Abstract
A model for context-dependent natural language semantics is proposed and formalized in terms of possible worlds. The meaning of a sentence depends on context and at the same time affects that context representing the knowledge about the world collected from a discourse. The model fits well with a “flat” semantic representation as first proposed by Hobbs (1985), consisting basically of a conjunction of atomic predications in which all variables are existentially quantified with the widest possible scope; in our framework, this provides very concise semantic terms as compared with other representations. There is a natural correspondence between the possible worlds semantics and a constraint solver, and it is shown how such a semantics can be defined using the programming language of Constraint Handling Rules (Frühwirth, 1995). Discourse analysis is clearly a process of abduction in this framework, and it is shown that the mentioned constraint solvers serve as effective and efficient abductive engines for the purpose.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdennadher, S., Christiansen, H.: An Experimental CLP Platform for Integrity Constraints and Abduction. In: Larsen, H.L., Kacprzyk, J., Zadrozny, S. (eds.) Proceedings of FQAS 2000, Flexible Query Answering Systems. Advances in Soft Computing series, pp. 141–152. Physica-Verlag (Springer), Heidelberg (2000)
Abdennadher, S., Schütz, H.: CHR \(^\lor \): A flexible query language. In: Andreasen, T., Christiansen, H., Larsen, H.L. (eds.) FQAS 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1495, pp. 1–14. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Christiansen, H.: Open theories and abduction for context and accommodation. In: Bouquet, P., Serafini, L., Brézillon, P., Benercetti, M., Castellani, F. (eds.) CONTEXT 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1688, pp. 455–458. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Christiansen, H.: Abductive Language Interpretation as Bottom-up Deduction. In: Wintner, S. (ed.) Natural Language Understanding and Logic Programming, Proceedings of the 2002 workshop, Roskilde University, Comp. Sci. Dept. Datalogiske Skrifter, vol. 92, pp. 33–47 (2002)
Christiansen, H.: CHR Grammars web site. Source text, manual, and examples (2002), http://www.ruc.dk/~henning/chrg
Christiansen, H.: CHR grammars. International Journal on Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, special issue on Constraint Handling Rules (to appear, 2005)
Christiansen, H., Dahl, V.: Assumptions and Abduction in Prolog. In: Muñoz-Hernández, S., Gómez-Perez, J.M., Hofstedt, P. (eds.) Proceedings of WLPE 2004: 14th Workshop on Logic Programming Environments and MultiCPL 2004: Third Workshop on Multiparadigm Constraint Programming Languages Workshop Proceedings, Saint-Malo, France, September 2004, pp. 87–101 (2004)
Console, L., Theseider Dupré, D., Torasso, P.: On the Relationship between Abduction and Deduction. Journal of Logic and Computation 1(5), 661–690 (1991)
Dahl, V., Tarau, P.: From Assumptions to Meaning. Canadian Artificial Intelligence 42 (Spring 1998)
Frühwirth, T.W.: Theory and Practice of Constraint Handling Rules. Journal of Logic Programming 37(1–3), 95–138 (1998)
Hobbs, J.: Ontological Promiscuity. In: Proceedings of the 23rd conference on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA, July 8-12, pp. 61–69 (1985)
Hobbs, J.R., Stickel, M.E., Appelt, D.E., Martin, P.: Interpretation as abduction. Artificial Intelligence 63, 69–142 (1993)
Jaffar, J., Maher, M.J.: Constraint logic programming: A survey. Journal of logic programming 19, 20, 503–581 (1994)
Kakas, A.C., Kowalski, R.A., Toni, F.: The role of abduction in logic programming. In: Gabbay, D.M., Hogger, C.J., Robinson, J.A. (eds.) Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, vol. 5, pp. 235–324. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1998)
Kazantzakis, N.: \(B\acute{\iota} o\varsigma\;\; \kappa\alpha\iota\;\; \Pi o\lambda\iota\tau\epsilon\acute{\iota}\alpha\;\; \tau o\upsilon\;\; A\lambda\acute{\epsilon}\xi\eta\;\; Zo\rho\mu\pi\acute{\alpha}\). [Eng.: Life and career of Alexis Zorbas.] (1946)
Mishler, E.G.: Meaning in Context: Is there any other Kind? Harward Educational Review 49(1), 1–19 (1979)
Montague, R.: Formal philosophy. Yale University Press, New Haven
Penn, J.R.: The Other Syntax: Approaching Natural Language Semantics through Logical Form Composition. In: Christiansen, H., Skadhauge, P.R., Villadsen, J. (eds.) CSLP 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3438, pp. 48–73. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Pereira, F.C.N., Warren, D.H.D.: Definite clause grammars for language analysis. A survey of the formalism and a comparison with augmented transition grammars. Artificial Intelligence 10(3-4), 165–176 (1980)
Rieger, C.: Conceptual overlays: A mechanism for the interpretation of sentence meaning in context. In: Proc. IJCAI 1975, pp. 143–150 (1975)
Stalnaker, R.: On the representation of context. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 7, 3–19 (1998)
Webster’s Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language, 1989th edn. Gramercy Books, dilithium Press (1989)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Christiansen, H., Dahl, V. (2005). Meaning in Context. In: Dey, A., Kokinov, B., Leake, D., Turner, R. (eds) Modeling and Using Context. CONTEXT 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3554. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11508373_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11508373_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26924-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31890-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)