Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mechanically Coupled Reaction-Diffusion Model to Predict Glioma Growth: Methodological Details

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Cancer Systems Biology

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1711))

  • 7110 Accesses

Abstract

Biophysical models designed to predict the growth and response of tumors to treatment have the potential to become a valuable tool for clinicians in care of cancer patients. Specifically, individualized tumor forecasts could be used to predict response or resistance early in the course of treatment, thereby providing an opportunity for treatment selection or adaption. This chapter discusses an experimental and modeling framework in which noninvasive imaging data is used to initialize and parameterize a subject-specific model of tumor growth. This modeling approach is applied to an analysis of murine models of glioma growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yankeelov TE, Quaranta V, Evans KJ, Rericha EC (2015) Toward a science of tumor forecasting for clinical oncology. Cancer Res 75(6):918–923

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atuegwu NC, Gore JC, Yankeelov TE (2010) The integration of quantitative multi-modality imaging data into mathematical models of tumors. Phys Med Biol 55(9):2429–2449

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Atuegwu NC, Colvin DC, Loveless ME, Xu L, Gore JC, Yankeelov TE (2012) Incorporation of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data into a simple mathematical model of tumor growth. Phys Med Biol 57(1):225–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Weis JA, Miga MI, Arlinghaus LR, Li X, Chakravarthy AB, Abramson V et al (2013) A mechanically coupled reaction-diffusion model for predicting the response of breast tumors to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Phys Med Biol 58(17):5851–5866

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Hormuth DA II, Weis JA, Barnes SL, Miga MI, Rericha EC, Quaranta V et al (2015) Predicting in vivo glioma growth with the reaction diffusion equation constrained by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging data. Phys Biol 12(4):46006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Weis JA, Miga MI, Arlinghaus LR, Li X, Abramson V, Chakravarthy AB et al (2015) Predicting the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant therapy using a mechanically coupled reaction-diffusion model. Cancer Res 75(22):4697–4707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Baldock A, Rockne R, Boone A, Neal M, Bridge C, Guyman L et al (2013) From patient-specific mathematical neuro-oncology to precision medicine. Front Oncol 3:62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Corwin D, Holdsworth C, Rockne RC, Trister AD, Mrugala MM, Rockhill JK et al (2013) Toward patient-specific, biologically optimized radiation therapy plans for the treatment of glioblastoma. PLoS One 8(11):e79115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hogea C, Davatzikos C, Biros G (2008) An image-driven parameter estimation problem for a reaction-diffusion glioma growth model with mass effects. J Math Biol 56(6):793–825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu Y, Sadowski SM, Weisbrod AB, Kebebew E, Summers RM, Yao J (2014) Patient specific tumor growth prediction using multimodal images. Med Image Anal 18(3):555–566

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Konukoglu E, Clatz O, Menze BH, Stieltjes B, Weber M-A, Mandonnet E et al (2010) Image guided personalization of reaction-diffusion type tumor growth models using modified anisotropic eikonal equations. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29:77–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Garg I, Miga MI (2008) Preliminary investigation of the inhibitory effects of mechanical stress in tumor growth. Proc SPIE 29:69182L-11

    Google Scholar 

  13. Venes D (2013) Taber’s® cyclopedic medical dictionary, 22nd edn. F. A. Davis Company, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  14. DeAngelis LM (2001) Brain tumors. N Engl J Med 344(2):114–123

    Google Scholar 

  15. Helmlinger G, Netti PA, Lichtenbeld HC, Melder RJ, Jain RK (1997) Solid stress inhibits the growth of multicellular tumor spheroids. Nat Biotechnol 15(8):778–783

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Padhani AR, Liu G, Mu-Koh D, Chenevert TL, Thoeny HC, Takahara T et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia 11(2):102–125

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yankeelov TE, Gore JC (2009) Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oncology: theory, data acquisition, analysis, and examples. Curr Med Imaging Rev 3(2):91–107

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Barth R, Kaur B (2009) Rat brain tumor models in experimental neuro-oncology: the C6, 9L, T9, RG2, F98, BT4C, RT-2 and CNS-1 gliomas. J Neuro-Oncol 94(3):299–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hormuth DA II, Weis JA, Barnes SL, Miga MI, Rericha EC, Quaranta V, Yankeelov TE (2017). A mechanically-coupled reaction-diffusion model that incorporates intra-tumoral heterogeneity to predict in vivo glioma growth. J R Soc Interface 14:128

    Google Scholar 

  20. Barnes SL, Sorace AG, Loveless ME, Whisenant JG, Yankeelov TE (2015) Correlation of tumor characteristics derived from DCE-MRI and DW-MRI with histology in murine models of breast cancer. NMR Biomed 28(10):1345–1356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Anderson AW, Xie J, Pizzonia J, Bronen RA, Spencer DD, Gore JC (2000) Effects of cell volume fraction changes on apparent diffusion in human cells. Magn Reson Imaging 18(6):689–695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Guo Y, Cai Y-Q, Cai Z-L, Gao Y-G, An N-Y, Ma L et al (2002) Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 16(2):172–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, Ikushima I, Shigematu Y, Hirai T et al (1999) Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 9(1):53–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Humphries PD, Sebire NJ, Siegel MJ, Olsen ØE (2007) Tumors in pediatric patients at diffusion-weighted mr imaging: apparent diffusion coefficient and tumor cellularity. Radiology 245(3):848–854

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Whisenant JG, Ayers GD, Loveless ME, Barnes SL, Colvin DC, Yankeelov TE (2014) Assessing reproducibility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging studies in a murine model of HER2+ breast cancer. Magn Reson Imaging 32(3):245–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Martin I, Dozin B, Quarto R, Cancedda R, Beltrame F (1997) Computer-based technique for cell aggregation analysis and cell aggregation in in vitro chondrogenesis. Cytometry 28(2):141–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rouzaire-Dubois B, Milandri JB, Bostel S, Dubois JM (2000) Control of cell proliferation by cell volume alterations in rat C6 glioma cells. Pflugers Arch 440(6):881–888

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Elkin BS, Ilankovan AI, Morrison B III (2011) A detailed viscoelastic characterization of the P17 and adult rat brain. J Neurotrauma 28:2235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee SJ, King MA, Sun J, Xie HK, Subhash G, Sarntinoranont M (2014) Measurement of viscoelastic properties in multiple anatomical regions of acute rat brain tissue slices. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 29:213–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lynch D (2005) Numerical partial differential equations for environmental scientsits and engineers: a first practical course. Springer, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  31. Miga MI, Paulsen KD, Lemery JM, Eisner SD, Hartov A, Kennedy FE et al (1999) Model-updated image guidance: initial clinical experiences with gravity-induced brain deformation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 10:866–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Levenberg K (1944) A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares. Q J Appl Mathmatics II(2):164–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Marquardt DW (1963) An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. J Soc Ind Appl Math 11(2):431–441

    Google Scholar 

  34. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45(2):228–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yankeelov TE, Atuegwu N, Hormuth DA, Weis JA, Barnes SL, Miga MI et al (2013) Clinically relevant modeling of tumor growth and treatment response. Sci Transl Med 5(187):187ps9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Marino S, Hogue IB, Ray CJ, Kirschner DE (September 2008) A methodology for performing global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in systems biology. J Theor Biol 254(1):178–196

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Broyden CG (1965) A class of methods for solving nonlinear simultaneous equations. Math Comput 19(92):577–593

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported through funding from CPRIT RR160005 and the National Cancer Institute U01CA174706, K25CA204599, and R01CA186193, from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke R01NS049251 and the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center Support Grant (NIH P30CA68485).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Computational and Engineering Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

    David A. Hormuth II, Stephanie L. Eldridge & Thomas E. Yankeelov

  2. Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

    Stephanie L. Eldridge & Thomas E. Yankeelov

  3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

    Jared A. Weis

  4. Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

    Jared A. Weis

  5. Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA

    Michael I. Miga

  6. Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA

    Michael I. Miga

  7. Department of Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA

    Michael I. Miga

  8. Diagnostic Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

    Michael I. Miga & Thomas E. Yankeelov

  9. Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

    Thomas E. Yankeelov

Authors
  1. David A. Hormuth II
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephanie L. Eldridge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jared A. Weis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael I. Miga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Thomas E. Yankeelov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to David A. Hormuth II or Thomas E. Yankeelov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. NNF Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Louise von Stechow

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Hormuth, D.A., Eldridge, S.L., Weis, J.A., Miga, M.I., Yankeelov, T.E. (2018). Mechanically Coupled Reaction-Diffusion Model to Predict Glioma Growth: Methodological Details. In: von Stechow, L. (eds) Cancer Systems Biology. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1711. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7493-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7493-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7492-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7493-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation