Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Facebook Engagement—Motivational Drivers and the Moderating Effect of Flow Episodes and Age Differences

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Research & Innovation Forum 2019 (RIIFORUM 2019)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1222 Accesses

Abstract

The rise of Facebook creates opportunities for consumers to entertain, present themselves and interact socially as well as for organizations and brands, who can utilize this social networking site (SNS) as a strategic tool in their integrated marketing communication. Despite engagement being considered a key success factor for content and services on Facebook, an issue still to address is how to trigger a Facebook user’s engagement. This paper is one of the few to theoretically and empirically investigate Facebook engagement and its psychological, motivational drivers. Drawing theoretical insights from uses and gratifications theory, theoretical accounts of flow and the socioemotional selectivity theory, we build and validate a model that connects the motivations that underlie Facebook behavior to involvement-related, emotional and conative facets of Facebook engagement. We test the model with the partially least squares approach on a sample of active Facebook users. The results strongly support the causal, mediating and moderating relationships included in the model. They show that three distinct types of motivational orientation (toward enjoyment, self-disclosure and community identification) contribute to a Facebooker’s engagement behavior. Importantly, the findings reveal that flow episodes strengthen the causal path from enjoyment-related motivation towards engagement, and that the impact of engagement on continued use of Facebook is greater for older Facebookers than among younger users. Based on these findings, the paper provides practical knowledge for organizations making use of Facebook and bears implications for the managers of brands that have active Facebook pages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Verhagen, T., Swen, E., Feldberg, F., Merikivi, J.: Benefitting from virtual customer environments: an empirical study of customer engagement. Comput. Human Behav. 48, 340–357 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pansari, A., Kumar, V.: Customer engagement: the construct, antecedents, and consequences. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 45, 294–311 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-016-0485-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Katz, E., Blumler, J.G., Gurevitch, M.: Uses and gratifications research. Public Opin. Q. 37, 509–523 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McQuail, D.: McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. Sage Publications, London (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ruggiero, T.E.: Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century. Mass Commun. Soc. 30, 3–37 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Luo, M.M., Remus, W.: Uses and gratifications and acceptance of web-based information services: an integrated model. Comput. Human Behav. 38, 281–295 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nadkarni, A., Hofmann, S.G.: Why do people use Facebook? Pers. Individ. Dif. 52, 243–249 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. van Dijck, J.: ‘You have one identity’: performing the self on Facebook and LinkedIn. Media, Cult. Soc. 35, 199–215 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443712468605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Seidman, G.: Self-presentation and belonging on Facebook: how personality influences social media use and motivations. Pers. Individ. Dif. 54, 402–407 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Baldus, B.J., Voorhees, C., Calantone, R.: Online brand community engagement: scale development and validation. J. Bus. Res. 68, 978–985 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.09.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hollebeek, L.D., Glynn, M.S., Brodie, R.J.: Consumer brand engagement in social media: conceptualization, scale development and validation. J. Interact. Mark. 28, 149–165 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eigenraam, A.W., Eelen, J., van Lin, A., Verlegh, P.W.J.: A consumer-based taxonomy of digital customer engagement practices. J. Interact. Mark. 44, 102–121 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2018.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hollebeek, L.D., Juric, B., Tang, W.: Virtual brand community engagement practices: a refined typology and model. J. Serv. Mark. 31, 204–217 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-01-2016-0006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hollebeek, L.D., Srivastava, R.K., Chen, T.: S-D logic–informed customer engagement: integrative framework, revised fundamental propositions, and application to CRM. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-016-0494-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jaakkola, E., Alexander, M.: The role of customer engagement behavior in value co-creation: a service system perspective. J. Serv. Res. 17, 247–261 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670514529187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang, S.-L., Chen, C.-T.: How consumers become loyal fans on Facebook. Comput. Human Behav. 82, 124–135 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Harmeling, C.M., Moffett, J.W., Arnold, M.J., Carlson, B.D.: Toward a theory of customer engagement marketing. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 45, 312–335 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-016-0509-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hall-Phillips, A., Park, J., Chung, T.L., Anaza, N.A., Rathod, S.R.: I (heart) social ventures: identification and social media engagement. J. Bus. Res. 69, 484–491 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zheng, X., Cheung, C.M.K., Lee, M.K.O., Liang, L.: Building brand loyalty through user engagement in online brand communities in social networking sites. Inf. Technol. People. 28, 90–106 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-08-2013-0144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee, D., Kim, H.S., Kim, J.K.: The impact of online brand community type on consumer’s community engagement behaviors: consumer-created vs. marketer-created online brand community in online social-networking web sites. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 14, 59–63 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rodríguez-Ardura, I., Meseguer-Artola, A.: Imagine, feel “there”, and flow! Immersive experiences on m-Facebook, and their affective and behavioural effects. Inf. Technol. People. In press (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-10-2017-0358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shin, D.: Empathy and embodied experience in virtual environment: to what extent can virtual reality stimulate empathy and embodied experience? Comput. Human Behav. 78, 64–73 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hayes, M., Van Stolk-Cooke, K., Muench, F.: Understanding Facebook use and the psychological affects of use across generations. Comput. Human Behav. 49, 507–511 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Leung, L.: Generational differences in content generation in social media: the roles of the gratifications sought and of narcissism. Comput. Human Behav. 29, 997–1006 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Manzi, C., Coen, S., Regalia, C., Yévenes, A.M., Giuliani, C., Vignoles, V.L.: Being in the social: a cross-cultural and cross-generational study on identity processes related to Facebook use. Comput. Human Behav. 80, 81–87 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Play and intrinsic rewards. J. Humanist. Psychol. 15, 41–63 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1177/002216787501500306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper and Row, New York, NY (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Carstensen, L.L.: The Influence of a Sense of Time on Human Development. Science (80-.). 312, 1913–1915 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Carstensen, L.L.: Integrating cognitive and emotion paradigms to address the paradox of aging. Cogn. Emot. In press (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2018.1543181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Brodie, R.J., Hollebeek, L.D., Juric, B., Ilic, A.: Customer engagement: conceptual domain, fundamental propositions, and implications for research. J. Serv. Res. 14, 252–271 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670511411703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bowden, J.L.-H., Conduit, J., Hollebeek, L.D., Luoma-aho, V., Solem, B.A.: Engagement valence duality and spillover effects in online brand communities. J. Serv. Theor. Pract. 27, 877–897 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-04-2016-0072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Harrigan, P., Evers, U., Miles, M.P., Daly, T.: Customer engagement and the relationship between involvement, engagement, self-brand connection and brand usage intent. J. Bus. Res. 88, 388–396 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Dessart, L., Veloutsou, C., Morgan-Thomas, A.: Capturing consumer engagement: duality, dimensionality and measurement. J. Mark. Manag. 32, 399–426 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2015.1130738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Blau, P.M.: Exchange and power in social life. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Emerson, R.M.: Social exchange theory. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 2, 335–362 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA7195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Homans, G.C.: Social behavior as exchange. Am. J. Sociol. 63, 597–606 (1958)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Fang, X., Zhang, J., Chan, S.S.: Development of an instrument for studying flow in computer game play. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 29, 456–470 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Pelet, J.-É., Ettis, S., Cowart, K.: Optimal experience of flow enhanced by telepresence: evidence from social media use. Inf. Manag. 54, 115–128 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Martins, B., Sheppes, G., Gross, J.J., Mather, M.: Age differences in emotion regulation choice: older adults use distraction less than younger adults in high-Intensity positive contexts. J. Gerontol. Ser. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 73, 603–611 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw028

  40. Mather, M., Carstensen, L.L.: Aging and motivated cognition: the positivity effect in attention and memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 496–502 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Chang, P.F., Choi, Y.H., Bazarova, N.N., Löckenhoff, C.E.: Age differences in online social networking: extending socioemotional selectivity theory to social network sites. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media. 59, 221–239 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1029126

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Open University of Catalonia, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Ave. Tibidabo 39-43, 08035, Barcelona, Spain

    Inma Rodríguez-Ardura & Antoni Meseguer-Artola

  2. University of Miami, 5250 University Dr, Coral Gables, FL, 33146, USA

    Inma Rodríguez-Ardura

Authors
  1. Inma Rodríguez-Ardura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antoni Meseguer-Artola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Inma Rodríguez-Ardura .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Research & Innovation Institute (Rii), Warsaw, Poland

    Anna Visvizi

  2. Deree College, The American College of Greece, Athens, Greece

    Miltiadis D. Lytras

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rodríguez-Ardura, I., Meseguer-Artola, A. (2019). Facebook Engagement—Motivational Drivers and the Moderating Effect of Flow Episodes and Age Differences. In: Visvizi, A., Lytras, M. (eds) Research & Innovation Forum 2019. RIIFORUM 2019. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30809-4_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30809-4_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30808-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30809-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation