Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

A CNN-Based Quality Assessment Method for Pseudo 4K Contents

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital TV and Wireless Multimedia Communications (IFTC 2021)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1560))

  • 895 Accesses

Abstract

Recently, there has been a growing interest in Ultra High-Definition (UHD) content, which brings a better visual experience for end-users. However, quite a few contents with 4K resolution are upscaled from High-Definition (HD) contents and suffer degradations in quality, such as blur, texture shift, etc. These pseudo 4K contents can not deliver the expected quality of experience (QoE) to end-users while requiring a high transmission bit rate in the meantime, which inevitably results in a waste of bandwidth resources. Hence, we develop a novel deep learning-based no reference (NR) image quality assessment (IQA) model for recognition and quality evaluation of real and fake 4K images. To reduce the computational overhead for a 4K image, we first select three representative patches with high texture complexity by the Grey-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) based measure. Next, the convolutional neural network (CNN) is adopted to extract the quality-aware features of three representative patches. Specifically, we extract different levels of features from intermediate layers of CNN and concatenate them into a more effective quality-aware feature representation. Finally, the shallow fully connected (FC) network is utilized to aggregate the features into the quality score and the overall quality score of the 4K image is calculated as the average value of three patches’ quality scores. The experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms all compared NR IQA metrics on the 4K IQA database.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Code access: https://github.com/luwei-1998/4K_IQA.

References

  1. Wang, J., Li, S.: Investigation and design of 4K ultra high definition television production and broadcasting system. In: 2020 IEEE 5th Information Technology and Mechatronics Engineering Conference (ITOEC), pp. 579–582 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ITOEC49072.2020.9141900

  2. Shah, R.R., Akundy, V.A., Wang, Z.: Real versus fake 4K-authentic resolution assessment. In: ICASSP 2021–2021 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 2185–2189. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhai, G., Sun, W., Min, X., Zhou, J.: Perceptual quality assessment of low-light image enhancement. ACM Trans. Multimed. Comput. Commun. Appl. (TOMM) 17(4), 1–24 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sun, W., Min, X., Zhai, G., Gu, K., Ma, S., Yang, X.: Dynamic backlight scaling considering ambient luminance for mobile videos on LCD displays. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 21(1), 110–124 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhai, G., Min, X.: Perceptual image quality assessment: a survey. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 63(11), 1–52 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-019-2757-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mittal, A., Moorthy, A.K., Bovik, A.C.: No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 21(12), 4695–4708 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhai, G., Wu, X., Yang, X., Lin, W., Zhang, W.: A psychovisual quality metric in free-energy principle. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 21(1), 41–52 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Xue, W., Zhang, L., Mou, X.: Learning without human scores for blind image quality assessment. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 995–1002 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu, W., Zhai, G., Min, X., Yang, X., Zhang, X.P.: Perceptual quality assessment for recognizing true and pseudo 4K content. In: ICASSP 2021–2021 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 2190–2194. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haralick, R.M., Shanmugam, K., Dinstein, I.H.: Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 6, 610–621 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun, W., Min, X., Zhai, G., Ma, S.: Blind quality assessment for in-the-wild images via hierarchical feature fusion and iterative mixed database training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.14550 (2021)

  12. Sun, W., Wang, T., Min, X., Yi, F., Zhai, G.: Deep learning based full-reference and no-reference quality assessment models for compressed UGC videos. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo Workshops (ICMEW), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Simonyan, K., Zisserman, A.: Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 (2014)

  14. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 770–778 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao, G., Huang, J.: DeepSim: deep learning code functional similarity. In: Proceedings of the 2018 26th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, pp. 141–151 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.J., Li, K., Fei-Fei, L.: ImageNet: a large-scale hierarchical image database. In: 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 248–255. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Paszke, A., et al.: Automatic differentiation in PyTorch (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014)

  19. Mittal, A., Soundararajan, R., Bovik, A.C.: Making a “completely blind’’ image quality analyzer. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 20(3), 209–212 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, L., Zhang, L., Bovik, A.C.: A feature-enriched completely blind image quality evaluator. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 24(8), 2579–2591 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu, Q., Wang, Z., Li, H.: A highly efficient method for blind image quality assessment. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 339–343. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Xu, J., Ye, P., Li, Q., Du, H., Liu, Y., Doermann, D.: Blind image quality assessment based on high order statistics aggregation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 25(9), 4444–4457 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Min, X., Gu, K., Zhai, G., Liu, J., Yang, X., Chen, C.W.: Blind quality assessment based on pseudo-reference image. IEEE Trans. Multimed. 20(8), 2049–2062 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Min, X., Zhai, G., Gu, K., Liu, Y., Yang, X.: Blind image quality estimation via distortion aggravation. IEEE Trans. Broadcast. 64(2), 508–517 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gu, K., Zhai, G., Yang, X., Zhang, W.: Using free energy principle for blind image quality assessment. IEEE Trans. Multimed. 17(1), 50–63 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xue, W., Mou, X., Zhang, L., Bovik, A.C., Feng, X.: Blind image quality assessment using joint statistics of gradient magnitude and Laplacian features. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 23(11), 4850–4862 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Narvekar, N.D., Karam, L.J.: A no-reference perceptual image sharpness metric based on a cumulative probability of blur detection. In: 2009 International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience, pp. 87–91 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/QOMEX.2009.5246972

  28. Sheikh, H.R., Sabir, M.F., Bovik, A.C.: A statistical evaluation of recent full reference image quality assessment algorithms. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 15(11), 3440–3451 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2019YFB1405900), and in part by the Open Research Project of the State Key Laboratory of Media Convergence and Communication, Communication University of China, China (No. SKLMCC2020KF003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guangtao Zhai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lu, W. et al. (2022). A CNN-Based Quality Assessment Method for Pseudo 4K Contents. In: Zhai, G., Zhou, J., Yang, H., An, P., Yang, X. (eds) Digital TV and Wireless Multimedia Communications. IFTC 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1560. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2266-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2266-4_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-2265-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-2266-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics