Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Adapting the task-taxon-task methodology to model the impact of chemical protective gear

  • SI: BRIMS 2010
  • Published:
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Task-Taxon-Task method (Anno et al. DNA-TR-95-115, 1996) is a statistical modeling approach to predict performance decrements on behavioral tasks in response to various stressors. We describe the basics of the T3 method and our approach to adapting it to handle more acute stressors, which can require decomposition into task networks via logical or empirical analysis. We provide an illustrative example showing how the method can be used to account for performance decrements in manual tasks associated with wearing protective gloves. This illustration provides a substantive application in which the current T3 method can be augmented to account for performance decrements in a new sub-domain, while additionally providing lessons for extending the method to new stressors, performance domains, and behavior modeling systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Allender L, Salvi L, Promisel D (1997) Evaluation of human performance under diverse conditions via modeling technology. In: Proceedings of the workshop on emerging technologies in human engineering testing and evaluation. NATO Research Study Group 24, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JR, Lebiere C (1998) The atomic components of thought. Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Anno GH, Dore MA, Roth TJ (1996) Taxonomic model for performance degradation in combat tasks. DNA-TR-95-115, Defense Nuclear Agency, Alexandria, VA

  • Anno GH (1997) Speed-accuracy measures for distributed interactive simulation of nuclear weapons effects. Technical report for Defense Special Weapons Agency, DSWA01-97-M-0309

  • Bensel CK, Teixeira RA, Kaplan DB (1987) The effects of US Army chemical protective clothing on speech intelligibility, visual field, body mobility, and psychomotor coordination of men. United States Army Natick Research. Development, and Engineering Center technical report TR-87-037, Natick, MA

  • Booher HR, Minninger J (2003) Human systems integration in army systems acquisition. In: Booher HR (ed) Handbook of human systems integration. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, pp 663–698

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Broadhurst PL (1959) The interaction of task difficulty and motivation: The Yerkes-Dodson Law revived. Acta Psychol 16:321–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card SK, Moran TP, Newell A (1980) The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems. Commun ACM 23(7):396–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card SK, Moran TP, Newell A (1983) The psychology of human computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale. ISBN 0-89859-859-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis EG, Wick CH, Salvi L, Kash HM (1990) Soldier performance of military operational tasks conducted while wearing chemical individual protective equipment (IPE): Data analysis in support of the revision of the U.S. Army Field Manual on NBC Protection (FM 3–4). Ballistic Research Laboratory technical report BRL-TR-3155, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD. DTIC Document ADA230157

  • Evertsz R, Busetta P, Pedrotti M, Ritter FE, Bittner JL (2008) CoJACK-Achieving principled behaviour variation in a moderated cognitive architecture. In: Proceedings of the 17th conference on behavior representation in modeling and simulation, 08-BRIMS-025. University of Central Florida, Orlando, pp 80–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitts PM (1966) Cognitive aspects of information processing: III. Set for speed versus accuracy. J Exp Psychol 71(6):849–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman EA, Kinkade RG, Chambers AN (1968) Development of a taxonomy of human performance: A review of the first year’s progress. Technical progress report for Advanced Research Projects Agency Order #1032. DTIC Document AD0684583

  • Fleishman EA (1975) Toward a taxonomy of human performance. Am Psychol 30(12):1127–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman EA, Quaintance MK (1984) Taxonomies of human performance. Academic Press, Orlando. With the assistance of Broedling LA

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett L, Jarboe N, Patton DJ, Mullins LL (2006) The effects of encapsulation on dismounted warrior performance. Army Research Laboratory technical report ARL-TR-3789, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD. DTIC Document ADA448610

  • Glenn SW, Parsons OA (1990) The role of time in neuropsychological performance: investigating and application in an alcoholic population. Clin Neuropsychol 4:344–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn SW, Parsons OA (1992) Neuropsychological efficiency measures in male and female alcoholics. J Stud Alcohol 53(6):546–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray WD, John BE, Atwood ME (1993) Project Ernestine: validating a GOMS analysis for predicting and explaining real-world task performance. Hum-Comput Interact 8(3):237–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunzelmann G, Gross JB, Gluck KA, Dinges DF (2009) Sleep deprivation and sustained attention performance: integrating mathematical and cognitive modeling. Cogn Sci 33(5):880–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan J, Broach D, Salas E (1990) Development of a task information taxonomy for human performance systems. Mil Psychol 2(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings JR, Wood CC, Lawrence BE (1976) Effects of graded doses of alcohol on speed-accuracy tradeoff in choice reaction time. Percept Psychophys 19(1):85–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John BE, Kieras DE (1996) The GOMS family of user interface analysis techniques: comparison and contrast. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact 3(4):320–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson R, Kobrick J (1997) Effects of wearing chemical protective clothing on rifle marksmanship and on sensory and psychomotor tasks. Mil Psychol 9(4):301–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieras D, Meyer DE (1997) An overview of the EPIC architecture for cognition and performance with application to human-computer interaction. Hum-Comput Interact 12:391–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein GA, Ross KG, Moon BM, Klein DE, Hoffman RR, Hollnagel E (2003) Macrocognition. IEEE Intell Syst May–June:81–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis JS, Bensel CK, Lockhart JM (1973) Dexterity afforded by CB protective gloves. Technical report 75-35-PR, US Army Natick Laboratories, Natick, MA, DTIC Document AD0759123

