Abstract
Early warning for rainfall-induced shallow landsliding can help reduce fatalities and economic losses. Although these commonly occurring landslides are typically triggered by subsurface hydrological processes, most early warning criteria rely exclusively on empirical rainfall thresholds and other indirect proxies for subsurface wetness. We explore the utility of explicitly accounting for antecedent wetness by integrating real-time subsurface hydrologic measurements into landslide early warning criteria. Our efforts build on previous progress with rainfall thresholds, monitoring, and numerical modeling along the landslide-prone railway corridor between Everett and Seattle, Washington, USA. We propose a modification to a previously established recent versus antecedent (RA) cumulative rainfall thresholds by replacing the antecedent 15-day rainfall component with an average saturation observed over the same timeframe. We calculate this antecedent saturation with real-time telemetered measurements from five volumetric water content probes installed in the shallow subsurface within a steep vegetated hillslope. Our hybrid rainfall versus saturation (RS) threshold still relies on the same recent 3-day rainfall component as the existing RA thresholds, to facilitate ready integration with quantitative precipitation forecasts. During the 2015–2017 monitoring period, this RS hybrid approach has an increase of true positives and a decrease of false positives and false negatives relative to the previous RA rainfall-only thresholds. We also demonstrate that alternative hybrid threshold formats could be even more accurate, which suggests that further development and testing during future landslide seasons is needed. The positive results confirm that accounting for antecedent wetness conditions with direct subsurface hydrologic measurements can improve thresholds for alert systems and early warning of rainfall-induced shallow landsliding.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6f06/b6f0633fc87f9f659045222c74b0a8c6fa7e3d4b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0209a/0209a98a48121bf4d8822e3868cc3a74d8aa0e8e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50413/504138500d4502b441d6a361fd513f0c25d355c1" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66b3e/66b3e44987ba529b49dfc5bcb7c4a93604292975" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4db9/d4db9534a23591cced10d631ec964a5ff75ca9f3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f30a/9f30aa667c34f26776127c5467fd1553218e38f6" alt=""
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baum RL, Godt JW (2010) Early warning of rainfall-induced shallow landslides and debris flows in the USA. Landslides 7:259–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-009-0177-0
Baum RL, McKenna JP, Godt JW, Harp EL, McMullen SR (2005) Hydrologic monitoring of landslide-prone coastal bluffs near Edmonds and Everett, Washington, 2001–2004. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2005–1063, 42 p
Berti M, Martina MLV, Franceschini S, Pignone S, Simoni A, Pizziolo M (2012) Probabilistic rainfall thresholds for landslide occurrence using a Bayesian approach, J Geophys Res Earth Surf, 117(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JF002367
Bogaard T, Greco R (2016) Landslide hydrology: from hydrology to pore pressure. WIREs Water 3:439–459. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1126
Bogaard T, Greco R (2018) Invited perspectives: Hydrological perspectives on precipitation intensity-duration thresholds for landslide initiation: proposing hydro-meteorological thresholds. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 18:31-39. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-31-2018
Brocca L, Melone F, Moramarco T (2008) On the estimation of antecedent wetness condition in rainfall–runoff modeling. Hydrol Process 22:629–642
Caine N (1980) The rainfall intensity–duration control of shallow landslides and debris flows. Geogr Ann A 62:23–27
Cannon SH, Ellen SD (1985) Rainfall conditions for abundant debris avalanches, San Francisco Bay region, California. Calif Geol 38(12):267–272
Chleborad AF, Baum RL, Godt JW, Powers PS (2008) A prototype system for forecasting landslides in the Seattle, Washington, area. In: Baum RL, Godt JW, Highland LM (eds) Landslides and engineering geology of the Seattle, Washington, area. Geological Society of America reviews in engineering geology, v. XX. Geological Society of America, Boulder, pp 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1130/2008.4020(06)
Ciavoletta M, Bogaard T, Gargano R, Greco R (2016) Is there predictive power in hydrological catchment information for regional landslide hazard assessment? Proc Earth Planet Sci 16:195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeps.2016.10.021
Collins BD, Znidarcic D (2004) Stability analyses of rainfall induced landslides. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130(4):362–372. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:4(362)
Corominas J (2000) Landslides and climate. In: Bromhead E, Dixon N, Ibsen ML (eds) Keynote lecture of proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Landslides. A. A. Balkema, Cardiff, 4, pp 1–33
De Vita P, Napolitano E, Godt JW, Baum RL (2013) Deterministic estimation of hydrological thresholds for shallow landslide initiation and slope stability models: case study from the Somma-Vesuvius area of southern Italy. Landslides 10(6):713–727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-012-0348-2
Ebel BA, Loague K, Montgomery DR, Dietrich WE (2008) Physics-based continuous simulation of long-term near-surface hydrologic response for the Coos Bay experimental catchment. Water Resour Res 44:W07417. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006442
Fawcett T (2006) An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recogn Lett 27:861–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010
Godt JW, Baum RL, Chleborad AF (2006) Rainfall characteristics for shallow landsliding in Seattle, Washington, USA. Earth Surf Process Landf 31:97–110
Godt JW, Baum RL, Savage WZ, Salciarini D, Schulz WH, Harp EL (2008) Transient deterministic shallow landslide modeling: requirements for susceptibility and hazard assessments in a GIS framework. Eng Geol 102(3):214–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.019
