Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Board gender diversity and firm performance: evidence from India

  • Published:
Asian Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the impact of board gender diversity on financial performance of listed Indian firms in a dynamic modelling framework. Using a firm-year unit of analysis, a sample of 148 publicly listed firms across multiple industries have been studied over a period of five financial years namely FY 2008–2009 to FY 2012–2013. Employing panel data analysis, percentage of women directors is taken as the independent variable and firm performance measured by return on assets (ROA) and Tobin’s Q as the dependent variables. The primary results of the study using ordinary least squares (OLS) and fixed effects (FE) estimation models point towards a positive and significant relationship between percentage of independent women directors (IWD) and firm performance. However, results are reversed when the theoretically superior Arellano Bond estimation is used. Findings of the study indicate that the number of companies with no IWDs is reducing across the 5 years of study. This may be due to external pressure created by stakeholders. Also, the number of companies with one IWD is increasing over the period of the study, while the number of companies with two or three or more directors is more or less the same. The number of two or three IWD companies remaining the same could arguably be due to lack of availability of independent directors who are women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, R., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat, S., & Black, B. (2001). The non-correlation between board independence and long term firm performance. Journal of Corporation Law, 27, 231–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilimoria, D. (2000). Building the business case for women corporate directors. In R. J. Burke & M. C. Mattis (Eds.), Women on corporate boards of directors: international challenges and opportunities (pp. 25–40). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bøhren, Ø., & Strøm, R. Ø. (2007). Aligned, informed, and decisive: characteristics of value-creating boards. Working Paper. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=966407

  • Bonn, I., Yoshikawa, T., & Phan, P. H. (2004). Effects of board structure on firm performance: a comparison between Japan and Australia. Asian Business & Management, 3, 105–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. J., & Mattis, M. C. (2000). Women in corporate boards of directors: international challenges and opportunities. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, K., & Mınguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, D., Simkins, B., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, D.A., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B.J., & Simpson, W.G. (2007). The diversity of corporate board committees and firm financial performance. http://ssrn.com/abstract=972763

  • Catalyst (2004). The bottom line: connecting corporate performance and gender diversity.

  • Chung, K.H, & Pruitt, S.W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin’s Q. Financial Management, 23(3), Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=957032

  • Dobbin, F., & Jung, J. (2011). Corporate board gender diversity and stock performance: the competence gap or institutional investor bias? North Carolina Law Review, 89, 809–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, P., & Bose, S. (2006). Gender diversity in the boardroom and financial performance of commercial banks: evidence from Bangladesh. The Cost and Management, 34(6), 70–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erhardt, N., Werbel, J., & Shrader, S. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance, 11(2), 102–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Agency problems and residual claims. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 327–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: the effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1–2), 85–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francoeur, C., Labelle, R., & Desgagne, B. S. (2008). Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2003). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: a survey of the economic literature. FRBNY Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R., Johnson, R., & Moesel, D. (1994). Corporate divestiture intensity of restructuring firms—effects of governance, strategy, and performance. Academy Management Journal, 37(5), 1207–1251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurkus, A.F., Park, J.C. & Woodard, L.S. (2008). Gender diversity, firm performance, and environment.” SSRN Working Paper

  • Keats, B. W., & Hitt, M. A. (1988). A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 570–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larcker, D. F., & Tayan, B. (2011). Corporate governance matters: a closer look at organizational choices and their consequences. Upper Saddle River: FT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. (1983). Applied linear regression models. Homewood: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2004). OECD principles of corporate governance. Paris: OECD Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J. A., & Zahra, S. A. (1991). The relative power of CEOs and boards of directors: associations with corporate performance. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 135–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N., Smith, V., & Verner, M. (2006). Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2,500 Danish Firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(7), 569–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanwick, P. A., & Stanwick, S. D. (2010). The relationship between corporate governance and financial performance: an empirical study of Canadian firms. The Business Review, Cambridge, 16(2), 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors and corporate boards: a review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 320–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wintoki, M. B., & Yang, T. (2007). Do firms adjust to a target board structure ? Working paper. USA: University of Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neeti Khetarpal Sanan.

Additional information

Submitted to Asian Journal of Business Ethics, “Special issue on Inclusive Development and Responsible Business in India”

Appendix

Appendix

Table 14 Sample companies

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sanan, N.K. Board gender diversity and firm performance: evidence from India. Asian J Bus Ethics 5, 1–18 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-016-0050-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-016-0050-x

Keywords