Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013

  • Long paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the ever-increasing development of technology and its integration into users’ private and professional life, a decision regarding its acceptance or rejection still remains an open question. A respectable amount of work dealing with the technology acceptance model (TAM), from its first appearance more than a quarter of a century ago, clearly indicates a popularity of the model in the field of technology acceptance. Originated in the psychological theory of reasoned action and theory of planned behavior, TAM has evolved to become a key model in understanding predictors of human behavior toward potential acceptance or rejection of the technology. The main aim of the paper is to provide an up-to-date, well-researched resource of past and current references to TAM-related literature and to identify possible directions for future TAM research. The paper presents a comprehensive concept-centric literature review of the TAM, from 1986 onwards. According to a designed methodology, 85 scientific publications have been selected and classified according to their aim and content into three categories such as (i) TAM literature reviews, (ii) development and extension of TAM, and (iii) modification and application of TAM. Despite a continuous progress in revealing new factors with significant influence on TAM’s core variables, there are still many unexplored areas of model potential application that could contribute to its predictive validity. Consequently, four possible future directions for TAM research based on the conducted literature review and analysis are identified and presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agarwal, R., Prasad, J.: The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decis. Sci. 28(3), 557–582 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ajzen, I.: From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl, J., Beckmann, J. (eds.) Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior. Springer, New York (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50(2), 179–211 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M.: Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Amoako-Gyampah, K.: Perceived usefulness, user involvement and behavioral intention: an empirical study of ERP implementation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23, 1232–1248 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Amoako-Gyampah, K., Salam, A.F.: An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Inf. Manag. 41(6), 731–745 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Arning, K., Ziefle, M.: Understanding age differences in PDA acceptance and performance. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23, 2904–2927 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barki, H., Hartwick, J.: User participation, conflict, and conflict resolution: the mediation roles of influence. Inf. Syst. Res. 5(4), 422–438 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown, S.A., Massey, A.P., Montoya-Weiss, M.M., Burkman, J.R.: Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 11(4), 283–295 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Burton-Jones, A., Hubona, G.S.: The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 43, 706–717 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Castaneda, J.A., Munoz-Leiva, F., Luque, T.: Web acceptance model (WAM): moderating effects of user experience. Inf. Manag. 44, 384–396 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chan, S., Lu, M.: Understanding internet banking adoption and use behavior: a Hong Kong perspective. J. Glob. Inf. Manag. 12(3), 21–43 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Charness, N., Boot, W.R.: Aging and information technology use: potential and barriers. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 18(5), 253–258 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chau, P.Y.K.: An empirical investigation on factors affecting the acceptance of CASE by systems developers. Inf. Manag. 30, 269–280 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chau, P.Y.K., Hu, P.: Investigating healthcare professionals’ decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories. Inf. Manag. 39(4), 297–311 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cheung, R., Vogel, D.: Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: an extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Comput. Educ. 63, 160–175 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chiou, W.-C., Lin, C–.C., Perng, C.: A strategic framework for website evaluation based on a review of the literature from 1995–2006. Inf. Manag. 47, 282–290 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chow, M., Herold, D.K., Choo, T.-M., Chan, K.: Extending the technology acceptance model to explore the intention to use Second Life for enhancing healthcare education. Comput. Educ. 59, 1136–1144 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chuttur, M.Y. (2009). Overview of the technology acceptance model: origins, developments and future directions. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, vol. 9, no. 37, pp. 1–21. Indiana University, USA

  20. Davis, F.D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Doctoral dissertation. MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA

  21. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–339 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of computer technology: system characteristics, user perceptions. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 38(3), 475–487 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 35(8), 982–1003 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 22(14), 11–32 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Davis, F.D., Venkatesh, V.: A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 45(1), 19–45 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Davis, F.D., Venkatesh, V.: Toward preprototype user acceptance testing of new information systems: implications for software project management. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 51(1), 31–46 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dishaw, M.T., Strong, D.M.: Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Inf. Manag. 36, 9–21 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Farahat, T.: Applying the technology acceptance model to online learning in the Egyptian Universities. Procedia Soc. Behav Sci 64, 95–104 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Featherman, M.S., Pavlou, P.A.: Predicting E-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 59(4), 451–474 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gefen, D.: What makes an ERP implementation relationship worthwhile: linking trust mechanisms and ERP usefulness. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 21(1), 263–288 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W.: Inexperience and experience with online stores: the importance of TAM and trust. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 50(3), 307–321 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gefen, D., Straub, D.W.: Gender difference in the perception and use of E-mail: an extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Q. 21(4), 389–400 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gong, M., Xu, Y., Yu, Y.: An enhanced technology acceptance model for web-based learning. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 15(4), 365–374 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gumussoy, C.A., Calisir, F., Bayram, A.: Understanding the behavioral intention to use ERP systems: an extended technology acceptance model. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp. 2024–2030 (2007)

  35. Hardgrave, B.C., Davis, F.D., Riemenschneider, C.K.: Investigating determinants of software developers’ intentions to follow methodologies. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 20(1), 123–151 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hong, W., Thong, J.Y.L., Wong, W., Tam, K.: Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: an empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 18(3), 97–124 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Horton, R.P., Buck, T., Waterson, P.E., Clegg, C.W.: Explaining intranet use with the technology acceptance model. J Inf. Technol. 16(4), 237–249 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hrastinski, S., Keller, C.: An examination of research approaches that underlie research on educational technology: a review from 2000 to 2004. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 36(2), 175–190 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hsiao, C.H., Yang, C.: The intellectual development of the technology acceptance model: a co-citation analysis. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 31, 128–136 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Hu, P.J., Chau, P.Y.K., Sheng, O.R.L., Tam, K.Y.: Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 16(2), 91–112 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hu, P.J., Lin, C., Chen, H.: User acceptance of intelligence and security informatics technology: a study of COPLINK. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 56(3), 235–244 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Huang, E.: The acceptance of women-centric websites. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 45(4), 75–83 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Huang, J.-H., Lin, Y.-R., Chuang, S.-T.: Elucidating user behavior of mobile learning: a perspective of the extended technology acceptance model. Electron. Libr. 25(5), 585–598 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Huang, L.J., Lu, M.T., Wong, B.K.: The impact of power distance on Email acceptance: evidence from the PRC. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 44(1), 93–101 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Igbaria, M., Iivari, J., Maragahh, H.: Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study. Inf. Manag. 29(5), 227–238 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Jackson, C.M., Chow, S., Leitch, R.A.: Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system. Decis. Sci. 28(2), 357–389 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., Chervany, N.L.: Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Q. 23(2), 183–213 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. King, W.R., He, J.: A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 43, 740–755 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Lee, D.Y., Lehto, M.R.: User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Comput. Educ. 61, 193–208 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lee, S., Kim, B.: Factors affecting the usage of intranet: a confirmatory study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25(1), 191–201 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Lee, W., Xiong, L., Hu, C.: The effect of Facebook users’ arousal and valence on intention to go to the festival: applying an extension of the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 31, 819–827 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Lee, Y., Kozar, K.A., Larsen, K.R.T.: The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 12(50), 752–780 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Legris, P., Ingham, J., Collerette, P.: Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 40, 191–204 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Liaw, S.S., Huang, H.M.: An investigation of user attitudes toward search engines as an information retrieval tool. Comput. Hum. Behav. 19(6), 751–765 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Lin, F., Wu, J.: An empirical study of end-user computing acceptance factors in small and medium enterprises in Taiwan: analyzed by structural equation modelling. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 44(3), 98–108 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Lu, J., Yu, C.-S., Liu, C., Yao, J.E.: Technology acceptance model for wireless internet. Internet Res. 13(3), 206–223 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Lucas, H.C., Spitler, V.K.: Technology use and performance: a field study of broker workstations. Decis. Sci. 30(2), 291–311 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Mathieson, K.: Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Inf. Syst. Res. 2(3), 173–191 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., Chinn, W.C.: Extending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources. Data Base Adv. Inf. Syst. 32(3), 86–112 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Melas, C.D., Zampetakis, L.A., Dimopoulou, A., Moustakis, V.: Modeling the acceptance of clinical information systems among hospital medical staff: an extended TAM model. J. Biomed. Inform. 44, 553–564 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Moon, J.W., Kim, Y.G.: Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Inf. Manag. 38(4), 217–230 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Nasri, W., Charfeddine, L.: Factors affecting the adoption of Internet banking in Tunisia: an integration theory of acceptance model and theory of planned behavior. J. High Technol. Manag. Res. 23, 1–14 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Oh, S., Ang, J., Kim, B.: Adoption of broadband internet in Korea: the role of experience in building attitudes. J. Inf. Technol. 18(4), 267–280 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Padilla-Meléndez, A., Aguila-Obra, A., Garrido-Moreno, A.: Perceived playfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning scenario. Comput. Educ. 63, 306–317 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Pai, F.-Y., Huang, K.-I.: Applying the technology acceptance model to the introduction of healthcare information systems. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 78, 650–660 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Park, N., Lee, K.M., Cheong, P.H.: University instructors’ acceptance of electronic courseware: an application of the technology acceptance model. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 13, 163–186 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Pavlou, P.A.: Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 7(3), 101–134 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Plouffe, C.R., Hulland, J.S., Vandenbosch, M.: Research report: richness versus parsimony in modeling technology adoption decisions-understanding merchant adoption of a smart card based payment system. Inf. Syst. Res. 12(2), 208–222 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Saadé, R.G., Kira, D.: The emotional state of technology acceptance. Issues Inf. Sci. Inf. Technol. 3, 529–539 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Schepers, J., Wetzels, M.: A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Inf. Manag. 44, 90–103 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Serenko, A.: A model of user adoption of interface agents for email notification. Interact. Comput. 20, 461–472 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Sharp, J.H.: Development, extension, and application: a review of the technology acceptance model. Inf. Syst. Educ. J. 5(9), 1–11 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Shih, H.: Extended technology acceptance model of internet utilization behavior. Inf. Manag. 41(6), 719–729 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Son, H., Park, Y., Kim, C., Chou, J.-S.: Toward an understanding of construction professionals’ acceptance of mobile computing devices in South Korea: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Autom. Constr. 28, 82–90 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Straub, D., Keil, M., Brenner, W.: Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: a three country study. Inf. Manag. 33(1), 1–11 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Sun, H., Zhang, P.: The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 64, 53–78 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Szajna, B.: Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Manag. Sci. 42(1), 85–92 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Tao, Y.-H., Cheng, C.-J., Sun, S.-Y.: What influences college students to continue using business simulation games? The Taiwan experience. Comput. Educ. 53, 929–939 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Taylor, S., Todd, P.: Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Inf. Syst. Res. 6(2), 144–176 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters, S., Budgen, D.: Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 52, 463–479 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Van der Heijden, H.: User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Q. 28(4), 695–704 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  82. Venkatesh, V.: Creation of favorable user perceptions exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Q. 23(2), 239–260 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  83. Venkatesh, V.: Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inf. Syst. Res. 11(4), 342–365 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A model of antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decis. Sci. 27(3), 451–481 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag. Sci. 46(2), 186–204 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G.: Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Q. 24(1), 115–139 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., Davis, F.: User acceptance of information technology: towards a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 479–501 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  88. Wagner, N., Hassanein, K., Head, M.: Computer use by older adults: a multi-disciplinary review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26, 870–882 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Q. 26(2), xiii–xxiii (2002)

  90. Wixom, B.H., Todd, P.A.: A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inf. Syst. Res. 16(1), 85–102 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Wu, C.-S., Cheng, F–.F., Yen, D.C., Huang, Y.-W.: User acceptance of wireless technology in organizations: a comparison of alternative models. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 33, 50–58 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Wu, K., Zhao, Y., Zhu, Q., Tan, X., Zheng, H.: A meta-analysis of the impact of trust on technology acceptance model: investigation of moderating influence of subject and context type. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 31(6), 572–581 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Yi, M.Y., Hwang, Y.: Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 59(4), 431–449 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Yu, C.-S., Liu, C., Yao, J.E.: Technology acceptance model for wireless Internet. Internet Res 13(3), 206–222 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Zhang, S., Zhao, J., Tan, W.: Extending TAM for online learning systems: an intrinsic motivation perspective. Tsinghua Sci. Technol. 13(3), 312–317 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper describes the results of research carried out within the project 177-0361994-1998 Usability and Adaptivity of Interfaces for Intelligent Authoring Shells funded by the Ministry of Science, Education and Sports of the Republic of Croatia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrina Granić.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marangunić, N., Granić, A. Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Univ Access Inf Soc 14, 81–95 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1

Keywords