Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Geometric error modeling and sensitivity analysis of a five-axis machine tool

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that precision design and error compensation are two basic methods to achieve high geometrical accuracy for machine tools. And for these two methods, error modeling and sensitivity analysis are key issues. In this paper, an error modeling method based on multi-body system (MBS) is used to construct the error mapping between error sources and the cutting tool pose error for a five-axis machine tool. According to the error mapping, the traditional definitions of local sensitivity indices (LSIs) and global sensitivity indices (GSIs) are introduced. Based on the LSIs and GSIs, the general local sensitivity indices (GLSIs), general global sensitivity indices (GGSIs), and general global sensitivity fluctuation indices (GGSFIs) are proposed. By using these new indices, error sensitivity analysis of the five-axis machine tool is conducted. According to the error sensitivity analysis results, the precision design of angular error components is conducted in numerical simulation. The results show that by using the proposed sensitivity analysis method, we can improve less error components but get more improvement for the cutting tool accuracy. It indicates that the proposed sensitivity indices and sensitivity analysis method are very effective and meaningful. The proposed sensitivity indices and sensitivity analysis method can also be used in the precision design and error compensation for other machine tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ramesh R, Mannan MA, Poo AN (2000) Error compensation in machine tools—a review part I: geometric, cutting-force induced and fixture-dependent errors. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40(9):1235–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang T, Li Y, Tang GB, Li SW, Zhao XY, Whitehouse DJ, Chetewyn DG, Liu XP (2002) Error modeling, sensitivity analysis and assembly process of a class of 3-DOF parallel kinematic machines with parallelogram struts. Sci China (Series E) 45(5):467–476

    Google Scholar 

  3. Huang Q, Zhang GB (2013) Precision design for machine tool based on error prediction. Chin J Mech Eng 26(1):151–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Khan AW, Chen WY (2011) A methodology for systematic geometric error compensation in five-axis machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53(5–8):615–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang JD, Guo JJ (2012) Research on volumetric error compensation for NC machine tool based on laser tracker measurement. Sci Chin-Technol Sci 55(11):3000–3009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bosetti P, Bruschi S (2012) Enhancing positioning accuracy of CNC machine tools by means of direct measurement of deformation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58(5–8):651–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cui GW, Lu Y, Li JG, Gao D, Yao YX (2012) Geometric error compensation software system for CNC machine tools based on NC program reconstructing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 63(1–4):169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barakat NA, Elbestawi MA, Spence AD (2000) Kinematic and geometric error compensation of a coordinate measuring machine. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40(6):833–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang SH, Lee JH, Liu Y (2006) Accuracy improvement of miniaturized machine tool: geometric error modeling and compensation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(12–13):1508–1516

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu SW, Ding GF, Qin SF, Lei J, Zhuang L, Yan KY (2012) Integrated geometric error modeling, identification and compensation of CNC machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 52(1):24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen GS, Mei XS, Li HL (2013) Geometric error modeling and compensation for large-scale grinding machine tools with multi-axes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68(9–12):2525–2534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang XS, Yang JG, Yan JY (2008) Synthesis error modeling of the five-axis machine tools based on multi-body system theory. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ 42(5):761–764, and 769

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li DX, Feng PF, Zhang JF, Yu DW, Wu ZJ (2014) An identification method for key geometric errors of machine tool based on matrix differential and experimental test. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 228(17):3141–3155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Su SP (2002) Study on precision modeling and error compensation methods for multi-axis CNC machine tools. National University of Defense Technology, China

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tian WJ, Gao WG, Zhang DW, Huang T (2014) A general approach for error modeling of machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 79:17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang ZF, Liu YW, Liu LB, Zhang YD (2000) Thermal error modeling of a five coordinate NC machine tool based on the multi-body theory. J Hebei Univ Technol 29(5):23–28

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cheng Q, Zhao HW, Zhang GJ, Gu PH, Cai LG (2014) An analytical approach for crucial geometrical errors identification of multi-axis tool based on global sensitivity analysis. Int J Adv Manfu Technol 75(1–4):107–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen JX, Lin SW, He BW (2014) Geometric error compensation for multi-axis CNC machines based on differential transformation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71(1–4):635–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fan KC, Wang H, Zhao JW, Chang TH (2003) Sensitivity analysis of the 3-PRS parallel kinematic spindle platform of a serial-parallel machine tool. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(15):1561–1569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Caro S, Wenger P, Bennis F, Chablat D (2006) Sensitivity analysis of the orthoglide: a three-DOF translational parallel kinematic machine. Transactions of the ASME. J Mech Des 128(2):392–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xie FG, Liu XJ, Chen YZ (2013) Error sensitivity analysis of a novel virtual center mechanism with parallel kinematics. J Mech Eng 49(17):85–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Xi FF, Verner M, Mechefske C (2002) Error sensitivity analysis for optimal calibration of parallel kinematic machines. ASME 2002 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Am Soc Mech Eng

  23. Merlet JP (2006) Jacobian, manipulability, condition number, and accuracy of parallel robots. J Mech Des 128:199–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tannous M, Caro S, Goldsztejn A (2014) Sensitivity analysis of parallel manipulators using an interval linearization method. Mech Mach Theory 71:93–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang P (2011) Research on the accuracy assurance of a class of 3-DOF spacial parallel manipulators. Tsinghua University, China

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fugui Xie or Xin-Jun Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, J., Xie, F. & Liu, XJ. Geometric error modeling and sensitivity analysis of a five-axis machine tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82, 2037–2051 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7492-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7492-5

Keywords