Abstract
Generalization is the ability of a model to perform well on cases not seen during the training phase. In Genetic Programming generalization has recently been recognized as an important open issue, and increased efforts are being made towards evolving models that do not overfit. In this work we expand on recent developments that showed that using a small and frequently changing subset of the training data is effective in reducing overfitting and improving generalization. Particularly, we build upon the idea of randomly choosing a single training instance at each generation and balance it with periodically using all training data. The motivation for this approach is based on trying to keep overfitting low (represented by using a single training instance) and still presenting enough information so that a general pattern can be found (represented by using all training data). We propose two approaches called interleaved sampling and random interleaved sampling that respectively represent doing this balancing in a deterministic or a probabilistic way. Experiments are conducted on three high-dimensional real-life datasets on the pharmacokinetics domain. Results show that most of the variants of the proposed approaches are able to consistently improve generalization and reduce overfitting when compared to standard Genetic Programming. The best variants are even able of such improvements on a dataset where a recent and representative state-of-the-art method could not. Furthermore, the resulting models are short and hence easier to interpret, an important achievement from the applications’ point of view.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archetti, F., Lanzeni, S., Messina, E., Vanneschi, L.: Genetic programming for computational pharmacokinetics in drug discovery and development. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines 8(4), 413–432 (2007)
Gathercole, C., Ross, P.: Dynamic Training Subset Selection for Supervised Learning in Genetic Programming. In: Davidor, Y., Männer, R., Schwefel, H.-P. (eds.) PPSN 1994. LNCS, vol. 866, pp. 312–321. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)
Gonçalves, I., Silva, S.: Experiments on controlling overfitting in genetic programming. In: Proceedings of the 15th Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Progress in Artificial Intelligence, EPIA 2011 (2011)
Gonçalves, I., Silva, S., Melo, J.B., Carreiras, J.M.B.: Random Sampling Technique for Overfitting Control in Genetic Programming. In: Moraglio, A., Silva, S., Krawiec, K., Machado, P., Cotta, C. (eds.) EuroGP 2012. LNCS, vol. 7244, pp. 218–229. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Kennedy, T.: Managing the drug discovery/development interface. Drug Discovery Today 2(10), 436–444 (1997)
Kola, I., Landis, J.: Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 3(8), 711–716 (2004)
Koza, J.R.: Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection (Complex Adaptive Systems), 1st edn. The MIT Press (1992)
Koza, J.R.: Human-competitive results produced by genetic programming. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines 11(3-4), 251–284 (2010)
Kushchu, I.: An evaluation of evolutionary generalisation in genetic programming. Artif. Intell. Rev. 18, 3–14 (2002)
Langdon, W.B.: Minimising testing in genetic programming. Tech. Rep. RN/11/10, Computer Science, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK (2011)
Liu, Y., Khoshgoftaar, T.: Reducing overfitting in genetic programming models for software quality classification. In: Proceedings of the Eighth IEEE International Conference on High Assurance Systems Engineering, HASE 2004, pp. 56–65. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2004)
O’Neill, M., Vanneschi, L., Gustafson, S., Banzhaf, W.: Open issues in genetic programming. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines 11, 339–363 (2010)
Poli, R., Langdon, W.B., McPhee, N.F.: A field guide to genetic programming (2008)
Silva, S., Costa, E.: Dynamic limits for bloat control in genetic programming and a review of past and current bloat theories. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines 10, 141–179 (2009)
Silva, S., Vanneschi, L.: Bloat free genetic programming: Application to human oral bioavailability prediction. International Journal of Data Mining and Bioinformatics 6(6), 585–601 (2012)
Vanneschi, L., Silva, S.: Using Operator Equalisation for Prediction of Drug Toxicity with Genetic Programming. In: Lopes, L.S., Lau, N., Mariano, P., Rocha, L.M. (eds.) EPIA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5816, pp. 65–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gonçalves, I., Silva, S. (2013). Balancing Learning and Overfitting in Genetic Programming with Interleaved Sampling of Training Data. In: Krawiec, K., Moraglio, A., Hu, T., Etaner-Uyar, A.Ş., Hu, B. (eds) Genetic Programming. EuroGP 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7831. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37207-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37207-0_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37206-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37207-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)