Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

New Ways of Teaching: Using Technology and Mobile Apps to Educate on Societal Grand Challenges

  • Editorial Essay
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We use this editorial essay as a call for a more effective use of new technologies, such as mobile apps and Web 2.0 tools, to educate students and other relevant stakeholders on business ethics, corporate social responsibility, and sustainability topics. We identify three overarching reasons that justify the need for new ways of teaching that further incorporate technology to foster the innovative thinking needed to tackle imminent societal grand challenges such as climate change and increasing inequality. First, we are facing a new generation of millennials and Generation Z students who are digital natives and more likely to search for educational content on their electronic devices. Second, new technologies offer opportunities to reach students globally, helping to democratize education. Third, we posit that the intrinsic characteristics of societal grand challenges, which are complex, uncertain, and evaluative, can benefit from technology as an effective translator of multilayered concepts into more digestible action items. Our essay ends with a brief summary of the four essays included in the thematic symposium: “There is an App for that! The Use of New Technologies and Apps in Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Education.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Alonso-Martínez, D., Jiménez-Parra, B., González-Álvarez, N., Godos-Díez, J. L., & Cabeza-García, L. (2019). Taking advantage of students’ passion for apps in sustainability and CSR teaching. Sustainability,11(3), 779–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aragón-Correa, J. A., Marcus, A., Rivera, J., & Kenworthy, A. (2017). Sustainability management teaching resources and the challenge of balancing planet, people, and profits. Academy of Management Learning and Education,16(3), 469–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audebrand, L. K. (2010). Sustainability in strategic management education: The quest for new root metaphors. Academy of Management Learning and Education,9(3), 413–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S. B. (2011). Embedding sustainability across the organization: A critical perspective. Academy of Management Learning and Education,10(4), 719–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bano, M., Zowghi, D., Kearney, M., Schuck, S., & Aubusson, P. (2018). Mobile learning for science and mathematics school education: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Computers and Education,121, 30–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P., & DesJardine, M. (2014). Business sustainability: It is about time. Strategic Organization,12, 70–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botsvadze, V. (2018). Top 25 countries ranked by internet users. Retrieved March 22, 2019, from https://vladimerbotsvadze.wordpress.com/2015/09/21/top-25-countries-ranked-by-internet-users-2013-2018-2/.

  • Civic Science. (2019). Millennials vs Gen Z. Retrieved March 23, 2019, from https://civicscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Millennials-vs.-Gen-Z.pdf.

  • Close, A. G., Dixit, A., & Malhotra, N. K. (2005). Chalkboards to cybercourses: The Internet and marketing education. Marketing Education Review,15(Spring), 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crompton, H., Burke, D., & Lin, Y.-L. (2019). Mobile learning and student cognition: A systematic review of PK 12 research using Bloom’s Taxonomy. British Journal of Educational Technology,50(2), 684–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Cerro-Velázquez, F., & Morales Méndez, G. (2018). Augmented reality and mobile devices: A binominal methodological resource for inclusive education (SDG 4). An example in secondary education. Sustainability,10(10), 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M., & Kohli, A. (2020). Can apps make air pollution visible? Learning about health impacts through engagement with air quality information. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3353132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte. (2014). The Deloitte Millennial Survey: Big demands and high expectations. Retrieved March 28, 2019, from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/About-Deloitte/gx-dttl-2014-millennial-survey-report.pdf.

  • Doyle, D., & Brown, F. W. (2000). Using a business simulation to teach applied skills—The benefits and the challenges of using student teams from multiple countries. Journal of European Industrial Training,24(6), 330–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egri, C. P., & Ralston, D. A. (2008). The role of corporate social and environmental responsibility in international business. Journal of International Management,14(4), 319–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ersoy-Babula, A. I., & Babula, M. (2018). Learning on the move business students’ adaptation of virtual learning environment and mobile device technology. The International Journal of Management Education,16(2), 321–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, F., Etzion, D., & Gehman, J. (2015). Tackling grand challenges pragmatically: Robust action revisited. Organization Studies,36(3), 363–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueiró, P. S., & Raufflet, E. (2015). Sustainability in higher education: A systematic review with focus on management education. Journal of Cleaner Production,106, 22–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E., Dunham, L., Fairchild, G., & Parmar, B. (2015). Leveraging the creative arts in business ethics teaching. Journal of Business Ethics,131(3), 519–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, P., Antolin-Lopez, R., & Montiel, I. (2019). Technology in responsible management education. In D. C. Moosmayer, O. Laasch, C. Parkes & K. G. Brown (Eds.), The Sage handbook of responsible management learning and education. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332880251.

  • García-Morales, V., Martín-Rojas, R., & Garde-Sánchez, R. (2020). Using Web 2.0 technologies to encourage social entrepreneurship action. Journal of Business Ethics.

  • Gatti, L., Ulrich, M., & Seele, P. (2018). Education for sustainable development through business simulation games: An exploratory study of sustainability gamification and its effects on students’ learning outcomes. Journal of Cleaner Production,207, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, G., Howard-Grenville, J., Joshi, A., & Tihanyi, L. (2016). Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Academy of Management Journal,59(6), 1880–1895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gezgin, D. M. (2019). The effect of mobile learning approach on university students’ academic success for database management systems course. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies,17(1), 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., & Preuss, L. (2010). Trade-offs in corporate sustainability: You can’t have your cake and eat it. Business Strategy and the Environment,19(4), 217–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., & Preuss, L. (2018). A paradox perspective on corporate sustainability: Descriptive, instrumental, and normative aspects. Journal of Business Ethics,148(2), 235–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamidi, H., & Chavoshi, A. (2018). Analysis of the essential factors for the adoption of mobile learning in higher education: A case study of students of the University of Technology. Telematics and Informatics,35(4), 1053–1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. (2016). Millennials engage with their smartphones more than they do actual humans. Retrieved February 20, 2018, from https://www.marketwatch.com/story/millennials-engage-with-their-smartphones-more-than-they-do-actual-humans-2016-06-21.

  • Howard-Grenville, J., Buckle, S. J., Hoskins, B. J., & George, G. (2014). Climate change and management: From the editors. Academy of Management Journal,57(3), 615–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation/by Neil Howe and Bill Straus; cartoons by R.J. Matson. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laasch, O., Moosmayer, D., & Arp, F. (2020). Responsible practices in the wild: An actor-network perspective on mobile apps in learning as translation(s). Journal of Business Ethics.

  • Lantz-Andersson, A., Vigmo, S., & Bowen, R. (2013). Crossing boundaries in Facebook: Students’ framing of language learning activities as extended spaces. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning,8(3), 293–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loon, M., Evans, J., & Kerridge, C. (2015). Learning with a strategic management simulation game: A case study. The International Journal of Management Education,13(3), 227–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, J. M., Folguera, C., & Arenas, D. (2003). Setting the Context: The role information technology in a business ethics course based on face-to-face dialogue. Journal of Business Ethics,48(1), 99–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matulich, E., Papp, R., & Haytk, D. L. (2008). Continuous improvement through teaching innovations: A requirement for today’s learners. Marketing Education Review,18(1), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, M., & Mayfield, J. (2019). Enhancing student learning and engagement with interactive fiction using Twine. Academy of Management Learning and Education. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2019.0080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcconatha, D., Praul, M., & Lynch, M. J. (2008). Mobile learning in higher education: An empirical assessment of a new educational tool. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,7(3), 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGovern, E., & Baruca, A. (2013). Want to enroll in a MOOC? No thanks, my professors have their own videos. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education,21(2), 64–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montiel, I., Antolín-López, R., & Gallo, P. J. (2018). Emotions and sustainability: A literary genre-based framework for environmental sustainability management education. Academy of Management Learning and Education,17(2), 155–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montiel, I., & Delgado-Ceballos, J. (2014). Defining and measuring corporate sustainability: Are we there yet? Organization and Environment,27(2), 113–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montiel, I., Delgado-Ceballos, J., & Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N. (2017). Mobile apps for sustainability management education: The example of GoodGuide. Academy of Management Learning and Education,16(3), 489–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan-Thomas, A., & Dudau, A. (2019). Of possums, hogs and horses: Capturing duality of student engagement in eLearning. Academy of Management Learning and Education. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2018.0029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., Bansal, P., & Aragón-Correa, J. A. (2019). Older and wiser: How CEOs’ time perspective influences long-term investments in environmentally responsible technologies. British Journal of Management,30(1), 134–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palfrey, J. G., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prado, A., Arce, R., López, L., García, J. & Pearson, A. (2020). Simulations vs. cases: Effectively teaching the premises of sustainable development in the classroom. Journal of Business Ethics.

  • Reinhardt, W., Ebner, M., Beham, G., & Costa, C. (2009). How people are using Twitter during conferences. Creativity and innovation competencies on the Web. In V. Hornung-Prähauser & M. Luckmann (Eds.), Proceedings of fifth Edumedia conference (pp. 145–156). Salzburg: Edumedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, M., Ajjan, H., & Honeycutt, E. (2014). Using technology to engage and improve millennial students’ presentation performance. Atlantic Marketing Journal,3(2), 7–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueda, L., Benítez, J., & Braojos, J. (2017). From traditional education technologies to student satisfaction in management education: A theory of the role of social media applications. Information and Management,54(8), 1059–1071.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., Wildman, J., & Piccolo, R. (2009). Using simulation-based training to enhance management education. Academy of Management Learning and Education,8(4), 559–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J. D., Bansal, P., & Gruber, M. (2017). New ways of seeing: Elaboration on a theme. Academy of Management Journal,60(2), 397–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P. (2010). Pedagogy of passion for sustainability. Academy of Management Learning and Education,9(3), 443–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slawinski, N., & Bansal, P. (2015). Short on time: Intertemporal tensions in business sustainability. Organization Science,26, 531–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starik, M., Rands, G., Marcus, A. A., & Clark, T. S. (2010). From the guest editors: In search of sustainability in management education. Academy of Management Learning and Education,9(3), 377–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, C. H. (2018). Exploring sustainability environment educational design and learning effect evaluation through migration theory: An example of environment educational serious games. Sustainability,10(10), 33–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sua, T. Y. (2012). Democratization of secondary education in Malaysia: Emerging problems and challenges of educational reform. International Journal of Educational Development,32(1), 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • StatCounter Global Stats. (2018). India among world leaders in use of mobile to surf the internet. Retrieved March 23, 2019, from http://gs.statcounter.com/press/india-amongst-world-leaders-in-use-of-mobile-to-surf-the-internet.

  • StatCounter Global Stats. (2013). Desktop vs. mobile vs. table market share in India. Retrieved March 23, 2019, from http://gs.statcounter.com/platform-market-share/desktop-mobile-tablet/worldwide/2013.

  • Statista. (2018). Millennials in the U.S.—Statistics and facts. Retrieved 30 July 2018, from https://www.statista.com/topics/2705/millennials-in-the-us/.

  • Times of India. (2018). Mobile phones contribute to 79 percent of all web traffic in India. Retrieved March 23, 2019, from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/mobile-phones-contribute-79-of-all-web-traffic-in-india/articleshow/64650073.cms.

  • United Nations. (2018). The Sustainable Development Goals report. Retrieved March 8, 2019, from https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/report/2018/TheSustainableDevelopmentGoalsReport2018-EN.pdf.

  • Wankel, C. (2009). Management education using social media. Organization Management Journal,6(1), 251–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, J., New, J. R., & Ireland, R. D. (2016). MOOCs and the online delivery of business education: What’s new? What’s not? What now? Academy of Management Learning and Education,15(2), 345–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteman, G., Walker, B., & Perego, P. (2013). Planetary boundaries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Studies,50(2), 307–336.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the JBE Special Issues Editor Rob Phillips for his excellence guidance. We also thank Kelley Crites for her insightful feedback. We acknowledge the financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (R&D Projects ECO2015-66504-P, ECO2016-75909-P, and ECO2017-88222-P), and the European Regional Development Fund-ERDF/FEDER-UE.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Baruch College, New York, USA

    Ivan Montiel

  2. University of Granada, Granada, Spain

    Javier Delgado-Ceballos & Natalia Ortiz-de-Mandojana

  3. University of Almeria, Almeria, Spain

    Raquel Antolin-Lopez

Authors
  1. Ivan Montiel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Javier Delgado-Ceballos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Natalia Ortiz-de-Mandojana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Raquel Antolin-Lopez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivan Montiel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Journal of Business Ethics Thematic Symposium “There is an App for that! The Use of New Technologies in Ethics, CSR and Corporate Sustainability Education.”

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Montiel, I., Delgado-Ceballos, J., Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N. et al. New Ways of Teaching: Using Technology and Mobile Apps to Educate on Societal Grand Challenges. J Bus Ethics 161, 243–251 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04184-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04184-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation