Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

The role of personal epistemology in the self-regulation of internet-based learning

  • Published:
Metacognition and Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The predictability of Internet-specific epistemic beliefs for self-regulated learning within Internet technologies was examined in a sample of 84 physics undergraduates. Dimensions of Internet-specific epistemic beliefs were found to explain unique variance in Internet-based search, help-seeking, and self-regulatory strategies, respectively. Specifically, students who emphasized that course-related knowledge located on the Internet consisted of specific facts and details perceived Internet-search and evaluation of search results to be less problematic and reported on more help-seeking and use of self-regulatory strategies during Internet-based learning. Moreover, students believing that Internet-based knowledge claims need to be checked against other sources, reason, and prior knowledge were reportedly more likely to use self-regulatory strategies when using the Internet during coursework. The results are discussed in light of what characterizes the Internet as a knowledge source.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the Joo et al. study (2000), Internet self-efficacy correlated significantly with students’ prior computer experience (r = .40), cognitive strategy use (r = .26), and self-regulated strategy use (r = .28). In the Bråten et al. study (2005), Internet self-efficacy correlated significantly with ICT-use (r = .53), Internet search–identification and evaluation (r = .27), and Internet communication–guidance, cooperation, and discussion (r = .20).

References

  • Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fischer, F., & Wallace, R. (2003). Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Review of Educational Research, 73, 277–320. doi:10.3102/00346543073003277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 199–209. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4004_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 523–535. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomé, T., Stahl, E., Pieschl, S., & Bromme, R. (2006). What matters in help-seeking? A study of help effectiveness and learner-related factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 113–129. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.01.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, R., & Khasawneh, S. (2007). Self-efficacy and college students’ perceptions and use of online learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 175–191. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendixen, L. D., & Hartley, K. (2003). Successful learning with hypermedia: The role of epistemological beliefs and metacognitive awareness. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28, 15–30. doi:10.2190/2Y7C-KRDV-5U01-UJGA.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bråten, I. (1991). Vygotsky as precursor to metacognitive theory: I. The concept of metacognition and its roots. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 35, 179–192. doi:10.1080/0031383910350302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2005). The relationship between epistemological beliefs, implicit theories of intelligence, and self-regulated learning among Norwegian post-secondary students. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 539–565. doi:10.1348/000709905X25067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2006). Epistemological beliefs, interest, and gender as predictors of Internet-based learning activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 1027–1042. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2009). Effects of task instruction and personal epistemology on the understanding of multiple texts about climate change. Discourse Processes.

  • Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Olaussen, B. S. (2003). Self-regulated learning and the use of information and communications technology in Norwegian teacher education. In D. M. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning (Vol. 3): Sociocultural influences and teacher education programs, pp. 199–221. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2005). The relationship between Internet-specific epistemological beliefs and learning within Internet technologies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33, 141–171. doi:10.2190/E763-X0LN-6NMF-CB86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2008). Are sophisticated students always better? The role of topic-specific personal epistemology in the understanding of multiple expository texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 814–840. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J., & Weaver, K. D. (2003). Gender and computers: Understanding the digital divide. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, T. I., Bals, M., & Turi, A. L. (2005). Are students’ beliefs about knowledge and learning associated with their reported use of learning strategies? The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 257–273. doi:10.1348/000709905X25049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeStefano, D., & LeFevre, J. A. (2007). Cognitive load in hypertext reading: a review. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1616–1641. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.08.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: a review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style. Review of Educational Research, 68, 322–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40, 117–128. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4002_6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology. Science Education, 85, 554–567. doi:10.1002/sce.1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, D. (1994). Epistemological beliefs in introductory physics. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 151–183. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1202_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2001). Educational research in the Internet age: examining the role of individual characteristics. Educational Researcher, 30, 22–26. doi:10.3102/0013189X030009022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2003). The use of comprehension aids in a hypermedia environment: investigating the impact of metacognitive awareness and epistemological beliefs. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12, 275–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378–405. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K. (2004). Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: thinking aloud during online searching. Educational Psychologist, 39, 43–55. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3901_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (eds). (2002). Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. H., Estell, D. B., & Alexander, J. M. (2008). Friends, classmates, and self-regulated learning: discussions with peers inside and outside the classroom. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 1–15. doi:10.1007/s11409-007-9007-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joo, Y. J., Bong, M., & Choi, H. J. (2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48, 5–17. doi:10.1007/BF02313398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karabenick, S., & Moosa, S. (2005). Culture and personal epistemology: U.S. and Middle Eastern students’ beliefs about scientific knowledge and knowing. Social Psychology of Education, 8, 375–393. doi:10.1007/s11218-005-1826-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. S., & Kamil, M. L. (2003). Electronic and multimedia documents. In A. P. Sweet & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension, pp. 166–175. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L., & Boldrin, A. (2008). Epistemic metacognition in the context of information searching on the Web. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Knowing, knowledge and beliefs: Epistemological studies across diverse cultures, pp. 377–404. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A., & Rose, D. H. (1998). Learning to read in a computer age. Peabody, MA: Center for Applied Special Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muis, K. R. (2007). The role of epistemic beliefs in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 42, 173–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muis, K. R., & Franco, G. M. (2009). Epistemic profiles and metacognition: Support for the consistency hypothesis.

