Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Global biodiversity research during 1900–2009: a bibliometric analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We performed a bibliometric analysis of published biodiversity research for the period of 1900–2009, based on the Science Citation Index (SCI) database. Our analysis reveals the authorial, institutional, spatiotemporal, and categorical patterns in biodiversity research and provides an alternative demonstration of research advancements, which may serve as a potential guide for future research. The growth of article outputs has exploded since the 1990s, along with an increasing collaboration index, references, and citations. Ecology, environmental sciences, biodiversity conservations, and plant science were most frequently used subject categories in biodiversity studies, and Biological Conservation, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Conservation Biology and Biodiversity and Conservation were most active journals in this field. The United States was the largest contributor in global biodiversity research, as the U.S. produced the most single-country and collaborative articles, had the greatest number of top research institutions, and had a central position in collaboration networks. We perceived an increasing number of both internationally collaborative and inter-institutionally collaborative articles, with the latter form of collaboration being more prevalent than the former. A keyword analysis found several interesting terminology preferences, confirmed conservation’s central position as a topic in biodiversity research, revealed the adoption of advanced technologies, and demonstrated keen interest in both the patterns and underlying processes of ecosystems. Our study reveals patterns in scientific outputs and academic collaborations and serves as an alternative and innovative way of revealing global research trends in biodiversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borgatti SP (2002) Netdraw network visualization. Analytic technologies, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns CE, Collins SL, Smith MD (2009) Plant community response to loss of large herbivores: comparing consequences in a South African and a North American grassland. Biodivers Conserv 18:2327–2342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron EZ (2008) Productivity in conservation research in the southern hemisphere. Conserv Biol 22:232–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cao M, Zhang JH (1997) Tree species diversity of tropical forest vegetation in Xishuangbanna, SW China. Biodivers Conserv 6:995–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C (2004) Searching for intellectual turning points: progressive knowledge domain visualization. Proc Nat Acad Sci 101:5303–5310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Zhang B, Ma K, Jiang Z (2009) Bibliometric analysis of status quo of conservation biology in China. Biodivers Sci 17:423–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu WT, Ho YS (2007) Bibliometric analysis of tsunami research. Scientometrics 73:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costello MJ, Coll M, Danovaro R et al (2010) A census of marine biodiversity knowledge, resources, and future challenges. PLoS ONE 5:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropper A (1993) Convention on biological diversity. Environ Conserv 20:364–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falagas ME, Karavasiou AI, Bliziotis IA (2006) A bibliometric analysis of global trends of research productivity in tropical medicine. Acta Trop 99:155–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glowka L, Burhenne-Guilmin F, Synge H (1994) A guide to convention on biological diversity. IUCN, Gland, CH

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldyn H (2010) Changes in plant species diversity of aquatic ecosystems in the agricultural landscape in West Poland in the last 30 years. Biodivers Conserv 19:61–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Alcaide G, Aleixandre-Benavent R, Navarro-Molina C, Valderrama-Zurian JC (2008) Coauthorship networks and institutional collaboration patterns in reproductive biology. Fertil Steril 90:941–956

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gray JS (1997) Marine biodiversity: patterns, threats and conservation needs. Biodivers Conserv 6:153–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gude PH, Hansen AJ, Jones DA (2007) Biodiversity consequences of alternative future land use scenarios in Greater Yellowstone. Ecol Appl 17:1004–1018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hadrys H, Balick M, Schierwater B (1992) Applications of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) in molecular ecology. Mol Ecol 1:55–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He T, Zhang J, Teng L (2005) Basic research in biochemistry and molecular biology in China: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 62:249–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heino J, Paavola R, Virtanen R, Muotka T (2005) Searching for biodiversity indicators in running waters: do bryophytes, macroinvertebrates, and fish show congruent diversity patterns? Biodivers Conserv 14:415–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez-Stefanoni JL (2006) The role of landscape patterns of habitat types on plant species diversity of a tropical forest in Mexico. Biodivers Conserv 15:1441–1457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho YS (2007) Bibliometric analysis of adsorption technology in environmental science. J Environ Prot Sci 1:1–11

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff RN (2000) The underpublishing of science and technology results. The Scientist 14:6

    Google Scholar 

  • Li T, Ho YS, Li CY (2008) Bibliometric analysis on global Parkinson’s disease research trends during 1991–2006. Neurosci Lett 441:248–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Zhang Y, Wang X, Ho YS (2009) Bibliometric analysis of atmospheric simulation trends in meteorology and atmospheric science journals. Crotica Chemica Acta 82:695–705

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malarvizhi R, Wang MH, Ho YS (2010) Research trends in adsorption technologies for dye containing wastewaters. World Appl Sci J 8:930–942

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manzelli M, Pileri L, Lacerenza N et al (2007) Genetic diversity assessment in Somali sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) accessions using microsatellite markers. Biodivers Conserv 16:1715–1730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller UG, Wolfenbarger LL (1999) AFLP genotyping and fingerprinting. Trends Ecol Evol 14:389–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muyzer G, de Waal EC, Uitterlinden AG (1993) Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:695–700

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker SS (2010) Buried treasure: soil biodiversity and conservation. Biodivers Conserv 19:3743–3756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielke RA, Marland G, Betts RA et al (2002) The influence of land-use change and landscape dynamics on the climate system: relevance to climate-change policy beyond the radiative effect of greenhouse gases. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A-Math Phys Eng Sci 360:1705–1719

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard A (1969) Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? J Doc 25:348–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarkowski SM (2007) Environmental health research in Europe-Bibliometric analysis. Eur J Pub Health 17:14–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Araujo MB et al (2005) Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102:8245–8250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tian YG, Wen C, Hong S (2008) Global scientific production on GIS research by bibliometric analysis from 1997–2006. J Informetr 2:65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tisdell C (2003) Socioeconomic causes of loss of animal genetic diversity: analysis and assessment. Ecol Econ 45:365–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM (1994) Beyond global warming-ecology and global change. Ecology 75:1861–1876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie S, Zhang J, Ho YS (2008) Assessment of world aerosol research trends by bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 77:113–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Qian W, Ho YS (2009) A bibliometric analysis of research related to ocean circulation. Scientometrics 80:305–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Wang MH, Hu J, Ho YS (2010) A review of published wetland research, 1991–2008: ecological engineering and ecosystem restoration. Ecol Eng 36:973–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Prof. Yuh-Shan Ho (Peking University, China) for his pioneering work in the bibliometric methods that were employed in this study. The authors would also like to thank Mr. Nan Feng (University of Alabama at Huntsville, USA), Mr. Chi Chen (University of Sydney, Australia), Ms. Wei Zou (University of Hong Kong, China), and Ms. Yangjie Guo (Wuhan University, China) for their valuable suggestions in preparing this manuscript. Comments from the anonymous referees and the editor are also gratefully appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Xingjian Liu

  2. The James and Marilyn Lovell Center for Environmental Geography and Hazards Research, Texas State University-San Marcos, San Marcos, TX, USA

    Xingjian Liu

  3. Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China

    Liang Zhang

  4. School of Resource and Environmental Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

    Song Hong

Authors
  1. Xingjian Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Liang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Song Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Song Hong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, X., Zhang, L. & Hong, S. Global biodiversity research during 1900–2009: a bibliometric analysis. Biodivers Conserv 20, 807–826 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9981-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9981-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation