Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Ability of modal analysis to detect osseointegration of implants in transfemoral amputees: a physical model study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Owing to the successful use of non-invasive vibration analysis to monitor the progression of dental implant healing and stabilization, it is now being considered as a method to monitor femoral implants in transfemoral amputees. This study uses composite femur–implant physical models to investigate the ability of modal analysis to detect changes at the interface between the implant and bone simulating those that occur during osseointegration. Using electromagnetic shaker excitation, differences were detected in the resonant frequencies and mode shapes of the model when the implant fit in the bone was altered to simulate the two interface cases considered: firm and loose fixation. The study showed that it is beneficial to examine higher resonant frequencies and their mode shapes (rather than the fundamental frequency only) when assessing fixation. The influence of the model boundary conditions on the modal parameters was also demonstrated. Further work is required to more accurately model the mechanical changes occurring at the bone–implant interface in vivo, as well as further refinement of the model boundary conditions to appropriately represent the in vivo conditions. Nevertheless, the ability to detect changes in the model dynamic properties demonstrates the potential of modal analysis in this application and warrants further investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aschoff HH, Clausen A, Hoffmeister T (2009) The endo–exo femur prosthesis—a new concept of bone-guided, prosthetic rehabilitation following above-knee amputation. Z Orthop Unfall 147(5):610–615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Avitabile P (1999) Modal space: back to basics. Exp Tech 23(3):17–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Avitabile P (1999) Modal space: back to basics. Exp Tech 23(5):17–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Avitabile P (2000) Modal space: back to basics. Exp Tech 24(3):13–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Avitabile P (2005) Modal space: back to basics. Exp Tech 29(6):23–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blevins RD (1979) Straight beams. In: Yalof B (ed) Formulas for natural frequency and mode shape. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, pp 101–200

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blunn GW, Pendegrass CJ 2011 Development of an intraosseous transcutaneous amputation prostheses (Itap). In: 2011 Myoelectric controls/powered prosthetics symposium, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada

  8. Cairns NJ 2010 The feasibility of vibration analysis as a technique to detect osseointegration of transfemoral implants. PhD Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

  9. Cairns NJ, Adam CJ, Pearcy MJ, Smeathers J 2011 Evaluation of modal analysis techniques using physical models to detect osseointegration of implants in transfemoral amputees. In: Patton J (ed) Engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBC), 2011 annual international conference of the IEEE, Boston, USA, pp 1600–1603

  10. Delgado D, Jones R, Fuentes AA, Lumsdaine A 2002 Quantitative determination of the stability of implant–bone interface using resonance frequency analysis. In: ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, New Orleans, pp 103–111

  11. Dias Rodrigues JF, Lopes H, de Melo FQ, Simoes JA (2004) Experimental modal analysis of a synthetic composite femur. Exp Mech 44:29–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dossing O 1988 Part 2 modal analysis and simulation. In: Bruel&Kjaer (ed) Structural testing. Bruel&Kjaer, Naerum, pp 1–56

  13. Elias JJ, Brunski JB, Scarton HA (1996) A dynamic modal testing technique for noninvasive assessment of bone–dental implant interfaces. J Oral Maxillofac Implants 11:728–734

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hagberg K (2005) Physiotherapy for patients having a trans-femoral amputation. In: Chien S, Grondahl HG, Robinson K (eds) The osseointegration book from calvarium to calcaneus. Quintessenz Verlags-GmbH, Berlin, pp 477–487

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hagberg K, Brånemark R (2009) One hundred patients treated with osseointegrated transfemoral amputation prostheses—rehabilitation perspective. J Rehab Res Dev 46:331–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hagberg K, Brånemark R, Gunterberg B, Rydevik B (2008) Osseointegrated trans-femoral amputation prostheses: prospective results of general and condition-specific quality of life in 18 patients at 2-year follow up. Prosthet Orthot Int 32:29–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. He J, Fu ZF (2001) Frequency response function measurement. In: He J, Fu ZF (eds) Modal analysis. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, pp 140–158

    Google Scholar 

  18. Huang HM, Cheng KY, Chen CF, Ou KL, Lin CT, Lee SY (2005) Design of a stability-detecting device for dental implants. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 219:203–211

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Khalil TB, Viano DC, Taber LA (1981) Vibrational characteristics of the embalmed human femur. J Sound Vib 75(3):417–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lachmann S, Jäger B, Axmann D, Gomez-Roman G, Groten M, Weber H (2006) Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Part I: an in vitro study on measurement reliability and a method of comparison in the determination of primary dental implant stability. Clin Oral Implants Res 17:75–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lachmann S, Laval JY, Jäger B, Axmann D, Gomez-Roman G, Groten M, Weber H (2006) Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Part 2: peri-implant bone loss follow-up. An in vitro study with the periotest and osstell instruments. Clin Oral Implants Res 17:80–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Maia NMM, Silva JMM, He J, Lieven NAJ, Lin RM, Skingle GW, To W-M, Urgueira APV (1997) Modal testing. In: Maia NMM, Silva JMM (eds) Theoretical and experimental modal analysis. SRP Ltd, pp 123-184

  23. Mayes RL, Gomez AJ (2006) Part 4: what’s shakin’, dude? Effective use of modal shakers. Exp Tech 30:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P (1996) Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant–tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 7:261–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Meredith N, Boo K, Friberg B, Jemt T, Sennerby L (1997) Resonance frequency measurement of implant stability in vivo. Clin Oral Implants Res 8:226–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nikiforidis G, Bezerianos A, Dimarogonas A, Sutherland C (1990) Monitoring of fracture healing by lateral and axial vibration analysis. J Biomech 23:323–330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Schuch CM, Pritham CH (2004) Transfemoral amputation: prosthetic management. In: Smith DG, Michael JW, Bowker JH (eds) Atlas of amputations and limb deficiencies surgical prosthetic and rehabilitation principles. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, pp 541–555

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shao F, Xu W, Crocombe A, Ewins D (2007) Natural frequency analysis of osseointegration for trans-femoral implant. Ann Biomed Eng 35:817–824

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Shelton TJ, Beck JP, Bloebaum RD, Bachus KN (2011) Percutaneous osseointegrated prostheses for amputees: limb compensation in a 12-month ovine model. J Biomech 44:2601–2606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sullivan J, Uden M, Robinson KP, Sooriakumaran S (2003) Rehabilitation of the trans-femoral amputee with an osseointegrated prosthesis: the United Kingdom experience. Prosthet Orthot Int 27:114–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ward DA, Robinson KP (2005) Osseointegration for the skeletal fixation of limb prostheses in amputations at the trans-femoral level. In: Chien S, Grondahl HG, Robinson K (eds) The osseointegration book from calvarium to calcaneus. Quintessenz Verlags-GmbH, Berlin, pp 463–476

    Google Scholar 

  32. Xu W, Shao F, Ewins D (2005) A resonant frequency measurement system for osseointegration trans-femoral implant. Key Eng Mater 295:139–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by an Australian Government International Postgraduate Research Scholarship. The authors would like to thank the Built Environment and Engineering workshop staff at Queensland University of Technology for their technical assistance in the preparation of the physical models.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicola J. Cairns.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cairns, N.J., Pearcy, M.J., Smeathers, J. et al. Ability of modal analysis to detect osseointegration of implants in transfemoral amputees: a physical model study. Med Biol Eng Comput 51, 39–47 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-012-0962-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-012-0962-0

Keywords