Abstract
We investigate the interactions of large composite dark matter (DM) states with the Standard Model (SM) sector. Elastic scattering with SM nuclei can be coherently enhanced by factors as large as A2, where A is the number of constituents in the composite state (there exist models in which DM states of very large A ≳ 108 may be realised). This enhancement, for a given direct detection event rate, weakens the expected signals at colliders by up to 1/A. Moreover, the spatially extended nature of the DM states leads to an additional, characteristic, form factor modifying the momentum dependence of scattering processes, altering the recoil energy spectra in direct detection experiments. In particular, energy recoil spectra with peaks and troughs are possible, and such features could be confirmed with only \( \mathcal{O}(50) \) events, independently of the assumed halo velocity distribution. Large composite states also generically give rise to low-energy collective excitations potentially relevant to direct detection and indirect detection phenomenology. We compute the form factor for a generic class of such excitations — quantised surface modes — finding that they can lead to coherently-enhanced, but generally sub-dominant, inelastic scattering in direct detection experiments. Finally, we study the modifications to capture rates in astrophysical objects that follow from the elastic form factor, as well as the effects of inelastic interactions between DM states once captured. We argue that inelastic interactions may lead to the DM collapsing to a dense configuration at the centre of the object.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Astrophysical Signatures of Secluded Dark Matter, Phys. Lett. B 671 (2009) 391 [arXiv:0810.1502] [INSPIRE].
J.D. March-Russell and S.M. West, WIMPonium and Boost Factors for Indirect Dark Matter Detection, Phys. Lett. B 676 (2009) 133 [arXiv:0812.0559] [INSPIRE].
W. Shepherd, T.M.P. Tait and G. Zaharijas, Bound states of weakly interacting dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 055022 [arXiv:0901.2125] [INSPIRE].
H. Goldberg and L.J. Hall, A New Candidate for Dark Matter, Phys. Lett. B 174 (1986) 151 [INSPIRE].
J.L. Feng, M. Kaplinghat, H. Tu and H.-B. Yu, Hidden Charged Dark Matter, JCAP 07 (2009) 004 [arXiv:0905.3039] [INSPIRE].
D.E. Kaplan, G.Z. Krnjaic, K.R. Rehermann and C.M. Wells, Atomic Dark Matter, JCAP 05 (2010) 021 [arXiv:0909.0753] [INSPIRE].
M. Yu. Khlopov, Composite dark matter from stable charged constituents, arXiv:0806.3581 [INSPIRE].
R. Laha and E. Braaten, Direct detection of dark matter in universal bound states, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 103510 [arXiv:1311.6386] [INSPIRE].
J.A. Frieman, G.B. Gelmini, M. Gleiser and E.W. Kolb, Solitogenesis: Primordial Origin of Nontopological Solitons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988) 2101 [INSPIRE].
A. Kusenko and M.E. Shaposhnikov, Supersymmetric Q balls as dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 418 (1998) 46 [hep-ph/9709492] [INSPIRE].
G. Krnjaic and K. Sigurdson, Big Bang Darkleosynthesis, arXiv:1406.1171 [INSPIRE].
W. Detmold, M. McCullough and A. Pochinsky, Dark Nuclei I: Cosmology and Indirect Detection, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 115013 [arXiv:1406.2276] [INSPIRE].
E. Hardy, R. Lasenby, J. March-Russell and S.M. West, Big Bang Synthesis of Nuclear Dark Matter, JHEP 06 (2015) 011 [arXiv:1411.3739] [INSPIRE].
G. Gelmini, A. Kusenko and S. Nussinov, Experimental identification of nonpointlike dark matter candidates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 101302 [hep-ph/0203179] [INSPIRE].
S. Chang, A. Pierce and N. Weiner, Momentum Dependent Dark Matter Scattering, JCAP 01 (2010) 006 [arXiv:0908.3192] [INSPIRE].
B. Feldstein, A.L. Fitzpatrick and E. Katz, Form Factor Dark Matter, JCAP 01 (2010) 020 [arXiv:0908.2991] [INSPIRE].
S.D. McDermott, H.-B. Yu and K.M. Zurek, The Dark Matter Inverse Problem: Extracting Particle Physics from Scattering Events, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 123507 [arXiv:1110.4281] [INSPIRE].
J.F. Cherry, M.T. Frandsen and I.M. Shoemaker, Halo Independent Direct Detection of Momentum-Dependent Dark Matter, JCAP 10 (2014) 022 [arXiv:1405.1420] [INSPIRE].
A.L. Fitzpatrick, W. Haxton, E. Katz, N. Lubbers and Y. Xu, The Effective Field Theory of Dark Matter Direct Detection, JCAP 02 (2013) 004 [arXiv:1203.3542] [INSPIRE].
G. Duda, A. Kemper and P. Gondolo, Model Independent Form Factors for Spin Independent Neutralino-Nucleon Scattering from Elastic Electron Scattering Data, JCAP 04 (2007) 012 [hep-ph/0608035] [INSPIRE].
C. McCabe, The Astrophysical Uncertainties Of Dark Matter Direct Detection Experiments, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 023530 [arXiv:1005.0579] [INSPIRE].
A. Djouadi, O. Lebedev, Y. Mambrini and J. Quevillon, Implications of LHC searches for Higgs-portal dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 709 (2012) 65 [arXiv:1112.3299] [INSPIRE].
M. Kuhlen et al., Dark Matter Direct Detection with Non-Maxwellian Velocity Structure, JCAP 02 (2010) 030 [arXiv:0912.2358] [INSPIRE].
J.I. Read, L. Mayer, A.M. Brooks, F. Governato and G. Lake, A dark matter disc in three cosmological simulations of Milky Way mass galaxies, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 397 (2009) 44 [arXiv:0902.0009] [INSPIRE].
J. Diemand et al., Clumps and streams in the local dark matter distribution, Nature 454 (2008) 735 [arXiv:0805.1244] [INSPIRE].
P.J. Fox, G.D. Kribs and T.M.P. Tait, Interpreting Dark Matter Direct Detection Independently of the Local Velocity and Density Distribution, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 034007 [arXiv:1011.1910] [INSPIRE].
P.J. Fox, J. Liu and N. Weiner, Integrating Out Astrophysical Uncertainties, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 103514 [arXiv:1011.1915] [INSPIRE].
M.T. Frandsen, F. Kahlhoefer, C. McCabe, S. Sarkar and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, Resolving astrophysical uncertainties in dark matter direct detection, JCAP 01 (2012) 024 [arXiv:1111.0292] [INSPIRE].
N. Bozorgnia, J. Herrero-Garcia, T. Schwetz and J. Zupan, Halo-independent methods for inelastic dark matter scattering, JCAP 07 (2013) 049 [arXiv:1305.3575] [INSPIRE].
E. Del Nobile, G. Gelmini, P. Gondolo and J.-H. Huh, Generalized Halo Independent Comparison of Direct Dark Matter Detection Data, JCAP 10 (2013) 048 [arXiv:1306.5273] [INSPIRE].
S. Scopel and K. Yoon, A systematic halo-independent analysis of direct detection data within the framework of Inelastic Dark Matter, JCAP 08 (2014) 060 [arXiv:1405.0364] [INSPIRE].
J.F. Cherry et al., in preparation.
A. Bohr and B. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure: Volume 2, Nuclear deformations, Benjamin, (1969).
S.R. Coleman, Q Balls, Nucl. Phys. B 262 (1985) 263 [Erratum ibid. B 269 (1986) 744] [INSPIRE].
L.J. Tassie, Scattering of Alpha-Particles by a Vibrational Nucleus, Aust. J. Phys. 15 (1962) 135.
C. Mahaux, P.F. Bortignon, R.A. Broglia and C.H. Dasso, Dynamics of the shell model, Phys. Rept. 120 (1985) 1 [INSPIRE].
D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner, Inelastic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 043502 [hep-ph/0101138] [INSPIRE].
K.M. Zurek, Asymmetric Dark Matter: Theories, Signatures and Constraints, Phys. Rept. 537 (2014) 91 [arXiv:1308.0338] [INSPIRE].
C. Kouvaris, Limits on Self-Interacting Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 191301 [arXiv:1111.4364] [INSPIRE].
P.W. Graham, S. Rajendran and J. Varela, Dark Matter Triggers of Supernovae, arXiv:1505.0444.
A. Gould, Resonant Enhancements in WIMP Capture by the Earth, Astrophys. J. 321 (1987) 571 [INSPIRE].
S. Tulin, H.-B. Yu and K.M. Zurek, Beyond Collisionless Dark Matter: Particle Physics Dynamics for Dark Matter Halo Structure, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 115007 [arXiv:1302.3898] [INSPIRE].
A.R. Zentner, High-Energy Neutrinos From Dark Matter Particle Self-Capture Within the Sun, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 063501 [arXiv:0907.3448] [INSPIRE].
M. Taoso, F. Iocco, G. Meynet, G. Bertone and P. Eggenberger, Effect of low mass dark matter particles on the Sun, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 083509 [arXiv:1005.5711] [INSPIRE].
B. Bertoni, A.E. Nelson and S. Reddy, Dark Matter Thermalization in Neutron Stars, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 123505 [arXiv:1309.1721] [INSPIRE].
A. Gould, Cosmological density of WIMPs from solar and terrestrial annihilations, Astrophys. J. 388 (1992) 338 [INSPIRE].
J.N. Bahcall, A.M. Serenelli and S. Basu, New solar opacities, abundances, helioseismology and neutrino fluxes, Astrophys. J. 621 (2005) L85 [astro-ph/0412440] [INSPIRE].
LUX collaboration, D.S. Akerib et al., First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 091303 [arXiv:1310.8214] [INSPIRE].
K. Griest and D. Seckel, Cosmic Asymmetry, Neutrinos and the Sun, Nucl. Phys. B 283 (1987) 681 [Erratum ibid. B 296 (1988) 1034] [INSPIRE].
A.H.G. Peter, Dark matter in the solar system II: WIMP annihilation rates in the Sun, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 103532 [arXiv:0902.1347] [INSPIRE].
S. Nussinov, L.-T. Wang and I. Yavin, Capture of Inelastic Dark Matter in the Sun, JCAP 08 (2009) 037 [arXiv:0905.1333] [INSPIRE].
A. Menon, R. Morris, A. Pierce and N. Weiner, Capture and Indirect Detection of Inelastic Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 015011 [arXiv:0905.1847] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1504.05419
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Hardy, E., Lasenby, R., March-Russell, J. et al. Signatures of large composite Dark Matter states. J. High Energ. Phys. 2015, 133 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2015)133
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2015)133