Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Combined transcriptome and proteome analysis reveals MSN and ARFIP2 as biomarkers for trastuzumab resistance of breast cancer

  • Research
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) accounts for 20–30% of all BC subtypes and is linked to poor prognosis. Trastuzumab (Tz), a humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody, is a first-line treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer which faces resistance challenges. This study aimed to identify the biomarkers driving trastuzumab resistance.

Methods

Differential expression analysis of genes and proteins between trastuzumab-sensitive (TS) and trastuzumab-resistant (TR) cells was conducted using RNA-seq and iTRAQ. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Gene Ontology (GO) were used to study their functions. The prognostic significance and protein levels of ARFIP2 and MSN were evaluated using online tools and immunohistochemistry. Sensitivity of MSN and ARFIP2 to other therapies was assessed using public pharmacogenomics databases and the R language.

Results

Five genes were up-regulated, and nine genes were down-regulated in TR cells at both transcriptional and protein levels. Low ARFIP2 and high MSN expression linked to poor BC prognosis. MSN increased and ARFIP2 decreased in TR patients, correlating with shorter OS. MSN negatively impacted fulvestrant and immunotherapy sensitivity, while ARFIP2 had a positive impact.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that MSN and ARFIP2 could serve as promising biomarkers for predicting response to Tz, offering valuable insights for future research in the identification of diagnostic and therapeutic targets for BC patients with Tz resistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Lei S et al (2021) Global patterns of breast cancer incidence and mortality: a population-based cancer registry data analysis from 2000 to 2020. Cancer Commun 41(11):1183–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Howlader N et al (2018) Differences in breast cancer survival by molecular subtypes in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 27(6):619–626

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Slamon DJ et al (1987) Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science 235(4785):177–182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Collins DM et al (2021) Effects of HER family-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors on antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity in HER2-expressing breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 27(3):807–818

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Junttila TT et al (2009) Ligand-independent HER2/HER3/PI3K complex is disrupted by trastuzumab and is effectively inhibited by the PI3K inhibitor GDC-0941. Cancer Cell 15(5):429–440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nagata Y et al (2004) PTEN activation contributes to tumor inhibition by trastuzumab, and loss of PTEN predicts trastuzumab resistance in patients. Cancer Cell 6(2):117–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bredin P, Walshe JM, Denduluri N (2020) Systemic therapy for metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Semin Oncol 47(5):259–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee HJ et al (2014) HER2 heterogeneity affects trastuzumab responses and survival in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 142(6):755–766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rimawi MF et al (2018) Low PTEN levels and PIK3CA mutations predict resistance to neoadjuvant lapatinib and trastuzumab without chemotherapy in patients with HER2 over-expressing breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 167(3):731–740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ozkavruk Eliyatkin N et al (2016) The role of p95HER2 in trastuzumab resistance in breast cancer. J buon 21(2):382–389

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mercogliano MF et al (2017) Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast overexpresses MUC4 and is associated with poor outcome to adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer. BMC Cancer 17(1):895

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Berns K et al (2016) Loss of ARID1A Activates ANXA1, which serves as a predictive biomarker for trastuzumab resistance. Clin Cancer Res 22(21):5238–5248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cimino D et al (2008) Identification of new genes associated with breast cancer progression by gene expression analysis of predefined sets of neoplastic tissues. Int J Cancer 123(6):1327–1338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gallardo A et al (2012) Increased signalling of EGFR and IGF1R, and deregulation of PTEN/PI3K/Akt pathway are related with trastuzumab resistance in HER2 breast carcinomas. Br J Cancer 106(8):1367–1373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hu HL et al (2019) Correlation between procollagen-lysine, 2-oxoglutarate 5-dioxygenase 2 and breast cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 12(3):1015–1021

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu H et al (2015) SLC9A3R1 stimulates autophagy via BECN1 stabilization in breast cancer cells. Autophagy 11(12):2323–2334

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Müller FE et al (2015) NDUFA4 expression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma is predictive for cancer-specific survival. Am J Cancer Res 5(9):2816–2822

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang DW et al (2016) Identification of CD20, ECM, and ITGA as biomarkers for osteosarcoma by integrating transcriptome analysis. Med Sci Monit 22:2075–2085

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Xu X et al (2019) Up-regulation of IGF2BP2 by multiple mechanisms in pancreatic cancer promotes cancer proliferation by activating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 38(1):497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Lazaro G et al (2013) Targeting focal adhesion kinase in ER+/HER2+ breast cancer improves trastuzumab response. Endocr Relat Cancer 20(5):691–704

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Leech AO et al (2018) Cleavage of the extracellular domain of junctional adhesion molecule-A is associated with resistance to anti-HER2 therapies in breast cancer settings. Breast Cancer Res 20(1):140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang XH et al (2010) Disruption of laminin-integrin-CD151-focal adhesion kinase axis sensitizes breast cancer cells to ErbB2 antagonists. Cancer Res 70(6):2256–2263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kanoh H, Williger BT, Exton JH (1997) Arfaptin 1, a putative cytosolic target protein of ADP-ribosylation factor, is recruited to Golgi membranes. J Biol Chem 272(9):5421–5429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cruz-Garcia D et al (2013) Recruitment of arfaptins to the trans-Golgi network by PI(4)P and their involvement in cargo export. EMBO J 32(12):1717–1729

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Ambroggio EE et al (2013) Arf1 and membrane curvature cooperate to recruit Arfaptin2 to liposomes. PLoS ONE 8(4):e62963

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Moss J, Vaughan M (1995) Structure and function of ARF proteins: activators of cholera toxin and critical components of intracellular vesicular transport processes. J Biol Chem 270(21):12327–12330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tsai SC et al (1992) Differential interaction of ADP-ribosylation factors 1, 3, and 5 with rat brain Golgi membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89(19):9272–9276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Shin OH, Exton JH (2001) Differential binding of arfaptin 2/POR1 to ADP-ribosylation factors and Rac1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 285(5):1267–1273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Judith D et al (2019) ATG9A shapes the forming autophagosome through Arfaptin 2 and phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase IIIβ. J Cell Biol 218(5):1634–1652

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Bommanavar S et al (2022) Membrane-organizing extension spike protein and its role as an emerging biomarker in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 26(1):82–86

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Tsukita S, Yonemura S (1999) Cortical actin organization: lessons from ERM (ezrin/radixin/moesin) proteins. J Biol Chem 274(49):34507–34510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Furthmayr H, Lankes W, Amieva M (1992) Moesin, a new cytoskeletal protein and constituent of filopodia: its role in cellular functions. Kidney Int 41(3):665–670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jung Y, McCarty JH (2012) Band 4.1 proteins regulate integrin-dependent cell spreading. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 426(4):578–584

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Sato N et al (1992) A gene family consisting of ezrin, radixin and moesin. Its specific localization at actin filament/plasma membrane association sites. J Cell Sci 103(pt 1):131–143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Haynes J et al (2011) Dynamic actin remodeling during epithelial-mesenchymal transition depends on increased moesin expression. Mol Biol Cell 22(24):4750–4764

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Lan S et al (2020) Moesin facilitates metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma cells by improving invadopodia formation and activating β-catenin/MMP9 axis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 524(4):861–868

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yano K et al (2020) Regulation of breast cancer resistance protein and P-glycoprotein by ezrin, radixin and moesin in lung, intestinal and renal cancer cell lines. J Pharm Pharmacol 72(4):575–582

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Faure C et al (2021) Allosteric inhibition of HER2 by moesin-mimicking compounds targets HER2-positive cancers and brain metastases. Cancer Res 81(21):5464–5476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bourdoulous S, Domingot A, Faure C (2020) Diagnosis and/or prognosis of her2-dependent cancer using moesin as a biomarker. Google Patents.

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81703557), A Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD), Research Project of Jiangsu Cancer Hospital (ZM202002) and by college student innovation and entrepreneurship project.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xiao Shi, Yuan Sheng, and Haoran Fei are contributed equally to this paper.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Marine Pharmaceutical Compound Screening, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Co-Innovation Center of Jiangsu Marine Bio-Industry Technology, School of Pharmacy, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang, 222005, China

    Xiao Shi, Haoran Fei, Bangbang Wei, Zhenyu Zhang, Xinyu Xia & Xinxin Si

  2. Department of General Surgery, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research & The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210009, China

    Changfei Mao

  3. Department of Pharmacy, Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211116, China

    Yuan Sheng

Authors
  1. Xiao Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuan Sheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haoran Fei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bangbang Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhenyu Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xinyu Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Changfei Mao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xinxin Si
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Xinxin Si and Bangbang collected data and conducted the data summary and statistical analysis. Haoran and Zhenyu Zhang performed experiments. Xinyu Yang and Changfei Mao searched for references and helped to write and revise the paper. Xiao Shi conducted data analysis and interpretation and wrote the manuscript. Yuan Sheng assembled data and reviewed the manuscript. Xiao Shi and Yuan Sheng reviewed and revised the paper. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Changfei Mao or Xinxin Si.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Informed consent

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and informed consent was obtained from all subjects and/or their legal guardian(s). All the experiments were conducted in accordance to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, X., Sheng, Y., Fei, H. et al. Combined transcriptome and proteome analysis reveals MSN and ARFIP2 as biomarkers for trastuzumab resistance of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 207, 187–201 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07355-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07355-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation