Abstract
The aim of this note is to discuss some issues posed by the emergency of universal interfaces able to decide on the truth of geometric statements. More specifically, we consider a recent GeoGebra module allowing general users to verify standard geometric theorems. Working with this module in the context of Varignon’s theorem, we were driven—by the characteristics of the GeoGebra interface—to perform a quite detailed study of the very diverse fate of attempting to automatically prove this statement, when using two different construction procedures. We highlight the relevance—for the theorem proving output—of expression power of the dynamic geometry interface, and we show that the algorithm deciding about the truth of some—even quite simple—statements can fall into a not true and not false situation, providing a source of confusion for a standard user and an interesting benchmark for geometers interested in discovering new geometric facts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Botana F., Kovács Z.: A Singular web service for geometric computations. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 74, 359–370 (2015)
Botana F., Hohenwarter M., Janičić J., Kovács Z., Petrović I., Recio T., Weitzhofer S.: Automated theorem proving in GeoGebra: current achievements. J. Autom. Reason. 55, 39–59 (2015)
Chou S.C.: Mechanical Geometry Theorem Proving. Reidel, Dordrecht (1988)
Dalzotto G., Recio T.: On protocols for the automated discovery of theorems in elementary geometry. J. Autom. Reason. 43, 203–236 (2009)
Recio T., Vélez M.P.: Automatic discovery of theorems in elementary geometry. J. Autom. Reason. 23, 63–82 (1999)
Recio, T., Sterk, H., Vélez, M.P.: Project: automatic geometry theorem proving. In: Cohen, A., Cuipers, H., Sterk, H. Some Tapas of Computer Algebra. Algorithms and Computations in Mathematics, vol. 4, pp. 276–296. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Botana, F., Recio, T. On the Unavoidable Uncertainty of Truth in Dynamic Geometry Proving. Math.Comput.Sci. 10, 5–25 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11786-016-0246-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11786-016-0246-4