Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Epistemology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
An Introduction to Knowledge Graphs

  • 122 Accesses

Abstract

The epistemological level provides primitives that connect conceptual modelling (e.g., types and properties modelling a domain) to a logical formalism. In the context of knowledge graphs, epistemological primitives manifest as languages for modelling and manipulating knowledge. In this chapter, we introduce the modelling primitives of RDF(S), SPARQL, SHACL, OWL, Rules, F-logic, and SKOS with examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Angele J, Kifer M, Lausen G (2009) Ontologies in F-logic. In: Studer R (ed) Staab S. Springer, Handbook on ontologies, pp 45–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoniou G, Groth P, Van Harmelen F, Hoekstra R (2012) A semantic web primer, 3rd edn. MIT press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechhofer S (2010) SKOS: past, present and future. The Semantic Web: Research and applications. http://videolectures.net/eswc2010_bechhofer_sppf/

  • Carroll JJ, Bizer C, Hayes P, Stickler P (2005) Named graphs. Journal of Web Semantics 3(4):247–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceri S, Gottlob G, Tanca L et al (1989) What you always wanted to know about Datalog (and never dared to ask). IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 1(1):146–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Kifer M, Warren DS (1993) HiLog: a foundation for higher-order logic programming. J Log Program 15(3):187–230

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Corby O, Zucker CF, Gandon F (2014) SPARQL template: a transformation language for RDF. PhD thesis, Inria

    Google Scholar 

  • De Giacomo G, Lenzerini M, Rosati R. On higher-order description logics. In Proceedings of the 22nd international workshop on description logics (DL2009) Oxford, July 27–30, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumontier M (2012) Real world applications of OWL, Protege short course presentation. https://www.slideshare.net/micheldumontier/owlbased-applications

  • Fellbaum C (2010) Princeton university: about WordNet. https://wordnet.princeton.edu/

  • Fensel D, Decker S, Erdmann M, Studer R (1998) Ontobroker: the very high idea. In: Proceedings of the eleventh international Florida artificial intelligence research society conference, May 18–20, 1998, AAAI Press, Sanibel Island, FL, pp 131–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensel D, Van Harmelen F, Horrocks I, McGuinness DL, Patel-Schneider PF (2001) OIL: an ontology infrastructure for the semantic web. IEEE Intell Syst 16(2):38–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gayo JEL, Prud’Hommeaux E, Boneva I, Kontokostas D (2017) Validating RDF data. Synthesis Lectures on Semantic Web: Theory and Technology 7(1):1–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpin H, Hayes PJ, McCusker JP, McGuinness DL, Thompson HS (2010) When owl: sameAs isn’t the same: an analysis of identity in linked data. In: The semantic web–ISWC 2010: 9th international semantic web conference, ISWC 2010, Shanghai, November 7–11, 2010, Revised Selected Papers, Part I, Springer, pp 305–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond T, Pasin M, Theodoridis E (2017) Data integration and disintegration: managing springer nature SciGraph with SHACL and OWL. In: Proceedings of the international semantic web conference (ISWC) 2017 (Posters, Demos & Industry Tracks), October 21–25, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartig O, Champin PA (2021) Metadata for RDF statements: the RDF-Star approach. In: Lotico

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman I (2012) SW tutorial. http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/CorePresentations/SWTutorial

  • Horrocks I (2009) OWL 2: the next generation. London Semantic Web Meetup Group. http://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/people/ian.horrocks/Seminars/download/OWL2-overview.pdf

  • Isaac A (2011) SKOS: simple knowledge organization system. Dublin Core tutorial. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.402.9073&rep=rep1&type=pdf/

  • Käfer T (2021) Distributed knowledge graphs: knowledge graphs and linked data, AI4Industry Summer School. https://ai4industry2021.sciencesconf.org/data/program/dkg.pdf

  • Kifer M (2005) Rules and ontologies in F-logic. In: Reasoning Web: First International Summer School 2005, Msida, Malta, July 25–29, 2005, Revised Lectures, Springer, pp 22–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Kifer M (2011) KR and reasoning on the semantic web: RIF. In: Domingue J, Fensel D, Hendler JA (eds) . Springer, Handbook of semantic web technologies, pp 399–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Kifer M, Lausen G (1989) F-logic: a higher-order language for reasoning about objects, inheritance and schema. In: SIGMOD/PODS04: international conference on management of data and symposium on principles database and systems, Portland, OR, June 1, pp. 134–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Kifer M, Lausen G, Wu J (1995) Logical foundations of object-oriented and frame-based languages. J ACM 42(4):741–843

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kontokostas D, Westphal P, Auer S, Hellmann S, Lehmann J, Cornelissen R, Zaveri A (2014) Test-driven evaluation of linked data quality. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World Wide Web, Seoul, Korea, April 7–11, pp 747–758

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludäscher B, Yang G, Kifer M (1999) Flora: The secret of object-oriented logic programming. Technical report, SUNY at Stony Brook

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness D, Fikes R, Stein L, Hendler J (2003) DAML-ONT: an ontology language for the Semantic Web, pp 65–93. In: Fensel et al. [2005]

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomarolli A, Anderlik S, Ká¹»ng J (2012) R2RIF-rule integration plugin for Protégé OWL. In: Computer aided systems theory–EUROCAST 2011: 13th international conference, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, February 6–11, 2011, Revised Selected Papers, Part I 13, Springer, pp 137–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Rietveld L, Hoekstra R (2017) The YASGUI family of SPARQL clients. Semantic Web 8(3):373–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sack H (2020) Semantic Web Technologies. OpenHPI, Hasso Plattner Institute. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLoOmvuyo5UAeihlKcWpzVzB51rr014TwD

  • Straccia U (2013) Foundations of fuzzy logic and semantic web languages. Taylor & Francis

    Google Scholar 

  • Verborgh R, De Roo J (2015) Drawing conclusions from linked data on the web: the EYE reasoner. IEEE Softw 32(3):23–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, Semantic Technology Institute, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

    Umutcan Serles & Dieter Fensel

Authors
  1. Umutcan Serles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dieter Fensel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Serles, U., Fensel, D. (2024). Epistemology. In: An Introduction to Knowledge Graphs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45256-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45256-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-45255-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-45256-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation