Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Outcome of a modular tapered uncemented titanium femoral stem in revision hip arthroplasty

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Revision hip arthroplasty using a modular tapered design gives the possibility for customising the prostheses to the individual anatomy intra-operatively. The success of this kind of surgery is still controversial due to the relative lack of medium- to long-term follow-up. Therefore we analysed the clinical and radiological outcome of the modular MRP-TITAN stem with diaphyseal fixation in revision hip surgery.

Methods

In this retrospective study we included 136 consecutive patients with MRP-TITAN stem implanted during revision hip arthroplasty. The average follow-up was 55 months. For clinical evaluation we used the Harris Hip Score and the Merle d’Aubigné and Postel score. The health-related quality of life was determined with the visual analogue pain scale.

Results

The surgeries were performed 109 months after primary total hip arthroplasty on average. The main indications for the MRP-TITAN revision stem were aseptic loosening, infection, and periprosthetic fracture. In the clinical outcome, patients achieved 75.1 points in the Harris Hip Score and 14.4 points in the Merle d’Aubigné and Postel Score. Mean level of persisting pain was 0.7 (VAS). The overall survival of the MRP stem in revision hip arthroplasty revealed 85.6 % survival at 9.75 years’ follow-up with a repeat revision rate of 6.8 %.

Conclusions

Performing revision hip arthroplasty using the MRP-TITAN stem revealed a good clinical outcome. There is a tendency for better results in comparison with the information given in literature for cementless modular revision stems including a lower rate in re-revisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fink B, Grossmann A, Schubring S, Schulz MS, Fuerst M (2009) Short-term results of hip revisions with a curved cementless modular stem in association with the surgical approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:65–73. doi:10.1007/s00402-008-0617-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berry DJ (2002) Femoral revision: distal fixation with fluted, tapered grit-blasted stems. J Arthroplast 17:142–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mumme T, Muller-Rath R, Weisskopf M, Andereya S, Neuss M, Wirtz DC (2004) The cement-free modular revision prosthesis MRP-hip revision stem prosthesis in clinical follow-up. Z Orthop Grenzgeb 142:314–321. doi:10.1055/s-2004-822795

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gravius S, Randau T, Wirtz DC (2011) What can be done when hip prostheses fail?:new trends in revision endoprosthetics. Orthopade 40:1084–1094. doi:10.1007/s00132-011-1844-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wirtz DC, Gravius S, Ascherl R, Forst R, Noeth U, Maus UM, Zeiler G, Moritz CD (2014) Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using a modular tapered, fluted titanium stem. Acta Orthop 85:562–569. doi:10.3109/17453674.2014.958809

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mumme T, Muller-Rath R, Andereya S, Wirtz DC (2007) Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem. Oper Orthop Traumatol 19:56–77. doi:10.1007/s00064-007-1195-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kavanagh BF, Fitzgerald RH Jr (1985) Clinical and roentgenographic assessment of total hip arthroplasty. A new hip score. Clin Orthop Relat Res (193):133–140

  8. Pak JH, Paprosky WG, Jablonsky WS, Lawrence JM (1993) Femoral strut allografts in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (295):172–178

  9. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:1629–1632

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wagner H, Wagner M (1993) Femur revision prosthesis. Z Orthop Grenzgeb 131:574–577. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1040074

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bohm P, Bischel O (2001) Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem: evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:1023–1031

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Randhawa K, Hossain FS, Smith B, Mauffrey C, Lawrence T (2009) A prospective study of hip revision surgery using the Exeter long-stem prosthesis: function, subsidence, and complications for 57 patients. J Orthop Traumatol 10:159–165. doi:10.1007/s10195-009-0068-0

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS (2013) Behaviour of the ultra-short anatomic cementless femoral stem in young and elderly patients. Int Orthop 37:2323–2330. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-2044-9

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schuh A, Werber S, Holzwarth U, Zeiler G (2004) Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years’ follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:306–309. doi:10.1007/s00402-004-0656-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wimmer MD, Randau TM, Deml MC, Ascherl R, Noth U, Forst R, Gravius N, Wirtz D, Gravius S (2013) Impaction grafting in the femur in cementless modular revision total hip arthroplasty: a descriptive outcome analysis of 243 cases with the MRP-TITAN revision implant. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14:19. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-14-19

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gravius S, Mumme T, Andereya S, Maus U, Muller-Rath R, Wirtz DC (2007) The morse taper junction in modular revision hip replacement. Z Orthop Unfallchirurgie 145:157–160. doi:10.1055/s-2007-965182

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hernigou P, Queinnec S, Flouzat Lachaniette CH (2013) One hundred and fifty years of history of the Morse taper: from Stephen A. Morse in 1864 to complications related to modularity in hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 37:2081–2088. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-1927-0

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wirtz DC, Heller KD, Holzwarth U, Siebert C, Pitto RP, Zeiler G, Blencke BA, Forst R (2000) A modular femoral implant for uncemented stem revision in THR. Int Orthop 24:134–138

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gutierrez Del Alamo J, Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Castellanos V, Gil-Garay E (2007) Radiographic bone regeneration and clinical outcome with the Wagner SL revision stem: a 5-year to 12-year follow-up study. J Arthroplast 22:515–524. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. van Diemen MP, Colen S, Dalemans AA, Stuyck J, Mulier M (2013) Two-stage revision of an infected total hip arthroplasty: a follow-up of 136 patients. Hip Int 23:445–450. doi:10.5301/hipint.5000049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopaedic Clinic Koenig-Ludwig-Haus, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Julius-Maximilians-University Wuerzburg, Brettreichstr. 11, 97074, Wuerzburg, Germany

    Maik Hoberg, Christian Konrads, Jana Engelien, Dorothee Oschmann, Michael Holder, Matthias Walcher & Maximilian Rudert

Authors
  1. Maik Hoberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christian Konrads
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jana Engelien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dorothee Oschmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michael Holder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Matthias Walcher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Maximilian Rudert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maik Hoberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoberg, M., Konrads, C., Engelien, J. et al. Outcome of a modular tapered uncemented titanium femoral stem in revision hip arthroplasty. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 39, 1709–1713 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2699-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2699-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation