Abstract
So far landscape analysis meant analysis of the spatial pattern of land cover or land use. However, biological organisms do not perceive the landscape only as land cover or land use, but they use all their senses, in order to become familiar with and react to their surroundings. We analyzed the acoustic environment as an additional layer of spatial information in landscape analysis, shortening the monopoly of visual patterns as landscape descriptors. We recorded sounds from a rural protected area into seven categories based on their origin, and examined their spatiotemporal variability and their correlation with landscape characteristics. The sounds were distinguished as Foreground or Background sounds. Foreground sounds correspond to sharp sounds originating near the observer and usually are understood as signals of urgent information, triggering reactions; while background sounds carry information over longer distances and may be used as landmarks to help individuals find their bearing even in the absence of visual signs. We found that the acoustic environment varies both temporally and spatially reflecting anthropogenic, geophysical and biological activities. The spatial pattern of the background sounds correlates, to an extent, with the visually perceived landscape features, but it does not correlate with the spatial pattern of the foreground sounds, which do not correlate strongly with the landscape pattern. This spatial pattern mismatch between acoustic environment and landscape, along with the highly dynamic nature of the acoustic environment compared to the relatively static nature of the land cover and land use spatial pattern highlight a limitation of the classical landscape analysis, and expands our understanding of the cognitive landscape.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bonaiuto M, Fornara F, Bonnes M (2003) Indexes of perceived residential environment quality and neighbourhood attachment in urban environments: a confirmation study on the city of Rome. Landsc Urban Plan 65:43–54. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00236-0
Botteldooren D, De Coensel B, De Muer T (2006) The temporal structure of urban sounds capes. J Sound Vib 292:105–123. doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2005.07.026
Bray JR, Curtis JT (1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr 27:325–349. doi:10.2307/1942268
Brown AL, Muhar A (2004) An approach to the acoustic design of outdoor space. J Environ Plann Manage 47:827–842. doi:10.1080/0964056042000284857
Brumm H, Todt D (2002) Noise-dependent song amplitude regulation in a territorial songbird. Anim Behav 63:891–897. doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1968
Carles JL, Barrio IL, de Lucio JV (1999) Sound influence on landscape values. Landsc Urban Plan 43:191–200. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00112-1
Clarke DS (1987) Principles of semiotic. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
Clarke KR, Warwick RM (1994) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Natural Environment Council, UK
Collins AM, Quillian MR (1969) Retrieval time from semantic memory. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 8:240–248. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80069-1
Corbin A (1998) Village bells. Columbia University Press, New York
Deely J (2005) Basics of semiotics, 4th edn. Tartu University Press, Tartu
Fang C, Ling D (2005) Guidence for noise reduction provided by tree belts. Landsc Urban Plan 71:29–34. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.01.005
Farina A, Belgrano A (2004) The eco-field: a new paradigm for landscape ecology. Ecol Res 19:107–110. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1703.2003.00613.x
Farina A, Belgrano A (2006) The eco-field hypothesis: toward a cognitive landscape. Landscape Ecol 21:5–17. doi:10.1007/s10980-005-7755-x
Farina A, Bogaert J, Schipania I (2005) Cognitive landscape and information: new perspectives to investigate the ecological complexity. Biosystems 79:235–240. doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2004.09.018
Gaver WW (1993a) How do we hear in the world? Explorations in ecological acoustics. Ecol Psychol 5:285–313. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco0504_2
Gaver WW (1993b) What in the world do we hear? An ecological approach to auditory event perception. Ecol Psychol 5:1–29. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco0501_1
Hedfors P, Grahn P (1998) Soundscapes in urban and rural planning and design. Yearb Soundscape Stud 1:67–82
Kallimanis SA, Mazaris DA, Tzanopoulos J, Halley MJ, Pantis DJ, Sgardelis PS (2008) How does habitat diversity and area affect species diversity? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:532–538. doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2008.00393.x
Klæboe R, Engelien E, Steinnes M (2006) Context sensitive noise impact mapping. Appl Acoust 67:620–642. doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2005.12.002
McGarigal K, Marks BJ (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA For Serv Gen Tech Rep PNW-351
Miller PN (2008) US National Parks and management of park soundscapes: a review. Appl Acoust 69:77–92. doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2007.04.008
Nielson HR, Nielson F (1995) Semantics with applications, a formal introduction, 1st edn. Wiley, Chicester
Öhrström E, Skånberg A, Svensson H et al (2006) Effects of road traffic noise and the benefit of access to quietness. J Sound Vibrat 295:40–59. doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2005.11.034
Papadimitriou K, Mazaris AD, Kallimanis AS, Pantis JD (2009) Cartographic representation of the sonic environment. Cartographic J (in press)
Pheasant R, Horoshenkov K, Watts G (2008) The acoustic and visual factors influencing the construction of tranquil space in urban and rural environments tranquil spaces-quiet places? J Acoust Soc Am 123:1446–1457. doi:10.1121/1.2831735
Quinn PG, Keough JM (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, UK
Rosch E (1978) Principles of categorization. In: Rosch E, Lloyd BB (eds) Cognition and categorization. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Schafer RM (1969) The new soundscape: a handbook for the modern music. Teacher, BMI, Don Mills, Canada
Schafer RM (1977) The tuning of the world. Knopf, New York
Simpson SD, Jeffs A, Montgomery JC et al (2008) Nocturnal relocation of adult and juvenile coral reef fishes in response to reef noise. Coral Reefs 27:97–104. doi:10.1007/s00338-007-0294-y
Taft OW, Haig SM (2006) Importance of wetland landscape structure to shorebirds wintering in an agricultural valley. Landscape Ecol 21:169–184. doi:10.1007/s10980-005-0146-5
Tardieu J, Susini P, Poisson F et al (2008) Perceptual study of soundscapes in train stations. Appl Acoust 69:1224–1239
Tischendorf L, Fahrig L (2000) On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos 90:7–19. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900102.x
Truax B (1984) Acoustic communication. Ablex, New Jersey
Truax B (1999) Handbook of acoustic ecology, 2nd edn. Street Publishing, (CD-ROM version). Burnaby, Cambridge
van Poll R (1997) The perceived quality of the urban residential environment–a multi-attribute evaluation. Roermund, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. The Netherlands
Viollon S, Lavandier C, Drake C (2002) Influence of visual settings on sound ratings in an urban environment. Appl Acoust 63:493–511. doi:10.1016/S0003-682X(01)00053-6
Vuilleumier S, Metzger R (2005) Animal dispersal modelling: Handling landscape features and related animal choices. Ecol Modell 190:159–170. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.04.017
Watts G, Chinn L, Godfrey N (1999) The effects of vegetation on the perception of traffic noise. Appl Acoust 56:39–56. doi:10.1016/S0003-682X(98)00019-X
Watts G, Morgan P, Abbott A (2006) A proposal for identifying quiet areas in accordance with the Environmental Noise Directive (END) In: Proceedings of IOA autumn conference 8, pp 7
Wg A EN–European Commission Working Group Assessment of Exposure to Noise (2003) Good practice guide for strategic noise mapping and the production of associated data on noise exposure. Assessment of Exposure to Noise Brussel: European Commission’s Working Group. pp 63
Wiens JA (1999) Toward a unified landscape ecology. In: Wiens JA, Moss MR (eds) Issues in landscape ecology. International Association for Landscape Ecology, Snowmass Village, Colorado, USA, pp 148–151
Wiens JA, Stenseth NC, Van Horne B et al (1993) Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology. Oikos 66:369–380. doi:10.2307/3544931
Wu J (2006) Landscape ecology, cross-disciplinarity, and sustainability science. Landscape Ecol 21:1–4. doi:10.1007/s10980-006-7195-2
Wu J, Hobbs R (2002) Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: An idiosyncratic synthesis. Landscape Ecol 17:355–365. doi:10.1023/A:1020561630963
Wu J, Hobbs R (eds) (2006) Key topics in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Wu J, Hobbs R (2007) Landscape ecology: the state-of-the-science. In: Wu J, Hobbs R (eds) Key topics in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 271–287
Zhang M, Kan J (2007) Towards the evaluation, description, and creation of soundscapes in urban open spaces. Environ Plann B Plann Des 34:68–86. doi:10.1068/b31162
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the researchers who have participated to the field work: (in alphabetical order) Dionysis Batzakis, Ioanna Etmektsogolou, Giorgos Frangiskos, Iordanis Houvardas, Nikos Kefalogiannis, Evagelia Drakou, Eleni Kotali, Hristos Koutsodimakis, Theodoros Lotis, Apostolos Loufopoulos, Filippos Theoharidis, Andreas Mniestis, Katerina Tzedaki and Nikos Valsamakis. This research is supported by the PYTHAGORAS project of the Operational Program for Education and Initial Vocational Training (EPEAEK) of the Hellenic Ministry of Education under the 3rd European Community Support Framework for Greece.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mazaris, A.D., Kallimanis, A.S., Chatzigianidis, G. et al. Spatiotemporal analysis of an acoustic environment: interactions between landscape features and sounds. Landscape Ecol 24, 817–831 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9360-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9360-x