Abstract
Given the existence of a Markovian state price density process, this paper extends Merton’s continuous time (instantaneous) mean-variance analysis and the mutual fund separation theory in which the risky fund can be chosen to be the growth optimal portfolio. The CAPM obtains without the assumption of log-normality for prices. The optimal investment policies for the case of a hyperbolic absolute risk aversion (HARA) utility function are derived analytically. It is proved that only the quadratic utility exhibits the global mean-variance efficiency among the family of HARA utility functions. A numerical comparison is made between the growth optimal portfolio and the mean-variance analysis for the case of log-normal prices. The optimal choice of target return which maximizes the probability that the mean-variance analysis outperforms the expected utility portfolio is discussed. Mean variance analysis is better near the mean and the expected utility maximization is better in the tails.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Artzner P, Delbean F, Eber JM, Heath D, Ku H (2007) Coherent multiperiod risk adjusted values and bellman’s principle. Ann Oper Res 152: 5–22
Breiman L (1961) Optimal gambling system for favorable games. In: Proceedings of the 4th Berkeley symposium on mathematics, statistics and probability, vol 1, pp 63–68
Cox J, Huang CF (1989) Optimal consumption and portfolio policies when asset prices follow a diffusion process. J Econ Theory 49: 33–83
Grauer RR (1981) A comparison of growth optimal and mean variance investment policies. J Financ Quant Anal 16: 1–21
Grauer RR, Hakansson NH (1993) On the use of mean-variance and quadratic approximations in implementing dynamic investment strategies: a comparison of the returns and investment policies. Manag Sci 39: 856–871
Grinold RC, Kahn RN (1995) Active portfolio management. IRWIN Inc., Homewood
Hakansson NH (1971) Capital growth and the mean-variance approach to portfolio selection. J Financ Quant Anal 6: 517–557
Hakansson NH, Ziemba WT (1995) Capital growth theory. In: Jarrow R, Maksimovic V, Ziemba WT (eds) Finance, vol 9. Elsevier, North-Holland, pp 61–86
Harrison M, Kreps D (1979) Martingale and multiperiod securities markets. J Econ Theory 20: 382–408
Hens T, Schenk-Hoppe K (2005) Evolutionary stability of portfolio rules in incomplete markets. J Math Econ 41: 43–46
Kroll Y, Levy H, Markowitz H (1984) Mean-varaince versus direct utility maximization. J Finance 39: 47–75
Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J Finance 7(1): 77–91
Merton RC (1969) Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: the continuous time case. Rev Econ Stat 51: 247–257
Merton RC (1971) Optimal consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model. J Econ Theory 3: 373–413
Merton RC (1973) An intertermporal capital asset pricing model. Econometrica 41: 867–887
Merton RC (1990) Continuous–time finance. Blackwell, Oxford
Øksendal B (1995) Stochastic partial differential equations. Springer, New York
Samuelson P (1967) General proof that diversification pays. J Financ Quant Anal 3(3): 1–13
Tobin J (1958) Liquidity preference as behaviour towards risk. Rev Econ Stat 25(2): 65–86
Zhao Y, Ziemba WT (2001) A stochastic programming model using an endogenously determined worst case risk measure for dynamic asset allocation. Math Program Ser B 89(2): 293–309
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MacLean, L.C., Zhao, Y. & Ziemba, W.T. Mean-variance versus expected utility in dynamic investment analysis. Comput Manag Sci 8, 3–22 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-009-0106-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-009-0106-7