Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Networked Practice Inquiry: A Small Window on the Students’ Viewpoint

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Conceptualizing and Innovating Education and Work with Networked Learning

Part of the book series: Research in Networked Learning ((RINL))

Abstract

Both networked learning and inquiry-based learning are signalled as pedagogical approaches which support and encourage the development of knowledge, skills and competences expected of a higher education learning experience. A combined networked learning and inquiry-based learning approach was envisaged as expedient to encourage postgraduate students to engage for learning on and with digital technologies simultaneously inspire wider life and work practice development. Past the course experience an interpretative study was taken up to obtain a description of this ‘networked practice inquiry’ approach from the students’ viewpoint. This chapter shares a description constituted from the disclosures of two participating students. In its capacity as a preliminary exploration, this research exposes students as enthused by networked practice inquiry methods for learning permitting them to deepen connections between study, work and life. Concurrently it exposes concerns deriving from the visibility networked learning educational openness conveys.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aditomo, A., Goodyear, P., Bliuc, A.-M., & Ellis, R. A. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in higher education: Principal forms, educational objectives, and disciplinary variations. Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), 1239–1258. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.616584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashwin, P. (2020). Transforming university education: A manifesto. Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, S. E., Edwards, R., & Doidge, M. (2012). How many qualitative interviews is enough?: Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research. Available at: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2273/

  • Bayne, S., Evans, P., Ewins, R., Knox, J., Lamb, J., Macleod, H., et al. (2020). The manifesto for teaching online. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beaty, L., Hodgson, V., Mann, S., & McConnell, D. (2002). Working towards E-quality in networked E-learning in higher education: A manifesto statement for debate. Retrieved from http://csalt.lancs.ac.uk/esrc/manifesto.pdf

  • Bell, A., Zenios, M., & Parchoma, G. (2010). Undergraduate experiences of coping with networked learning: Difficulties now, possibilities for the future. Paper presented at the Seventh International Conference on Networked Learning, Aalborg, Denmark. Online Proceedings. Retrieved from https://www.networkedlearning.aau.dk/past-conference-proceedings/

  • Bober, M., & Hynes, D. (2018). Tools for entertainment or learning? Exploring students’ and tutors’ domestication of mobile devices. In N. Bonderup Dohn, S. Cranmer, J.-A. Sime, M. De Laat, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), Networked learning: Reflections and challenges. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (2014). Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other. Oxon: UK: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer Commission. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research universities. State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brew, A. (2010). Imperatives and challenges in integrating teaching and research. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(2), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903552451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2001). The internet galaxy. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Caviglia, F., Dalsgaard, C., Davidsen, J., & Ryberg, T. (2018). Students’ digital learning environments. Paper presented at the Eleventh International Conference on Networked Learning, Zagreb, Croatia. Online Proceedings. Retrieved from https://www.networkedlearning.aau.dk/past-conference-proceedings/, https://www.networkedlearningconference.org.uk/abstracts/papers/dalsgaard_15.pdf

  • Corrin, L., Bennett, S., & Lockyer, L. (2010). Digital natives: Everyday life versus academic study. Paper presented at the Seventh International Conference on Networked Learning, Aalborg, Denmark. Online Proceedings. Retrieved from https://www.networkedlearning.aau.dk/past-conference-proceedings/

  • Creanor, L., Gowan, D., Howells, C., & Trinder, K. (2006). The learner’s voice: A focus on the e-learner experience. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Networked Learning, Lancaster, England. Online Proceedings. Retrieved from https://www.networkedlearning.aau.dk/past-conference-proceedings/

  • Cutajar, M. (2014). Qualitative differences in post-compulsory pre-university Maltese students’ accounts of their networked learning experiences. Ph.D., Lancaster University, Lancaster, England. Retrieved from https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/72904/

  • Cutajar, M. (2017). The student experience of learning using networked technologies: An emergent progression of expanding awareness. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(4), 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2017.1327451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutajar, M. (2018). Variation in students’ perceptions of others for learning. In N. Bonderup Dohn, S. Cranmer, J.-A. Sime, M. de Laat, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), Networked learning: Reflections and challenges. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czerniewicz, L., & Brown, C. (2010). Born into the Digital Age in the south of Africa: The reconfiguration of the “digital citizen”. Paper presented at the Seventh International Conference on Networked Learning, Aalborg, Denmark. Online Proceedings. Retrieved frp, https://www.networkedlearning.aau.dk/past-conference-proceedings/

  • Dahlbom, B. (2002). From systems to services. Retrieved from https://bodahlbom.se/2002/05/14/from-systems-to-services/

  • De Laat, M., & Lally, V. (2004). It’s not so easy: Researching the complexity of emergent participant roles and awareness in asynchronous networked learning discussions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(3), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00085.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dede, C. (2009). Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills. In J. Bellanca & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st century skills (pp. 51–76). Solution Tree Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawns, T. (2018). Postdigital education in design and practice. Postdigital Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0021-8

  • Ferreday, D., & Hodgson, V. (2008). The tyranny of participation and collaboration in networked learning. Paper presented at the Sixth International Conference on Networked Learning, Halkidiki, Greece. Online Proceedings. Retrieved from https://www.networkedlearning.aau.dk/past-conference-proceedings/

  • Finegold, A. R. D., & Cooke, L. (2006). Exploring the attitudes, experiences and dynamics of interaction in online groups. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P. (2001). Effective networked learning in higher education: Notes and Guidelines. Retrieved from England http://csalt.lancs.ac.uk/jisc/docs/Guidelines_final.doc

  • Goodyear, P., & Carvalho, L. (2014a). Networked learning and learning networks. In L. Calvalho & P. Goodyear (Eds.), The architecture of productive learning networks. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., & Carvalho, L. (2014b). Framing the analysis of learning network architectures. In L. Carvalho & P. Goodyear (Eds.), The architecture of productive learning networks. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., Jones, C., Asensio, M., Hodgson, V., & Steeples, C. (2005). Networked learning in higher education: Students’ expectations and experiences. Higher Education, 50(3), 473–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6364-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourlay, L., & Oliver, M. (2016). It’s not all about the learner: Reframing students’ digital literacy as sociomaterial practice. In T. Ryberg, C. Sinclair, S. Bayne, & M. de Laat (Eds.), Research, boundaries, and policy in networked learning (pp. 77–92). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, L., & Eynon, R. (2017). Digital divides and social justice in technology-enhanced learning. In E. Duval, M. Sharples, & R. Sutherland (Eds.), Technology enhanced learning: Research themes (pp. 157–168). Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, M. (2017). Online collaboration and cooperation: The recurring importance of evidence, rationale and viability. Education and Information Technologies, 22(3), 1005–1024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9469-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the “net generation”. Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, M. (2005). Linking research and teaching to benefit student learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260500130387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2015). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946

  • Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2011). Qualitative research methods. London, UK: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, P., Fisher, K., Gilding, T., Taylor, P. G., & Trevitt, A. (2000). Place and space in the design of new learning environments. Higher Education Research & Development, 19(2), 221–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jandrić, P., Knox, J., Besley, T., Ryberg, T., Suoranta, J., & Hayes, S. (2018). Postdigital science and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(10), 893–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1454000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaques, D., & Salmon, G. (2008). Learning in groups: A handbook for face-to-face and online environments. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, P., & O’Rourke, K. (2004). Guide to curriculum design: Enquiry-based learning. Higher Education Academy, 30(2), 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, G. E., Judd, T. S., Churchward, A., Gray, K., & Krause, K.-L. (2008). First year students’ experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 108–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerwald, B. A., & Bentley, B. P. (2020). Understanding and identifying cognitive load in networked learning. In N. Bonderup Dohn, P. Jandrić, T. Ryberg, & M. de Laat (Eds.), Mobility, data and learner agency in networked learning. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2005). Learners and learning in the twenty-first century: What do we know about students’ attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses? Studies in Higher Education, 30(3), 257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krüger, S. (2006). Students’ experiences of e-learning: A virtual ethnography into blended online learning. Paper presented at the Fifth International conference on Networked Learning, Lancaster, England. Online Proceedings. Retrieved from https://www.networkedlearning.aau.dk/past-conference-proceedings/

  • Lister, P. (2020). Smart learning in the community: Supporting citizen digital skills and literacies. In N. Streitz & S. Konomi (Eds.), Distributed, ambient and pervasive interactions. HCII 2020 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science) (Vol. 12203, pp. 533–547). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, S. (2010). A personal inquiry into an experience of adult learning online. In P. Goodyear, S. Banks, V. Hodgson, & D. McConnell (Eds.), Advances in research on networked learning. Kluwer Academic publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, P. (2019). Higher education in a globalising world. Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, D., Hodgson, V., & Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (2012). Networked learning: A brief history and new trends. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, & D. McConnell (Eds.), Exploring the theory, pedagogy and practice of networked learning. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Networked Learning Editorial Collective (NLEC). (2020). Networked learning: Inviting redefinition. Postdigital Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00167-8

  • Nicolajsen, H. W., & Thomas, R. (2014). Creating a peer-driven learning network in higher education. In L. Calvalho & P. Goodyear (Eds.), The architecture of productive learning networks. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R. (2008). Engaging first year students using a Web-supported inquiry-based learning setting. Higher Education, 55(3), 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9055-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, R. G. (2007). Information technology as a service. In Enterprise service computing: From concept to deployment (pp. 1–24). IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanau, R., Hosein, A., & Jones, C. (2010). Learning and living technologies: A longitudinal study of first-year students’ expectations and experiences in the use of ICT. Paper presented at the Seventh International Conference on Networked Learning, Aalborg, Denmark. Online Proceedings. Retrieved from https://www.networkedlearning.aau.dk/past-conference-proceedings/

  • Ramanau, R., Sharpe, R., & Benfield, G. (2008). Exploring patterns of student learning technology use in their relationship to self-regulation and perceptions of learning community. Paper presented at the International Conference on Networked Learning, Halkidiki: Greece. Online Proceedings. Retrieved from https://www.networkedlearning.aau.dk/past-conference-proceedings/

  • Reynolds, M., & Trehan, K. (2003). Learning from difference? Management Learning, 34(2), 163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryberg, T., Buus, L., & Georgsen, M. (2012). Differences in understandings of networked learning theory: Connectivity or collaboration? In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, & D. McConnell (Eds.), Exploring the theory, pedagogy and practice of networked learning. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryberg, T., Davidsen, J., & Hodgson, V. (2018a). Understanding nomadic collaborative learning groups. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryberg, T., & Larsen, M. C. (2008). Networked identities: Understanding relationships between strong and weak ties in networked environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00272.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryberg, T., Sørensen, M. T., & Davidsen, J. (2018b). Student groups as ‘adhocracies’—Challenging our understanding of PBL, collaboration and technology use. Paper presented at the Seventh International Research Symposium on PBL: Innovation, PBL and Competences in Engineering Education, Aalborg, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sclater, M., & Bolander, K. (2010). Factors influencing students’ orientation to collaboration in networked learning. In P. Goodyear, S. Banks, V. Hodgson, & D. McConnell (Eds.), Advances in research on networked learning (pp. 175–203). Springer Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shivonen, M. (2020). Online learning from the peers in higher education. Paper presented at the Twelfth International Conference on Networked Learning, Kolding, Denmark [online]. Online Proceedings. Retrieved from https://www.networkedlearning.aau.dk/past-conference-proceedings/

  • Siemens, G., Gašević, D., & Dawson, S. (2015). Preparing for the digital university: A review of the history and current state of distance, blended, and online learning. Retrieved from http://linkresearchlab.org/PreparingDigitalUniversity.pdf

  • Spronken-Smith, R. (2012). Experiencing the process of knowledge creation: The nature and use of inquiry-based learning in higher education. Paper presented at the International Colloquium on Practices for Academic Inquiry, University of Otago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen, D. L., Sørensen, M. T., & Ryberg, T. (2016). Where have all the students gone? They are all on Facebook now. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Networked Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Malta Strategic Plan 2020–2025: Serving students, scholarship and society, sustainably. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.um.edu.mt/about/strategy

  • Välimaa, J., & Hoffman, D. (2008). Knowledge society discourse and higher education. Higher Education, 56(3), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9123-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitworth, A., & Webster, L. (2020). Stewarding and power in networked learning. In Mobility, data and learner agency in networked learning (pp. 137–153). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, B. (2020). New pandemic edtech power networks. Retrieved from https://codeactsineducation.wordpress.com/2020/04/01/new-pandemic-edtech-power-networks/?fbclid=IwAR3ZpTEr8SClkhdMU82jwS6PLuCwYvpXtU3oQjAX1Flm-rdhyAK__JhG46k

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Cutajar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cutajar, M. (2021). Networked Practice Inquiry: A Small Window on the Students’ Viewpoint. In: Dohn, N.B., Hansen, J.J., Hansen, S.B., Ryberg, T., de Laat, M. (eds) Conceptualizing and Innovating Education and Work with Networked Learning. Research in Networked Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85241-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85241-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85240-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85241-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics