Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Promoting Self-Regulation in Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective on Learning

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to review recent research on self-regulated learning and discuss the implications of this research for science education. We draw on examples of self-regulated learning from the science education literature to summarise and illustrate effective instructional methods and the development of metacognitive understanding (Gunstone; 1999a; Rickey & Stacy, 2000; White & Mitchell, 1994). We also focus on the crucial role that metacognition plays in self-regulation (Baird & White, 1996; Nichols, Tippins, & Wieseman, 1997; White, 1998).

We divide our discussion into two main parts. The first focuses on three components of self-regulated learning, including cognition, metacognition, and motivation. We relate these aspects of self-regulation to current practices in science education. The second section focuses on six general instructional strategies for improving self-regulation in the science classroom. We focus on the use of inquiry based learning, the role of collaborative support, strategy and problem solving instruction, the construction of mental models, the use of technology to support learning, and the role of personal beliefs such as self-efficacy and epistemological world views. These instructional strategies are selected because they reflect extensive research agendas over the last decade within the science education literature and are essential to metacognition and self-regulation (Butler & Winne, 1995; Gunstone, 1999b).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, J. M., Carr, M., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1995). Development of metacognition in gifted children: Directions for future research. Developmental Review, 15(1), 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. W., & Hogan, K. (2000). Preface: Designing programs for science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 627–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2000). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 181–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baird, J. R., & White, R. T. (1996). Metacognitive strategies in the classroom. In D. F. Treagust, R. Duit, & B. J. Fraser (Eds.), Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics (pp. 190–200). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W. P., & Lawson, A. E. (2001). Complex instructional analogies and theoretical concept acquisition in college genetics. Science Education, 85(6), 665–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeth, M. E. (1997). Teaching for conceptual change: Using status as a metacognitive toolkit. Science Education, 82(1), 343–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeth, M. E. (1998). Facilitating conceptual change learning: The need for teachers to support metacognition. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(1), 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2002). Beliefs about science: How does science instruction contribute? In B. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 321–346). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendixen, L. D., Schraw, G., & Dunkle, M. E. (1998). Epistemic beliefs and moral reasoning. The Journal of Psychology, 13(3), 187–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchini, J. A. (1997). Where knowledge construction, equity, and context intersect: Student learning of science in small groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(10), 1039–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blank, L. M. (2000). A metacognitive learning cycle: A better warranty for student understanding. Science Education, 84(4), 486–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D. W., & Crippen, K. J. (2001). Learning difficult content using the web: Strategies make a difference. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(4), 283–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., Norby, M. M., & Ronning, R. R. (2003). Cognitive psychology and instruction (4th ed.). Columbus, OH: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, J. R., & Scharmann, L. C. (1996). Influence of cooperative early field experience on preservice elementary teachers' science self-efficacy. Science Education, 80(4), 419–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. (1999). The use of problem-solving based instructional model in initiating change in students' achievement and alternative frameworks. International Journal of Science Education, 21(4), 373–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, C., & Brown, D. A. (2002). Student-generated questions: A meaningful aspect of learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 521–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, C. A., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2002). Authentic inquiry: Introduction to the special section. Science Education, 86(1), 171–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, C. A., & Malhorta, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in the schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. A. (2003). Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: Generic and directed prompts. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 91–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delclos, V. R., & Harrington, C. (1991). Effects of strategy monitoring and proactive instruction on children's problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhillon, A. S. (1998). Individual differences with problem-solving strategies used in physics. Science Education, 82(3), 379–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(3), 239–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufresne, R., Mestre, J., Hart, D. M., & Rath, K. A. (2002). The effect of Web-based homework on test performance in large enrollment introductory physics courses. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21(3), 229–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duggan, S., & Gott, R. (2002). What sort of science education do we really need? International Journal of Science Education, 24(7), 661–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology. Science Education, 85(5), 554–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts, sciences, sports, and games (pp. 1–50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, A. I., Campbell, R. L., & Lai, M. K. (1999). Improving elementary school science teaching by cross-level mentoring. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10(1), 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K., & Reiner, M. (2000). Thought experiments in science education: Potential and current realization. International Journal of Science Education, 22(3), 265–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: It's meaning, measure and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 479–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greca, I. M., & Moreira, M. A. (2000). Mental models, conceptual models, and modeling. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunstone, R. (1999a). Content knowledge, a reflection, and their intertwining: A response to the paper set. Science Education, 83(3), 393–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunstone, R. (1999b). The importance of specific science content in the enhancement of metacognition. In P. J. Fensham, R. F. Gunstone, & R. T. White (Eds.), The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning (pp. 131–146). London, England: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunstone, R., & Mitchell, I. J. (1998). Metacognition and conceptual change. In J. L. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Noval (Eds.), Teaching for science education: A human constructivist view (pp. 133–163). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains. American Psychologist, 53(9), 449–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169–190). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (1996). Secondary students' mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry. Science Education, 80(5), 509–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 99–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, K. (1999). Sociocognitive roles in science group discourse. International Journal of Science Education, 21(8), 855–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, K. (2000). Exploring a process view of students' knowledge about the nature of science. Science Education, 84(1), 51–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, K. (2002). Small groups' ecological reasoning while making an environmental management decision. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 341–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, K., & Thomas, D. (2001). Cognitive comparisons of students' systems modeling in ecology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(4), 319–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, D. J. (2002). The motivational effects of specific teaching activities and computer use for science learning: Findings from the third international mathematics and science study (TIMSS). International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(4), 423–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, D. (1997). Effect of explicit problem solving instruction on high school students' problem-solving performance and conceptual understanding of physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 551–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, P. D. (2002). Modernizing science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehng, J. J., Johnson, S. D., & Anderson, R. C. (1993). Schooling and student's epistemological beliefs about learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18(1), 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H., Carr, C., & Yueh, H. P. (1998). Computers as mind tools for engaging learners in critical thinking. TechTrends, 43(2), 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahle, J. B., & Boone, W. (2000). Strategies to improve student science learning: Implications for science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11(2), 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardash, C. M., & Scholes, R. J. (1996). Effects of preexisting beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issues. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 260–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. J., & Anderson, C. W. (2000). Learning with understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 757–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khishfe, R., & Fouad, A. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 338–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, A. (2001). Training in metacognition and comprehension of physics texts. Science Education, 85(6), 758–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96(4), 674–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28(1), 16–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D., & Weinstock, M. (2002). What is epistemological thinking and why does it matter? In B. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 103–177). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The developmental of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15(3), 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wegner, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C. (2000). Designing the knowledge integration environment. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 781–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L. (1994). Cognitive and metacognitive aspects in conceptual change by analogy. Instructional Science, 22(2), 157–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, C. J., & Thomas, G. P. (2000). Changing the learning environment to enhance explaining and understanding in a year 12 chemistry classroom. Learning Environments Research, 3(3), 209–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K., & Woodruff, E. (1997). Consensually driven explanation in science teaching. Science Education, 81(2), 173–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neber, H., & Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). Self-regulated science learning with highly gifted students: The role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological, and environmental variables. High Ability Studies, 13(1), 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M. (2001). Response to contradiction: Conflict resolution strategies used by students in problem solving of chemical equilibrium. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(2), 205–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S. E., Tippins, D., & Wieseman, K. (1997). A toolkit for developing critically reflective science teachers. Research in Science Education, 27(2), 175–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieswandt, M. (2001). Problems and possibilities for learning in an introductory chemistry course from a conceptual change perspective. Science Education, 85(2), 158–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate prepositional hierarchies leading to the empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86(4), 548–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osman, M. E., & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Effects of advance questioning and prior knowledge on science learning. Journal of Educational Research, 52(1), 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R. D. (1993a). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47–87). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R. D. (1993b). Learning scientific concepts through material and social activities: Conversational analysis meets conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 28(3), 265–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pell, T., & Jarvis, T. (2001). Developing attitude to science scales for use with children of ages five to eleven years. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 847–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn, J. H., Nedeff, V. M., & Gozdzik, G. (2000). Organic chemistry and the Internet: A web-based approach to homework and testing using the WE_LEARN system. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(2), 227–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. N. (1993). Person-plus: A distributed view of thinking and learning. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 88–110). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. F., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Learning to teach primary science through problem-based learning. Science Education, 82(2), 215–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452–501). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 167–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Borkowski, J., & Schneider, W. (1989). Good information processing: What is it and what education can do to promote it. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 43(2), 194–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., & Ghatala, E. S. (1990). Self-regulated learning: Monitoring learning from text. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., & Wharton-McDonald, R. (1997). Skilled comprehension and its development through instruction. School Psychology Review, 26(4), 448–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puntambekar, S. (1995). Helping students learn ‘how to learn’ from texts: Towards and ITS for developing metacognition. Instructional Science, 23(1–3), 163–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puntambekar, S., & duBoulay, B. (1997). Design and development of MIST: A system to help students develop metacognition. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16(1), 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, S., Harris, I., & Tschirner, U. (2001). Student peer teaching: An innovative approach to instruction in science and engineering education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(2), 165–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramey-Gassert, L., Shroyer, M. G., & Staver, J. R. (1998). A qualitative study of factors influencing science teaching self-efficacy of elementary level teachers. Science Education, 80(3), 283–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiner, M., & Gilbert, J. (2000). Epistemological resource for thought experimentation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 489–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reybold, L. E. (2001). Encouraging the transformation of personal epistemology. Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(3), 413–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickey, D., & Stacy, A. M. (2000). The role of metacognition in learning chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(7), 915–919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W. (1998). Science teaching as knowledgability: A case study of knowing and learning during coteaching. Science Education, 82(3), 357–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W., & Tobin, K. (2001). The implications of coteaching/cogenerative dialogue for teacher evaluation: Learning from multiple perspectives of everyday practice. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15(1), 7–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W., McRobbie, C. J., Lucas, B., & Boutonne, S. (1997). Why may students fail to learn from demonstrations? A social practice perspective on learning in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(5), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W., Tobin, K., & Zimmermann, A. (2002). Coteaching/cogenerative dialoguing: Learning environments research as classroom praxis. Learning Environments Research, 5(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 249–268). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1994). Synthesizing epistemological belief research: Tentative understandings and provocative confusions. Educational Psychology Review, 6(4), 293–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). An evolving theoretical framework for an epistemological beliefs system. In B. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 103–177). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoon, K. J., & Boone, W. J. (1998). Self-efficacy and alternative conceptions of science of preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 82(5), 553–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., & Olafson, L. J. (2002). Teachers' epistemological world views and educational practices. Issues in Education, 8(2), 99–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children's cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 359–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepardson, D. P. (1999). The role of anomalous data in restructuring fourth graders' frameworks for understanding electric circuits. Journal of Science Education, 21(1), 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratford, S. J. (1997). A review of computer-based model research in precollege science classrooms. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16(1), 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. R., & Zeichner, K. M. (1999). Idea and action: Action research and the development of conceptual change teaching of science. Science Education, 83(3), 309–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. P., & McRobbie, C. J. (1999). Using metaphors to probe students' conceptions of chemistry learning. International Journal of Science Education, 21(6), 667–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. P., & McRobbie, C. J. (2001). Using a metaphor for learning to improve students' metacognition in the chemistry classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 222–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., & Tippins, D. J. (1996). Metaphors as seeds for conceptual change and the improvement of science teaching. Science Education, 80(6), 711–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toth, E. E., Suthers, D. D., & Lesgold, A. M. (2002). The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry. Science Education, 86(2), 264–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. (2001). Collaboratively developing instructional activities of conceptual change through the Internet: Science teachers' perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(5), 619–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. (2002). Collaboratively developing instructional activities of conceptual change through the Internet: Science teachers' perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(5), 619–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (1999). Teachers' knowledge of models and modeling in science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(11), 1141–1153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van See, E. H. (2000). Analysis of a student-generated discussion. Journal of Science Education, 22(2), 115–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 45–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. and Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. C. (1998). Strategies in K-12 science instruction to promote conceptual change. Science Education, 82(4), 455–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. W., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), The handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841–873). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, B. C. (2000). Pre-service teachers' epistemology viewed through perspectives on problematic classroom situations. Journal of Education for Teaching, 26(3), 279–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. T. (1998). Decisions and problems in research on metacognition. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1207–1213). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. T., & Mitchell, I. J. (1994). Metacognition and the quality of learning. Studies in Science Education, 23(1), 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windschitl, M. (2002). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87(1), 112–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zembal-Saul, C., Blumenfeld, P., & Krajcik, J. (2000). Influence of guided cycles of planning, teaching, and reflection on prospective elementary teachers' science content representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 318–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. (2000). Attaining self-regulated learning: A social-cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Nevada, USA

    Gregory Schraw, Kent J. Crippen & Kendall Hartley

Authors
  1. Gregory Schraw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kent J. Crippen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kendall Hartley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schraw, G., Crippen, K.J. & Hartley, K. Promoting Self-Regulation in Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective on Learning. Res Sci Educ 36, 111–139 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation