Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Attitude and Orbit Optimal Control of Combined Spacecraft via a Fully-Actuated System Approach

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the attitude and orbit control for the combined spacecraft formed after a target spacecraft without the autonomous control ability is captured by a service spacecraft. The optimal controller of fully-actuated system is proposed to realize the attitude and orbit stabilization control of combined spacecraft. The stability of the system is proved by introducing Lyapunov function. Numerical simulation of the combined spacecraft and physical experiment based on the combined spacecraft simulator (CSS) are completed. Both simulation and experiment results demonstrate the effectiveness and practicability of the optimal controller of fully-actuated system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ding S H, Li S H, and Li Q, Adaptive set stabilization of the attitude of a rigidspacecraft without angular velocity measurements, Journal of Systems Science & Complexity, 2011, 24(1): 105–119.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang D W and Liu G P, Output feedback predictive control for discrete quasilinear systems with application to spacecraft flying-around, Asian Journal of Control, 2021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asjc.2587.

  3. Zhang D W and Liu G P, Coordinated control of quasilinear multiagent systems via output feedback predictive control, ISA Transactions, 2021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2021.10.004.

  4. Forshaw J L, Aglietti G S, Navarathinam N, et al., Removedebris: An in-orbit active debris removal demonstration mission, Acta Astronautica, 2016, 127(Oct.–Nov): 448–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Golebiowski W, Michalczyk R, Dyrek M, et al., Validated simulator for space debris removal with nets and other flexible tethers applications, Acta Astronautica, 2016, 129: 229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Qiao J Z, Liu Z B, and Li W S, Anti-disturbance attitude control of combined spacecraft with enhanced control allocation scheme, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2018, 31(8): 1741–1751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang P F, Wang M, Chang H T, et al., Takeover control of attitude maneuver for failed spacecraft, Journal of Astronautics, 2016, 37(8): 924–935 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huang P F, Lu Y B, Wang M, et al., Attitude takeover control for spacecraft with unknown parameter, Control and Decision, 2017, 32(9): 1547–1555 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huang P F, Wang D K, Meng Z J, et al., Post-capture attitude control for a tethered space robot-target combination system, Robotica, 2015, 33(4): 898–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang P F, Wang M, Meng Z J, et al., Attitude takeover control for post-capture of target spacecraft using space robot, Aerospace Science and Technology, 2016, 51(Apr): 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang T, Yue X K, Ning X, et al., Stabilization and parameter identification of tumbling space debris with bounded torque in postcapture, Acta Astronautica, 2016, 123(Jun.–Jul.): 301–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang P F, Wang M, Meng Z J, et al., Reconfigurable spacecraft attitude takeover control in post-capture of target by space manipulators, Journal of the Franklin Institute, 2016, 353(9): 1985–2008.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang X W, Biggs J D, and Duan G R, Post-capture attitude control with prescribed performance, Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 96: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Han D, Huang P F, Liu X Y, et al., Combined spacecraft stabilization control after multiple impacts during the capture of a tumbling target by a space robot, Acta Astronautica, 2020, 176: 24–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jiang H Y, Zhou B, Li D X, et al., Data-driven-based attitude control of combined spacecraft with noncooperative target, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 2019, 29: 5801–5819.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu W F, Hu Z H, Zhang Y, et al., On-orbit identifying the inertia parameters of space robotic systems using simple equivalent dynamics, Acta Astronautica, 2017, 132(Mar): 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang M M, Luo J J, Yuan J P, et al., Detumbling control for kinematically redundant space manipulator post-grasping a rotational satellite, Acta Astronautica, 2017, 141(Dec): 98–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao Q and Duan G R, Integrated design of trajectory tracking and inertia property identification for post-capture of non-cooperative target, Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 95: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang B, Liang B, Wang Z W, et al., Coordinated stabilization for space robot after capturing a noncooperative target with large inertia, Acta Astronautica, 2017, 134: 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang X W and Duan G R, Dynamic infinity-norm constrained control allocation for attitude tracking control of overactuated combined spacecraft, Control Theory and Applications, 2019, 13(11): 1692–1703.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Meng Q L, Liang J X, and Ma O, Identification of all the inertial parameters of a non-cooperative object in orbit, Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 91: 571–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Huang P F, Zhang F, Meng Z J, et al., Adaptive control for space debris removal with uncertain kinematics, dynamics and states, Acta Astronautica, 2016, 128: 416–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lu Y B, Huang P F, and Meng Z J, Adaptive neural network dynamic surface control of the post-capture tethered spacecraft, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2019, 56(2): 1406–1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gao H, Ma G F, Lü Y Y, et al., Data-driven model-free adaptive attitude control of partially constrained combined spacecraft with external disturbances and input saturation, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2019, 32(5): 1281–1293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gao H, Ma G F, Lü Y Y, et al., Forecasting-based data-driven model-free adaptive sliding mode attitude control of combined spacecraft, Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 86(Mar): 364–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhao Q and Duan G R, Concurrent learning adaptive finite-time control for spacecraft with inertia parameter identification under external disturbance, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2021, 57(6): 3691–3704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wei C S, Luo J J, Dai H H, et al., Learning-based adaptive prescribed performance control of postcapture space robot-target combination without inertia identifications, Acta Astronautica, 2018, 146(May): 228–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Duan G R, High-order system approaches—I. Fully-actuated systems and parametric designs, Acta Automatica Sinica, 2020, 46(7): 1333–1345 (in Chinese).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Duan G R, High-order system approaches-II. Controllability and full-actuation, Acta Automatica Sinica, 2020, 46(8): 1571–1581 (in Chinese).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Duan G R, High-order system approaches—III. Observability and observer design, Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 2020, 46(9): 1885–1895 (in Chinese).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Duan G R, High-order fully actuated system approaches: Part I. Models and basic procedure, International Journal of Systems Science, 2021, 52(2): 422–435.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Duan G R, High-order fully actuated system approaches: Part II. Generalized strict-feedback systems, International Journal of Systems Science, 2021, 52(3): 437–454.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Duan G R, High-order fully actuated system approaches: Part III. Robust control and high-order backstepping, International Journal of Systems Science, 2021, 52(5): 952–971.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Duan G R, High-order fully actuated system approaches: Part IV. Adaptive control and high-order backstepping, International Journal of Systems Science, 2021, 52(5): 972–989.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Duan G R, High-order fully actuated system approaches: Part V. Robust adaptive control, International Journal of Systems Science, 2021, 52(10): 2129–2143.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Duan G R, High-order fully-actuated system approaches: Part VI. Disturbance attenuation and decoupling, International Journal of Systems Science, 2021, 52(10): 2161–2181.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Duan G R, High-order fully actuated system approaches: Part VII. Controllability, stabilisability and parametric designs, International Journal of Systems Science, 2021, 52(14): 3091–3114.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Duan G R, High-order fully actuated system approaches: Part VIII. Optimal control with application in spacecraft attitude stabilisation, International Journal of Systems Science, 2021, 52(14): 3091–3114.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Duan G R, High-order fully-actuated system approaches: Part IX. Generalised PID control and model reference tracking, International Journal of Systems Science, 2022, 53(3): 652–674.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Duan G R, High-order fully actuated system approaches: Part X. Basics of discrete-time systems, International Journal of Systems Science, 2022, 53(4): 810–832.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Luo W W, Zhou B, He L, et al., Global stabilization of the spacecraft rendezvous system by delayed and bounded linear feedback, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2022, 52(3): 1373–1384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Cao L, Liu G P, Hu W S, et al., Design and implementation of C-MEX S-functions in an Android-based networked control system laboratory, Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01423312211026805.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Control Theory and Guidance Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150001, China

    Guangquan Duan & Guo-Ping Liu

  2. Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China

    Guo-Ping Liu

Authors
  1. Guangquan Duan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guo-Ping Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guangquan Duan or Guo-Ping Liu.

Additional information

This paper was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 62173255 and 62188101.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duan, G., Liu, GP. Attitude and Orbit Optimal Control of Combined Spacecraft via a Fully-Actuated System Approach. J Syst Sci Complex 35, 623–640 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-022-1492-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-022-1492-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation