Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

BehavDT: A Behavioral Decision Tree Learning to Build User-Centric Context-Aware Predictive Model

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper formulates the problem of building a context-aware predictive model based on user diverse behavioral activities with smartphones. In the area of machine learning and data science, a tree-like model as that of decision tree is considered as one of the most popular classification techniques, which can be used to build a data-driven predictive model. The traditional decision tree model typically creates a number of leaf nodes as decision nodes that represent context-specific rigid decisions, and consequently may cause overfitting problem in behavior modeling. However, in many practical scenarios within the context-aware environment, the generalized outcomes could play an important role to effectively capture user behavior. In this paper, we propose a behavioral decision tree, “BehavDT” context-aware model that takes into account user behavior-oriented generalization according to individual preference level. The BehavDT model outputs not only the generalized decisions but also the context-specific decisions in relevant exceptional cases. The effectiveness of our BehavDT model is studied by conducting experiments on individual user real smartphone datasets. Our experimental results show that the proposed BehavDT context-aware model is more effective when compared with the traditional machine learning approaches, in predicting user diverse behaviors considering multi-dimensional contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aha DW, Kibler D, Albert MK (1991) Instance-based learning algorithms. Mach Learn 6(1):37–66

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eagle N, Pentland AS (2006) Reality mining: sensing complex social systems. Personal and ubiquitous computing 10(4):255–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. El Khaddar MA, Boulmalf M (2017) Smartphone: the ultimate iot and ioe device. Smartphones from an Applied Research Perspective, pp 137

  4. Zulkernain S et al (2010) A mobile intelligent interruption management system. J UCS 16(15):2060–2080

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eibe F, Witten IH (1998) Generating accurate rule sets without global optimization

  6. Freitas AA (2000) Understanding the crucial differences between classification and discovery of association rules: A position paper. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 2(1):65–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Han J, Pei J, Kamber M (2011) Data mining: concepts and techniques. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Holte RC (1993) Very simple classification rules perform well on most commonly used datasets. Mach Learn 11(1):63–90

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hong J, Suh E-H, Kim J, Kim SY (2009) Context-aware system for proactive personalized service based on context history. Expert Syst Appl 36(4):7448–7457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. John GH, Langley P (1995) Estimating continuous distributions in bayesian classifiers. In: Proceedings of the 11th conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence, pp 338–345. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.

  11. Keerthi SS, Shevade SK, Bhattacharyya C, Murthy KRK (2001) Improvements to platt’s smo algorithm for svm classifier design. Neural Comput 13(3):637–649

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Le Cessie S, Van Houwelingen JC (1992) Ridge estimators in logistic regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics) 41(1):191–201

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee W-P (2007) Deploying personalized mobile services in an agent-based environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4)

  14. Veljko P, Mirco M (2014) Interruptme: designing intelligent prompting mechanisms for pervasive applications. In: UbiComp, pp 897–908. ACM

  15. Pielot M (2014) Large-scale evaluation of call-availability prediction. In: Proceedings of the international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing, pp 933–937. ACM

  16. Pielot M, De Oliveira R, Kwak H, Oliver N (2014) Didn’t you see my message?: predicting attentiveness to mobile instant messages. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 3319–3328. ACM

  17. Quinlan RJ (1986) Induction of decision trees. Mach Learn 1(1):81–106

    Google Scholar 

  18. Quinlan RJ (1993) C4.5: Programs for machine learning. Machine Learning

  19. Sarker I (2018) Mobile data science: Towards understanding data-driven intelligent mobile applications. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Scalable Information Systems 5(19):e4

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sarker IH (2018) Behavminer: Mining user behaviors from mobile phone data for personalized services. In: Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications (PerCom 2018). IEEE, Athens

  21. Sarker IH (2018) Understanding the role of data-centric social context in personalized mobile applications. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Context-aware Systems and Applications 5(15):e1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sarker IH (2019) Context-aware rule learning from smartphone data: survey, challenges and future directions. J Big Data 6 (1):95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sarker IH (2019) A machine learning based robust prediction model for real-life mobile phone data. Internet of Things 5:180–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sarker IH, Colman A, Han J (2019) Recencyminer: mining recency-based personalized behavior from contextual smartphone data. J Big Data 6(1):49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sarker IH, Colman A, Han J, Kayes ASM, Watters P (2019) Calbehav: A machine learning based personalized calendar behavioral model using time-series smartphone data. Comput J :1–16

  26. Sarker IH, Colman A, Kabir MA, Han J (2017) Individualized time-series segmentation for mining mobile phone user behavior. Comput J 61(3):349–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sarker IH, Kabir MA, Colman A, Han J (2017) An approach to modeling call response behavior on mobile phones based on multi-dimensional contexts. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on mobile software engineering and systems, pp 91–95. IEEE Press

  28. Sarker IH, Kabir MA, Colman A, Han J (2017) An effective call prediction model based on noisy mobile phone data. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing and proceedings of the 2017 ACM international symposium on wearable computers, pp 193–196. ACM

  29. Sarker IH, Kayes ASM, Furhad H, Islam MM, Islam S (2019) E-miim: an ensemble-learning-based context-aware mobile telephony model for intelligent interruption management. AI and SOCIETY, pp 1–9

  30. Sarker IH, Kayes ASM, Watters P (2019) Effectiveness analysis of machine learning classification models for predicting personalized context-aware smartphone usage. J Big Data 6(1):57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sarker IH, Salah K (2019) Appspred: Predicting context-aware smartphone apps using random forest learning. Internet of Things

  32. Sheng S, Ling CX (2005) Hybrid cost-sensitive decision tree, knowledge discovery in databases. In: PKDD 2005, Proceedings of 9th European conference on principles and practice of knowledge discovery in databases. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3721

  33. Witten IH, Frank E (2005) Data mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques. Morgan, Kaufmann

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Wu C-C, Chen Y-L, Liu Y-H, Yang X-Y (2016) Decision tree induction with a constrained number of leaf nodes. Appl Intell 45(3):673–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wu X, Kumar V, Quinlan JR, Ghosh J, Yang Q, Motoda H, McLachlan GJ, Ng A, Liu B, Yu S (2008) Philip Top 10 algorithms in data mining. Knowledge and information systems 14(1):1–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhu H et al (2014) Mining mobile user preferences for personalized context-aware recommendation. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 5(4):58

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iqbal H. Sarker.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sarker, I.H., Colman, A., Han, J. et al. BehavDT: A Behavioral Decision Tree Learning to Build User-Centric Context-Aware Predictive Model. Mobile Netw Appl 25, 1151–1161 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-019-01443-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-019-01443-z

Keywords