Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

A survey on question answering systems over linked data and documents

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Information Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Question Answering (QA) systems aim at supplying precise answers to questions, posed by users in a natural language form. They are used in a wide range of application areas, from bio-medicine to tourism. Their underlying knowledge source can be structured data (e.g. RDF graphs and SQL databases), unstructured data in the form of plain text (e.g. textual excerpts from Wikipedia), or combinations of the above. In this paper we survey the recent work that has been done in the area of stateless QA systems with emphasis on methods that have been applied in RDF and Linked Data, documents, and mixtures of these. We identify the main challenges, we categorize the existing approaches according to various aspects, we review 21 recent systems, and 23 evaluation and training datasets that are most commonly used in the literature categorized according to the type of the domain, the underlying knowledge source, the provided tasks, and the associated evaluation metrics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/

  2. https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/

  3. http://wiki.dbpedia.org/projects/dbpedia-lookup

  4. https://trec.nist.gov/data/qa.html

  5. https://deeplearning4j.org/word2vec.html

  6. https://www.mpi-inf.mpg.de/departments/databases-and-information-systems/research/yago-naga/patty/

  7. http://wordnet.princeton.edu/

  8. https://stanfordnlp.github.io/CoreNLP/

  9. https://github.com/dbpedia-spotlight/dbpedia-spotlight/wiki/Installation

  10. http://aksw.org/Projects/FOX.html

References

  • Abacha, A.B., & Zweigenbaum, P. (2015). Means: A medical question-answering system combining nlp techniques and semantic web technologies. Information Processing and Management, 51(5), 570–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abend, O., Reichart, R., Rappoport, A. (2009). Unsupervised argument identification for semantic role labeling. In Procs of the Joint Conf. of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th Intern. Joint Conf. on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP (pp. 28–36): Association for Computational Linguistics.

  • Abney, S.P. (1991). Parsing by chunks. In Principle-based parsing (pp 257–278): Springer.

  • Allam, A.M.N., & Haggag, M.H. (2012). The question answering systems: A survey. International Journal of Research and Reviews in Information Sciences (IJRRIS), 2,(3).

  • Anam, S., Kim, Y.S., Kang, B.H., Liu, Q. (2016). Adapting a knowledge-based schema matching system for ontology mapping. In Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference, ACSW ’16 (pp. 27:1–27:10). New York: ACM.

  • El Asri, L., Schulz, H., Sharma, S., Zumer, J., Harris, J., Fine, E., Mehrotra, R., Suleman, K. (2017). Frames: A corpus for adding memory to goal-oriented dialogue systems. CoRR, arXiv:1704.00057.

  • Auer, S., Bizer, C., Kobilarov, G., Lehmann, J., Cyganiak, R., Ives, Z. (2007). Dbpedia: A nucleus for a web of open data. The semantic web, 722–735.

  • Bast, H., & Haussmann, E. (2015). More accurate question answering on freebase. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 1431–1440): ACM.

  • Baudiš, P., & Šedivỳ, J. (2015). Modeling of the question answering task in the yodaqa system. In International Conference of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum for European Languages (pp. 222–228): Springer.

  • Berant, J., Chou, A., Frostig, R., Liang, P. (2013). Semantic parsing on freebase from question-answer pairs. EMNLP, 2, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berant, J., & Liang, P. (2014). Semantic parsing via paraphrasing. In ACL (1) (pp. 1415–1425).

  • Berant, J., & Liang, P. (2015). Imitation learning of agenda-based semantic parsers. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 3, 545–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisk, Y., Reddy, S., Blitzer, J., Hockenmaier, J., Steedman, M. (2016). Evaluating induced ccg parsers on grounded semantic parsing. arXiv:1609.09405.

  • Bollacker, K., Evans, C., Paritosh, P., Sturge, T., Taylor, J. (2008). Freebase: a collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data (pp. 1247–1250): ACM.

  • Bonadiman, D., Uva, A.E., Moschitti, A. (2017). Multitask learning with deep neural networks for community question answering. CoRR, arXiv:1702.03706.

  • Bordes, A., Usunier, N., Chopra, S., Weston, J. (2015). Large-scale simple question answering with memory networks. CoRR, arXiv:1506.02075.

  • Cao, Y., Liu, F., Simpson, P., Antieau, L., Bennett, A., Cimino, J.J., Ely, J., Yu, H. (2011). Askhermes: An online question answering system for complex clinical questions. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 44(2), 277–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, A., Simperl, E., Koesten, Laura, Konstantinidis, G., Ibáñez-Gonzalez, L.-D., Kacprzak, E., Groth, Paul. (2019). Dataset search: a survey. arXiv:1901.00735.

  • Chen, D., Fisch, A., Weston, J., Bordes, A. (2017). Reading wikipedia to answer open-domain questions. CoRR, arXiv:1704.00051.

  • Chu-Carroll, J., Fan, J., Schlaefer, N., Zadrozny, W. (2012). Textual resource acquisition and engineering. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 56 (3.4), 4–1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cimiano, P., Lopez, V., Unger, C., Cabrio, E., Ngonga Ngomo, A., Walter, S. (2013). Data: Multilingual Question Answering over Linked (QALD-3): Lab Overview, (pp. 321–332). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, Z., Li, L., Xu, W. (2016). Cfo: Conditional focused neural question answering with large-scale knowledge bases. arXiv:1606.01994.

  • Das, R., Zaheer, M., Reddy, S., McCallum, A. (2017). Question answering on knowledge bases and text using universal schema and memory networks. arXiv:1704.08384.

  • Devi, M., & Dua, M. (2017). Adans: An agriculture domain question answering system using ontologies. In 2017 International Conference on Computing, Communication and Automation (ICCCA) (pp. 122–127). IEEE.

  • Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K. (2018). Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. CORR arXiv:1810.04805.

  • Dhuliawala, S., Kanojia, D., Bhattacharyya, P. (2016). Slangnet: A wordnet like resource for english slang. In LREC.

  • Diefenbach, D, Hormozi, N, Amjad, S., Both, A. (2017a). Introducing feedback in qanary: How users can interact with QA systems. In European Semantic Web Conference (pp. 81–86): Springer.

  • Diefenbach, D., Singh, K., Both, A., Cherix, D., Lange, C., Auer, S. (2017b). The qanary ecosystem: getting new insights by composing question answering pipelines. In International Conference on Web Engineering (pp. 171–189): Springer.

  • Dimitrakis, E., Sgontzos, K., Papadakos, P., Marketakis, Y., Papangelis, A., Stylianou, Y., Tzitzikas, Y. (2018). On finding the relevant user reviews for advancing conversational faceted search. EMSASW@ ESWC.

  • Dodge, J., Gane, A., Zhang, X., Bordes, A., Chopra, S., Miller, A.H., Szlam, A., Weston, J. (2015). Evaluating prerequisite qualities for learning end-to-end dialog systems. CoRR, arXiv:1511.06931.

  • Dubey, M., Banerjee, D., Chaudhuri, D., Lehmann, J. (2018). Earl: Joint entity and relation linking for question answering over knowledge graphs. In International Semantic Web Conference (pp. 108–126): Springer.

  • Fader, A., Soderland, S., Etzioni, O. (2011). Identifying relations for open information extraction. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 1535–1545): Association for Computational Linguistics.

  • Feng, Y., Huang, S., Zhao, D., et al. (2016). Hybrid question answering over knowledge base and free text. In Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers (pp. 2397–2407).

  • Ferret, O., Grau, B., Hurault-Plantet, M., Illouz, G., Monceaux, L., Robba, I., Vilnat, A. (2001). Finding an answer based on the recognition of the question focus. In TREC.

  • Ferrucci, D., Brown, E., Chu-Carroll, J., Fan, J., Gondek, D., Kalyanpur, A.A., Lally, A., Murdock, J.W., Nyberg, E., Prager, J., et al. (2010). Building watson: an overview of the deepqa project. AI Magazine, 31(3), 59–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrucci, D.A. (2012). Introduction to ”this is watson”. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 56(3.4), 1–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrucci, D., Levas, A., Bagchi, S., Gondek, D., Mueller, E.T. (2013). Watson: beyond jeopardy!. Artificial Intelligence, 199, 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangemi, A., Presutti, V., Recupero, D.R., Nuzzolese, A.G., Draicchio, F., Mongiovì, M. (2017). Semantic web machine reading with fred. Semantic Web, 8(6), 873–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, B.F., Jr., Wolf, A.K., Chomsky, C., Laughery, K. (1961). Baseball: an automatic question-answerer. In Papers presented at the May 9-11, 1961, western joint IRE-AIEE-ACM computer conference (pp. 219–224): ACM.

  • Gupta, P., & Gupta, V. (2012). A survey of text question answering techniques. International Journal of Computer Applications, 53(4).

  • Gustafson, J., Bell, L., Beskow, J., Boye, J., Carlson, R., Edlund, J., Granström, B., House, D., Wirén, M. (2000). Adapt—a multimodal conversational dialogue system in an apartment domain. In The Sixth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) (pp. 134–137). Beijing.

  • He, S., Liu, S., Chen, Y., Zhou, G., Liu, K., Zhao, J. (2013). Casia@ qald-3: A question answering system over linked data. In CLEF (Working Notes).

  • Hermann, K.M., Kocisky, T., Grefenstette, E., Espeholt, L., Kay, W., Suleyman, M., Blunsom, P. (2015). Teaching machines to read and comprehend. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 1693–1701).

  • Herzog, O., & Rollinger, C.-R. (1991). Text understanding in LILOG: integrating computational linguistics and artificial intelligence: final report on the IBM Germany LILOG-project. Berlin: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett, D., Lacoste, A., Jones, L., Polosukhin, I., Fandrianto, A., Han, J., Kelcey, M., Berthelot, D. (2016). Wikireading: A novel large-scale language understanding task over wikipedia. CoRR, arXiv:1608.03542.

  • Hill, F., Bordes, A., Chopra, S., Weston, J. (2015). The goldilocks principle: Reading children’s books with explicit memory representations. arXiv:1511.02301.

  • Höffner, K., Walter, S., Marx, E., Usbeck, R., Lehmann, J., Ngonga Ngomo, A.-C. (2016). Survey on challenges of Question Answering in the Semantic Web. Semantic Web Journal.

  • Iyyer, M., Boyd-Graber, J.L., Claudino, L.M.B., Socher, R., Daumé, H. III. (2014). A neural network for factoid question answering over paragraphs. In EMNLP (pp. 633–644).

  • Konstantinova, N., & Orasan, C. (2012). Interactive question answering. Emerging Applications of Natural Language Processing: Concepts and New Research (pp. 149–169).

  • Kumar, H., Agarwal, A., Joshi, S. (2018). Dialogue-act-driven conversation model: an experimental study. In Proc. of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 1246–1256).

  • Lally, A., Prager, J.M., McCord, M.C., Boguraev, B.K., Patwardhan, S., Fan, J., Fodor, P., Chu-Carroll, J. (2012). Question analysis: How watson reads a clue. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 56(3.4), 2–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., & Roth, D. (2006). Learning question classifiers: The role of semantic information. Natural Language Engineering, 12(3), 229–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J. (2007). An exploration of the principles underlying redundancy-based factoid question answering. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 25(2), 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., Hu, Q., Zhang, Y., Xing, C., Sheng, M. (2017). A knowledge-based health question answering system. In Smart Health (pp. 286–291). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  • Lukovnikov, D., Fischer, A., Lehmann, J., Auer, S. (2017). Neural network-based question answering over knowledge graphs on word and character level. In Procs of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 1211–1220).

  • Manning, C.D., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J.R., Bethard, S., McClosky, D. (2014). The stanford corenlp natural language processing toolkit. In ACL (System Demonstrations) (pp 55–60).

  • McCrae, J., Spohr, D., Cimiano, P. (2011). Linking lexical resources and ontologies on the semantic web with lemon. In Extended Semantic Web Conference (pp. 245–259). Springer.

  • Mendes, P.N., Jakob, M., García-Silva, A., Bizer, C. (2011). Dbpedia spotlight: Shedding light on the web of documents. In Procs of the 7th International Conference on Semantic Systems, I-Semantics ’11.

  • Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G.S., Dean, J. (2013). Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (vol. 26, pp. 3111–3119).

  • Miller, G.A. (1995). Wordnet: A lexical database for english. Communications of the ACM, 38(11), 39–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A.H., Fisch, A., Dodge, J., Karimi, A., Bordes, A., Weston, J. (2016). Key-value memory networks for directly reading documents. CoRR, arXiv:1606.03126.

  • Mishra, A., & Jain, S.K. (2016). A survey on question answering systems with classification. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 28 (3), 345–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mollá, D., & Vicedo, J.L. (2007). Question answering in restricted domains An overview. Computer Linguistics, 33(1), 41–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreo, A, Castro, J L, Zurita, J M. (2017). Towards portable natural language interfaces based on case-based reasoning. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 1–34.

  • Mountantonakis, M., & Tzitzikas, Y. (2016). On measuring the lattice of commonalities among several linked datasets. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 9 (12), 1101–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mountantonakis, M., & Tzitzikas, Y. (2018). Scalable methods for measuring the connectivity and quality of large numbers of linked datasets. ACM Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ), 9(3), 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountantonakis, M., & Tzitzikas, Y. (2019). Large scale semantic integration of linked data: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 52(5).

  • Nakashole, N., Weikum, G., Suchanek, F. (2012). Patty: A taxonomy of relational patterns with semantic types. In Procs of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (pp. 1135–1145).

  • Norouzi, N., Bruder, G., Belna, B., Mutter, S., Turgut, D., Welch, G. (2019). A systematic review of the convergence of augmented reality, intelligent virtual agents, and the internet of things. In Artificial Intelligence in IoT (pp. 1–24): Springer.

  • Ogden, W., Mcdonald, J., Bernick, P., Chadwick, R. (2008). Habitability in question-answering systems. In Advances in Open Domain Question Answering (pp. 457–473). Springer.

  • Papangelis, A., Papadakos, P., Kotti, M., Stylianou, Y., Tzitzikas, Y., Plexousakis, D. (2017). Ld-sds: Towards an expressive spoken dialogue system based on linked-data. In Search Oriented Conversational AI, SCAI 17 Workshop (co-located with ICTIR) (pp. 17).

  • Park, S., Kwon, S., Kim, B., Lee, G.G. (2015). Isoft at qald-5: Hybrid question answering system over linked data and text data. In CLEF (Working Notes).

  • Pasupat, P., & Liang, P. (2015). Compositional semantic parsing on semi-structured tables. arXiv:1508.00305.

  • Pathak, S., & Mishra, N. (2016). Context aware restricted tourism domain question answering system. In 2016 2nd International Conference on Next Generation Computing Technologies (NGCT) (pp. 534–539): IEEE.

  • Patra, B. (2017). A survey of community question answering. CoRR, arXiv:1705.04009.

  • Penas, A., Unger, C., Ngomo, A.-C.N. (2014). Overview of CLEF Question Answering Track 2014, (pp. 300–306). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, J., Socher, R., Manning, C. (2014). Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In Procs of the 2014 conf. on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP) (pp. 1532–1543).

  • Peters, M.E., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., Zettlemoyer, L. (2018). Deep contextualized word representations. CORR arXiv:1802.05365.

  • Pham, M., Alse, S., Knoblock, C.A., Szekely, P. (2016). Semantic Labeling: A Domain-Independent Approach, (pp. 446–462). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popescu, A.-M., Etzioni, O., Kautz, H. (2003). Towards a theory of natural language interfaces to databases. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces (pp. 149–157): ACM.

  • Presutti, V., Draicchio, F., Gangemi, A. (2012). Knowledge extraction based on discourse representation theory and linguistic frames. In International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (pp. 114–129): Springer.

  • Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., Liang, P. (2016). Squad: 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text. arXiv:1606.05250.

  • Ramnandan, S. K., Mittal, A., Knoblock, C.A., Szekely, P. (2015). Assigning Semantic Labels to Data Sources, (pp. 403–417). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedel, S., Yao, L., McCallum, A., Marlin, B. M. (2013). Relation extraction with matrix factorization and universal schemas. In Procs of the 2013 Conf. of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies.

  • Rodrigo, A. (2017). Anselmo penas A study about the future evaluation of question-answering systems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 137, 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasikumar, U., & Sindhu, L. (2014). A survey of natural language question answering system. International Journal of Computer Applications, 108(15).

  • Savenkov, D., & Agichtein, E. (2016). When a knowledge base is not enough: Question answering over knowledge bases with external text data. In Procs of the 39th Intern. ACM SIGIR Conference.

  • Schmidt, M., & Braunger, P. (2018). A survey on different means of personalized dialog output for an adaptive personal assistant. In Adjunct Publication of the 26th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (pp. 75–81): ACM.

  • Serban, I.V., Lowe, R., Henderson, P., Charlin, L., Pineau, J. (2015). A survey of available corpora for building data-driven dialogue systems. CoRR, arXiv:1512.05742.

  • Singh, K., Both, A., Diefenbach, D., Shekarpour, S., Cherix, D., Lange, C. (2016). Qanary–the fast track to creating a question answering system with linked data technology. In International Semantic Web Conference (pp. 183–188): Springer.

  • Song, S., Zhang, X., Qin, G. (2017). Multi-domain ontology mapping based on semantics. Cluster Computing.

  • Speck, R., & Ngomo, A.-C.N. (2014). Ensemble learning for named entity recognition. In International semantic web conference (pp. 519–534): Springer.

  • Trivedi, P., Maheshwari, G., Dubey, M., Lehmann, J. (2017). Lc-quad: A corpus for complex question answering over knowledge graphs. In International Semantic Web Conference (pp. 210–218): Springer.

  • Unger, C., Forascu, C., López, V., Ngomo, A.-C.N., Cabrio, E., Cimiano, P., Walter, S. (2015). Question answering over linked data (QALD-5). In Working Notes of CLEF 2015 - Conference and Labs of the Evaluation forum: Toulouse, France.

  • Unger, C., Ngomo, A.-C.N., Cabrio, E. (2016). 6th Open Challenge on Question Answering over Linked Data (QALD-6), (pp. 171–177). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voorhees, E.M., & Tice, D.M. (2000). Building a question answering test collection. In Procs of the 23rd annual inter. ACM SIGIR conf. on Research and development in information retrieval (pp. 200–207): ACM.

  • Wang, M. (2006). A survey of answer extraction techniques in factoid question answering. Computational Linguistics, 1(1).

  • Wang, W., Yang, N., Wei, F., Chang, B., Zhou, M. (2017). Gated self-matching networks for reading comprehension and question answering. In Procs of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (vol. 1, pp. 189–198).

  • Wang, Z., Wang, Z., Long, Y., Wang, J., Xu, Z., Wang, B. (2019). Enhancing generative conversational service agents with dialog history and external knowledge. Computer Speech & Language, 54, 71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, Y., Dhingra, B., Salakhutdinov, R. (2017). Question answering from unstructured text by retrieval and comprehension. CoRR, arXiv:1703.08885.

  • Woods, W.A. (1973). Progress in natural language understanding: an application to lunar geology. In Procs of the June 4-8, 1973, national computer conference and exposition (pp. 441–450): ACM.

  • Xiong, C., Xhong, V., Socher, R. (2016). Dynamic coattention networks for question answering. arXiv:1611.01604.

  • Xu, K., Zhang, S., Feng, Y., Zhao, D. (2014). Answering natural language questions via phrasal semantic parsing. In Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing (pp. 333–344): Springer.

  • Xu, K., Reddy, S., Feng, Y., Huang, S., Zhao, D. (2016). Question answering on freebase via relation extraction and textual evidence. arXiv:1603.00957.

  • Yang, L., Ai, Q., Spina, D., Chen, R.-C., Pang, L., Croft, W.B., Guo, J., Scholer, F. (2016). Beyond factoid qa: effective methods for non-factoid answer sentence retrieval. In European Conference on Information Retrieval (pp. 115–128): Springer.

  • Yi, Y., Yih, W.-T., Meek, C. (2015). Wikiqa: A challenge dataset for open-domain question answering. In EMNLP (pp. 2013–2018).

  • Yi, Y., & Chang, M.-W. (2016). S-mart: Novel tree-based structured learning algorithms applied to tweet entity linking. arXiv:1609.08075.

  • Yao, X., Berant, J., Van Durme, B., Qa, F. (2014a). Information extraction or semantic parsing. In Proceedings of ACL.

  • Yao, X., & Van Durme, B. (2014b). Information extraction over structured data: Question answering with freebase. In ACL (1) (pp. 956–966).

  • Yih, W.-T., Chang, M.-W., He, X., Gao, J. (2015). Semantic parsing via staged query graph generation: Question answering with knowledge base. In Procs of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th Intern, Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (vol. 1).

  • Zhang, Y., He, S., Liu, K., Zhao, J. (2016). A joint model for question answering over multiple knowledge bases. In AAAI (pp. 3094–3100).

  • Zou, L., Huang, R., Wang, H., Yu, J. X., He, W., Zhao, D. (2014). Natural language question answering over rdf: a graph data driven approach. In Procs of the SIGMOD international conference on Management of data (pp 313–324): ACM.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Michalis Mountantonakis, Katerina Papantoniou and Yannis Marketakis for making suggestions that improved the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Eleftherios Dimitrakis or Yannis Tzitzikas.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dimitrakis, E., Sgontzos, K. & Tzitzikas, Y. A survey on question answering systems over linked data and documents. J Intell Inf Syst 55, 233–259 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-019-00584-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-019-00584-7

Keywords