Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

From Design Thinking to Design Doing: Experiences from an Academic Staff Development Programme for Blended Course Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Conceptualizing and Innovating Education and Work with Networked Learning

Part of the book series: Research in Networked Learning ((RINL))

  • 566 Accesses

Abstract

The uptake of design thinking in higher education is on the rise. Yet, it has not been strongly established in academic staff development. This chapter reflects on a blended learning course design intervention, aimed at promoting a ‘design thinking mindset’ among university lecturers. By analysing empirical data gathered through participant interactions, we discuss the implications and potential of design thinking for academic staff development. Analysis of the data shows an increased awareness of a complex and diverse student body, a recognition of interdisciplinary collaboration, mentoring and reflection. Additionally, we highlight that adopting design thinking poses significant challenges, which include the need for continued practice, securing departmental buy-in and upscaling initiatives. The findings emphasise the importance of creating a ‘safe’ space to experiment, modelling a designing-on-the-go approach, focusing on the iterative processes of (re)design, providing scaffolding for learning, making the design thinking processes explicit, building a community of practice, giving regular feedback and maintaining the balance between playfulness and reflection. We conclude that this approach to academic staff development promotes an active practice of design thinking as ‘design doing’, to recognise and demonstrate the importance of empathy, which places the learner at the centre of the learning experience design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    See http://bit.ly/DBLcourseoutline

  2. 2.

    https://www.gillysalmon.com/carpe-diem.html

  3. 3.

    All names changed.

References

  • Bali, M., & Caines, A. (2018). A call for promoting ownership, equity, and agency in faculty development via connected learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0128-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beligatamulla, G., Rieger, J., Franz, J., & Strickfaden, M. (2019). Making pedagogic sense of design thinking in the higher education context. Open Education Studies, 1(1), 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2009). Change by design (Google eBook). Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=x7PjWyVUoVAC&pgis=1

  • Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Council on Aboriginal Learning Knowledge Center (CCALKC). (2007). First nations holistic lifelong learning model. Retrieved December 12, 2019, from https://bit.ly/2WrFjzW

  • Clinton, G., & Hokanson, B. (2011). Creativity in the training and practice of instructional designers: The Design/Creativity Loops model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(1), 111–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (2007). Designerly ways of knowing. Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • d.school. (2011). Design mindset and process (PowerPoint). Retrieved from https://dschool.stanford.edu/resources/getting-started-with-design-thinking

  • Di Russo, S. (2016). Understanding the behaviour of design thinking in complex environments. Unpublished PhD thesis, Swinburne University, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dysart, S., & Weckerle, C. (2015). Professional development in higher education: A model for meaningful technology integration. Journal for Information Technology Education: Innovative Practices, 14, 255–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gachago, D., Cruz, L., Belford, C., Livingston, C., Morkel, J., Patnaik, S., & Swartz, B. (under review). From third places to third spaces: Moving beyond mobile communities of practice in the age of COVID-19. International Journal for Academic Development Special Issue on “Conversations on learning and teaching: Changing conceptions and practice” (publication 2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gachago, D., Cruz, L., Morkel, J., & Parker, M. (2019). Development of cross-continental design principles for blended learning course design. In 8th International DEFSA Conference, 9–11 September 2019, Cape Town, South Africa (pp. 105–115). Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2Zv1tnc

    Google Scholar 

  • Gachago, D., Morkel, J., Hitge, L., Van Zyl, I., & Ivala, E. (2017). Developing eLearning champions: A design thinking approach. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gachago, D., Van Zyl, I., & Waghid, F. (forthcoming). More than delivery: Designing blended learning spaces with and for academic staff. In L. Sosibo & E. Ivala (Eds.), Creating effective teaching and learning spaces: Shaping futures and envisioning unity in diversity and transformations. Vernon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garreta-Domingo, M., Sloep, P. B., Hernández-Leo, D., & Mor, Y. (2017). Learning design for teacher professional development. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P. (2015). Teaching as design. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 2(2), 27–50. Retrieved from http://www.herdsa.org.au/wp-content/uploads/HERDSARHE2015v02p27.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitge, L. (2016). Cognitive apprenticeship in architecture education: Using a scaffolding tool to support conceptual design. Unpublished master thesis, University of Cape Town, Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson-Williams, C., & Deacon, A. (2013). Pedagogic strategies to support learning design thinking in a masters course. Educational Research for Social Change, 2(1), 82–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • IDEO. (2012). Design thinking for educators. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13757-0. Retrieved from http://www.designthinkingforeducators.com/

  • Irwin, T. (2015). Redesigning a design program: How Carnegie Mellon University is developing a design curricula for the 21st century. Solutions, 2015, 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivala, E. (2016). Educational technology training: Staff development approaches. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 14(3), 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jobst, B., Endrejat, P., & Meinel, C. (2011). Does design thinking mediate critical innovation skills? An interview approach to synthesize five competencies taught at the D. School. In International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (pp. 199–204). City University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobst, B., & Meinel, C. (2012). How can creative self-efficacy be fostered in design education? In International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (pp. 5220–5226). Artesis University College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juelsbo, T., Tanggaard, L., & Glaveanu, V. P. (2017). From design thinking to design doing. In F. Darbellay, Z. Moody, & L. Todd (Eds.), Creative design thinking: Interdisciplinary perspectives (Creativity in the twenty first century) (Vol. 1, 1st ed., pp. 149–167). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., & Hong, H. Y. (2015). Design thinking for education: Conceptions and applications in teaching and learning. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, B. (2005). How designers think: The design process demystified (4th ed.). Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morkel, J. (2015). Ideate crea8 iterate: A learning design workshop. ELearning Update, Caesar’s Palace, Johannesburg. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/jolandamorkel/learning-design-workshop-at-elearnigupdate-2015

  • Networked Learning Editorial Collective (NLEC). (2020). Networked learning: Inviting redefinition. Postdigital Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00167-8

  • Ng’ambi, D., Brown, C., Bozalek, V., Gachago, D., & Wood, D. (2016). Technology enhanced teaching and learning in South African higher education—A review of a 20 year journey. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 843–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, B. (2011). Design thinking is a failed experiment. So what’s next? Fast Company. Retrieved from http://www.fastcodesign.com/1663558/design-thinking-is-a-failed-experiment-sowhats-next

    Google Scholar 

  • Porcini, M. (2009). Your new design process is not enough! Hire design thinkers! Design Management Institute Review, 20(3), 6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauth, I., Köppen, E., Jobst, B., & Meinel, C. (2010). Design thinking: An educational model towards creative confidence. In 1st International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC 2010), (December) (pp. 1–8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, M. (2017). “Design doing”: What if we put more design into design thinking? In 4D designing development developing design (pp. 315–325).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saldana, J. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, J., Groeger, L., & Sobel, L. (2016). The design thinking mindset: An assessment of what we know and what we see in practice. Journal of Design, Business & Society, 2(3), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitzinger, J. (2016). 10 Learner experience powers from experience girl! Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/catspyjamas/10-learner-experience-powers-from-experience-girlimoot16-agents-of-change

  • Smulders, F. E. H. M., Dorst, K., & Vermaas, P. E. (2014). Applying design thinking elsewhere: Organizational context matters. In Proceedings of the 19th DMI: Academic Design Management Conference (pp. 2797–2817). Design Management Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soeder, U. (2016). The World Cafe design principles. Retrieved from http://www.theworldcafe.com/keyconcepts-resources/design-principles

  • Taheri, M., Unterholzer, T., Strasse, H., Hölzle, K., & Meinel, C. (2016). An educational perspective on design thinking learning outcomes. In The ISPIM Innovation Forum. ISPIM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornberg, R., & Charmaz, K. (2014). Grounded theory and theoretical coding. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 153–169). Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ulibarri, N., Cravens, A. E., Cornelius, M., Royalty, A., & Nabergoj, A. S. (2014). Research as design: Developing creative confidence in doctoral students through design thinking. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 9, 249–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Zyl, I., & De la Harpe, R. (2014). Mobile application design for health intermediaries. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies (Vol. 5, pp. 323–328). SCITEPRESS-Science and Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Thienen, J., Royalty, A., & Meinel, C. (2017). Design thinking in higher education: How students become dedicated creative problem solvers. In Handbook of research on creative problem-solving skill development in higher education (pp. 306–328). IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Walling, D. R. (2014). Designing learning for tablet classrooms: Innovations in instruction. Springer International.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela Gachago .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gachago, D., Morkel, J., van Zyl, I., Ivala, E. (2021). From Design Thinking to Design Doing: Experiences from an Academic Staff Development Programme for Blended Course Design. In: Dohn, N.B., Hansen, J.J., Hansen, S.B., Ryberg, T., de Laat, M. (eds) Conceptualizing and Innovating Education and Work with Networked Learning. Research in Networked Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85241-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85241-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85240-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85241-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics