Abstract
Case-based reasoning systems usually accept the conventional similarity assumption during retrieval, preferring to retrieve a set of cases that are maximally similar to the target problem. While we accept that this works well in many domains, we suggest that in others it is misplaced. In particular, we argue that often diversity can be as important as similarity. This is especially true in case-based recommender systems. In this paper we propose and evaluate strategies for improving retrieval diversity in CBR systems without compromising similarity or efficiency.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aamodt, A. and Plaza, E.: Case-Based Reasoning: Foundational Issues, Methodological Variations, and System Approaches. AI Communications, 7(1):39–52, 1994.
Bergmann, R., Richter, M., Schmitt, S., Stahl, A. and Vollrath, I.: Utility-SOriented Matching: A New Research Direction for Case-Based Reasoning. In: Proceedings of the German Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning, 2001.
Burke, R.: Conceptual Indexing and Active Retrieval of Video for Interactive Learning Environments. Knowledge-Based Systems, 9(8):491–499, 1996.
Burke, R.: A case-based approach to collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the 5th European Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning. Springer-Verlag, 2000.
Faltings, B.: Probabilistic Indexing for Case-Based Prediction. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, pages 611–622. Springer-Verlag, 1997.
S. Fox, S. and Leake, D. B.: Using Introspective Reasoning to Refine Indexing. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 391–397. Morgan Kaufmann, 1995.
Kolodner, J.: Judging which is the “best” case for a case-based reasoner. In: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning, pages 77–81. Morgan Kaufmann, 1989.
Kolodner, J.: Case-Based Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.
Konstan, J.A., Miller, B.N., Maltz, D., Herlocker, J.L., Gorgan, L.R., and J. Riedl.: GroupLens: Applying collaborative filtering to Usenet news. Communications of the ACM, 40(3):77–87, 1997.
Leake, D. B.: Case-Based Reasoning: Experiences,Lessons and Future Directions. AAAI/MIT Press, 1996.
Leake, D. B.: Constructive Similarity Assessment: Using Stored Cases to Define New Situations. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 313–318. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 1992.
Smyth, B. and Cotter, P.: A Personalized TV Listings Service for the Digital TV Age. Journal of Knowledge-Based Systems, 13(2-3):53–59, 2000.
Smyth, B.: and Keane, M.: Adaptation-Guided Retrieval: Questioning the Similarity Assumption in Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 102:249–293, 1998.
Smyth, B.: and McKenna, E.: Incremental Footprint-Based Retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 21st SGES International Conference on Knowledge Based Systems and Applied Artificial Intelligence, pages 89–101. Springer Verlag, 2000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Smyth, B., McClave, P. (2001). Similarity vs. Diversity. In: Aha, D.W., Watson, I. (eds) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. ICCBR 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2080. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44593-5_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44593-5_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42358-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44593-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive