Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Exploring the invisible college of citizen science: questions, methods and contributions

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study contributes to an understanding of citizen science using the lens of collaborative scientific communication and methods as a key part of theoretically driven citizen science projects. Findings of this study demonstrate application of diverse research methodologies to understand various aspects of individuals’ participation in science projects, including incentives for engagement and motivation. Research questions addressed by citizen science studies revealed seven broad areas of scholarly interest: natural science, behavior, social justice, technology, education, research design, and health. Citizen science research was predominantly led by questions associated with natural and behavioral sciences, including environmentalism and conservation, climate and climate change, environmental monitoring, and the motivations of individuals to become citizen scientists. Applied citizen science research demonstrated a relatively higher preference for survey and mixed method approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. MeSH Citizen Science Tree Structure: https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov/record/ui?ui=D000080029.

  2. WoS Search Tips: https://clarivate.libguides.com/woscc/searchtips.

References

  • Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K. V., & Shirk, J. (2009). Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59(11), 977–984. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonney, R., Phillips, T. B., Ballard, H. L., & Enck, J. W. (2016). Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), 2–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brossard, D., Lewenstein, B., & Bonney, R. (2005). Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1099–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, C. W. (2019). Critical perspectives on international pharmaceutical innovation: Malthus, foucault and resistance. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 15(1), 68–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappa, F., Rosso, F., & Hayes, D. (2019). Monetary and social rewards for crowdsourcing. Sustainability, 11(10), 2834. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Citizen scientists discover rare cosmic pairing: Brown dwarfs traversing space together, but separated by billions of miles, puzzle scientists. (2020). ScienceDaily. Retrieved April 27, 2020, from https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/02/200212121955.htm

  • Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C., Larson, L., Dayer, A., Stedman, R., & Decker, D. (2015). Are wildlife recreationists conservationists? Linking hunting, birdwatching, and pro-environmental behavior. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 79(3), 446–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosquer, A., Raymond, R., & Prevot-Julliard, A.-C. (2012). Observations of everyday biodiversity: A new perspective for conservation? Ecology and Society, 17(4), 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cozby, P. C., & Bates, S. C. (2014). Methods in behavioral research. McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B. (1982). Invisible colleges and information transfer: A review and commentary with particular reference to the social sciences. Journal of Documentation, 48(3), 212–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, V. (2015). Motivation to participate in an online citizen science game: A study of Foldit. Science Communication, 37(6), 723–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vreede, T., de Vreede, G.-J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2017). Antecedents of engagement in community-based crowdsourcing. In T.X. Bui & R.H. Sprague (Eds.), Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS) (pp. 761–770). Hawaii, HI: University of Hawai’i at Manoa.

  • Dean, A. J., Church, E. K., Loder, J., Fielding, K. S., & Wilson, K. A. (2018). How do marine and coastal citizen science experiences foster environmental engagement? Journal of Environmental Management, 213, 409–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhillon, C. M. (2017). Using citizen science in environmental justice: Participation and decision-making in a Southern California waste facility siting conflict. Local Environment, 22(12), 1479–1496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diner, D., Nakayama, S., Nov, O., & Porfiri, M. (2018). Social signals as design interventions for enhancing citizen science contributions. Information, Communication & Society, 21(4), 594–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duerr, A. E., Braham, M. A., Miller, T. A., Cooper, J., Anderson, J. T., & Katzner, T. E. (2019). Roost- and perch-site selection by Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) in eastern North America. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 131(2), 310–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duží, B., Osman, R., Lehejček, J., Nováková, E., Taraba, P., & Trojan, J. (2019). Exploring citizen science in post-socialist space: Uncovering its hidden character in the Czech Republic. Moravian Geographic Reports, 27(4), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2019-0019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans-Agnew, R. A., & Eberhardt, C. (2019). Uniting action research and citizen science: Examining the opportunities for mutual benefit between two movements through a woodsmoke photovoice study. Action Research, 17(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750318798909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Febbraro, M. D., Menchetti, M., Russo, D., Ancillotto, L., Aloise, G., Roscioni, F., Preatoni, D. G., Loy, A., Martinoli, A., Bertolino, S., & Mori, E. (2019). Integrating climate and land-use change scenarios in modelling the future spread of invasive squirrels in Italy. Diversity and Distributions, 25(4), 644–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Follett, R., & Strezov, V. (2015). An analysis of citizen science based research: Usage and publication patterns. PLoS ONE, 10(11), e014368. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frensley, T., Crall, A., Stern, M., Jordan, R., Gray, S., Prysby, M., Newman, G., Hmelo-Silver, C., Mellor, D., & Huang, J. (2017). Bridging the benefits of online and community supported citizen science: A case study on motivation and retention with conservation-oriented volunteers. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaber, N. (2019). Mobilizing health metrics for the human rights to water in Flint. Michigan. Health and Human Rights Journal, 21(1), 179–189.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, M., Bollard-Breen, B., & Towns, D. R. (2016). The community-conservation conundrum: Is citizen science the answer? Land, 5(4), 37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geri, N., Gafni, R., & Bengov, P. (2017). Crowdsourcing as a business model: Extrinsic motivations for knowledge sharing in user-generated content websites. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 10(1), 90–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gharesifard, M., & Wehn, U. (2016). To share or not to share: Drivers and barriers for sharing data via online amateur weather networks. Journal of Hydrology, 535, 181–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gharesifard, M., Wehn, U., & van der Zaag, P. (2017). Towards benchmarking citizen observatories: Features and functioning of online amateur weather networks. Journal of Environmental Management, 193, 381–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grainger, A. (2017). Citizen observatories and the new Earth observation science. Remote Sensing, 9(2), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A., Pawson, S. M., & Marzano, M. (2019). Emerging stakeholder relations in participatory ICT design: Renegotiating the boundaries of sociotechnical innovation in forest biosecurity surveillance. Forests, 10(10), 836. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10100836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajibayova, L. (2020). (Un) theorizing citizen science: Investigation of theories applied to citizen science studies. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(8), 916–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haklay, M. (2013). Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: Overview and typology of participation. In D. Sui, S. Elwood, & M. Goodchild (Eds.), Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge (pp. 105–121). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, K., Ludwig, T., & Aitamurto, T. (2019). Capitalizing relationships: Modes of participation in crowdsourcing. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 28(5), 977–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, Y., Parrish, J. K., Rowe, S., & Jones, T. (2019). Evolving interest and sense of self in an environmental citizen science program. Ecology and Society. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10956-240233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heigl, F., Kieslinger, B., Paul, K. T., Uhlik, J., & Dörler, D. (2019). Opinion: Toward an international definition of citizen science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(17), 8089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hite, R., Jones, M. G., Andre, T., Childers, G., & Corin, E. (2019). Female and minority experiences in an astronomy-based science hobby. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 14(4), 937–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingwe, R. (2017). Crowdsourcing-based geoinformation, disadvantaged urbanisation challenges, sub-Saharan Africa: Theoretical perspectives and notes. Quaestiones Geographicae, 36(1), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C. B., Østerlund, C., Mugar, G., Hassman, K. D., & Crowston, K. (2015). Motivations for sustained participation in crowdsourcing: case studies of citizen science on the role of talk. Proceedings of the 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp.1624–1634). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.

  • Jordan, R., Crall, A., Gray, S., Phillips, T., & Mellor, D. (2015). Citizen science as a distinct field of inquiry. BioScience, 65(2), 208–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasperowski, D., & Kullenberg, C. (2019). The many modes of citizen science. Science & Technology Studies, 32(2), 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A. R., & Maddalena, K. (2016). Networks, genres, and complex wholes: Citizen science and how we act together through typified text. Canadian Journal of Communication, 41(2), 287–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kermish-Allen, R., Peterman, K., & Bevc, C. (2019). The utility of citizen science projects in K-5 schools: Measures of community engagement and student impacts. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 14(3), 627–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9830-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (1996). Crossing boundaries Knowledge disciplinarity and interdisciplinarities. The University Press of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landon, A. C., Kyle, G. T., van Riper, C. J., Schuett, M. A., & Park, J. (2018). Exploring the psychological dimensions of stewardship in recreational fisheries. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 38(3), 579–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. D. (2016). Crowdsourcing, communities and social identities: Using citizen science to combat online toxicity. In T. Marsh, M. Ma, M. Oliveira, J. Baalsrud Hauge, & S. Göbel (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science Joint International Conferences on Serious Games (pp. 231–242). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lievrouw, L. A. (1989). The invisible college reconsidered: Bibliometrics and the development of scientific communication theory. Communication Research, 16(5), 615–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lueftenegger, M., Bardach, L., Bergsmann, E., Schober, B., & Spiel, C. (2019). A citizen science approach to measuring students’ achievement goals. International Journal of Educational Research, 95, 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukyanenko, R., Parsons, J., & Wiersma, Y. F. (2014). The IQ of the crowd: Understanding and improving information quality in structured user-generated content. Information Systems Research, 25(4), 669–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, V. Y. (2017). Citizen science as a means for increasing public engagement in science: Presumption or possibility? Science Communication, 39(2), 142–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, V. Y., Christidis, L., Lloyd, D. J., & Pecl, G. T. (2016a). Understanding drivers, barriers and information sources for public participation in marine citizen science. Journal of Science Communication, 15(2), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, V., Smith, L., Bowling, A., Christidis, L., Lloyd, D., & Pecl, G. (2016b). Citizens as scientists: What influences public contributions to marine research? Science Communication, 38(4), 495–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105–2125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J. (2019). Comparing science communication theory with practice: An assessment and critique using Australian data. Public Understanding of Science, 28(4), 382–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millar, E., & Searcy, C. (2020). The presence of citizen science in sustainability reporting. Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal, 11(1), 31–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W., Liu, L. A., Amin, Z., & Gray, M. (2018). Involving occupants in net-zero energy solar housing retrofits: An Australian sub-tropical case study. Solar Energy, 159, 390–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muldoon, C., O’Grady, M. J., & O’Hare, G. M. P. (2018). A survey of incentive engineering for crowdsourcing. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 33, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nerbonne, J. F., & Nelson, K. C. (2004). Volunteer macroinvertebrate monitoring in the United States: Resource mobilization and comparative state structures. Society and Natural Resources, 17(9), 817–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nerbonne, J. F., & Nelson, K. C. (2008). Volunteer macroinvertebrate monitoring: Tensions among group goals, data quality, and outcomes. Environmental Management, 42(3), 470–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odenwald, S. F. (2020). A citation study of earth science projects in citizen science. PLoS ONE, 15(7), e0235265. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottinger, G. (2017). Making sense of citizen science: Stories as a hermeneutic resource. Energy Research & Social Science, 31, 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, J., & Wand, Y. (2013). Extending classification principles from information modeling to other disciplines. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(5), 245–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelacho, M., Ruiz, G., Sanz, F., Tarancón, A., & Clemente-Gallardo, J. (2021). Analysis of the evolution and collaboration networks of citizen science scientific publications. Scientometrics, 126, 225–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perovich, L. J., Wylie, S., & Bongiovanni, R. (2018). Pokémon Go, pH, and projectors: Applying transformation design and participatory action research to an environmental justice collaboration in Chelsea. MA. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 5(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2018.1483874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, T. B., Ballard, H. L., Lewenstein, B. V., & Bonney, R. (2019). Engagement in science through citizen science: Moving beyond data collection. Science Education, 103(3), 665–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poisson, A. C., McCullough, I. M., Cheruvelil, K. S., Elliott, K. C., Latimore, J. A., & Soranno, P. A. (2020). Quantifying the contribution of citizen science to broad-scale ecological databases. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 18(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preist, C., Massung, E., & Coyle, D. (2014). Competing or aiming to be average? Normification as a means of engaging digital volunteers. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 1222–1233). New York, NY: ACM.

  • Prestopnik, N., Crowston, K., & Wang, J. (2017). Gamers, citizen scientists, and data: Exploring participant contributions in two games with a purpose. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 254–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, C. A., & Lee, H. S. (2013). Changes in participants’ scientific attitudes and epistemological beliefs during an astronomical citizen science project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(7), 773–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, D., de Solla, J., & Beaver, D. (1966). Collaboration in an invisible college. American Psychologist, 21(11), 1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qaurooni, D., Ghazinejad, A., Kouper, I., & Ekbia, H. (2016). Citizens for science and science for citizens: The view from participatory design. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1822–1826). New York, NY: ACM.

  • Ridgeway, M. L., & Yerrick, R. K. (2018). Whose banner are we waving? Exploring STEM partnerships for marginalized urban youth. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(1), 59–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotman, D., Preece, J., Hammock, J., Procita, K., Hansen, D., Parr, C., Lewis, D., & Jacobs, D. (2012). Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 217–226). New York, NY: ACM.

  • Schrögel, P., & Kolleck, A. (2019). The many faces of participation in science. Science & Technology Studies. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.59519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. N. (2016). ‘We are the monitors now’: Experiential knowledge, transcorporeality and environmental justice. Social & Legal Studies, 25(3), 261–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, H., Schuldt, J. P., McLeod, P. L., Crain, R. L., & Dickinson, J. L. (2018). Group norm violations in an online environmental social network: Effects on impression formation and intergroup judgments. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(3), 422–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, A. (2017). Framing in science communication [Doctoral dissertation. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey]. https://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/53995/

  • Teixeira, A. A. C. (2011). Mapping the (in)visible college(s) in the field of entrepreneurship. Scientometrics, 89, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiago, P., Gouveia, M. J., Capinha, C., Santos-Reis, M., & Pereira, H. M. (2017). The influence of motivational factors on the frequency of participation in citizen science activities. Nature Conservation, 18, 61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinati, R., Luczak-Roesch, M., Simperl, E., & Hall, W. (2017). An investigation of player motivations in Eyewire, a gamified citizen science project. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 527–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tipaldo, G., & Allamano, P. (2017). Citizen science and community-based rain monitoring initiatives: An interdisciplinary approach across sociology and water science Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Water, 4(2), e1200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toomey, A., & Domroese, M. (2013). Can citizen science lead to positive conservation attitudes and behaviors? Human Ecology Review, 20(1), 50–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torras-Gómez, E., Guo, M., & Ramis, M. M. (2019). Sociological theory from dialogical democracy. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3), 216–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehn, U., & Almomani, A. (2019). Incentives and barriers for participation in community-based environmental monitoring and information systems: A critical analysis and integration of the literature. Environmental Science & Policy, 101, 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, A., & Crowston, K. (2011). From conservation to crowdsourcing: A typology of citizen science. 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2011.207

  • Zuccala, A. (2006). Modeling the invisible college. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(2), 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20256

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kent State University, Kent, USA

    Lala Hajibayova, L. P. Coladangelo & Heather A. Soyka

Authors
  1. Lala Hajibayova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. P. Coladangelo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Heather A. Soyka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lala Hajibayova.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 188 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hajibayova, L., Coladangelo, L.P. & Soyka, H.A. Exploring the invisible college of citizen science: questions, methods and contributions. Scientometrics 126, 6989–7003 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04050-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04050-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation