Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Evaporation and canopy characteristics of coniferous forests and grasslands

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Canopy-scale evaporation rate (E) and derived surface and aerodynamic conductances for the transfer of water vapour (gs and ga, respectively) are reviewed for coniferous forests and grasslands. Despite the extremes of canopy structure, the two vegetation types have similar maximum hourly evaporation rates (E max) and maximum surface conductances (gsmax) (medians = 0.46 mm h-1 and 22 mm s-1). However, on a daily basis, median E max of coniferous forest (4.0 mm d-1) is significantly lower than that of grassland (4.6 mm d-1). Additionally, a representative value of ga for coniferous forest (200 mm s-1) is an order of magnitude more than the corresponding value for grassland (25 mm s-1). The proportional sensitivity of E, calculated by the Penman-Monteith equation, to changes in gs is >0.7 for coniferous forest, but as low as 0.3 for grassland. The proportional sensitivity of E to changes in ga is generally ±0.15 or less.

Boundary-line relationships between gs and light and air saturation deficit (D) vary considerably. Attainment of gsmax occurs at a much lower irradiance for coniferous forest than for grassland (15 versus about 45% of full sunlight). Relationships between gs and D measured above the canopy appear to be fairly uniform for coniferous forest, but are variable for grassland. More uniform relationships may be found for surfaces with relatively small ga, like grassland, by using D at the evaporating surface (D0) as the independent variable rather than D at a reference point above the surface. An analytical expression is given for determining D0 from measurable quantities. Evaporation rate also depends on the availability of water in the root zone.

Below a critical value of soil water storage, the ratio of evaporation rate to the available energy tends to decrease sharply and linearly with decreasing soil water content. At the lowest value of soil water content, this ratio declines by up to a factor of 4 from the non-soil-water-limiting plateau. Knowledge about functional rooting depth of different plant species remains rather limited. Ignorance of this important variable makes it generally difficult to obtain accurate estimates of seasonal evaporation from terrestrial ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams RS, Black TA, Fleming RL (1991) Evapotranspiration and surface conductance in a high elevation, grass-covered forest clearcut. Agric For Met 56:173–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Andre J-C, Bougeault P, Mahfouf J-F, Mascart P, Noilham J, Pinty J-C (1989) Impacts of forests on mesoscale meteorology. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B 324:407–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Black TA (1979) Evapotranspiration from Douglas fir stands exposed to soil water deficits. Water Resour Res 15:164–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Black TA, Kelliher FM (1989) Processes controlling understorey evapotranspiration. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B 324:207–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder IR (1990) Evaporation in the uplands. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 148 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DI (1989) Energy balance and transpiration from tussock grassland in New Zealand. Bound Layer Met 46:133–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DI, Murray DL (1990) Water balance of snow tussock grassland in New Zealand. J Hydrol 118:229–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapp RB, Hornberger GM (1978) Empirical equations for some soil hydraulic properties. Water Resour Res 14:601–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Couturier DE, Ripley EA (1973) Rainfall interception in mixed grass prairie. Can J Plant Sci 53:659–663

    Google Scholar 

  • Denmead OT (1984) Plant physiological methods for studying evapotranspiration: Problems of telling the forest from the trees. Agric Water Manag 8:167–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Denmead OT, Shaw RH (1962) Availability of soil water to plants as affected by soil moisture and meteorological conditions. Agron J 54:385–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunin FX, Reyenga W (1978) Evaporation from themeda grassland. I. Controls imposed on the process in a sub-humid environment. J Appl Ecol 15:317–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunin FX, Aston AR, Reyenga W (1978) Evaporation from a themeda grassland. II. Resistance model of plant evaporation. J Appl Ecol 15:847–858

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastham J, Rose CW, Cameron DM, Rance SJ, Talsma T (1988) The effect of tree spacing on evaporation from an agroforestry experiment. Agric For Met 42:355–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnigan JJ, Raupach MR (1987) Transfer processes in plant canopies in relation to stomatal characteristics. In: Zeiger E, Farquhar G, Cowan I (eds) Stomatal function. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, USA, pp 385–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzjarrald DR, Moore KE (1993) Growing season boundary layer climate and surface exchanges in the northern lichen woodland. J Geophys Res (in press)

  • Gardner WR (1959) Solution to the flow equation for the drying of soils and other porous media. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 23:183–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner WR (1983) Soil properties and efficient water use: An overview. In: Taylor HM, Jordan WR, Sinclair TR (eds), Limitations to efficient water use in crop production. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp 45–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Gash JHC, Shuttleworth WJ, Lloyd CR, Andre J-C, Goutorbe J-P, Gelpe J (1989) Micrometeorological measurements in Les Landes Forest during HAPEX-MOBILHY. Agric For Met 46:131–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollan T, Passioura JB, Munns R (1986) Soil water status affects the stomatal conductance of fully turgid wheat and sunflower leaves. Austral J Plant Physiol 13:459–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Granier A, Bobay V, Gash JHC, Gelpe J, Saugier B, Shuttleworth WJ (1990) Vapour flux density and transpiration rate comparisons in a stand of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) in Les Landes forest. Agric For Met 51:309–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs CMJ, De Bruin HAR (1992) The sensitivity of regional transpiration to land-surface characteristics: Significance of feedback. J Climate 5:683–698

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis PG, McNaughton KG (1986) Stomatal control of transpiration: Scaling up from leaf to region. In: Kozlowski TT (ed) Advances in Ecological Research, vol. 15, Academic Press, London, pp 1–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis PG, Landsberg JJ, James BD (1976) Coniferous forest: In: Monteith JL (ed) Vegetation and atmosphere. Vol 2, Academic Press, London, pp 171–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelliher FM, Black TA, Price DT (1986) Estimating the effects of understory removal from a Douglas-fir forest using a two-layer-canopy evapotranspiration model. Water Resources Res 22:1891–1899

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelliher FM, Whitehead D, McAneney KJ, Judd MJ (1990) Partitioning evapotranspiration into tree and understorey components in two young Pinus radiata D. Don stands. Agric For Met 50:211–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelliher FM, Whitehead D, Pollock DS (1992) Rainfall interception by trees and slash in a young Pinus radiata D. Don stand. J Hydrol 131:187–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Verma SB (1990) Components of surface energy balance in a temperate grassland ecosystem. Bound Layer Met 51:401–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Verma SB (1991) Modelling canopy stomatal conductance in a temperate grassland ecosystem. Agric For Met 55:149–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Körner Ch (1993) Leaf diffusive conductances in the major vegetation types of the globe. In: Schulze E-D (ed) Ecophysiology of photosynthesis. Ecological Studies. vol. 100. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafleur PM (1992) Energy balance and evapotranspiration from a subarctic forest. Agric For Met 58:163–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafleur PM, Rouse WR (1988) The influence of surface cover and climate on energy partitioning and evaporation in a subarctic wetland. Bound Layer Met 44:327–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuning R, Condon AG, Dunin FX, Zegelin S, Denmead OT (1993) Rainfall interception and soil evaporation below a wheat canopy. Agric For Met (in press)

  • Leverenz J, Deans JD, Ford ED, Jarvis PG, Milne R, Whitehead D (1982) Systematic spatial variation of stomatal conductance in a sitka spruce plantation. J Appl Ecol 19:835–851

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindroth A (1985a) Canopy conductance of coniferous forest related to climate. Water Resour Res 21:297–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindroth A (1985b) Seasonal and diurnal variation in energy budget components in coniferous forests. J Hydrol 82:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • McAneney KJ, Judd MJ (1983) Pasture production and water use measurements in the central Waikato. New Zealand J Agric Res 26:7–13

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton KG (1976) Evaporation and advection. I. Evaporation from extensive homogeneous surfaces. Quart J Roy Met Soc 102:181–191

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton KG, Black TA (1973) A study of evapotranspiration from a Douglas-fir forest using the energy balance approach. Water Resour Res 9:1579–1590

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton KG, Jarvis PG (1991) Effects of spatial scale on stomatal control of transpiration. Agric For Met 54:319–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne R (1979) Water loss and canopy resistance of a young sitka spruce plantation. Bound Layer Met 16:67–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne R, Deans JD, Ford ED, Jarvis PG, Leverenz J, Whitehead D (1985) A comparison of two methods of estimating transpiration rates from a sitka spruce plantation. Bound Layer Met 32:155–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteith JL (1965) Evaporation and environment. Symp Soc for Exp Biol 19:205–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteith JL (ed) (1976) Vegetation and the atmosphere. Vol. 2. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteith JL (1990) Porometry and baseline analysis: The case for compatibility. Agric For Met 49:155–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore CJ (1976) Eddy flux measurements above a pine forest. Quart J Roy Met Soc 102:913–918

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore CJ, Fisch G (1986) Estimating heat storage in Amazonian tropical forest. Agric For Met 38:147–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Nnyamah JU, Black TA (1977) Rates and patterns of water uptake in a Douglas-fir forest. Soil Sci Soc Am J 41:972–979

    Google Scholar 

  • Osberg PM (1986) Lysimeter measurements of salal understorey evapotranspiration and forest soil evaporation after salal removal in a Douglas-fir plantation. M.Sc. thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Plamandon AP (1972) Hydrologic properties and water balance of the forest floor of a Canadian west coast watershed. Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Parton WJ, Lauenroth WK, Smith FM (1981) Water loss from a shortgrass steppe. Agric Met 24:97–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Price DT, Black TA (1990) Effects of short-term variation in weather on diurnal canopy CO2 flux and evapotranspiration of a juvenile Douglas-fir stand. Agric For Met 50:139–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Raupach MR (1991) Vegetation-atmosphere interaction in homogeneous and heterogeneous terrain: Some implications of mixed-layer dynamics. Vegetatio 91:105–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Raupach MR, Finnigan JJ (1988) ‘Single-layer models of evaporation from plant canopies are incorrect but useful, whereas multilayer models are correct but useless’: Discus. Austral J Plant Physiol 15:705–716

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley EA, Redman RE (1976) Grassland In: Monteith JL (ed) Vegetation and atmosphere. Vol 2. Academic Press, London, pp 349–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley EA, Saugier B (1978) Biophysics of a natural grassland: Evaporation. J Appl Ecol 15:459–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie JT (1972) Model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cove. Water Resour Res 8:1204–1213

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts J (1983) Forest transpiration: A conservative hydrological process? J Hydrol 66:133–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze E-D (1986) Carbon dioxide and water vapour exchange in response to drought in the atmosphere and in the soil. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 37:247–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze E-D, Hall AE (1983) Stomatal responses, water loss and CO2 assimilation rates of plants in contrasting environments. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegler H (eds) Encyclopedia of plant physiology, New Series, vol 12B, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 181–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze E-D, Hantschel R, Werk KS, Horn R (1987) Water relations of two Norway spruce stands at different stages of decline. In: Schulze E-D, Lange OL, Oren R (eds), Ecological studies, volume 77, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 341–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Scotter DR, Clothier BE, Turner MA (1979) The soil water balance in a fragiqualf and its effect on pasture growth in central New Zealand. Austral J Soil Res 17:455–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Shockley DR (1955) Capacity of soil to hold moisture. Agric Engineer 36:109–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuttleworth WJ (1989) Micrometeorology of temperate and tropical forests. Phil Trans Roy Met Soc Lond Serv B 324:199–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuttleworth WJ, Wallace JS (1985) Evaporation from sparse crops — an energy combination theory. Quart J Roy Met Soc 111:839–855

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims PL, Singh JS, Lauenroth WK (1978) The structure and function of ten western North American grasslands. I. Abiotic and vegetational characteristics. J Ecol 66:251–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart JB (1988) Modelling surface conductance of pine forest. Agric For Met 43:19–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart JB, Gay LW (1989) Preliminary modelling of transpiration from the FIFE site in Kansas. Agric For Met 48:305–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart JB, Verma SB (1992) Comparison of surface fluxes and conductances at two contrasting sites within the FIFE area. J Geophys Res 97:18,623–18,628

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone EL, Kalisz PJ (1991) On the maximum extent of tree roots. Forest Ecol Manag 46:59–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajchman SJ, Hadrich F, Lee R (1979) Energy budget evaluation of the transpiration — PF relationship in a young pine forest. Water Resour Res 15:159–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan CS, Black TA, Nnyamah JU (1978) A simple vapor diffusion model applied to a thinned Douglas-fir stand. Ecology 59:1221–1229

    Google Scholar 

  • Teklehaimanot Z, Jarvis PG (1991) Direct measurement of evaporation of intercepted water from forest canopies. J Appl Ecol 28:603–618

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom AS (1975) Momentum, mass and heat exchange of plant communities. In: Monteith JL (ed) Vegetation and the Atmosphere, vol 1, Academic Press, London, pp 57–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead D, Jarvis PG (1981) Coniferous plantation. In: Kozlowski TT (ed) Plant growth and water deficit, vol 6, Academic Press, London, pp 49–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead D, Jarvis PG, Waring RH (1984) Stomatal conductance, transpiration, and resistance to water uptake in a Pinus sylvestris spacing experiment. Can J For Res 14:692–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead D, Kelliher FM, Lane PM, Pollock DS (1993) Seasonal partitioning of evaporation between trees and understorey in a widely-spaced Pinus radiata stand. J Appl Ecol (in press)

  • World Resources Institute (1990) World resources 1990–1991. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 383 p

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. F. M. Kelliher

    Present address: Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, P.O. Box 31-011, Christchurch, New Zealand

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl Pflanzenökologie, Universität Bayreuth, P.O. Box 101251, D-95440, Bayreuth, Germany

    F. M. Kelliher & E. D. Schulze

  2. CSIRO Centre for Environmental Mechanics, GPO Box 821, 2601, Canberra, ACT, Australia

    R. Leuning

Authors
  1. F. M. Kelliher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Leuning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. D. Schulze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelliher, F.M., Leuning, R. & Schulze, E.D. Evaporation and canopy characteristics of coniferous forests and grasslands. Oecologia 95, 153–163 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00323485

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00323485

Key words

Search

Navigation