Guzzetti F, Peruccacci S, Rossi M, Stark CP (2008) The rainfall intensity–duration control of shallow landslides and debris flows: an update. Landslides 5:3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-007-0112-1
Jakob M, Holm K, Lange O, Schwab JW (2006) Hydrometeorological thresholds for landslide initiation and forest operation shutdowns on the north coast of British Columbia. Landslides 3:228–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-006-0044-1
Jakob M, Owen T, Simpson T (2012) A regional real-time debris-flow warning system for the District of North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Landslides 9:165–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-011-0282-8
Keefer DK, Wilson RC, Mark RK, Brabb EE, Brown WM, Ellen SD, Harp EL, Wieczorek GF, Alger CS, Zatkin RS (1987) Real-time landslide warning during heavy rainfall. Science 238(4829):921–925. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.238.4829.921
Leonarduzzi E, Molnar P, McArdell BW (2017) Predictive performance of rainfall thresholds for shallow landslides in Switzerland from gridded daily data. Water Resour Res 53:6612–6625. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021044
Lu N, Godt JW (2013) Hillslope hydrology and stability. Cambridge University Press, New York
Mirus, BB, Smith JB, Stark B, Lewis Y, Michel A, Baum RL (2016) Assessing landslide potential on coastal bluffs near Mukilteo, Washington—geologic site characterization for hydrologic monitoring, U.S. Geological Survey – Open-File Report, 2016-1082, pp. 28. doi:https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20161082
Mirus, BB, Smith JB, Baum RL (2017a) Shallow landslide assessment of coastal bluffs along Puget Sound using a physics-based hydro-mechanical model. In: De Graff JV, Shakur A (eds) Landslides: putting experience, knowledge and emerging technologies into practice, Association of Environmental & Engineering Geologists (AEG), special publication 27, ISBN: 978–0–9897253-7-8, p. 442–454
Mirus BB, Smith JB, Baum RL (2017b) Hydrologic impacts of landslide disturbances: Implications for remobilization and hazard persistence. Water Resour Res WRCR22885. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020842
Moody JA, Ebel BA (2012) Hyper-dry conditions provide new insights into the cause of extreme floods after wildfire. Catena 93:58–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2012.01.006
Napolitano E, Fusco F, Baum RL, Godt JW, De Vita P (2016) Effect of antecedent-hydrological conditions on rainfall triggering of debris flows in ash-fall pyroclastic mantled slopes of Campania (southern Italy). Landslides 13:967–983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0647-5
Piciullo L, Mads-Peter D, Graziella D, Herve C, Michele C (2017) Adapting the EDuMaP method to test the performance of the Norwegian early warning system for weather-induced landslides. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 17:817–831. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-817-2017
Ponziani F, Pandolfo C, Stelluti M, Berni N, Brocca L, Moramarco R (2012) Assessment of rainfall thresholds and soil moisture modeling for operational hydrogeological risk prevention in the Umbria region (Central Italy). Landslides 9:229–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-011-0287-3
Posner AJ, Georgakakos KP (2015) Soil moisture and precipitation thresholds for real-time landslide prediction in El Salvador. Landslides 12:1179–1196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0618-x
Samia J, Temme A, Bregt A, Wallinga J, Guzzetti F, Ardizzone F, Rossi M (2017) Do landslides follow landslides? Insights in path dependency from a multi-temporal landslide inventory. Landslides 14:547–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-016-0739-x
Schaefer JT (1990) The critical success index as an indicator of warning skill. Weather Forecast 5:570–575
Scheevel CR, Baum RL, Mirus BB, Smith JB (2017) Precipitation thresholds for landslide occurrence near Seattle, Mukilteo, and Everett, Washington. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2017–1039, 51 p. doi:https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20171039
Sidle RC, Ochiai H (2006) Landslides: processes, prediction, and land use. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118665954
Smith JB, Baum RL, Mirus BB, Michel A, Stark B (2017a) Results of hydrologic monitoring on landslide-prone coastal bluffs near Mukilteo, Washington. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 2017–1095, pp. 47, doi:https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20171095
Smith JB, Baum RL, Mirus BB, Michel A, Stark B (2017b) Results of hydrologic monitoring on landslide-prone coastal bluffs near Mukilteo, Washington. U.S. Geological Survey data release. doi:https://doi.org/10.5066/F7NZ85WX
Staley DM, Kean JW, Cannon SH, Laber JL, Schmidt KM (2013) Objective definition of rainfall intensity-duration thresholds for the initiation of post-fire debris flows in southern California. Landslides 10:547–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-012-0341-9
Swets JA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240(4857):1285–1293
Tiranti D, Rabuffetti D (2010) Estimation of rainfall thresholds triggering shallow landslides for an operational warning system implementation. Landslides 7:471–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-010-0198-8
Wieczorek GF, Glade T (2005) Climatic factors influencing occurrence of debris flows. In: Jakob M, Hungr O (eds) Debris flow hazards and related phenomena. Springer, Berlin, pp 325–362
Acknowledgements
This work was funded in part through a technical assistance agreement between Sound Transit and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Landslides Hazards Program. All rainfall and hydrologic monitoring data are available through the USGS ScienceBase catalog: https://doi.org/10.5066/F7NZ85WX (Smith et al. 2017b). Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 830 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mirus, B.B., Becker, R.E., Baum, R.L. et al. Integrating real-time subsurface hydrologic monitoring with empirical rainfall thresholds to improve landslide early warning. Landslides 15, 1909–1919 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-0995-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-0995-z