  • MacKay DG (1982) The problems of flexibility, fluency, and speed-accuracy trade-off in skilled behavior. Psychol Rev 89(5):483–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer DE, Glass JM, Mueller ST, Seymour TL, Kieras DE (2001) Executive-process interactive control: a unified computational theory for answering 20 questions (and more) about cognitive ageing. Eur J Cogn Psychol 13(1):123–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer DE, Smith JEK, Kornblum S, Abrams RA, Wright CE (1990) Speed-accuracy tradeoffs in aimed movements: toward a theory of rapid voluntary action. In: Attention and performance XIII, pp 173–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan GP, Ritter FE, Stevenson WE, Schenck IN, Cohen MA (2005) dTank: an environment for architectural comparisons of competitive agents. In: Proceedings of the 14th conference on behavior representation in modeling and simulation, 05-BRIMS-043. University of Central Florida, Orlando, pp 133–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller ST, Jones M, Minnery BS, Hiland JMH (2007) The BICA Cognitive Decathlon: a test suite for biologically-inspired cognitive agents. In: Proceedings of the 16th conference on behavior representation in modeling and simulation, 07-BRIMS-015. Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller ST, Zimmerman LA, McClellan GE, Crary DJ, Cheng K (2009) Cognitive performance prediction with the T3 methodology. Technical progress report for Defense Threat Reduction Agency, contract # HDTRA-1-08-C-0025

  • Neades M, Klopcic JT, Davis EG (1998) New methodology for the assessment of battlefield insults and injuries on the performance of Army, Navy, and Air Force military tasks. In: Proceedings of the RTO HFM meeting on models for aircrew safety assessment, RTO MP-20, p 28

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachella RG, Pew RW (1968) Speed-accuracy tradeoff in reaction time: effect of discrete criterion times. J Exp Psychol 76:19–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parks S (2006) Inside HELP, Administrative and reference manual. VORT Corp, Palo Alto. ISBN 0-89718-097-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton EW, Gray WD, Schoelles MJ (2009) SANLab-CM: the stochastic activity network laboratory for cognitive modeling. In: Human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting proceedings, vol 53, pp 1654–1658

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez T (1997) Modeling military task performance for Army and Air Force personnel wearing chemical protective clothing. Mil Psychol 9(4):375–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter FE, Reifers AL, Klein LC, Schoelles MJ (2007) Lessons from defining theories of stress. In: Gray WD (ed) Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems (IMoCS). Oxford University Press, New York, pp 254–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Rundell OH, Williams HL (1979) Alcohol and speed-accuracy tradeoff. Hum Factors 21(4):433–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvi L (2001) Development of Improved Performance Research Integration Tool (IMPRINT) performance degradation factors for the Air Warrior Program. Army Research Laboratory Technical Report, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD. DTIC Document ADA387840

  • Samsonovich A (2010a) Comparative table of cognitive architectures. Retrieved from http://bicasociety.org/cogarch/

  • Samsonovich AV (2010b) Toward a unified catalog of implemented cognitive architectures. In: Biologically inspired cognitive architectures 2010. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 195–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders AF (1983) Towards a model of stress and human performance. Acta Psychol 53(1):61–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweickert R, Fisher DL, Proctor RW (2003) Steps toward building mathematical and computer models from cognitive task analyses. Hum Factors 45(1):77–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman BG, Johns M, Cornwell J, O’Brien K (2006) Human behavior models for agents in simulators and games: part I: enabling science with PMFserv. Presence 15(2):139–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira RA, Bensel CK (1990) The effects of chemical protective gloves and glove liners on manual dexterity. US Army Natick Research, Development and Engineering Center Technical Report NATICK/TR/91/002, Natick, MA. DTIC Document ADA231250

  • Thorne D, Genser S, Sing H, Hegge F (1983) Plumbing human performance limits during 72 hours of high task load. In: Forshaw SE (ed) Proceedings of the 24th DRG seminar on the human as a limiting element in military systems, vol 1. NATO Defense Research Group, Toronto, pp 17–40 (NATO-DRG Rep No SD-A-DR(83) 170)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickelgren WA (1977) Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychol 41(1):67–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickens CD (2002) Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theor Issues Ergon 3(2):159–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittman J, Harrison CT (2001) OneSAF: a product line approach to simulation development. Technical Report 01E-SIW-061, MITRE Corporation and US Army Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command. DTIC Document ADA460127

  • Williams D, Englund C, Suces A, Overson M (1997) Effects of chemical protective clothing, exercise, and diphenhydramine on cognitive performance during sleep deprivation. Mil Psychol 9(4):329–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yerkes RM, Dodson JD (1908) The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. J Comp Neurol Psychol 18:459–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shane T. Mueller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mueller, S.T., Simpkins, B., Anno, G. et al. Adapting the task-taxon-task methodology to model the impact of chemical protective gear. Comput Math Organ Theory 17, 251–271 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-011-9093-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-011-9093-7

Keywords