Abstract
A model in which strongness ofκ is indestructible under κ+ -weakly closed forcing notions satisfying the Prikry condition is constructed. This is applied to solve a question of Hajnal on the number of elements of {λ δ|2δ<λ}.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldwin, S.: Between strong and superstrong. J. Sym. Logic.51, 547–559 (1986)
Dodd, A.: The core model. Lond. Math. Soc. Lect. Note Ser.61, 195–200 (1982)
Erdös, P., Hajnal, A., Mate, A., Rado, R.: Combinatoriacal set theory: partition relations for cardinals. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics 106. Amsterdam: North-Holland 1984
Gitik, M.: Changing confinalities and the nonstationary ideal. Isr. J. Math.56, 280–314 (1986)
Gitik, M.: The negation of the singular cardinal hypothesis from 0(κ)=κ + + to appear
Laver, R.: Making the supercompactness ofκ indestructible underκ-directed closed forcing. Isr. J. Math.29, 385–388 (1978)
Levy, A., Solovay, R.: Measurable cardinals and the continuum hypothesis. Isr. J. Math.5, 234–248 (1967)
Magidor, M.: Cnaging cofinalities of cardinals. Fund. Math.99, 61–71 (1978)
Mitchell, W.: Hypermeasurable cardinals. Logic Colloquim 78. Amsterdam: North-Holland 1979, pp. 303–317
Prikry, K.: Changing measurable into accessible cardinals. Diss Math68, 5–52 (1970)
Shelah, S.: Around classification theory of models. (Lect. Notes Math., vol. 1182) Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer 1986
Shelah, S.: Some notes on iterated forcing with\(2^{\aleph _0 } > \aleph _2\). Notre Dame J. Formal Logic29, 1–17 (1988)
Shelah, S., Woodin, H.: Large cardinals imply that every reasonably definable set of reals is Lebeque measurable. Jsr. J. Math.
Solovay, R.: Strongly compact cardinals and the G.C.H. In: Henkin, L. Proceedings of the Tarski Symposium, Proc. Symp. Pure Math.25, 365–372 (1975)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gitik, M., Shelah, S. On certain indestructibility of strong cardinals and a question of Hajnal. Arch Math Logic 28, 35–42 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01624081
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01624081