Abstract
In this study, we utilize various approaches for efficiency analysis to explore the state of efficiency of public hospitals in Queensland, Australia, in the year 2016/17. Besides the traditional nonparametric approaches like DEA and FDH, we also use a more recent and very promising robust approach–order-\(\alpha \) quantile frontier estimators (Aragon et al. 2005). Upon obtaining the individual estimates from various approaches, we also analyze performance on a more aggregate level—the level of Local Hospital Networks by using an aggregate efficiency measure constructed from the estimated individual efficiency scores. Our analysis suggests that the relatively low efficiency of some Local Hospital Networks in Queensland can be partially explained by the fact that the majority of their hospitals are small and located in remote areas.
We dedicate our modest contribution to Professor Christine Thomas-Agnan–a great Scholar who together with various colleagues have originated, developed and inspired many interesting directions in research, among which is the concept of partial \(\alpha \)-frontier modelling that we use in this work.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Under Activity Based Funding, hospitals are reimbursed based on the number and the complexity of patient care episodes they provide. Hospitals receive a fixed rate for each episode, and the value of the fixed rate is determined by the DRG to which the episode belongs.
- 2.
In the fiscal year 2016/17, Australia spent $181 billion on healthcare (more than $7,400 per person and 10% of its GDP), about a 57% increase since 2006/07 (after adjusting for inflation). This turns out to be an average annual growth rate of 4.67% over the decade: around 2% higher than average growth of GDP (Australian Institute of Health andWelfare 2018).
- 3.
Although the order-\(\alpha \) quantile frontier estimators can provide new insights from the data compared to the traditional nonparametric estimators, the traditional approach, especially the CRS-DEA, still has its merits and value in itself (see more discussion in Sect. 4).
- 4.
For the cases of multiple-output, one can either follow the multivariate conditional quantile approach proposed by Daouia and Simar (2007) or utilize aggregation techniques to aggregate outputs. In this study, we adopt Daraio and Simar ’s (2007) approach (the approach based on Principal Component Analysis) to aggregate hospital outputs into a single output measure. An alternative approach would be to use a price-based aggregation approach (Zelenyuk 2020).
- 5.
Other standard regularity conditions are “No Free Lunch” and “Producing Nothing is Possible” (see more details in Sickles and Zelenyuk 2019).
- 6.
Being similar to recent studies in the literature (e.g. Clement et al. 2008; Hu et al. 2012; Besstremyannaya 2013; Chowdhury and Zelenyuk 2016), we measure efficiency in output direction because the level of inputs used in public hospitals is usually fixed and influenced by external factors (the budget of hospitals are usually planned in advance with relatively fixed (typically 12+ months) labour contracts and huge investment in fixed inputs). Moreover, an output-oriented model is consistent with the aim of Queensland Health, which is to maximize healthcare services delivered to local community from given resources (see Queensland Health 2016).
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
There are 16 HHSs in Queensland, but only 15 HHSs directly manage and operate public hospitals in defined local geographical areas, the remaining HHS is a specialist statewide HHS dedicated to caring for children and young people from across Queensland.
- 11.
Public hospitals in Queensland include acute hospitals, mixed sub- and non-acute hospitals, early parenting centres, women’s and children’s hospitals, and psychiatric hospitals. We only consider public acute hospitals, which account for more than 90% of inpatient cases treated. Our sample does not include hospitals that were just opened in 2017 and hospitals that are not operated by a HHS.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
Ideally, outputs of hospitals should be measured by the improvement in medical condition of patients. However, it is technically difficult to obtain this measure in practice, thus most of the hospital efficiency studies use quantities of services as an alternative measure of hospital outputs (Hollingsworth 2008).
- 15.
Public acute hospitals in Australia are divided into five groups listed in descending order of activity volume and service diversification, as follows: principal referral hospitals, public acute group A hospitals, public acute group B hospitals, public acute group C hospitals, public acute group D hospitals. According to Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2015), hospitals in the first three groups are generally larger than hospitals in the last two groups.
- 16.
The classification is based on the remoteness area information provided in the Australian hospital peer groups in which the remoteness of a hospital is measured by the physical road distance to its nearest urban centre.
- 17.
Note that the IDs here are not the real ID but randomly generated for each HHS.
- 18.
We thank the anonymous referee for this insight.
- 19.
- 20.
Note that the IDs here are not the real ID but randomly generated for each hospital.
- 21.
K-mean clustering is an unsupervised machine learning algorithm helping cluster data into a predetermined number of clusters so as to minimize the within-cluster sum of squares.
- 22.
A deeper analysis on hospital efficiency based on geographical location (e.g. with some spatial maps) could be a fruitful research direction. Some hospitals in major cities may benefit from the presence of other hospitals to adjust their capacities or to select their patients, while this may be not possible for hospitals in remote areas. Moreover, some hospitals in urban areas may be in intensive competition, while others in rural areas may be local monopolies. We thank the anonymous referee for this insight.
References
Aigner, D., Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 64(6), 1263–1297. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5.
Aragon, Y., Daouia, A., & Thomas-Agnan, C. (2005). Nonparametric frontier estimation: A conditional quantile-based approach. Econometric Theory, 21(2), 358–389. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466605050206.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2015). Australian hospital peer groups (tech. rep. No. 66). Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Canberra, ACT. https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/79e7d756-7cfe-49bf-b8c0-0bbb0daa2430/14825.pdf.aspx?inline=true.
Australian Institute of Health andWelfare. (2018). Health expenditure Australia 2016-17 (tech. rep.No. 64). Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Canberra, ACT. https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/e8d37b7d-2b52-4662-a85f-01eb176f6844/aihw-hwe-74.pdf.aspx?inline=true.
Australian Institute of Health andWelfare. (2019). Hospital resources 2017-18: Australian hospital statistics (tech. rep. No. 233). Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Canberra, ACT. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/hospitals/hospital-resources-2017-18-ahs/contents/summary.
Badin, L., Daraio, C., & Simar, L. (2012). How to measure the impact of environmental factors in a nonparametric production model. European Journal of Operational Research, 223(3), 818–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.06.028.
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078.
Besstremyannaya, G. (2013). The impact of Japanese hospital financing reform on hospital efficiency: A difference-in-difference approach. The Japanese Economic Review, 64(3), 337–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5876.2012.00585.x.
Bogetoft, P., & Otto, L. (2019). Benchmarking: Benchmark and frontier analysis using DEA and SFA. R package version, 28. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Benchmarking.
Cazals, C., Florens, J.-P., & Simar, L. (2002). Nonparametric frontier estimation: Arobust approach. Journal of Econometrics, 106(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00080-X.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.
Chowdhury, H., & Zelenyuk, V. (2016). Performance of hospital services in Ontario: DEA with truncated regression approach. Omega, 63, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.10.007.
Chowdhury, H., Zelenyuk, V., Laporte, A., & Wodchis, W. P. (2014). Analysis of productivity, efficiency and technological changes in hospital services in Ontario: How does case-mix matter? International Journal of Production Economics, 150, 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pe.2013.12.003.
Clement, J. P., Valdmanis, V. G., Bazzoli, G. J., Zhao, M., & Chukmaitov, A. (2008). Is more better? an analysis of hospital outcomes and efficiency with a DEA model of output congestion. Health Care Management Science, 11(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-007-9025-8.
Council of Australian Governments. (2011). National health reform agreement. http://www.federalfinancialrelations.gov.au/content/npa/health/_archive/national-agreement.pdf.
Daouia, A., & Laurent, T. (2013). Frontiles: Partial frontier efficiency analysis. R package version, 1, 2. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/frontiles.
Daouia, A., & Simar, L. (2007). Nonparametric efficiency analysis: A multivariate conditional quantile approach. Journal of Econometrics, 140(2), 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.07.002.
Daraio, C., & Simar, L. (2007). Economies of scale, scope and experience in the italian motorvehicle sector. In Daraio, C., & Simar, L. (eds.), Advanced robust and nonparametric methods in efficiency analysis: Methodology and applications (pp. 135–165). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35231-2_6.
Daraio, C., Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2018). Central limit theorems for conditional efficiency measures and tests of the ’separability’ condition in non-parametric, two-stage models of production. The Econometrics Journal, 21(2), 170–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/ectj.12103.
Deprins, D., Simar, L., & Tulkens, H. (1984). Measuring labor efficiency in post offices. In M. G. Marchand, P. Pestieau, & H. Tulkens (Eds.), The performance of public enterprises: Concepts and measurements (pp. 243–267). North-Holland: Amsterdam.
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Logan, J. (1983). The relative efficiency of Illinois electric utilities. Resources and Energy, 5(4), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0572(83)90033-6.
Färe, R., & Zelenyuk, V., (2003). On aggregate Farrell efficiencies. European Journal of Operational Research, 146(3), 615–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00259-X.
Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100.
Grosskopf, S., Nguyen, B. H., Yong, J., & Zelenyuk, V. (2020). Healthcare structural reform and the performance of public hospitals: The case of Queensland, Australia [In Progress].
Hollingsworth, B. (2008). The measurement of efficiency and productivity of health care delivery. Health Economics, 17(10), 1107–1128. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1391.
Hu, H. H., Qi, Q., & Yang, C. H. (2012). Evaluation of China’s regional hospital efficiency: DEA approach with undesirable output. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 63(6), 715–725. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.77.
Kneip, A., Park, B. U., & Simar, L. (1998). A note on the convergence of nonparametric DEA estimators for production efficiency scores. Econometric Theory, 14, 783–793. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466698146042.
Kneip, A., Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2008). Asymptotics and consistent bootstraps for DEA estimators in nonparametric frontier models. Econometric Theory, 24(6), 1663–1697. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466608080651.
Kohl, S., Schoenfelder, J., & Fugener, A., & Brunner, J. O., (2019). The use of data envelopment analysis (DEA) in healthcare with a focus on hospitals. Health Care Management Science, 22(2), 245–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-018-9436-8.
Meeusen, W., & van Den Broeck, J. (1977). Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review, 18(2), 435–444. https://doi.org/10.2307/2525757.
Munson, F. C., & Zuckerman, H. S. (1983). The managerial role. In Shortell, S. M., & Kaluzny, A. D. (eds.), Health care management: A text in organization theory and behavior (pp. 48–58). Wiley.
Nguyen, B. H., & Zelenyuk, V. (2021). Aggregate efficiency of industry and its groups: The case of Queensland public hospitals. Empirical Economics. forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01994-1.
O’Neill, L., Rauner, M., Heidenberger, K., & Kraus, M. (2008). A cross-national comparison and taxonomy of DEA-based hospital efficiency studies. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 42(3), 158–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2007.03.001.
Park, B. U., Jeong, S.-O., & Simar, L. (2010). Asymptotic distribution of conical-hull estimators of directional edges. The Annals of Statistics, 38(3), 1320–1340. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-AOS746.
Park, B. U., Simar, L., & Weiner, C. (2000). FDH efficiency scores from a stochastic point of view. Econometric Theory, 16, 855–877. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466600166034.
Parmeter, C. F., & Zelenyuk, V. (2019). Combining the virtues of stochastic frontier and data envelopment analysis. Operations Research, 67(6), 1628–1658. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2018.1831.
Paul, C. J. M. (2002). Productive structure and efficiency of public hospitals. In Fox, K. J. (ed.), Efficiency in the public sector (pp. 219–248). Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3592-5_9.
Productivity Commission. (2010). Public and private hospital: Multivariate analysis (tech. rep. Supplement to Research Report). Productivity Commission. Canberra, ACT66. https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/hospitals/supplement/supplement.pdf.
Queensland Health. (2016). Health funding principles and guidelines 2016-17 financial year.
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
Shephard, R. W. (1953). Cost and production functions. Princeton University Press.
Shephard, R. W. (1970). Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton University Press.
Sickles, R., & Zelenyuk, V. (2019). Measurement of productivity and efficiency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139565981.
Simar, L. (2007). How to improve the performances of DEA/FDH estimators in the presence of noise? Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28(3), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-007-0057-3.
Simar, L., Van Keilegom, I., & Zelenyuk, V. (2017). Nonparametric least squares methods for stochastic frontier models. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 47(3), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-016-0474-2.
Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2007). Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics, 136(1), 31–64. https://doi.org/10.016/j.jeconom.2005.07.009.
Simar, L., & Wilson, P.W., (2011). Two-stage DEA: Caveat emptor. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 36(2), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-011-0230-6.
Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2013). Estimation and inference in nonparametric frontier models: Recent developments and perspectives. Foundations and Trends® in Econometrics, 5(3–4), 183–337. https://doi.org/10.1561/0800000020.
Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2015). Statistical approaches for non-parametric frontier models: A guided tour. International Statistical Review, 83(1), 77–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12056.
Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2020). Hypothesis testing in nonparametric models of production using multiple sample splits. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 53(3), 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-020-00574-w.
Simar, L., & Zelenyuk, V. (2007). Statistical inference for aggregates of Farrell-type efficiencies. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(7), 1367–1394. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.991.
Simar, L., & Zelenyuk, V. (2011). Stochastic FDH/DEA estimators for frontier analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 36(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-010-0170-6.
Simar, L., & Zelenyuk, V. (2018). Central limit theorems for aggregate efficiency. Operations Research, 66(1), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2017.1655.
Weisgrau, S. (1995). Issues in rural health: Access, hospitals, and reform. Health care Financing Review, 17(1), 1–14.
Zelenyuk, V. (2020). Aggregation of inputs and outputs prior to data envelopment analysis under big data. European Journal of Operational Research, 282(1), 172–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.08.007.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Editor and two anonymous referees for many fruitful comments that helped improving this paper substantially. We acknowledge the support from our institution. We also acknowledge the financial support from the Australian Research Council (from the ARC Future Fellowship grant FT170100401). We thank Dan O’Halloran for his fruitful comments. We also thank David Du, Hong Ngoc Nguyen, Zhichao Wang and Evelyn Smart for their feedback from proofreading. We acknowledge and thank Queensland Health for providing part of the data that we used in this study. These individuals and organizations are not responsible for the views expressed in this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nguyen, B.H., Zelenyuk, V. (2021). Robust Efficiency Analysis of Public Hospitals in Queensland, Australia. In: Daouia, A., Ruiz-Gazen, A. (eds) Advances in Contemporary Statistics and Econometrics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73249-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73249-3_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73248-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73249-3
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)