Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Connection number of set pair analysis based TOPSIS method on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application to decision making

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intuitionistic fuzzy set plays a significant role to handle the uncertainties in the data during the decision-making process. Keeping the advantage of it in mind, an attempt has been made in the present article for rating the different preferences of the object based on the set pair analysis (SPA). For this, a major component of SPA, known as a connection number, has been constructed based on the preference values and the comprehensive ideal values of the object. An extension of TOPSIS method is further developed, based on the proposed connection number of SPA, to calculate relative-closeness of sets of alternatives which are used to generate the ranking order of the alternatives. A real example is taken to demonstrate the applicability and validity of the proposed methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Atanassov K, Gargov G (1989) Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 31:343–349

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20:87–96

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bai ZY (2013) An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method based on an improved score function. The Scientific World Journal Volume 2013, Article ID 879,089 6 pages

  4. Boran FE, Genċ S, Akay D (2011) Personnel selection based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries 21(5):493–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. ChangJian W (2007) Application of the set pair analysis theory in multiple attribute decision-making. J Mech Strength 6:029

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fu S, Zhou H (2017) Triangular fuzzy number multi-attribute decision-making method based on set-pair analysis. J Softw Eng 11(1):116–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Garg H (2016) Generalized intuitionistic fuzzy interactive geometric interaction operators using einstein t-norm and t-conorm and their application to decision making. Comput Ind Eng 101:53– 69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Garg H (2016) Generalized intuitionistic fuzzy multiplicative interactive geometric operators and their application to multiple criteria decision making. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 7(6):1075–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Garg H (2016) A new approach for solving fuzzy differential equations using runga Ü kutta and biogeography Ü based optimization. J Intell Fuzzy Syst, IOS Press 30:2417–2429

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Garg H (2016) A new generalized improved score function of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and applications in expert systems. Appl Soft Comput 38:988–999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.10.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Garg H (2016) A new generalized pythagorean fuzzy information aggregation using einstein operations and its application to decision making. Int J Intell Syst 31(9):886–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Garg H (2016) A novel accuracy function under interval-valued pythagorean fuzzy environment for solving multicriteria decision making problem. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 31(1):529–540

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Garg H (2016) Some series of intuitionistic fuzzy interactive averaging aggregation operators. SpringerPlus 5 (1):999. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2591-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Garg H (2017) Generalized pythagorean fuzzy geometric aggregation operators using Einstein t-norm and t-conorm for multicriteria decision-making process. Int J Intell Syst 32(6):597–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Garg H (2017) Novel intuitionistic fuzzy decision making method based on an improved operation laws and its application. Eng Appl ArtifIntell 60:164–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Garg H, Agarwal N, Tripathi A (2015) Entropy based multi-criteria decision making method under fuzzy environment and unknown attribute weights. Global J Technol Optim 6:13–20

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hu J, Yang L (2011) Dynamic stochastic multi-criteria decision making method based on cumulative prospect theory and set pair analysis. Syst Eng Procedia 1:432–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hung CC, Chen LH (2009) A fuzzy TOPSIS decision making method with entropy weight under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. In: Proceedings of the international multiconference of engineers and computer scientists 2009

  19. Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey. Springer , Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang YL, Xu CF, Yao Y, Zhao KQ (2004) Systems information in set pair analysis and its applications. In: Proceedings of 2004 international conference on machine learning and cybernetics, vol 3, pp 1717–1722

  21. Joshi D, Kumar S (2014) Intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and distance measure based topsis method for multi-criteria decision making. Egyptian Informatics Journal 15(2):97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kumar K, Garg H (2016) TOPSIS Method based on the connection number of set pair analysis under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set environment. Comput Appl Math 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-016-0402-0

  23. Nancy, Garg H (2016) Novel single-valued neutrosophic decision making operators under frank norm operations and its application. Int J Uncertain Quantif 6(4):361–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rui Y, Zhongbin W, Anhua P (2012) Multi-attribute group decision making based on set pair analysis. Int J Advancements in Computing Technology 4(10):205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sahin R (2016) Fuzzy multicriteria decision making method based on the improved accuracy function for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Soft Comput 20(7):2557– 2563

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Sivaraman G, Nayagam VLG, Ponalagusamy R (2013) Multi-criteria interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision making using a new score function. In: KIM 2013 knowledge and information management conference. pp 122–131

  27. Wang JQ, Gong L (2009) Interval probability stochastic multi-criteria decision-making approach based on set pair analysis. Control and Decision 24:1877–1880

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wang W, Liu X (2012) Intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregation using einstein operations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20(5):923–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang X, Triantaphyllou E (2008) Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some electre methods. Omega - Int J Manag Sci 36:45–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Xie Z, Zhang F, Cheng J, Li L (2013) Fuzzy multi-attribute decision making methods based on improved set pair analysis. In: Sixth international symposium on computational intelligence and design, vol. 2, pp 386–389

  31. Xu ZS (2007) Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15:1179–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Xu ZS, Yager RR (2006) Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Gen Syst 35 :417–433

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Yang J, Zhou J, Liu L, Li Y, Wu Z (2008) Similarity measures between connection numbers of set pair analysis. Springer, Berlin, pp 63–68

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhao K (1989) Set pair and set pair analysis-a new concept and systematic analysis method. In: Proceedings of the national conference on system theory and regional planning, pp 87–91

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mathematics, Thapar University, Patiala, 147004, Punjab, India

    Kamal Kumar & Harish Garg

Authors
  1. Kamal Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Harish Garg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harish Garg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, K., Garg, H. Connection number of set pair analysis based TOPSIS method on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application to decision making. Appl Intell 48, 2112–2119 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1067-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1067-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation