Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Norms, Institutional Power and Roles: Towards a Logical Framework

  • Conference paper
Foundations of Intelligent Systems (ISMIS 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4203))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In the design of the organisation of a multiagent system the concept of role is fundamental. We informally analyse this concept through examples. Then we propose a more formal definition that can be decomposed into: the conditions that have to be satisfied to hold a role, the norms and institutional powers that apply to a role holder. Finally, we present a modal logical framework to represent these concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aqvist, L.: Deontic logic. In: Gabbay, D., Guenthner, F. (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 2, Reidel (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Broersen, J., Dignum, F., Dignum, V., Meyer, J.-J.C.: Designing a deontic logic of deadlines. In: Lomuscio, A., Nute, D. (eds.) DEON 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3065, Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Carmo, J., Jones, A.J.I.: Deontic Logic and Contrary-to-Duties. In: Gabbay, D. (ed.) Handbook of Philosphical Logic (rev. Edition), Reidel (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chellas, B.F.: Modal Logic: An introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dastani, M., Dignum, V., Dignum, F.: Role-assignement in open agent societies. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Demolombe, R., Bretier, P., Louis, V.: Formalisation de l’obligation de faire avec délais. Troisiémes Journées francophones Modéles Formels de l’Interaction (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Demolombe, R., Hamon, E.: What does it mean that an agent is performing a typical procedure? A formal definition in the Situation Calculus. In: Castelfranci, C., Lewis Johnson, W. (eds.) First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fasli, M.: On commitments, roles and obligations. In: Second International Workshop of Central Eastern Europe on Multi-Agent Systems on: From theory to practice in multi-agent systems (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hohfeld, W.N.: Some fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning. Yale Law Journal 23 (1913)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jones, A.J., Sergot, M.: A formal characterisation of institutionalised power. Journal of the Interest Group in Pure and Applied Logics 4(3) (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jones, A.J.I.: A logical framework. In: Pitt, J. (ed.) The Open Agent Society, John Wiley and Sons (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kanger, S.: New foundations of ethical theory. In: Hilpinen, R. (ed.) Deontic logic, pp. 36–58. D. Reidel Publishing Company (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Krogh, C.: Obligations in multiagents systems. In: Proceedings of the fifth Scandinavian Conference on AI, IOS Press, Amsterdam (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Makinson, D.: On the formal representation of rights relations. Journal of Philosophical Logic 15 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pörn, I.: Action Theory and Social Science. Some Formal Models. Synthese Library 120 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Searle, J.R.: Speech Acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press, New-York (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Segerberg, K.: Some Meinong/Chisholm thesis. In: Segerberg, K., Sliwinski, K. (eds.) Logic, Law, Morality. A festrichft in honor of Lennart Aqvist, vol. 51, pp. 67–77. Uppsala Philosophical Studies (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Segerberg, K.: Intension, Intention. In: Kahle, R. (ed.) To be announced, CSLI Publications (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. von Wright, G.H.: Norm and Action. Routledge and Kegan (1963)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Demolombe, R., Louis, V. (2006). Norms, Institutional Power and Roles: Towards a Logical Framework. In: Esposito, F., RaÅ›, Z.W., Malerba, D., Semeraro, G. (eds) Foundations of Intelligent Systems. ISMIS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4203. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11875604_58

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11875604_58

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-45764-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45766-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics