Summary
A honey bee colony can skillfully choose among nectar sources. It will selectively exploit the most profitable source in an array and will rapidly shift its foraging efforts following changes in the array. How does this colony-level ability emerge from the behavior of individual bees? The answer lies in understanding how bees modulate their colony's rates of recruitment and abandonment for nectar sources in accordance with the profitability of each source. A forager modulates its behavior in relation to nectar source profitability: as profitability increases, the tempo of foraging increases, the intensity of dancing increases, and the probability of abandoning the source decreases. How does a forager assess the profitability of its nectar source? Bees accomplish this without making comparisons among nectar sources. Neither do the foragers compare different nectar sources to determine the relative profitability of any one source, nor do the food storers compare different nectar loads and indicate the relative profitability of each load to the foragers. Instead, each forager knows only about its particular nectar source and independently calculates the absolute profitability of its source. Even though each of a colony's foragers operates with extremely limited information about the colony's food sources, together they will generate a coherent colonylevel response to different food sources in which better ones are heavily exploited and poorer ones are abandoned. This is shown by a computer simulation of nectar-source selection by a colony in which foragers behave as described above. Nectar-source selection by honey bee colonies is a process of natural selection among alternative nectar sources as foragers from more profitable sources “survive” (continue visiting their source) longer and “reproduce” (recruit other foragers) better than do foragers from less profitable sources. Hence this colonial decision-making is based on decentralized control. We suggest that honey bee colonies possess decentralized decision-making because it combines effectiveness with simplicity of communication and computation within a colony.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baird DH, Seeley TD (1983) An equilibrium theory of queen production in honeybee colonies preparing to swarm. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 13:221–228
Boch R (1956) Die Tanze der Bienen bei nahen und fernen Trachtquellen. Z Vergl Physiol 38:136–167
Butler CG (1945) The influence of various physical and biological factors of the environment on honeybee activity. An examination of the relationship between activity and nectar concentration and abundance. J Exp Biol 21:5–12
Camazine S, Sneyd J (1991) A mathematical model of colony-level nectar source selection by honey bees: self-organization through simple individual rules. J Theor Biol (in press)
Darwin CR (1877) The effects of cross and self fertilization in the vegetable kingdom. Appleton, New York
Deneubourg JL, Goss S, Franks N, Pasteels JM (1989) The blind leading the blind: modelling chemically mediated army ant raid patterns. J Insect Behav 2:719–725
Esch HA, Bastian JA (1970) How do newly recruited honey bees approach a food site? Z Vergl Physiol 68:175–181
Franks NR (1989) Army ants: a collective intelligence. Am Sci 77:138–145
Franks NR, Fletcher CR (1983) Spatial patterns in army ant foraging and migration: Eciton burchelli on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:261–270
Frisch K von (1967) The dance language and orientation of bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Haken H (1978) Synergetics — an introduction. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg
Hayek FA (1945) The use of knowledge in society. Am Econ Rev 35:519–530
Heinrich B (1985) The social physiology of temperature regulation in honeybees. Fortschr Zool 31:393–406
Hofstadter DR (1979) Gödel, Escher, Bach: an eternal golden braid. Basic Books, New York
Holldobler B (1981) Foraging and spatiotemporal territories in the honey ant Myrmecocystus mimicus Wheeler (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:301–314
Jeanne RL (1986) The organization of work in Polybia occidentalis: costs and benefits of specialization in a social wasp. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:333–341
Lindauer M (1948) Über die Einwirkung von Duft- und Geschmacksstoffen sowie anderer Faktoren auf die Tänze der Bienen. Z Vergl Physiol 31:348–412
Lindauer M (1955) Schwarmbienen auf Wohnungssuche. Z Vergl Physiol 37:263–324
Lindauer M (1961) Communication among social bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Lindauer M (1975) Verständigung im Bienenstaat. Fischer, Stuttgart New York
Lumsden CJ, Holldobler B (1983) Ritualized combat and intercolony communication in ants. J Theor Biol 100:81–98
Markl H (1985) Manipulation, modulation, information, cognition: some of the riddles of communication. Fortschr Zool 31:163–194
Mautz D (1971) Der Kommunikationseffekt der Schwänzeltänze bei Apis mellifica carnica (Pollm.). Z Vergl Physiol 72:197–220
Nicolis G, Prigogine I (1977) Self-organization in nonequilibrium systems. Wiley, New York
Núñez JA (1966) Quantitative Beziehungen zwischen den Eigenschaften von Futterquellen und dem Verhalten von Sammelbienen. Z Vergl Physiol 53:142–164
Núñez JA (1970) The relationship between sugar flow and foraging and recruiting behaviour of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) Anim Behav 18:527–538
Núñez JA (1982) Honeybee foraging strategies at a food source in relation to its distance from the hive and the rate of sugar flow. J Apic Res 21:139–150
Pasteels JM, Deneubourg J-L, Goss S (1987a) Self-organization mechanisms in ant societies (1): Trail recruitment to newly discovered food sources. In: Pasteels JM, Deneubourg J-L (eds) From individual to collective behavior in social insects. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 155–175
Pasteels JM, Deneubourg J-L, Goss S (1987b) Transmission and amplification of information in a changing environment: the case of insect societies. In: Prigogine I, Sanglier M (eds) Law of nature and human conduct. G.O.R.D.E.S., Bruxelles, pp 129–156
Pattee HH (1976) Physical theories of biological co-ordination. In: Grene M, Mendelsohn E (eds) Topics in the philosophy of biology, vol 27. Boston studies in philosophy of science. Reidel, Boston, pp 153–173
Reeve HK, Gamboa GJ (1983) Colony activity integration in primitively eusocial wasps: the role of the queen (Polistes fuscatus, Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 13:63–74
Schuá L (1952) Untersuchungen über die Einfluß meteorologische Elemente auf das Verhalten der Bienen. Z Vergl Physio1 34:258–277
Seeley TD (1982) How honeybees find a home. Sci Am 247(Oct):158–168
Seeley TD (1985) Honeybee ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Seeley TD (1986) Social foraging by honeybees: how colonies allocate foragers among patches of flowers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:343–354
Seeley TD (1989) Social foraging in honey bees: how nectar foragers assess their colony's nutritional status. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:181–199
Seeley TD, Levien RA (1987) A colony of mind. The beehive as thinking machine. The Sciences 27:38–43
Seeley TD, Visscher PK (1988) Assessing the benefits of cooperation in honeybee foraging: search costs, forage quality, and competitive ability. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:229–237
Simon HA (1981) The sciences of the artificial, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. Freeman, San Francisco
Visscher PK, Seeley TD (1982) Foraging strategy of honeybee colonies in a temperate deciduous forest. Ecology 63:1790–1801
Waddington KD (1982) Honey bee foraging profitability and round dance correlates. J Comp Physiol 148:297–301
Waddington KD (1985) Cost-intake information used in foraging. J Insect Physiol 31:891–897
Weaver N (1979) Possible recruitment of foraging honeybees to high-reward areas of the same plant species. J Apic Res 18:179–183
Wilson EO (1962) Chemical communication among workers of the fire ant Solenopsis saevissima (Fr. Smith). 1. The organization of mass-foraging. Anim Behav 10:134–147
Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Wilson EO, Hölldobler B (1988) Dense heterarchies and mass communication as the basis of organization in ant colonies. Trends Ecol Evol 3:65–68
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Offprint requests to: T.D. Seeley
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seeley, T.D., Camazine, S. & Sneyd, J. Collective decision-making in honey bees: how colonies choose among nectar sources. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28, 277–290 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175101
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175101