee and W. Vogelsang, Jet production in (un)polarized pp collisions: dependence on jet algorithm, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 094009 [arXiv:1209.1785] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  80. M. Dasgupta, F. Dreyer, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, Small-radius jets to al l orders in QCD, JHEP 04 (2015) 039 [arXiv:1411.5182] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  81. D.J. Scott and W.J. Waalewijn, The leading jet transverse momentum in inclusive jet production and with a loose jet veto, JHEP 03 (2020) 159 [arXiv:1912.06673] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  82. F. Aversa, P. Chiappetta, M. Greco and J.P. Guillet, QCD corrections to parton-parton scattering processes, Nucl. Phys. B 327 (1989) 105 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  83. B. Jager, A. Schafer, M. Stratmann and W. Vogelsang, Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to high pT pion production in longitudinally polarized pp collisions, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 054005 [hep-ph/0211007] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  84. T. Kaufmann, A. Mukherjee and W. Vogelsang, Hadron fragmentation inside jets in hadronic col lisions, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 054015 [Erratum ibid. 101 (2020) 079901] [arXiv:1506.01415] [INSPIRE].

  85. Z.-B. Kang, F. Ringer and I. Vitev, The semi-inclusive jet function in SCET and small radius resummation for inclusive jet production, JHEP 10 (2016) 125 [arXiv:1606.06732] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  86. L. Dai, C. Kim and A.K. Leibovich, Fragmentation of a jet with small radius, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 114023 [arXiv:1606.07411] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  87. V.N. Gribov and L.N. Lipatov, Deep inelastic ep scattering in perturbation theory, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 15 (1972) 438 [Yad. Fiz. 15 (1972) 781] [INSPIRE].

  88. G. Altarelli and G. Parisi, Asymptotic freedom in parton language, Nucl. Phys. B 126 (1977) 298 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  89. Y.L. Dokshitzer, Calculation of the structure functions for deep inelastic scattering and e+ e− annihilation by perturbation theory in quantum chromodynamics., Sov. Phys. JETP 46 (1977) 641 [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 73 (1977) 1216] [INSPIRE].

  90. P. Cal, F. Ringer and W.J. Waalewijn, The jet shape at NLL’, JHEP 05 (2019) 143 [arXiv:1901.06389] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  91. M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, The anti-kt jet clustering algorithm, JHEP 04 (2008) 063 [arXiv:0802.1189] [INSPIRE].

    MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  92. Y.L. Dokshitzer, G.D. Leder, S. Moretti and B.R. Webber, Better jet clustering algorithms, JHEP 08 (1997) 001 [hep-ph/9707323] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  93. M. Wobisch and T. Wengler, Hadronization corrections to jet cross-sections in deep inelastic scattering, in the proceedings of the Workshop on Monte Carlo Generators for HERA Physics (Plenary Starting Meeting), April 27–30, Hamburg, Germany (1998) [hep-ph/9907280] [INSPIRE].

    Google Scholar 

  94. W.T. Giele and E.W. Glover, Higher order corrections to jet cross-sections in e+ e− annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 1980 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  95. B. Andersson, G. Gustafson, L. Lönnblad and U. Pettersson, Coherence effects in deep inelastic scattering, Z. Phys. C 43 (1989) 625 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  96. C.W. Bauer, F.J. Tackmann, J.R. Walsh and S. Zuberi, Factorization and resummation for dijet invariant mass spectra, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 074006 [arXiv:1106.6047] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  97. M. Procura, W.J. Waalewijn and L. Zeune, Resummation of double-differential cross sections and fully-unintegrated parton distribution functions, JHEP 02 (2015) 117 [arXiv:1410.6483] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  98. S. Fleming, A.H. Hoang, S. Mantry and I.W. Stewart, Top jets in the peak region: factorization analysis with NLL resummation, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 114003 [arXiv:0711.2079] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  99. I.W. Stewart, F.J. Tackmann and W.J. Waalewijn, The quark beam function at NNLL, JHEP 09 (2010) 005 [arXiv:1002.2213] [INSPIRE].

    MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  100. Z. Ligeti, I.W. Stewart and F.J. Tackmann, Treating the b quark distribution function with reliable uncertainties, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 114014 [arXiv:0807.1926] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  101. M.D. Schwartz and H.X. Zhu, Nonglobal logarithms at three loops, four loops, five loops, and beyond, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 065004 [arXiv:1403.4949] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  102. A. Banfi, M. Dasgupta, K. Khelifa-Kerfa and S. Marzani, Non-global logarithms and jet algorithms in high-pT jet shapes, JHEP 08 (2010) 064 [arXiv:1004.3483] [INSPIRE].

    MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  103. T. Sjöstrand et al., An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 [arXiv:1410.3012] [INSPIRE].

    MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  104. S. Dulat et al., New parton distribution functions from a global analysis of quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 033006 [arXiv:1506.07443] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  105. D. Bertolini, M.P. Solon and J.R. Walsh, Integrated and differential accuracy in resummed cross sections, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 054024 [arXiv:1701.07919] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  106. Z.-B. Kang, F. Ringer and W.J. Waalewijn, The energy distribution of subjets and the jet shape, JHEP 07 (2017) 064 [arXiv:1705.05375] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  107. CMS collaboration, Measurement of groomed jet mass in PbPb and pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s_{NN}} \) = 5.02 TeV, CMS-PAS-HIN-16-024, (2017).

  108. ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the jet mass in high transverse momentum Z(→ \( b\overline{b} \))γ production at \( \sqrt{s} \)= 13 TeV using the ATLAS detector, arXiv:1907.07093 [INSPIRE].

  109. CMS collaboration, Search for low mass vector resonances decaying into quark-antiquark pairs in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 112007 [arXiv:1909.04114] [INSPIRE].

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Theoretical Physics Amsterdam and Delta Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Pedro Cal & Wouter J. Waalewijn

  2. Nikhef, Theory Group, Science Park 105, 1098 XG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Pedro Cal & Wouter J. Waalewijn

  3. C.N. Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA

    Kyle Lee

  4. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA

    Kyle Lee

  5. Nuclear Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA

    Kyle Lee & Felix Ringer

  6. Physics Department, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA

    Felix Ringer

Authors
  1. Pedro Cal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kyle Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Felix Ringer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wouter J. Waalewijn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyle Lee.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

ArXiv ePrint: 2007.12187

Rights and permissions

Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cal, P., Lee, K., Ringer, F. et al. Jet energy drop. J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 12 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2020)012

Download citation

  • Received: 12 August 2020

  • Revised: 24 September 2020

  • Accepted: 28 September 2020

  • Published: 05 November 2020

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2020)012

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Jets
  • QCD Phenomenology
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Cancel contracts here

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature