Abstract
While designing for experience is now mainstream, the technology design community is still grappling with understanding meaningful ways of involving users and participants in the design of experiences and technologies that don’t yet exist. In this chapter, I discuss three distinct techniques collaborators and I have used across different projects to involve participants in exploring future experiences and to anticipate the consequences of new technologies. While the formats of the techniques and contexts explored are diverse, the examples I discuss—questionable concepts, invisible design and experience design theatre—have in common the use of provocation to seed discussion, ideation and anticipation. In this chapter I explain the motivations behind these techniques, how we have used them in specific projects, and the ways they have enabled non-designers to engage in meaningful forms of design criticism and to shape the direction of technology design projects. I close the chapter with some reflections on the techniques, drawing out practical learning for how techniques like these might enable designers and participants to play with provocation in future projects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
References
Andersen K (2012) Making magic machines. In: Proceedings of the 10th European Academy of Design conference
Bardzell J, Bardzell S (2011) Pleasure is your birthright: digitally enabled designer sex toys as a case for third-wave HCI. In: Proceedings of CHI 2011, pp 257–266. ACM Press, New York
Bardzell S, Bardzell J, Forlizzi J, Zimmerman J, Antanitis J (2012) Critical design and critical theory: the challenge of designing for provocation. In: Proceedings of DIS 2012, pp 288–297. ACM Press, New York
Bell G, Blythe M, Sengers P (2005) Making by making strange: defamiliarization and the design of domestic technologies. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact 12(2):149–173
Boal A (1979) Theatre of the oppressed. Pluto Press, London
Blythe M, Andersen K, Clarke R, Wright P (2016) Anti-solutionist strategies: seriously silly design fiction. In: Proceedings of CHI 2016, pp 4968–4978. ACM Press, New York
Briggs P, Olivier P (2009) Film as invisible design: the example of the Biometric Daemon. Extended abstracts of CHI 2009, pp 3511–3512. ACM Press, New York
Briggs P, Blythe M, Vines J, Lindsay S, Dunphy P, Nicholson J, Green D, Kitson J, Monk A, Olivier P (2012) Invisible design: exploring insights and ideas through ambiguous film scenarios. In: Proceedings of DIS 2012, pp 534–543. ACM Press, New York
Cabrero D, Winschiers-Theophilus H, Abdelnour-Nocera J, Koch Kapuire G (2016) A hermeneutic inquiry into user-created personas in different Namibian locales. In: Proceedings of PDC 2016, pp 101–110. ACM Press, New York
Chin G Jr, Rosson M, Carroll J (1997) Participatory analysis: shared development of requirements from scenarios. In: Proceedings of CHI 1997, pp 162–169. ACM Press, New York
Dunne A, Raby F (2001) Design noir: the secret life of electronic objects. Birkhäuser, Berlin
Dunne A, Raby F (2013) Speculative everything: design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT Press, Cambridge
Graham C, Rouncefield M (2008) Probes and participation. In: Proceedings of PDC’08, pp 194–197. ACM Press, New York
Laurel B (1993) Computers as theatre. Addison Wesley, Boston
Lindsay D, Jackson D, Schofield G, Olivier P (2012) Engaging older people using participatory design. In: Proceedings of CHI 2012, pp 1199–1208. ACM Press, New York
Mancini C, Rogers Y, Bandara AK, Coe T, Jedrzejczyk L, Joinson AN, Price BA, Thomas K, Nuseibeh B (2010) Contravision: exploring users’ reactions to futuristic technology. In: Proceedings of CHI 2010, pp 153–162. ACM Press, New York
Newell A, Carmichael A, Morgan M, Dickinson A (2006) The use of theatre in requirements gathering and usability studies. Interact Comput 18(5):996–1011
Newell A, Morgan M, Gregor P, Charmichael A (2011) Theatre as an intermediary between users and CHI designers. Extended abstracts of CHI 2006, pp 111–116. ACM Press, New York
Raijmakers B, Gaver W, Bishay J (2006) Design documentaries: inspiring design research through documentary film. In: Proceedings of DIS 2006, pp 229–238. ACM Press, New York
Raptis D, Jensen R, Kjeldskov J, Skov M (2017) Aesthetic, functional and conceptual provocation in research through design. In: Proceedings of DIS 2017, pp 29–41. ACM Press, New York
Rice M, Newell A, Morgan M (2007) Forum theatre as a requirements gathering methodology in the design of a home telecommunication system for older adults. Behav Inf Technol 26(4):323–331
Sanders E, Stappers PJ (2012) Convivial toolbox: generative research for the front end of design. BIS Publishers, Amsterdam
Tanenbaum J, Pufal M, Tanenbaum K (2016) The limits of our imagination: design fiction as a strategy for engaging with dystopian futures. In: Proceedings of LIMITS 2016, article 10. ACM Press, New York
Vines J, Blythe M, Lindsay S, Dunphy P, Monk A, Olivier P (2012) Questionable concepts: critique as a resource for designing with eighty somethings. In: Proceedings of CHI 2012, pp 1169–1178. ACM Press, New York
Vines J, Denman-Cleaver T, Dunphy P, Wright P, Olivier P (2014) Experience design theatre: exploring the role of live theatre in scaffolding design dialogues. In: Proceedings of CHI 2014, pp 683–692. ACM Press, New York
Vines J, Wright P, Silver D, Winchcombe M, Olivier P (2015) Authenticity, relatability and collaborative approaches to sharing knowledge about assistive living technology. In: Proceedings of CSCW 2015, pp 82–94. ACM Press, New York
Acknowledgements
The techniques and projects I have described above have come from a range of projects and are the fruit of collaborations with many fantastic people. Specific thanks must go to Pam Briggs, Mark Blythe, Andrew Monk, Patrick Olivier, Pete Wright, Stephen Lindsay, Paul Dunphy and Tess Denman-Cleaver. The projects described have been funded by a range of sources, including: the EPSRC funded ‘New Approaches to Banking for the Older Old’ project (EP/H042911/1); the EPSRC Digital Economy theme ‘Social Inclusion through the Digital Economy Research Hub’ (EP/G066019/1); the Technology Strategy Board funded ‘SALT’ project (2377-25137); and the EU FP7-ICT ‘OASIS’ project (215754). Thanks to all the participants across these many projects whom have contributed their time and effort to our research, and put up with our silly ideas and our occasionally strange activities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vines, J. (2018). Playing with Provocations. In: Blythe, M., Monk, A. (eds) Funology 2. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68213-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68213-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68212-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68213-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)