  • Muis, K. R., Bendixen, L. D., & Haerle, F. C. (2006). Domain-generality and domain-specificity in personal epistemology research: philosophical and empirical reflections in the development of a theoretical framework. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 3–54. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9003-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2005). E-learning in tertiary education. Where do we stand?. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieschl, S., Stahl, E., & Bromme, R. (2008). Epistemological beliefs and self-regulated learning with hypertext. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 17–37. doi:10.1007/s11409-007-9008-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation, pp. 451–502. San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813. doi:10.1177/0013164493053003024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, W. M., Oughton, J. M., Ayersman, D. J., Ervin, J. R., & Giessler, S. F. (2000). Computer experience, learning style, and hypermedia navigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 609–628. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00026-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roll, I., Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2007). Designing for metacognition- applying cognitive tutor principles to the tutoring of help seeking. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 125–140. doi:10.1007/s11409-007-9010-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouet, J. F. (2006). The skills of document use: From text comprehension to Web-based learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M. P. (1984). Monitoring text comprehension: Individual differences in epistemological standards. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 248–258. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.2.248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelstuen, M. S., & Bråten, I. (2007). Examining the validity of self-reports on scales measuring students’ strategic processing. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 351–378. doi:10.1348/000709906X106147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498–504. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searl, J. R. (1983). Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih, P. C., Muñoz, D., & Sánchez, F. (2006). The effect of previous experience with information and communication technologies on performance in a web-based learning program. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 962–970. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, N. H., Andersen, C., Hong, N., Howard, B., & McGee, S. (2004). The influence of metacognitive skills on learner’s memory of information in a hypermedia environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31, 77–93. doi:10.2190/JE7W-VL6W-RNYF-RD4M.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strømsø, H. I., Grøttum, P., & Lycke, K. H. (2004). Changes in student approaches to learning with the introduction of computer-supported problem-based learning. Medical Education, 38, 390–398. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01786.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strømsø, H. I., Grøttum, P., & Lycke, K. H. (2007). Content and processes in problem-based learning: a comparison of computer-mediated and face-to-face communication. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 271–282. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00221.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2008). Dimensions of topic-specific epistemological beliefs as predictors of multiple-text understanding. Learning and Instruction, 18, 513–527. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. C. (2008). The use of Internet-based instruction for the development of epistemological beliefs: a case study in Taiwan. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Knowing, knowledge and beliefs: Epistemological studies across diverse cultures, pp. 273–285. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice, pp. 277–304. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helge I. Strømsø.

Appendices

Appendix A

Factor analysis of the internet-specific epistemological questionnaire

Table 5

Appendix B

Factor analysis of the internet-based learning activities scale

Table 6

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strømsø, H.I., Bråten, I. The role of personal epistemology in the self-regulation of internet-based learning. Metacognition Learning 5, 91–111 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-009-9043-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-009-9043-7

Keywords