Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Journal of High Energy Physics
  3. Article

Dark matter bound state formation in fermionic Z2 DM model with light dark photon and dark Higgs boson

  • Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • Open access
  • Published: 13 October 2020
  • Volume 2020, article number 82, (2020)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Dark matter bound state formation in fermionic Z2 DM model with light dark photon and dark Higgs boson
Download PDF
  • Pyungwon Ko2,3,
  • Toshinori Matsui2,4 &
  • Yi-Lei Tang1,3 

  • 311 Accesses

  • 14 Citations

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

A preprint version of the article is available at arXiv.

Abstract

If fermionic dark matter (DM) is stabilized by dark U(1) gauge symmetry that is spontaneously broken into its subgroup Z2, the particle contents of the model becomes very rich: DM and excited DM, both of them are Majorana fermions, as well as two dark force mediators, dark photon and dark Higgs boson are naturally present due to the underlying dark gauge symmetry. In this paper, we study the DM bound state formation processes within this scenario, assuming both dark photon and dark Higgs are light mediators and including the effects of excited DM. The Goldstone boson contributions to the potential matrix in the Schrödinger equations are found to be important. The emissions of a longitudinal vector boson (or somehow equivalently a Goldstone boson) during the DM bound state formations are crucial to induce a significant reannihilation process, reducing the dark matter relic abundance. Most of the stringent constraints for this kind of dark matter considered in the literature are simply evaded.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Extension of minimal fermionic dark matter model: a study with two Higgs doublet model

Article Open access 12 August 2015

Singlet-Doublet Fermionic Dark Matter in Gauge Theory of Baryons

Chapter © 2024

Confronting dark fermion with a doubly charged Higgs in the left–right symmetric model

Article Open access 05 October 2022
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  1. G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk, Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept. 405 (2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175] [INSPIRE].

  2. A. Sommerfeld, Über die Beugung und Bremsung der Elektronen (in German), Annalen Phys. 403 (1931) 257.

  3. J. Hisano, S. Matsumoto and M.M. Nojiri, Unitarity and higher order corrections in neutralino dark matter annihilation into two photons, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 075014 [hep-ph/0212022] [INSPIRE].

  4. J. Hisano, S. Matsumoto and M.M. Nojiri, Explosive dark matter annihilation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 031303 [hep-ph/0307216] [INSPIRE].

  5. J. Hisano, S. Matsumoto, M.M. Nojiri and O. Saito, Non-perturbative effect on dark matter annihilation and gamma ray signature from galactic center, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 063528 [hep-ph/0412403] [INSPIRE].

  6. J. Hisano, S. Matsumoto, O. Saito and M. Senami, Heavy wino-like neutralino dark matter annihilation into antiparticles, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 055004 [hep-ph/0511118] [INSPIRE].

  7. M. Cirelli, A. Strumia and M. Tamburini, Cosmology and astrophysics of minimal dark matter, Nucl. Phys. B 787 (2007) 152 [arXiv:0706.4071] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. J. March-Russell, S.M. West, D. Cumberbatch and D. Hooper, Heavy dark matter through the Higgs portal, JHEP 07 (2008) 058 [arXiv:0801.3440] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Cirelli, R. Franceschini and A. Strumia, Minimal dark matter predictions for galactic positrons, anti-protons, photons, Nucl. Phys. B 800 (2008) 204 [arXiv:0802.3378] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Cirelli and A. Strumia, Minimal dark matter predictions and the PAMELA positron excess, PoS(IDM2008)089 (2008) [arXiv:0808.3867] [INSPIRE].

  11. I. Cholis, D.P. Finkbeiner, L. Goodenough and N. Weiner, The PAMELA positron excess from annihilations into a light boson, JCAP 12 (2009) 007 [arXiv:0810.5344] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. I. Cholis, G. Dobler, D.P. Finkbeiner, L. Goodenough and N. Weiner, The case for a 700+ GeV WIMP: cosmic ray spectra from ATIC and PAMELA, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 123518 [arXiv:0811.3641] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. G. Bertone, M. Cirelli, A. Strumia and M. Taoso, Gamma-ray and radio tests of the e+e− excess from DM annihilations, JCAP 03 (2009) 009 [arXiv:0811.3744] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. E.J. Chun and J.-C. Park, Dark matter and sub-GeV hidden U(1) in GMSB models, JCAP 02 (2009) 026 [arXiv:0812.0308] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Bai and Z. Han, Measuring the dark force at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 051801 [arXiv:0902.0006] [INSPIRE].

  16. N. Arkani-Hamed, D.P. Finkbeiner, T.R. Slatyer and N. Weiner, A theory of dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 015014 [arXiv:0810.0713] [INSPIRE].

  17. PAMELA collaboration, An anomalous positron abundance in cosmic rays with energies 1.5–100 GeV, Nature 458 (2009) 607 [arXiv:0810.4995] [INSPIRE].

  18. AMS collaboration, First result from the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station: precision measurement of the positron fraction in primary cosmic rays of 0.5–350 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 141102 [INSPIRE].

  19. AMS collaboration, High statistics measurement of the positron fraction in primary cosmic rays of 0.5–500 GeV with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 121101 [INSPIRE].

  20. B. Moore et al., Dark matter substructure within galactic halos, Astrophys. J. Lett. 524 (1999) L19 [astro-ph/9907411] [INSPIRE].

  21. A.V. Kravtsov, Dark matter substructure and dwarf galactic satellites, Adv. Astron. 2010 (2010) 281913 [arXiv:0906.3295] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. B. Moore, T.R. Quinn, F. Governato, J. Stadel and G. Lake, Cold collapse and the core catastrophe, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 310 (1999) 1147 [astro-ph/9903164] [INSPIRE].

  23. W.J.G. de Blok, The core-cusp problem, Adv. Astron. 2010 (2010) 789293 [arXiv:0910.3538] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Vogelsberger, J. Zavala and A. Loeb, Subhaloes in self-interacting galactic dark matter haloes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 423 (2012) 3740 [arXiv:1201.5892] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Boylan-Kolchin, J.S. Bullock and M. Kaplinghat, Too big to fail? The puzzling darkness of massive milky way subhaloes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 415 (2011) L40 [arXiv:1103.0007] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. M. Boylan-Kolchin, J.S. Bullock and M. Kaplinghat, The milky way’s bright satellites as an apparent failure of ΛCDM, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 422 (2012) 1203 [arXiv:1111.2048] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. A. Pontzen and F. Governato, How supernova feedback turns dark matter cusps into cores, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 421 (2012) 3464 [arXiv:1106.0499] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. A.M. Brooks and A. Zolotov, Why baryons matter: the kinematics of dwarf spheroidal satellites, Astrophys. J. 786 (2014) 87 [arXiv:1207.2468] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. A.M. Brooks, M. Kuhlen, A. Zolotov and D. Hooper, A baryonic solution to the missing satellites problem, Astrophys. J. 765 (2013) 22 [arXiv:1209.5394] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. T. Bringmann, F. Kahlhoefer, K. Schmidt-Hoberg and P. Walia, Strong constraints on self-interacting dark matter with light mediators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 141802 [arXiv:1612.00845] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. S.W. Randall, M. Markevitch, D. Clowe, A.H. Gonzalez and M. Bradac, Constraints on the self-interaction cross-section of dark matter from numerical simulations of the merging galaxy cluster 1E0657-56, Astrophys. J. 679 (2008) 1173 [arXiv:0704.0261] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. M. Markevitch et al., Direct constraints on the dark matter self-interaction cross-section from the merging galaxy cluster 1E0657-56, Astrophys. J. 606 (2004) 819 [astro-ph/0309303] [INSPIRE].

  33. A.H.G. Peter, M. Rocha, J.S. Bullock and M. Kaplinghat, Cosmological simulations with self-interacting dark matter II: halo shapes vs. observations, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 430 (2013) 105 [arXiv:1208.3026] [INSPIRE].

  34. M. Rocha et al., Cosmological simulations with self-interacting dark matter I: constant density cores and substructure, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 430 (2013) 81 [arXiv:1208.3025] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. F. Kahlhoefer, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, M.T. Frandsen and S. Sarkar, Colliding clusters and dark matter self-interactions, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 437 (2014) 2865 [arXiv:1308.3419] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. D. Harvey, R. Massey, T. Kitching, A. Taylor and E. Tittley, The non-gravitational interactions of dark matter in colliding galaxy clusters, Science 347 (2015) 1462 [arXiv:1503.07675] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. M. Kaplinghat, S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu, Dark matter halos as particle colliders: unified solution to small-scale structure puzzles from dwarfs to clusters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 041302 [arXiv:1508.03339] [INSPIRE].

  38. K. Petraki, M. Postma and M. Wiechers, Dark-matter bound states from Feynman diagrams, JHEP 06 (2015) 128 [arXiv:1505.00109] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. K. Petraki, M. Postma and J. de Vries, Radiative bound-state-formation cross-sections for dark matter interacting via a Yukawa potential, JHEP 04 (2017) 077 [arXiv:1611.01394] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. J. Ellis, F. Luo and K.A. Olive, Gluino coannihilation revisited, JHEP 09 (2015) 127 [arXiv:1503.07142] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. R. Laha, Directional detection of dark matter in universal bound states, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 083509 [arXiv:1505.02772] [INSPIRE].

  42. K.M. Belotsky, E.A. Esipova and A.A. Kirillov, On the classical description of the recombination of dark matter particles with a Coulomb-like interaction, Phys. Lett. B 761 (2016) 81 [arXiv:1506.03094] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. N. Fonseca, L. Necib and J. Thaler, Dark matter, shared asymmetries and galactic gamma ray signals, JCAP 02 (2016) 052 [arXiv:1507.08295] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. S. Kim and M. Laine, Rapid thermal co-annihilation through bound states in QCD, JHEP 07 (2016) 143 [arXiv:1602.08105] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. X.-J. Bi, Z. Kang, P. Ko, J. Li and T. Li, Asymmetric dark matter bound state, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 043540 [arXiv:1602.08816] [INSPIRE].

  46. Z. Kang, Bound states via Higgs exchanging and heavy resonant di-Higgs, Phys. Lett. B 771 (2017) 313 [arXiv:1606.01531] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. F. Nozzoli, A balance for dark matter bound states, Astropart. Phys. 91 (2017) 22 [arXiv:1608.00405] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. S. Kim and M. Laine, On thermal corrections to near-threshold annihilation, JCAP 01 (2017) 013 [arXiv:1609.00474] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. P. Asadi, M. Baumgart, P.J. Fitzpatrick, E. Krupczak and T.R. Slatyer, Capture and decay of electroweak WIMPonium, JCAP 02 (2017) 005 [arXiv:1610.07617] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. S.P. Liew and F. Luo, Effects of QCD bound states on dark matter relic abundance, JHEP 02 (2017) 091 [arXiv:1611.08133] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. M. Cirelli, P. Panci, K. Petraki, F. Sala and M. Taoso, Dark matter’s secret liaisons: phenomenology of a dark U(1) sector with bound states, JCAP 05 (2017) 036 [arXiv:1612.07295] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. H. Fukuda, M. Ibe and T.T. Yanagida, Dark matter candidates in a visible heavy QCD axion model, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 095017 [arXiv:1702.00227] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. A. Mitridate, M. Redi, J. Smirnov and A. Strumia, Cosmological implications of dark matter bound states, JCAP 05 (2017) 006 [arXiv:1702.01141] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. I. Baldes and K. Petraki, Asymmetric thermal-relic dark matter: Sommerfeld-enhanced freeze-out, annihilation signals and unitarity bounds, JCAP 09 (2017) 028 [arXiv:1703.00478] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. W.-Y. Keung, I. Low and Y. Zhang, Reappraisal of dark matter co-annihilating with a top or bottom partner, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 015008 [arXiv:1703.02977] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. Y. Kats, M. McCullough, G. Perez, Y. Soreq and J. Thaler, Colorful twisted top partners and partnerium at the LHC, JHEP 06 (2017) 126 [arXiv:1704.03393] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. S.J. Lonsdale, M. Schroor and R.R. Volkas, Asymmetric dark matter and the hadronic spectra of hidden QCD, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 055027 [arXiv:1704.05213] [INSPIRE].

  58. S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu, Dark matter self-interactions and small scale structure, Phys. Rept. 730 (2018) 1 [arXiv:1705.02358] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. S. Biondini and M. Laine, Re-derived overclosure bound for the inert doublet model, JHEP 08 (2017) 047 [arXiv:1706.01894] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  60. E. Braaten, E. Johnson and H. Zhang, Zero-range effective field theory for resonant wino dark matter. Part I. Framework, JHEP 11 (2017) 108 [arXiv:1706.02253] [INSPIRE].

  61. A.J. Markestad, Dark matter bound state formation for pseudo-scalar mediators, master’s thesis, Oslo U., Oslo, Norway (2017) [INSPIRE].

  62. J. Harz and K. Petraki, Higgs enhancement for the dark matter relic density, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 075041 [arXiv:1711.03552] [INSPIRE].

  63. I. Baldes, M. Cirelli, P. Panci, K. Petraki, F. Sala and M. Taoso, Asymmetric dark matter: residual annihilations and self-interactions, SciPost Phys. 4 (2018) 041 [arXiv:1712.07489] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. S.J. Lonsdale and R.R. Volkas, Comprehensive asymmetric dark matter model, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 103510 [arXiv:1801.05561] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  65. J. Ellis, J.L. Evans, F. Luo, K.A. Olive and J. Zheng, Stop coannihilation in the CMSSM and SubGUT models, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 425 [arXiv:1801.09855] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  66. M. Geller, S. Iwamoto, G. Lee, Y. Shadmi and O. Telem, Dark quarkonium formation in the early universe, JHEP 06 (2018) 135 [arXiv:1802.07720] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  67. S. Biondini, Bound-state effects for dark matter with Higgs-like mediators, JHEP 06 (2018) 104 [arXiv:1805.00353] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  68. J. Harz and K. Petraki, Radiative bound-state formation in unbroken perturbative non-Abelian theories and implications for dark matter, JHEP 07 (2018) 096 [arXiv:1805.01200] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  69. E. Braaten, D. Kang and R. Laha, Production of dark-matter bound states in the early universe by three-body recombination, JHEP 11 (2018) 084 [arXiv:1806.00609] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  70. R. Oncala and K. Petraki, Dark matter bound states via emission of scalar mediators, JHEP 01 (2019) 070 [arXiv:1808.04854] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  71. T. Binder, L. Covi and K. Mukaida, Dark matter Sommerfeld-enhanced annihilation and bound-state decay at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 115023 [arXiv:1808.06472] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  72. A. Bhattacharya and T.R. Slatyer, Bound states of pseudo-Dirac dark matter, JCAP 03 (2019) 029 [arXiv:1812.03169] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  73. J. Harz and K. Petraki, Higgs-mediated bound states in dark-matter models, JHEP 04 (2019) 130 [arXiv:1901.10030] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  74. R. Laha and E. Braaten, Direct detection of dark matter in universal bound states, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 103510 [arXiv:1311.6386] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  75. S. Baek, P. Ko and W.-I. Park, Local Z2 scalar dark matter model confronting galactic GeV-scale γ-ray, Phys. Lett. B 747 (2015) 255 [arXiv:1407.6588] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  76. P. Ko and Y. Tang, Self-interacting scalar dark matter with local Z3 symmetry, JCAP 05 (2014) 047 [arXiv:1402.6449] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  77. P. Ko and Y. Tang, Galactic center γ-ray excess in hidden sector DM models with dark gauge symmetries: local Z3 symmetry as an example, JCAP 01 (2015) 023 [arXiv:1407.5492] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  78. L.M. Krauss and F. Wilczek, Discrete gauge symmetry in continuum theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 (1989) 1221 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  79. B. Batell, Dark discrete gauge symmetries, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 035006 [arXiv:1007.0045] [INSPIRE].

  80. E. Ma, Inception of self-interacting dark matter with dark charge conjugation symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 772 (2017) 442 [arXiv:1704.04666] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  81. A. Ahmed, M. Duch, B. Grzadkowski and M. Iglicki, Multi-component dark matter: the vector and fermion case, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 905 [arXiv:1710.01853] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  82. M. Duerr, K. Schmidt-Hoberg and S. Wild, Self-interacting dark matter with a stable vector mediator, JCAP 09 (2018) 033 [arXiv:1804.10385] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  83. M. Iglicki, Vector-fermion dark matter, Ph.D. thesis, Warsaw U., Warsaw, Poland (2018) [arXiv:1804.10289] [INSPIRE].

  84. A. Ahmed, M. Duch, B. Grzadkowski and M. Iglicki, Vector-fermion dark matter model, Acta Phys. Polon. B 48 (2017) 2405 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  85. J.B. Dent, S. Dutta and R.J. Scherrer, Thermal relic abundances of particles with velocity-dependent interactions, Phys. Lett. B 687 (2010) 275 [arXiv:0909.4128] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  86. J.L. Feng, M. Kaplinghat and H.-B. Yu, Sommerfeld enhancements for thermal relic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 083525 [arXiv:1005.4678] [INSPIRE].

  87. J. Zavala, M. Vogelsberger and S.D.M. White, Relic density and CMB constraints on dark matter annihilation with Sommerfeld enhancement, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 083502 [arXiv:0910.5221] [INSPIRE].

  88. L.G. van den Aarssen, T. Bringmann and Y.C. Goedecke, Thermal decoupling and the smallest subhalo mass in dark matter models with Sommerfeld-enhanced annihilation rates, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 123512 [arXiv:1202.5456] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  89. T. Binder, M. Gustafsson, A. Kamada, S.M.R. Sandner and M. Wiesner, Reannihilation of self-interacting dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 123004 [arXiv:1712.01246] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  90. S. Weinberg, Goldstone bosons as fractional cosmic neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 241301 [arXiv:1305.1971] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  91. S. Baek, P. Ko and W.-I. Park, Search for the Higgs portal to a singlet fermionic dark matter at the LHC, JHEP 02 (2012) 047 [arXiv:1112.1847] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  92. R. Morris and N. Weiner, Low energy INTEGRAL positrons from exciting dark matter, arXiv:1109.3747 [INSPIRE].

  93. D.P. Finkbeiner and N. Weiner, X-ray line from exciting dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 083002 [arXiv:1402.6671] [INSPIRE].

  94. D.P. Finkbeiner, L. Goodenough, T.R. Slatyer, M. Vogelsberger and N. Weiner, Consistent scenarios for cosmic-ray excesses from Sommerfeld-enhanced dark matter annihilation, JCAP 05 (2011) 002 [arXiv:1011.3082] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  95. M. Beneke, C. Hellmann and P. Ruiz-Femenia, Non-relativistic pair annihilation of nearly mass degenerate neutralinos and charginos III. Computation of the Sommerfeld enhancements, JHEP 05 (2015) 115 [arXiv:1411.6924] [INSPIRE].

  96. R. Barbieri, R. Gatto and E. Remiddi, Singular binding dependence in the hadronic widths of 1++ and 1+− heavy quark anti-quark bound states, Phys. Lett. B 61 (1976) 465 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  97. R. Barbieri, M. Caffo and E. Remiddi, Gluon jets from quarkonia, Nucl. Phys. B 162 (1980) 220 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  98. R. Barbieri, M. Caffo, R. Gatto and E. Remiddi, Strong QCD corrections to p wave quarkonium decays, Phys. Lett. B 95 (1980) 93 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  99. R. Barbieri, M. Caffo, R. Gatto and E. Remiddi, QCD corrections to P wave quarkonium decays, Nucl. Phys. B 192 (1981) 61.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  100. G.T. Bodwin, E. Braaten, T.C. Yuan and G. Lepage, P wave charmonium production in B meson decays, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 3703 [hep-ph/9208254] [INSPIRE].

  101. G.T. Bodwin, E. Braaten and G. Lepage, Rigorous QCD analysis of inclusive annihilation and production of heavy quarkonium, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 1125 [Erratum ibid. 55 (1997) 5853] [hep-ph/9407339] [INSPIRE].

  102. K. Blum, R. Sato and T.R. Slatyer, Self-consistent calculation of the Sommerfeld enhancement, JCAP 06 (2016) 021 [arXiv:1603.01383] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  103. Y.-L. Tang and G.-L. Zhou, Calculations of the Sommerfeld effect in a unified wave function framework, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 036016 [arXiv:1806.10124] [INSPIRE].

  104. T.R. Slatyer, The Sommerfeld enhancement for dark matter with an excited state, JCAP 02 (2010) 028 [arXiv:0910.5713] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  105. D. Barducci et al., Collider limits on new physics within MicrOMEGAs4.3, Comput. Phys. Commun. 222 (2018) 327 [arXiv:1606.03834] [INSPIRE].

  106. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs4.1: two dark matter candidates, Comput. Phys. Commun. 192 (2015) 322 [arXiv:1407.6129] [INSPIRE].

  107. M.B. Wise and Y. Zhang, Stable bound states of asymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 055030 [Erratum ibid. 91 (2015) 039907] [arXiv:1407.4121] [INSPIRE].

  108. Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 030001 [INSPIRE].

  109. LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group collaboration, Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 1. Inclusive observables, arXiv:1101.0593 [INSPIRE].

  110. S. Dittmaier et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 2. Differential distributions, arXiv:1201.3084 [INSPIRE].

  111. LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group collaboration, Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 3. Higgs properties, arXiv:1307.1347 [INSPIRE].

  112. D.A. Dicus and V.S. Mathur, Upper bounds on the values of masses in unified gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 3111 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  113. B.W. Lee, C. Quigg and H.B. Thacker, The strength of weak interactions at very high-energies and the Higgs boson mass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 883 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  114. B.W. Lee, C. Quigg and H.B. Thacker, Weak interactions at very high-energies: the role of the Higgs boson mass, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1519 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  115. M. Lüscher and P. Weisz, Is there a strong interaction sector in the standard lattice Higgs model?, Phys. Lett. B 212 (1988) 472 [INSPIRE].

  116. W.J. Marciano, G. Valencia and S. Willenbrock, Renormalization group improved unitarity bounds on the Higgs boson and top quark masses, Phys. Rev. D 40 (1989) 1725 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  117. R. Essig et al., Working group report: new light weakly coupled particles, in Community summer study 2013: Snowmass on the Mississippi, (2013) [arXiv:1311.0029] [INSPIRE].

  118. A. Fradette, M. Pospelov, J. Pradler and A. Ritz, Cosmological constraints on very dark photons, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 035022 [arXiv:1407.0993] [INSPIRE].

  119. J. Bramante, P.J. Fox, G.D. Kribs and A. Martin, Inelastic frontier: discovering dark matter at high recoil energy, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 115026 [arXiv:1608.02662] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  120. XENON collaboration, Search for WIMP inelastic scattering off Xenon nuclei with XENON100, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 022008 [arXiv:1705.05830] [INSPIRE].

  121. PandaX-II collaboration, Exploring the dark matter inelastic frontier with 79.6 days of PandaX-II data, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 102007 [arXiv:1708.05825] [INSPIRE].

  122. XMASS collaboration, Search for WIMP-129 Xe inelastic scattering with particle identification in XMASS-I, Astropart. Phys. 110 (2019) 1 [arXiv:1809.05358] [INSPIRE].

  123. B. Ren, K. Tsumura and X.-G. He, A Higgs quadruplet for type III seesaw and implications for μ → eγ and μ − e conversion, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 073004 [arXiv:1107.5879] [INSPIRE].

  124. P.-H. Gu and X.-G. He, Electrophilic dark matter with dark photon: from DAMPE to direct detection, Phys. Lett. B 778 (2018) 292 [arXiv:1711.11000] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  125. A. Das and B. Dasgupta, Selection rule for enhanced dark matter annihilation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 251101 [arXiv:1611.04606] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  126. T.R. Slatyer, Indirect dark matter signatures in the cosmic dark ages. I. Generalizing the bound on s-wave dark matter annihilation from Planck results, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 023527 [arXiv:1506.03811] [INSPIRE].

  127. F. Kahlhoefer, K. Schmidt-Hoberg and S. Wild, Dark matter self-interactions from a general spin-0 mediator, JCAP 08 (2017) 003 [arXiv:1704.02149] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  128. M.E. Peskin and D.V. Schroeder, An introduction to quantum field theory, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, U.S.A. (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  129. M.S. Chanowitz and M.K. Gaillard, The TeV physics of strongly interacting W’s and Z’s, Nucl. Phys. B 261 (1985) 379 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  130. P. Hoyer, Bound states — from QED to QCD, arXiv:1402.5005 [INSPIRE].

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Physics, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 135 Xingang Xi Road, Guangzhou, 510275, China

    Yi-Lei Tang

  2. School of Physics, KIAS, 85 Hoegiro, Seoul, 02455, Republic of Korea

    Pyungwon Ko & Toshinori Matsui

  3. Quantum Universe Center, KIAS, 85 Hoegiro, Seoul, 02455, Republic of Korea

    Pyungwon Ko & Yi-Lei Tang

  4. Department of Physics, KAIST, 291 Daehakro, Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea

    Toshinori Matsui

Authors
  1. Pyungwon Ko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Toshinori Matsui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yi-Lei Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi-Lei Tang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

ArXiv ePrint: 1910.04311

Rights and permissions

Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ko, P., Matsui, T. & Tang, YL. Dark matter bound state formation in fermionic Z2 DM model with light dark photon and dark Higgs boson. J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 82 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2020)082

Download citation

  • Received: 15 November 2019

  • Revised: 09 July 2020

  • Accepted: 07 September 2020

  • Published: 13 October 2020

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2020)082

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Beyond Standard Model
  • Cosmology of Theories beyond the SM
  • Effective Field Theories
  • Discrete Symmetries
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Cancel contracts here

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2024 Springer Nature