Abstract
Planning of complex chemical syntheses is illustrated by application of two different approaches (Corey’s and Ugi-Dugundji’s) in designing of new pharmaceuticals. The second approach (known worldwide as the D–U model) allows to generate synthetic pathways to required compounds, neglecting very expensive process of searching through enormously large databases on chemical reactions. The main features of both approaches are briefly discussed, and finally our own extension of the D–U model—based on the application of machine learning methods—is briefly discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bunin BA, Siesel B, Morales G, Bajorath J (2007) Chemoinformatics: theory, practice & products. Springer, Berlin
Cohagan C, Grzymala-Busse JW, Hippe ZS (2012) Experiments on mining inconsistent data with bagging and the MLEM2 rule induction. J Granular Comp, Rough Sets Int Syst 2:257–271
Dugundji J, Ugi I (1973) An algebraic model of constitutional chemistry as a basis for chemical computer programs. Topics Curr Chem 39:19–64
Grzymala-Busse JW, Grzymala-Busse WJ, Hippe ZS, Rząsa W (2010) An improved comparison of three rough set approaches to missing attribute values. Control Cybern 39:1–18
Hippe ZS, Fic G, Mazur M (1992) A preliminary appraisal of selected problems in computer-assisted organic synthesis. ReclTrav Chim Pays-Bas 111:255–261
Hippe ZS (2007) A suite of computer program systems for machine learning. Zamojskie Studia i Materiały 9:39–52 (in Polish)
Hippe ZS (2011) Special problems of databases design and exploitation in planning of pharmaceuticals. In: Nowakowski A (ed) Infobases: science, european projects, informational community. Informatic Center TASK, Gdańsk, Poland (in Polish)
Jackson P (1999) Introduction to expert systems. Addison-Wesley Longman Limited, Harlow
Knuth D (1997) The art of computer programming: fundamental algorithms (Section 2.3: Trees). Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts
Morrison RT, Boyd RN (1997) Organic chemistry. Allyn and Bacon Inc, Boston
Thompson JR, Koronacki J (2001) Statistical process control: the deming paradigm and beyond. Chapman and Hall, New York
Acknowledgment
Many thanks are expressed for generous support from Ministry of Education of Poland (grants 3 T11C 013 30 and 3 T11C 033 30). I am extremely grateful to my coworkers: Dr G Nowak, Dr G Fic and MSc M Mazur for creative and devoted cooperation over many years, and for excellent work done during implementation of some new machine learning ideas into the computer system CSB.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hippe, Z.S. (2014). A Comparison of Two Approaches Used for Intelligent Planning of Complex Chemical Syntheses. In: S. Hippe, Z., L. Kulikowski, J., Mroczek, T., Wtorek, J. (eds) Issues and Challenges in Artificial Intelligence. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 559. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06883-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06883-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06882-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06883-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)