Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Reasoning about action and time with epistemic conditionals

  • Communications
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Methodologies for Intelligent Systems (ISMIS 1994)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 869))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 139 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asher, N. (in press a):’ Belief Dynamics in a Changing World', Proceedings of ICCS 93, San Sebastian, Spain, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Asher, N. (in press b):’ Commonsense Entailment: A Conditional Logic for Some Generics', in Crocco G., L. Farinas, A. Herzig, Conditional Logics and Artificial Intelligence, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asher, N. (1994): Problems with Persistence', Topoi, 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Asher, N. (1993b):’ Extensions for Commonsense Entailment', Workshop on Conditionals, Proceedings Of The 13th International Joint Conference On Artificial Intelligence, Chambery, France.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Asher, N. & R. Koons (1993):’ The Revision of Beliefs and Intentions in a Changing World', AAAI Spring Symposium Series On Reasoninag About Mental States: Formal Theories And Applications, Stanford CA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Asher, N. & M. Morreau (1991):’ Commonsense Entailment: A Modal Theory of Nonmonotonic Reasoning', Proceedings Of The 12th International Joint Conference On Artificial Intelligence, Sydney Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baker, A. (1991):’ Nonmonotonic Reasoning in the Framework of the Situation Calculus', Artificial Intelligence 49.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gelfond, M.& V. Lifschitz (1992):’ Describing Action and Change by Logic Programs', Proceedings Joint International Conference And Symposium On Logic Programming.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lewis, D. (1973):’ Causation', Journal of Philosophy 70, 556–567.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lifschitz, V. (1987):’ Formal Theories of Action', The Frame Problem In Artificial Intelligence, pp. 35–57. Los Altos: Morgan Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lifschitz, V. & A. Rabinov (1990):’ Miracles in Formal Theories of Action', Artificial Intelligence, 38, pp. 225–237.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lifschitz, V. (1990):’ Frames in the Space of Situations', Artificial Intelligence 39.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lin, F. & Y. Shoham (1991):’ Provably Correct Theories of Action: Preliminary Report', AAAI 91, Anaheim, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kartha,N. (1993):’ Formalization of Action', Proceedings Of The 13th International Joint Conference On Artificial Intelligence, Chambery, France.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Koons, R. & N. Asher (1994):’ Belief Revision in a Changing World', TARK 94.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sandewall E. (1993):’ The Range of Applicability of Nonmonotonic Logics for the Inertia Problem', Proceedings Of The 13th International Joint Conference On Artificial Intelligence, Chambery, France.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Winslett, M. (1988):’ Reasoning about Action using a Possible Models Approach', in Proceedings Of The Seventh National Conference On Artificial Intelligence, 89–93.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Winslett, M. (1990): 'sometimes Updates are Circumscription', AAAI 90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IRIT -Université Paul Sabatier, 118 Route de Narbonne, F-31062, Toulouse Cedex, France

    Nicholas Asher

Authors
  1. Nicholas Asher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Zbigniew W. Raś Maria Zemankova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Asher, N. (1994). Reasoning about action and time with epistemic conditionals. In: Raś, Z.W., Zemankova, M. (eds) Methodologies for Intelligent Systems. ISMIS 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 869. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58495-1_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58495-1_46

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58495-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49010-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation